Ok and what makes them think its a dictatorship.
I didn't say they think it's a dictatorship. I am conveying that they are against it becoming a dictatorship.
I thought Trump was elected fairly and is merely acting on the policies he was elected for.
So do I.
It seems most people support Trumps immigration policy. That is what he was elected for and now he carrying out that promise. In fact it seems most still approve of this policy now he is acting on it.
Polls Show Americans Overwhelmingly Support President Trump’s Mass Deportations
Per a Harvard/Harris poll taken October 1 – October 2, 56% of registered voters support deporting all illegal aliens, and a whopping 78% support deporting criminal illegal aliens.
The American people overwhelmingly support President Donald J. Trump’s and United States Homeland Secretary Kristi Noem’s mass deportation of illegal aliens from the country, according to two national polls.
Polls can be misleading. What do people think of deporting dreamers for example.
https://www.pewresearch.org/race-and-ethnicity/2025/03/26/americans-views-of-deportations/
And you don't think both sides do it.
I would think billionaires would be more for autocracy while ordinary citizens would be for preserving democracy.
I would suggest under the last administration the media was primarily controlled by them. Trump has been in for 5 minutes. He hasn't had time to but off the media yet lol.
The media marketplace is already owned by conglomerates who make money either way. Do you remember when I showed who voted for citizens united and who voted for the FEC?
That I think is the problem that is causing the violence. People are using such language and its fueling radicals.
What violence are you referring to? I like to reason upon facts.
You know Trump he is brash lol. I think he meant those who break the law. I think the US has a strong constitution.
That's what most people think that support Trump. But the fact remains, we're not supposed to have the military doing domestic law enforcement. Trump is saying he is considering invoking the insurrection act, based on false claims of out of control crime rates in Democratic run cities.
I am glad you said its based on your belief. What do you say to those who disagree.
I'd say they are ignoring what he is saying.
Who believe he is doing the right thing in dealing with these issues. They are not easy to deal with.
My nation went through similar and people were saying the government were trying to control everyone. Yet now we all agree it was the right thing to do as a whole.
I don't think you understand what is going on. Trump lost a fair election. With the help of fellow republicans he tried to get Pence the vice president to overturn the results so as to stay in power. That is proof of a wannabe dictator. He now fires anyone in his administration who doesn't believe his slander.
Why is is so bad to use the military if needed against such radicals.
Like I said, he lost the election fair and square. He slanders people. There is no evidence of far-left radicals.
Violence and terror has gone up 500% or more. What do they do just let it happen. I think no matter how they dealt with this issue people were going to used violence to stop it as they fundementally disagree with the immigration policy.
I like to reason upon facts. You need to provide some evidence of what you claim.
Thats interesting that both parties seen building some sort of barrier was important. This shows that fundementally they agree that people should not be coming into the US illegally. That removing illegals is the right thing to do.
The disagreement is about what constitutes humane and just treatment of people. We have parents who are illegals who have children who are lawful citizens. We have children who were brought here as toddlers and are now living productive lives as adults and professionals who don't have any prospects in the country they were brought from. We have millions of refugees who have no lawful citizenship anywhere in the world.
At the end of the day it got to a point where it was causing damage and harm and something had to be done. If everyone agrees that a wall needs to be built because stopping organised crime and others coming illegal is near impossible and that it damages the US. Then surely there should be agreement on dealing with the problem.
The problem is complex. Cartels just toss drug shipments over the wall or cut holes in it with angle grinders. They simply pay border guards to look the other way.
When he does something he really does something lol.
Yeah, when he fools people, he really fools people.
Ok. Now I think the problem has become something of an issue that has to be dealt with.
Immigration reform has been an issue for most of my lifetime.
Maybe. But as I mentioned the language and narratives have suggested or implied that illegals were not illegals. Thus leading to radical groups and individuals believing they should stop the government from cracking down on illegals or have the right to stay in the US.
I not sure why you say maybe. I like to reason upon facts and what I have provided is what I find as officially documented. I don't recall any narratives that suggested illegals were not illegals, so I don't know what you mean.
I don't know what the solution. Yes if officers are being abusive of their power or breaking the law themselves then they should face justice.
But also I think as this situation has been left for so long and got out of hand and some fundementally disagree with deporting illegals fullstop. Even if the officers were angels there would still be violence to stop the government.
I don't personally know of anybody who disagrees with deporting illegals full stop. I know it's mostly illegal people who have grown up here and who have productive lives and who are neighbors and who have children born here who are legal citizens that out of compassion many would like to see amnesty be granted.
But don't both sides do this.
This is not just the US but a worldwide phenomena. The same divide is happening between the Left and Right in many western nations. Which to me speaks of a culture wide war and divide. Rather than any specific politician or group. Especially on the hot button issues like immigration which has become the biggest issue all over the world.
Geopolitically, I know Aleksandr Dugin has spoken about it for decades. A plan to divide the world into three superpowers by destabilizing democratic governments with culture wars. The plan involves step one, buying up media in those countries with democratic governments, and also buying large shares in companies who employ large numbers of the citizenry in the major cities. Step two, create turmoil and war in countries bordering those democratic countries, thus creating millions of refugees fleeing into the democratic countries one wants to destabilize. Step three, send in pro autocratic politicians who run on a platform of anti-immigration.
When Dugin wrote about it, he said America would be difficult and I assume he was referring to the fact that we are already a melting pot of many cultures. He said something like democrats in the USA would not fall for it, but republicans would be open to accepting racism under the guise of anti-multiculturalism.
Lol he knows how to get under peoples skins. I think he is half joking.
The people who work for him don't think so. I've seen two cabinet meetings where each member at the table takes a turn complimenting him on how great he is and what an honor it is to serve under his leadership.
I think all politicians think they are right about everything.
I don't. I personally know that many on the local are genuine servants of the people. and I know a few on the federal level and they would not want any backside-kissing advisors.
That is the nature of the beast in that politics has become partisan. So oppositions don't want to admit being wrong and will make the opposition look bad. Rather than having any genuine ideas about making things great. Time is always the reality checker.
Actually, a left/right dichotomy represents equally valid opposing subjective views. In politics we can see the reasoning in dichotomies like employer/employee, consumer/supplier, buyer/seller.
Yeah both sides do it and it seems they are getting more polarised and the radical fringes are coming to the center and dictating parties.
So far, I haven't seen the democrats conspire to create fake electors so as to overturn a fair election. I haven't seen anyone on the Democratic side wearing a hat saying I was right about everything. And I've never heard a democrat talk about invoking the insurrection act.
Yes and thats why I don't trust either parties or any political ideologies. The are fundementally at war with Christ and subscribing to them would be promoting and cultivating the dark principalities and invisible forces that aim to defy and undermine Christ and Christianity.
I think you're being too cynical. Like is said
there are valid left/right dichotomies in politics. There are people who run for office who are led by the Spirit of Christ.
Yes this is vital. I think its natural that people will lean on their ideas and beliefs. In some ways fundementally this is not a case of facts but belief. Beliefs about who we are, what is beyond, and how we should order society.
There are facts and the truth is not impotent. There's a difference between positive and negative prejudice. The course of grace through faith is reasonable, while the course of cynicism through mutual distrust is unreasonable.
Do you think as the bible says 'some will look and listen but not see and hear my words'. That the world is primarily against Christs truth and Gods Kingdom. How could Christians even proclaim this today without being attacked as bigoted or hateful.
The Gospel has spiritual enemies because people are the battlefield. Most times, if you say his Name Jesus in public, the devil is present in the air. The devil is an accuser/slanderer. He will use ad hominem attacks, attacking the messenger, and he will use false equivalence as in unfair weights and measures that show iniquity.
Those who preach the Gospel must expect to carry the same cross as the Christ did, and forgive those who will crucify you, just as he did. It's The Holy Spirit that provides the courage.
Probably so. But both sides do it so much that its hard to tell anything is truth lol.
I've never seen a guy like Trump on either side. He slanders others more than any person I've ever seen. He obviously approves of those who openly bow down to him and submit to his authority over them. He says he alone can fix things. He says he knows more than most anybody about almost everything. He says he is the bringer of peace, the chosen one. He indicates he wants to be worshipped.
I think fundementally this is a fight in the world. Between two principalities fighting for world order.
But neither are Gods way. I think it best to not get too involved. Yes speak out against injustice. But we can do that from the sidelines.
Don't get me wrong; everyone should do what they're led to do, because The Spirit doesn't lead everyone to do the same thing. But the Spirit never leads us to slander others whether they're protesting in the streets or standing on the sidelines.
I don't think politics is inevitable. Certainly any Christian community should not be governed by the political ideologies of the day. They are ideologies that happen to align with some Christian truths and values.
Keeping true to the sentiment of to govern, politics is the delegation of power to set policy in governing. It occurs on every level, from the head of household to neighborhood HOA's, to local, to county, to state, to federal. Politics are inevitable wherever policy is being put forth in governing, including potty training.
But ideologically they are different and its the belief component that is what we should not be subscribing to. Such as Marxism, Socialism, Conservatism, materialism, capitalism, libralism, feminism ect.
I'm just saying the greatest is the one who serves the rest is different than the one who wants the rest to serve them. It can be seen in someone's words and actions.
I think He would have something to say about the nations these people are fleeing from. I don't think he would get involved. He would know this is something that cannot be intervened in and has to be what it has to be. This is the world rising up against Christ.
Matthew 5:13-16
Ye are the
salt of the earth: but if the
salt have lost his savour, wherewith shall it be
salted? it is thenceforth good for nothing, but to be cast out, and to be trodden under foot of men. Ye are the light of the world. A city that is set on an hill cannot be hid. Neither do men light a candle, and put it under a bushel, but on a candlestick; and it giveth light unto all that are in the house. ...
His kingdom is not on this earth that we are to create some equal and peaceful utopia through political means. In fact that is what the Pharisees wanted. He avoided such traps.
I'm not saying there's going to be a utopia. I'm saying I want to bring extra oil so that my lamp is burning when the bridegroom comes.
Yes this is a fundemental intuition we all have. Though it can be snuffed out by worldly power and self presevation and money. Thats the problem. There is a battle between flesh and spirit. If the whole system in of the world then we can point out the injustice and truth which is not political without subscribing to the political ideology.
I've seen numerous reporting of the political divisions in congregations. The evangelicals in particular were lining up to support Trump.
So you don't think both sides do it. They would not be politicians if they didn't. It use to be that parties agreed more. But in recent years its become polarised. Neither part will admit they are wrong or the other is right lol. One says black and the says white.
I'm saying it sounds like spin --> false equivalence. When did a Democratic President try to overturn the results of a fair election to stay in power? Propaganda is about turning positives into negatives, negatives into positives, or making them look the same so no one can tell the difference.
That sounds a bit shallow and also doing the oppositions thinking. Why don't you actually look at what they said. I think it was much more nuenced.
I did look at what they said. And I looked at numerous exit polls. the two main reasons were inflation and immigration.
Like I said only time will tell.
It's telling right now.
Yes its a messy business. If there is any injustice then people will be sued. The truth always comes out in the end.
I'm not sure anyone can sue the government for being deported.
Do you think this crackdown is deterring people and organised crime from trafficking people over the border.
I think deporting people to foreign countries that they've never been to qualifies as human trafficking.