J
Jet Black
Guest
Valen said:
from where did you pull the idea that there would be a simple equation?
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Valen said:What equation do you have that is going to fill up the -123,194,000,000,000 humans?
Jet Black said:1) I have never heard of humans being around that long ago, furthermore the populations would have been small for a long time, because there wasn'T really the technology for major growth. you can'T just go round sticking a couple of numbers into a bad equation which takes nothing like diseases and predators (early humans would have been the hunted as well as the hunter) into account. you continue to amaze us with the rest of your abysmal mathematics with the migration calculation.
as for the rest, I can't even be bothered to be blunt about it. you persist in using the >1,000,000 year number, and forget about all sorts of things, like how the chinese, Aztecs, Incas and so on had civilisation for thousands of years, but it stalled until the Europeans came along.
Jet Black said:from where did you pull the idea that there would be a simple equation?
Valen said:I totally disagree...
If there are more deaths to be included in this number then...
-123,194,000,000,000 - diseases and predators = ?
what are you talking about abysmal mathematics this is just estimate
Egyptian Civilization is the oldest among them, check the date properly.
Jet Black said:say a man and woman breed, and they produce children exponentially. say you have another man and woman, and as a control you kill the man. are they going to breed exponentially? no.
your maths is abysmal because you go round assuming linearity and so on, and you just can't apply them.
and where do you get the 1.6 million years number from?
Jet Black said:say a man and woman breed, and they produce children exponentially. say you have another man and woman, and as a control you kill the man. are they going to breed exponentially? no.
your maths is abysmal because you go round assuming linearity and so on, and you just can't apply them.
and where do you get the 1.6 million years number from?
Valen said:Where is your equation?
Valen said:Study geology and evolution
Jet Black said:no need to answer. the oldest examples of homo sapiens are about 160,000 years old. you appear to have just added three orders of magnitude.
Jet Black said:answer my earlier question, why should there be an equation?
Valen said:The first human beings came from the pleistocene period
Valen said:how could have geologists came to a conclusion about the time line? c14? they have equations and you must have them!
I discovered something blatant about the C14
Jet Black said:gee.
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=oldest+homo+sapiens
top link. that took about 0.06 seconds to rubbish your number.
Jet Black said:the first homonids you mean. well why are you assuming exponential growth from 1.6 million years ago? are you going to tell me next that all life grows exponentially?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?