Oh, so it's not being used as evidence that homosexuality is OK?
No. It's being stated as a fact. If anything, it was an argument to encourage liberalism.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Oh, so it's not being used as evidence that homosexuality is OK?
New English translations of the Bible use the term 'homosexuality'. It is agreed that 'homosexuality' was not an official term in the Hebrew language until long after the Bible was published however.
Jesus said "Go and sin no more."
That hardly sounds supporting of relativism or liberalism.
yes, it is. It seems david X thinks stereotypes are usually somewhat true, so are all conservatives atleast somewhat bible-thumping fascists?Liberalism isn't a "do whatever you want" standing. That's such a stereotype.
No, most stereo types are from some truth about a single person.Most stereo types are from some truth.
Liberals are on a march forward, even on things that should remain as they are.
You are getting close. Actually, it's this:The point of translating is not to translate the Hebrew language into Hebrew. The point of translating text is to make it understandable for modern readers or speakers of a foreign language to understand what they are reading in a modern native language. The point of the new and better translations is to clear up the confusions being caused by those with promosexual agendas.
Just before that, he said:"Neither do I condemn you."Jesus said "Go and sin no more."
That hardly sounds supporting of relativism or liberalism.
Clear point in case here is that things have now been lost in translation. Feel free to read a more easier to read Bible, I'll rather read the true Word.You are getting close. Actually, it's this:
The point of the new and "better" translations is to push an anti-homosexual agenda.
which side are you ON???Clear point in case here is that things have now been lost in translation. Feel free to read a more easier to read Bible, I'll rather read the true Word.
Sorry, I was trying to reply to the following statement by Carmodywhich side are you ON???