• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

A conversation about unity.

Xeno.of.athens

I will give you the keys of the Kingdom of heaven.
May 18, 2022
7,466
2,387
Perth
✟203,827.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
I am a deacon in my Baptist church in a town right outside of Houston. There is my church, a Methodist church, and a Catholic Church within a couple of blocks. We all talk to each other, fellowship with each other, and even have charitable events together. However when it is time to break bread, as Jesus commanded and as Acts 2:42 states, only the Catholic Church is not welcoming because of their closed communion policy.

Jesus stated that where 2 or 3 are gathered in my name there He is so every one that is gathered in His name whether in a building or not are part of His church. If the Catholic Church wishes unity among the churches and Christians then there is much that they need to change. We still love our Catholic brothers and will continue to fellowship with them simply because that is the call of every Christian.
The Catholic Church affirms that all baptised persons who believe in Christ are in some way joined to her (cf. Unitatis Redintegratio, §3). However, the Eucharist is not merely a symbol of unity—it is its culmination and visible expression of union and communion in Christ. The Church’s discipline of “closed communion” is not a rejection of others’ faith, but a safeguard of the sacrament’s integrity. As the Catechism of the Catholic Church teaches, “Ecclesial communities derived from the Reformation… have not preserved the proper reality of the Eucharistic mystery in its fullness” (CCC §1400). Because the Eucharist signifies full communion in faith, sacraments, and ecclesial governance, it cannot be shared where that unity does not yet exist (Redemptionis Sacramentum, §84).


You rightly cite Matthew 18:20, and Christ is present where believers gather in His name. Yet His presence in the Eucharist is of a different order—“substantial,” “real,” and “true” (CCC §1374)—requiring full communion with the Church He founded. The Catholic Church earnestly desires unity, but this unity must be rooted in truth and sacramental fidelity. As Pope Benedict XVI affirmed, “The Eucharist is intrinsically linked to full communion with the Church” (Sacramentum Caritatis, §56). Your love for your Catholic brethren is appreciated, and the Church reciprocates that love while remaining faithful to the deposit of faith entrusted to her by Christ.
 
Upvote 0

ARBITER01

Legend
Aug 12, 2007
14,299
1,937
60
✟230,281.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Republican
The term church refers, in its primary theological sense, to the community of Christian believers united in faith and sacramental life, and secondarily to the physical building designated for public worship. Etymologically, church derives from the Old English cirice, itself rooted in the West Germanic kirika, which was borrowed from the Greek kyriakē (κυριακή), meaning “of the Lord” or “belonging to the Lord,” a feminine adjective formed from kyrios (κύριος), “Lord.” This term originally denoted the “Lord’s house” (kyriakē oikia) and was adopted into early Christian usage to describe both the liturgical assembly and the sacred space in which it gathered. The semantic evolution reflects both ecclesiological and architectural dimensions of Christian tradition.

1Co 12:13 For by one Spirit are we all immersed into one body,....

Christians are joined together as a body, not a church/building.

I know there has been some discussion about unity this and unity that in this forum section, but I don't see GOD a bit worried about it. He knows who is His and who isn't, and it seems that is good enough for Him.
 
Upvote 0

Hentenza

I will fear no evil for You are with me
Site Supporter
Mar 27, 2007
35,634
4,407
On the bus to Heaven
✟97,557.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
The Catholic Church affirms that all baptised persons who believe in Christ are in some way joined to her (cf. Unitatis Redintegratio, §3). However, the Eucharist is not merely a symbol of unity—it is its culmination and visible expression of union and communion in Christ. The Church’s discipline of “closed communion” is not a rejection of others’ faith, but a safeguard of the sacrament’s integrity. As the Catechism of the Catholic Church teaches, “Ecclesial communities derived from the Reformation… have not preserved the proper reality of the Eucharistic mystery in its fullness” (CCC §1400). Because the Eucharist signifies full communion in faith, sacraments, and ecclesial governance, it cannot be shared where that unity does not yet exist (Redemptionis Sacramentum, §84).


You rightly cite Matthew 18:20, and Christ is present where believers gather in His name. Yet His presence in the Eucharist is of a different order—“substantial,” “real,” and “true” (CCC §1374)—requiring full communion with the Church He founded. The Catholic Church earnestly desires unity, but this unity must be rooted in truth and sacramental fidelity. As Pope Benedict XVI affirmed, “The Eucharist is intrinsically linked to full communion with the Church” (Sacramentum Caritatis, §56). Your love for your Catholic brethren is appreciated, and the Church reciprocates that love while remaining faithful to the deposit of faith entrusted to her by Christ.
Thanks for the primer but I was Catholic so I’m aware. My complaint remains though since the Bible exhorts Christians to break bread together. Transubstantiation is one of those deal breaker Catholic doctrines for me.
 
Upvote 0

concretecamper

I stand with Candice.
Nov 23, 2013
7,372
2,869
PA
✟335,334.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Thanks for the primer but I was Catholic so I’m aware. My complaint remains though since the Bible exhorts Christians to break bread together. Transubstantiation is one of those deal breaker Catholic doctrines for me.
If you believe that the Eucharist is His Body and Blood, you'd be Catholic and would be able to receive. If you reject this Scriptural teaching, don't complain.
 
Upvote 0

Hentenza

I will fear no evil for You are with me
Site Supporter
Mar 27, 2007
35,634
4,407
On the bus to Heaven
✟97,557.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
If you believe that the Eucharist is His Body and Blood, you'd be Catholic and would be able to receive. If you reject this Scriptural teaching, don't complain.
The scriptural teaching is NOT transubstantiation.

“and when He had given thanks, He broke it and said, “This is My body, which is for you; do this in remembrance of Me.” In the same way He also took the cup after supper, saying, “This cup is the new covenant in My blood; do this, as often as you drink it, in remembrance of Me.” For as often as you eat this bread and drink the cup, you proclaim the Lord’s death until He comes.”
‭‭1 Corinthians‬ ‭11‬:‭24‬-‭26‬ ‭NASB2020‬‬

Jesus described communion as a remembrance of Him and nothing here points to a literal meaning. In fact Jesus was still alive and wearing His body and His blood was still circulating in His body keeping Him alive. His sacrifice did not come until His crucifixion. Jesus, after all, was fully human. The doctrine of transubstantiation was a later development.

And I do believe the symbolism of communion so I don’t have to complain.
 
Upvote 0