• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

A Composer's Intention

Status
Not open for further replies.

JDawggS316

Newbie
Jul 31, 2008
32
1
✟22,767.00
Faith
Baptist
As we hear music played on the radio these days pertaining to drugs, sex and immoral lifestyles, we automatically assume it is a direct result of the influence of evil and the corrupt human nature.

What about those classical pieces that had no lyrics?

Should we consider the writer's motives and moral's, and true intentions behind a classical piece when determining whether or not it is also a direct result of the influence of evil and the corrupt human nature?

I love classical music. But this thought has just dawned me that the creators and composers to some of these wonderful pieces could have been very similar, if not worse, to secular artists today.

Thoughts?
 

student ad x

Senior Contributor
Feb 20, 2009
9,837
805
just outside the forrest
✟36,577.00
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
As we hear music played on the radio these days pertaining to drugs, sex and immoral lifestyles, we automatically assume it is a direct result of the influence of evil and the corrupt human nature.

What about those classical pieces that had no lyrics?

Should we consider the writer's motives and moral's, and true intentions behind a classical piece when determining whether or not it is also a direct result of the influence of evil and the corrupt human nature?

I love classical music. But this thought has just dawned me that the creators and composers to some of these wonderful pieces could have been very similar, if not worse, to secular artists today.

Thoughts?


Hey Jdawgg,

Do you think that somehow patterns of notes, underlying blocks of sound to a sequential moving line and combined with some violent rhythmic element can cause the mind to sin?

The impressionists had a thick texture to the sound what many a listener would consider a dreamy quality. I don't know if anyone would think of absinthe or a liberal lifestyle from listening to their music without first finding fault with how the impressionists had lived.

When Stravinsky's Rite of Spring premiered, it caused what we would consider a riot. Do you reckon it was caused by Stravinsky's rhythmic, primitive, archaic sound or could the cause have been the rejection of that sound/style of music as a refined sensible form: Palestrina, Bach, Mozart or even Brahms?

It's interesting to ponder things like these. :)
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.