• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

A Failed Prophecy?

Status
Not open for further replies.
C

Caliban

Guest
Not necessarily my opinion but thought for debate!


Isaiah 7:14 says "The Virgin will be with child and will call him Immanuel." Immanuel means "God With Us." Yeshua means "God (Yah) Shall Save (Shua)." Isaiah 7:14 seems to specifically suggest that the Virgin will CALL the child Immanuel. Since "God With Us" and "God Shall Save" are not identical names, what are we to make of this?
In Matthew 1:23 we read: "Behold, the parthenos (young woman/virgin) shall be with child, and shall bear a Son, and they shall call His name Immanuel," which translated means, "God with us."

According to many skeptics, no one ever called Jesus by the name "Immanuel", which suggests a failed prophecy. In their view, because Matthew quoted from Isaiah the phrase "call his name" we should understand "Immanuel" to be taken literally since other biblical passages use names literally (i.e., Adam’s naming of Seth; Cain’s naming of Enoch; Seth’s naming of Enos, etc...). But if Matthew intended the name "Immanuel" to be taken literally then why do we not see any reference to it? Thought provoking? I’ll say it is.
 

Borealis

Catholic Homeschool Dad
Dec 8, 2003
6,906
621
55
Barrie, Ontario
✟10,009.00
Faith
Catholic
Politics
CA-Conservatives
'Immanuel' means 'God is with us.' It's much like the Archangel Raphael using a different name in Tobit; he calls himself 'Azariah,' which means 'God helps.'

The names aren't literal; they are symbolic of the person they represent. Besides, if Isaiah had explicitly prophesied 'Jesus' as the Messiah's name, how many would-be Messiahs would there have been?
 
Upvote 0

JRP

Active Member
Oct 24, 2005
25
2
59
Philadelphia, PA.
✟22,655.00
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Married
The Greek word "onoma" (name) is used literally of proper names and figuratively of title, authority, attributes, or character traits - as is the Hebrew word "shem" (name). Matthew's use of Immanuel is akin to those designations ascribed to the messiah in Isaiah 9:6.

Isa 9:6 For to us a child is born, to us a son is given; and the government shall be upon his shoulder, and his name shall be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.