• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

A Christian response to "No Kings."

Clare73

Blood-bought
Jun 12, 2012
29,947
7,707
North Carolina
✟363,203.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
What the protesters fail to realize is that Kings aren't elected, but presidents like Trump are.
They know that. . .
The voters elected Trump as president, and he only gets to serve this term and the voters
elected a new president in 2028. Not so Kings, they inherit their crown for the most part.
They just create a false cause because they don't have a true cause.

It's the MO to destabilize, bought and paid for by enemies of the Republic.
 
Upvote 0

childeye 2

Well-Known Member
Aug 18, 2018
6,184
3,435
67
Denver CO
✟248,938.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
They know that. . .

They just create a false cause because they don't have a true cause.

It's the MO to destabilize, bought and paid for by enemies of the Republic.
Do you have proof that they don't have a true cause? If not, this all is slandering the protestors.
 
Upvote 0

Clare73

Blood-bought
Jun 12, 2012
29,947
7,707
North Carolina
✟363,203.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Do you have proof that they don't have a true cause? If not, this all is slandering the protestors.
Can you demonstrate their true cause; i.e., government action contrary to our law which, gives them just cause for their objection?
 
Upvote 0

Clare73

Blood-bought
Jun 12, 2012
29,947
7,707
North Carolina
✟363,203.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
People simply don't want to turn the country into a dictatorship.
False narrative. . .until actual violation of the law is demonstrated, which it has not been.

There is no true cause for their actions. . .it's all simply about obstruction of what the plurality of the people voted for.

And they're too blind to see that they are simply alienating that plurality of voters, thereby guaranteeing their deserved exile to the wilderness in the next election.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Clare73

Blood-bought
Jun 12, 2012
29,947
7,707
North Carolina
✟363,203.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
You do realize I'm talking about slandering people like other voters, illegal immigrants and public figures, right?
You do realize the moderators can stop it on this forum, right?
 
Upvote 0

childeye 2

Well-Known Member
Aug 18, 2018
6,184
3,435
67
Denver CO
✟248,938.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
False narrative. . .until actual violation of the law is demonstrated, which it has not been.
The deportation of Kilmer Abrego Garcia. Without due process he was sent to a prison in a foreign country.
There is no true cause for their actions. . .it's all simply about obstruction of what the plurality of the people voted for.
Can you prove that? If not, you're just slandering these people. What we do to the least of the brethren of Christ we do unto him. That's why I always protest against injustice and oppression.
And they're too blind to see that they are simply alienating that plurality of voters, thereby guaranteeing their deserved exile to the wilderness in the next election.
God sees us, what we say about others. It's wickedness to want to believe bad things said about others without any evidence.
 
Upvote 0

Hazelelponi

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 25, 2018
11,949
11,334
USA
✟1,059,976.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
The deportation of Kilmer Abrego Garcia. Without due process he was sent to a prison in a foreign country.

He had due process. He went before an immigration judge and was ordered deported.

The due process was having the case heard by a judge. He went to a foreign prison because he was a criminal in his country.

This is the United States. Our charge is US citizens and US law. Not whether El Salvador has the right to enforce its own laws on its own citizens.
 
Last edited:
Reactions: Clare73
Upvote 0

Fervent

Well-Known Member
Sep 22, 2020
6,895
3,126
45
San jacinto
✟215,460.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Dictators have been known to kick the ladder, historically. So how they achieved power isn't relevant, the question is how firmly they cling to it and how gracefully they give it up. Caesar came to power through republic, but after Caesar came to power the republic ceased to be. Liberty is only secure so long as the people are prone to resist even a whiff of overreach of authority.
 
Reactions: childeye 2
Upvote 0

Clare73

Blood-bought
Jun 12, 2012
29,947
7,707
North Carolina
✟363,203.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Clare73

Blood-bought
Jun 12, 2012
29,947
7,707
North Carolina
✟363,203.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Do you have proof that they don't have a true cause? If not, this all is slandering the protestors.
Deporting illegal immigrants is enforcing the law of our land.

Any who object to deportation, are objecting to our duly legislated laws.

Have you studied Civics?
 
Upvote 0

childeye 2

Well-Known Member
Aug 18, 2018
6,184
3,435
67
Denver CO
✟248,938.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
We have thousands and thousands of illegal immigrants in this country.
They cannot all be run through our Court system for deportation.
We have millions and millions of illegal immigrants. It's been that way for most of our lifetimes.
Extraordinary circumstances require extraordinary measure
Where love is compromised, wrong is rationalized.
It's not my job to prove, it's your job to prove your charge of the government violating our law (Ro 13:1-2).

I've already shown the DOJ breaking the law, Kilmer Abrego Garcia was sent to prison without due process. You on the other hand have slandered these people based on accusations that they have no true cause.
 
Upvote 0

childeye 2

Well-Known Member
Aug 18, 2018
6,184
3,435
67
Denver CO
✟248,938.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Deporting illegal immigrants is enforcing the law of our land.

Any who object to deportation, are objecting to our duly legislated laws.

Have you studied Civics?
This is a strawman argument. The issue of the protest is the centralizing of power.
 
Upvote 0

Hazelelponi

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 25, 2018
11,949
11,334
USA
✟1,059,976.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
This is a strawman argument. The issue of the protest is the centralizing of power.

What has been centralized?

The Union's victory in the Civil War cemented the supremacy of the federal government over the states, you would have to change the constitution I think at this point to change the supremacy of the Federal Government, and hence Federal law being able to override state law.
 
Upvote 0

Fervent

Well-Known Member
Sep 22, 2020
6,895
3,126
45
San jacinto
✟215,460.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
The centralization concern is about the power of the executive vs the other branches of the federal government, not the state's vs the federal government
 
Upvote 0

Clare73

Blood-bought
Jun 12, 2012
29,947
7,707
North Carolina
✟363,203.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
We have millions and millions of illegal immigrants. It's been that way for most of our lifetimes.
The millions and millions of our lifetime did not arrive in the last few years, as they have now.
Where love is compromised, wrong is rationalized.
When love has no boiundaries, it is not love, it is license/lawlessness.
I've already shown the DOJ breaking the law, Kilmer Abrego Garcia was sent to prison without due process.
Garcia has received due process. . .

The only due process needed is simply proof of legal entrance.
You on the other hand have slandered these people based on accusations that they have no true cause.
As you slandered our law enforcement for no cause when they are enforcing our law.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

childeye 2

Well-Known Member
Aug 18, 2018
6,184
3,435
67
Denver CO
✟248,938.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Ok and what makes them think its a dictatorship.
I didn't say they think it's a dictatorship. I am conveying that they are against it becoming a dictatorship.
I thought Trump was elected fairly and is merely acting on the policies he was elected for.
So do I.
Polls can be misleading. What do people think of deporting dreamers for example. https://www.pewresearch.org/race-and-ethnicity/2025/03/26/americans-views-of-deportations/
And you don't think both sides do it.
I would think billionaires would be more for autocracy while ordinary citizens would be for preserving democracy.
I would suggest under the last administration the media was primarily controlled by them. Trump has been in for 5 minutes. He hasn't had time to but off the media yet lol.
The media marketplace is already owned by conglomerates who make money either way. Do you remember when I showed who voted for citizens united and who voted for the FEC?
That I think is the problem that is causing the violence. People are using such language and its fueling radicals.
What violence are you referring to? I like to reason upon facts.
You know Trump he is brash lol. I think he meant those who break the law. I think the US has a strong constitution.
That's what most people think that support Trump. But the fact remains, we're not supposed to have the military doing domestic law enforcement. Trump is saying he is considering invoking the insurrection act, based on false claims of out of control crime rates in Democratic run cities.
I am glad you said its based on your belief. What do you say to those who disagree.
I'd say they are ignoring what he is saying.
I don't think you understand what is going on. Trump lost a fair election. With the help of fellow republicans he tried to get Pence the vice president to overturn the results so as to stay in power. That is proof of a wannabe dictator. He now fires anyone in his administration who doesn't believe his slander.
Why is is so bad to use the military if needed against such radicals.
Like I said, he lost the election fair and square. He slanders people. There is no evidence of far-left radicals.
Violence and terror has gone up 500% or more. What do they do just let it happen. I think no matter how they dealt with this issue people were going to used violence to stop it as they fundementally disagree with the immigration policy.
I like to reason upon facts. You need to provide some evidence of what you claim.
Thats interesting that both parties seen building some sort of barrier was important. This shows that fundementally they agree that people should not be coming into the US illegally. That removing illegals is the right thing to do.
The disagreement is about what constitutes humane and just treatment of people. We have parents who are illegals who have children who are lawful citizens. We have children who were brought here as toddlers and are now living productive lives as adults and professionals who don't have any prospects in the country they were brought from. We have millions of refugees who have no lawful citizenship anywhere in the world.
The problem is complex. Cartels just toss drug shipments over the wall or cut holes in it with angle grinders. They simply pay border guards to look the other way.
When he does something he really does something lol.
Yeah, when he fools people, he really fools people.
Ok. Now I think the problem has become something of an issue that has to be dealt with.
Immigration reform has been an issue for most of my lifetime.
I not sure why you say maybe. I like to reason upon facts and what I have provided is what I find as officially documented. I don't recall any narratives that suggested illegals were not illegals, so I don't know what you mean.
I don't personally know of anybody who disagrees with deporting illegals full stop. I know it's mostly illegal people who have grown up here and who have productive lives and who are neighbors and who have children born here who are legal citizens that out of compassion many would like to see amnesty be granted.
Geopolitically, I know Aleksandr Dugin has spoken about it for decades. A plan to divide the world into three superpowers by destabilizing democratic governments with culture wars. The plan involves step one, buying up media in those countries with democratic governments, and also buying large shares in companies who employ large numbers of the citizenry in the major cities. Step two, create turmoil and war in countries bordering those democratic countries, thus creating millions of refugees fleeing into the democratic countries one wants to destabilize. Step three, send in pro autocratic politicians who run on a platform of anti-immigration.

When Dugin wrote about it, he said America would be difficult and I assume he was referring to the fact that we are already a melting pot of many cultures. He said something like democrats in the USA would not fall for it, but republicans would be open to accepting racism under the guise of anti-multiculturalism.
Lol he knows how to get under peoples skins. I think he is half joking.
The people who work for him don't think so. I've seen two cabinet meetings where each member at the table takes a turn complimenting him on how great he is and what an honor it is to serve under his leadership.
I think all politicians think they are right about everything.
I don't. I personally know that many on the local are genuine servants of the people. and I know a few on the federal level and they would not want any backside-kissing advisors.
Actually, a left/right dichotomy represents equally valid opposing subjective views. In politics we can see the reasoning in dichotomies like employer/employee, consumer/supplier, buyer/seller.
Yeah both sides do it and it seems they are getting more polarised and the radical fringes are coming to the center and dictating parties.
So far, I haven't seen the democrats conspire to create fake electors so as to overturn a fair election. I haven't seen anyone on the Democratic side wearing a hat saying I was right about everything. And I've never heard a democrat talk about invoking the insurrection act.
I think you're being too cynical. Like is said there are valid left/right dichotomies in politics. There are people who run for office who are led by the Spirit of Christ.
Yes this is vital. I think its natural that people will lean on their ideas and beliefs. In some ways fundementally this is not a case of facts but belief. Beliefs about who we are, what is beyond, and how we should order society.
There are facts and the truth is not impotent. There's a difference between positive and negative prejudice. The course of grace through faith is reasonable, while the course of cynicism through mutual distrust is unreasonable.
Do you think as the bible says 'some will look and listen but not see and hear my words'. That the world is primarily against Christs truth and Gods Kingdom. How could Christians even proclaim this today without being attacked as bigoted or hateful.
The Gospel has spiritual enemies because people are the battlefield. Most times, if you say his Name Jesus in public, the devil is present in the air. The devil is an accuser/slanderer. He will use ad hominem attacks, attacking the messenger, and he will use false equivalence as in unfair weights and measures that show iniquity.

Those who preach the Gospel must expect to carry the same cross as the Christ did, and forgive those who will crucify you, just as he did. It's The Holy Spirit that provides the courage.
Probably so. But both sides do it so much that its hard to tell anything is truth lol.
I've never seen a guy like Trump on either side. He slanders others more than any person I've ever seen. He obviously approves of those who openly bow down to him and submit to his authority over them. He says he alone can fix things. He says he knows more than most anybody about almost everything. He says he is the bringer of peace, the chosen one. He indicates he wants to be worshipped.
I think fundementally this is a fight in the world. Between two principalities fighting for world order.

But neither are Gods way. I think it best to not get too involved. Yes speak out against injustice. But we can do that from the sidelines.
Don't get me wrong; everyone should do what they're led to do, because The Spirit doesn't lead everyone to do the same thing. But the Spirit never leads us to slander others whether they're protesting in the streets or standing on the sidelines.
I don't think politics is inevitable. Certainly any Christian community should not be governed by the political ideologies of the day. They are ideologies that happen to align with some Christian truths and values.
Keeping true to the sentiment of to govern, politics is the delegation of power to set policy in governing. It occurs on every level, from the head of household to neighborhood HOA's, to local, to county, to state, to federal. Politics are inevitable wherever policy is being put forth in governing, including potty training.
But ideologically they are different and its the belief component that is what we should not be subscribing to. Such as Marxism, Socialism, Conservatism, materialism, capitalism, libralism, feminism ect.
I'm just saying the greatest is the one who serves the rest is different than the one who wants the rest to serve them. It can be seen in someone's words and actions.
Matthew 5:13-16
Ye are the salt of the earth: but if the salt have lost his savour, wherewith shall it be salted? it is thenceforth good for nothing, but to be cast out, and to be trodden under foot of men. Ye are the light of the world. A city that is set on an hill cannot be hid. Neither do men light a candle, and put it under a bushel, but on a candlestick; and it giveth light unto all that are in the house. ...
His kingdom is not on this earth that we are to create some equal and peaceful utopia through political means. In fact that is what the Pharisees wanted. He avoided such traps.
I'm not saying there's going to be a utopia. I'm saying I want to bring extra oil so that my lamp is burning when the bridegroom comes.
I've seen numerous reporting of the political divisions in congregations. The evangelicals in particular were lining up to support Trump.
I'm saying it sounds like spin --> false equivalence. When did a Democratic President try to overturn the results of a fair election to stay in power? Propaganda is about turning positives into negatives, negatives into positives, or making them look the same so no one can tell the difference.
That sounds a bit shallow and also doing the oppositions thinking. Why don't you actually look at what they said. I think it was much more nuenced.
I did look at what they said. And I looked at numerous exit polls. the two main reasons were inflation and immigration.
Like I said only time will tell.
It's telling right now.
Yes its a messy business. If there is any injustice then people will be sued. The truth always comes out in the end.
I'm not sure anyone can sue the government for being deported.
Do you think this crackdown is deterring people and organised crime from trafficking people over the border.
I think deporting people to foreign countries that they've never been to qualifies as human trafficking.
 
Upvote 0

Richard T

Well-Known Member
Mar 25, 2018
3,451
2,194
traveling Asia
✟143,647.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Yes, but Sampson had been used by God before he became a degenerate. Trump never had that. However, God does use Trump and you mention many of those things rightly. But perhaps now, he is going to be brought down? Is there anything good on the horizon that Trump can offer? Is he becoming an embarassment? Will God really exalt America with a prideful posture of America first, vulgar talk and the love of money? To me it is God's plan to make America humble and many of Trump's policies I think are going to do exactly that.
 
Upvote 0

childeye 2

Well-Known Member
Aug 18, 2018
6,184
3,435
67
Denver CO
✟248,938.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
The millions and millions of our lifetime did not arrive in the last few years, as they have now.
The dreamers are being targeted by ICE.
When love has no boiundaries, it is not love, it is license/lawlessness.
5 And hope maketh not ashamed; because the love of God is shed abroad in our hearts by the Holy Ghost which is given unto us.

6 For when we were yet without strength, in due time Christ died for the ungodly.

7 For scarcely for a righteous man will one die: yet peradventure for a good man some would even dare to die.

8 But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us.

9 Much more then, being now justified by his blood, we shall be saved from wrath through him.

10 For if, when we were enemies, we were reconciled to God by the death of his Son, much more, being reconciled, we shall be saved by his life.

11 And not only so, but we also joy in God through our Lord Jesus Christ, by whom we have now received the atonement.

12 Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned:

13 (For until the law sin was in the world: but sin is not imputed when there is no law.

14 Nevertheless death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over them that had not sinned after the similitude of Adam's transgression, who is the figure of him that was to come.

15 But not as the offence, so also is the free gift. For if through the offence of one many be dead, much more the grace of God, and the gift by grace, which is by one man, Jesus Christ, hath abounded unto many.

16 And not as it was by one that sinned, so is the gift: for the judgment was by one to condemnation, but the free gift is of many offences unto justification.

17 For if by one man's offence death reigned by one; much more they which receive abundance of grace and of the gift of righteousness shall reign in life by one, Jesus Christ.)

18 Therefore as by the offence of one judgment came upon all men to condemnation; even so by the righteousness of one the free gift came upon all men unto justification of life.

19 For as by one man's disobedience many were made sinners, so by the obedience of one shall many be made righteous.

20 Moreover the law entered, that the offence might abound. But where sin abounded, grace did much more abound:

21 That as sin hath reigned unto death, even so might grace reign through righteousness unto eternal life by Jesus Christ our Lord.
As you slandered our law enforcement for no cause when they are enforcing our law.
Slander is when you say bad things bout others without evidence. I didn't slander law enforcement. Here are the facts showing that Abrego Garcia was sent to a prison in El Salvador without due process -->Immigration Policy and Individual Rights: The Abrego Garcia Case
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Clare73

Blood-bought
Jun 12, 2012
29,947
7,707
North Carolina
✟363,203.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
The dreamers are being targeted by ICE.
???
Are they legal or illegal?
If they're illegal, ICE is enforcing the law.
Here are the facts showing that Abrego Garcia was sent to a prison in El Salvador without due process -->Immigration Policy and Individual Rights: The Abrego Garcia Case
America is not responsible for what happens to Garcia in his home country.
If he wishes to come here, he must do so legally.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0