A Pondering of the Peculiar (4)

[dad]

Here's the way it is: if you condemn homosexuality then you are a homophobe. ...

Here's the way it is: if you condemn cannibalism then you are a canibalophobe. .. if you condemn bestiality then you are a bestiophobe. ..if you condemn murder then you are a killerophobe..if you condemn the bible then you are a bibliophobiac! if you condemn YECS then you are a Yecophobe!! if you condemn vampires then you are a vampophobe! if you condemn terrorism then you are a Terrorophobe. if you condemn Republicans then you are a Repulicaiophobiac!

 

[Atheos canadensis]

Here's the way it is: if you condemn cannibalism then you are a canibalophobe. .. if you condemn bestiality then you are a bestiophobe. ..if you condemn murder then you are a killerophobe..if you condemn the bible then you are a bibliophobiac! if you condemn YECS then you are a Yecophobe!! if you condemn vampires then you are a vampophobe! if you condemn terrorism then you are a Terrorophobe. if you condemn Republicans then you are a Repulicaiophobiac!

Congratulations; you understand etymology. That doesn't make being a homophobe any better.

 

[Dizredux]

This is something that has always puzzled me. If homosexuality is something the individual is born being then they are as God made them. How can I condemn anyone for simply being one of God's children made just as God intended?

Never made a lot of sense to me.

Dizredux

 

[Subduction Zone]

Congratulations; you understand etymology. That doesn't make being a homophobe any better.

Actually he doesn't.

A phobia is a hatred that is based upon an irrational fear.

Now you may even hate all of those things that he mentioned. That does not mean that you have an irrational fear of them. So they are not phobias by definition.

And you know why they say many people who are homophobic have that fear, don't you?

 

[Sayre]

This is something that has always puzzled me. If homosexuality is something the individual is born being then they are as God made them. How can I condemn anyone for simply being one of God's children made just as God intended?

Never made a lot of sense to me.

Dizredux

Partially born that way - though they don't make good song lyrics. There is a nurturing component as well.

I don't see how this is relevant though because tendency to arson (pardon the pun) also has genetic basis.

 

[Dizredux]

Partially born that way - though they don't make good song lyrics. There is a nurturing component as well.

I would like to see some research on this. There are too many cases of kids finding themselves, despite their earnest wishes, gay with the rest of the siblings being hetro to feel that nurturing has a lot to do with this.

I don't see how this is relevant though because tendency to arson (pardon the pun) also has genetic basis.

You may not but I do and I never said it was heritable. We don't know right now what is causative, it might be mutations, it might be epigenetics, it might be biochemical or a combination of a number of things. Right now we simply don't know. Do you have evidence to the contrary?

So right back to what I said, they are likely as God made them so how can anyone condemn them unless they feel somehow they not also God's children.

Dizredux

 

[Subduction Zone]

Twin studies have shown that homosexuality has a strong genetic component. A weaker factor is how many older brothers a child has:

Older brothers increases odds of being gay

That seems to account for one out of seven gay men.

 

[Sayre]

All I'm saying is that the genetic component is not 100%. But people are born with traits that we both accept and reject as moral. We appeal to genetics in an ad hoc manner. I think we should not use it at all. Im for equality regardless of the causes of sexuality.

 

[AV1611VET]

And you know why they say many people who are homophobic have that fear, don't you?

Because those who say it have a fear of being alone?

 

[Sayre]

Continuing with the argument - do we think God made arsonists that way? The genetic aspect I don't dispute I just don't like the conclusions we reach applying them.

 

[AV1611VET]

Twin studies have shown that homosexuality has a strong genetic component.

Ya ... blame it on your genes.

I heard incest runs in the family too.

 

[Subduction Zone]

All I'm saying is that the genetic component is not 100%. But people are born with traits that we both accept and reject as moral. We appeal to genetics in an ad hoc manner. I think we should not use it at all. Im for equality regardless of the causes of sexuality.

Oh definitely. It is a complex trait. People don't go gay simply because they were not brought up with a strong male figure, or too much of a strong male figure.

And they surely don't "go gay" as a matter of choice.

One thing we know is that it can be cured by forced injections of female hormones:

Alan Turing - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Oh wait, that article says the opposite of that

My bad.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Ya ... blame it on your genes.

I heard incest runs in the family too.

Incest is a mental illness that has been shown to be passed on by teaching.

With twin studies it is fairly clear that genetics is a big factor:


Gay Men in Twin Study - NYTimes.com

And there is no "blame" involved. Your homophobia is showing.

 

[Lujack Skylark]

I went to the St. Louis zoo and saw no baby infants in the monkey house. Apes produce apes. Humans produce humans. Genesis 1:25-26

 

[Subduction Zone]

I went to the St. Louis zoo and saw no baby infants in the monkey house. Apes produce apes. Humans produce humans. Genesis 1:25-26

But since we are apes your totally ignorant statement is meaningless.

 

[lasthero]

I went to the St. Louis zoo and saw no baby infants in the monkey house

A) 'Baby infants'. Infants are babies. Your redundant statement is redudant.

B) 'Infant' applies to all animals, not just humans. So you did see some infants, there. What you meant was 'human infant', but even then, you're wrong, because...

C) ...humans are apes.

 

[GenemZ]

By "strutting in pride" do you mean gay parades and suchlike?

Would you like to see a few videos here of their "normalcy?"

And what agendas seek to weaken the moral structure of society?

Its an unspoken agenda. So to speak. Its an intuitive instinctive drive that becomes aggressive that organizes when a society is experiencing a moral decline. Like Putin in now taking advantage of the decline of US power with our wimpy Obama playing Chamberlain. The agenda becomes a meeting point to organize and find ways change society to make themselves feel comfortable with their own predilections that are normally looked down upon when a society is healthy and strong.

I find it ironic... Coming from England, you should not need to ask how it happens. Just look how the Muslims see how weak you have become.

​

 

[Atheos canadensis]

Would you like to see a few videos here of their "normalcy?"



Its an unspoken agenda. So to speak. Its an intuitive instinctive drive that becomes aggressive that organizes when a society is experiencing a moral decline. Like Putin in now taking advantage of the decline of US power with our wimpy Obama playing Chamberlain. The agenda becomes a meeting point to organize and find ways change society to make themselves feel comfortable with their own predilections that are normally looked down upon when a society is healthy and strong.

I find it ironic... Coming from England, you should not need to ask how it happens. Just look how the Muslims see how weak you have become.

So are you trying to convince us that you aren't a homophobe or that it's alright to be a homophobe?

 

[GenemZ]

What kind of steak? T-bone?

I have a phenomenal come back for that. But, I will refrain considering the context of this forum. And, amazing how you notice every little detail of what I write. I'm flattered.

Just because they have different desires than you does not mean they are attacking the "moral structure of a society".

They can do what ever they want and still not attack the moral structure of society. They choose not to do it that way.

And please, Sodom was probably a mythical city. If you were arguing with someone who kept bringing up Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny would you take them seriously?

Tell me? .. Do you have an app on your computer for giving that response? Its become a form letter response from atheists and liberals when they want to avoid an issue.

What is the difference between an atheist and a liberal?

The atheist knows he does not believe in God.


.​

 

[Mr Strawberry]

Would you like to see a few videos here of their "normalcy?"

I've no idea what you have in mind, but are these videos exclusive to homosexuals or can you find heterosexual equivalents?

Its an unspoken agenda. So to speak. Its an intuitive instinctive drive that becomes aggressive that organizes when a society is experiencing a moral decline. Like Putin in now taking advantage of the decline of US power with our wimpy Obama playing Chamberlain. The agenda becomes a meeting point to organize and find ways change society to make themselves feel comfortable with their own predilections that are normally looked down upon when a society is healthy and strong.

You think homosexuality is looked down upon when a society is healthy and strong, is that what you are saying?

Just out of interest, how do you feel about Putin's current actions against homosexuals in Russia?

I find it ironic... Coming from England, you should not need to ask how it happens. Just look how the Muslims see how weak you have become.

You don't think it's ironic that you are having to use images of religious extremism to try and make a point about what you imagine homosexuality is trying to do? You don't feel you've missed some irony there?