A question for those believing in Evolution

[Jet Black]

What equation do you have that is going to fill up the -123,194,000,000,000 humans?

from where did you pull the idea that there would be a simple equation?

 

[Valen]

1) I have never heard of humans being around that long ago, furthermore the populations would have been small for a long time, because there wasn'T really the technology for major growth. you can'T just go round sticking a couple of numbers into a bad equation which takes nothing like diseases and predators (early humans would have been the hunted as well as the hunter) into account. you continue to amaze us with the rest of your abysmal mathematics with the migration calculation.
as for the rest, I can't even be bothered to be blunt about it. you persist in using the >1,000,000 year number, and forget about all sorts of things, like how the chinese, Aztecs, Incas and so on had civilisation for thousands of years, but it stalled until the Europeans came along.

I totally disagree...
If there are more deaths to be included in this number then...
-123,194,000,000,000 - diseases and predators = ?
what are you talking about abysmal mathematics this is just estimate
Egyptian Civilization is the oldest among them, check the date properly.

 

[Valen]

from where did you pull the idea that there would be a simple equation?

So whats your equation?

 

[Jet Black]

I totally disagree...
If there are more deaths to be included in this number then...
-123,194,000,000,000 - diseases and predators = ?
what are you talking about abysmal mathematics this is just estimate
Egyptian Civilization is the oldest among them, check the date properly.

say a man and woman breed, and they produce children exponentially. say you have another man and woman, and as a control you kill the man. are they going to breed exponentially? no.

your maths is abysmal because you go round assuming linearity and so on, and you just can't apply them.

and where do you get the 1.6 million years number from?

 

[Valen]

say a man and woman breed, and they produce children exponentially. say you have another man and woman, and as a control you kill the man. are they going to breed exponentially? no.

your maths is abysmal because you go round assuming linearity and so on, and you just can't apply them.

and where do you get the 1.6 million years number from?

Where is your equation?

 

[Jet Black]

no need to answer. the oldest examples of homo sapiens are about 160,000 years old. you appear to have just added three orders of magnitude.

 

[Valen]

say a man and woman breed, and they produce children exponentially. say you have another man and woman, and as a control you kill the man. are they going to breed exponentially? no.

your maths is abysmal because you go round assuming linearity and so on, and you just can't apply them.

and where do you get the 1.6 million years number from?

Study geology and evolution

 

[Jet Black]

Where is your equation?

answer my earlier question, why should there be an equation?

 

[Jet Black]

Study geology and evolution

gee.

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=oldest+homo+sapiens

top link. that took about 0.06 seconds to rubbish your number.

 

[Brimshack]

Valen have you stopped beating your wife lately?

 

[Valen]

no need to answer. the oldest examples of homo sapiens are about 160,000 years old. you appear to have just added three orders of magnitude.

The first human beings came from the pleistocene period

 

[Jet Black]

read the link.

 

[Valen]

answer my earlier question, why should there be an equation?

how could have geologists came to a conclusion about the time line? c14? they have equations and you must have them!
I discovered something blatant about the C14

 

[Jet Black]

The first human beings came from the pleistocene period

"heh"

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=pleistocene+human

2nd link down.

crikey, google destroys you again.

 

[Jet Black]

how could have geologists came to a conclusion about the time line? c14? they have equations and you must have them!
I discovered something blatant about the C14

c14 is radiaoactive decay. what does that have to do with population growth?

 

[Valen]

gee.

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=oldest+homo+sapiens

top link. that took about 0.06 seconds to rubbish your number.

But I was talking about the FIRST HUMANS before they become homo sapiens

 

[Jet Black]

the first homonids you mean. well why are you assuming exponential growth from 1.6 million years ago? are you going to tell me next that all life grows exponentially?

 

[Valen]

the first homonids you mean. well why are you assuming exponential growth from 1.6 million years ago? are you going to tell me next that all life grows exponentially?

So what equation are you going to use to refute my claim?

 

[Jet Black]

I ask you for the third time: why do you assume that there is an equation?
also, what does C14 have to do with population growth?

edit: actually as asked you four times and implied it 5. I should just program a bit to ask you over and over shouldn't I?

 

[Valen]

Show me an equation that holds few human survivors 1,600,000 years ago basing the factual 6,000,000,000 in 1999