• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

A challenge for evolutionists.

Nathan Poe

Well-Known Member
Sep 21, 2002
32,198
1,693
51
United States
✟41,319.00
Faith
Agnostic
Politics
US-Democrat
Why are "right" and "wrong" involved when it isn't a moral judgment?

1 person says "if you do this, bad stuff will happen."
Another says, "If you do this, great stuff will happen."

Sounds like a moral decision to me...
 
Upvote 0
S

solja247

Guest
You do realise this didn't literally, actually happen, don't you? You do realise that this isn't ACTUAL history being reported, don't you?

Why not? Because you dont like it? because you dont think its possible? Because you cant stand the story of God creating the world?

Tell me why it cant be history?

Is it history that Jesus died and rose again? or was Jospehus on pot?
 
Upvote 0

Nostromo

Brian Blessed can take a hike
Nov 19, 2009
2,343
56
Yorkshire
✟25,338.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
1 person says "if you do this, bad stuff will happen."
Another says, "If you do this, great stuff will happen."

Sounds like a moral decision to me...
Presumably, the question you'd ask yourself in such a situation would be: "Is God more likely to know what he's talking about than a snake?"
No?
 
Upvote 0

Tomatoman

Well-Known Member
Feb 3, 2010
1,338
51
✟1,829.00
Faith
Anglican
Why not? Because you dont like it? because you dont think its possible? Because you cant stand the story of God creating the world?

No, because it's patent rubbish, that's why. Whichever way you look at it it's nonsense. Let's actually look at what you wrote again:


There is as much evidence for this outside the Bible as there is for Harry Potter and Lord Voldemort. The two are quite comparable in that they are absurd stories completely lacking in any evidence outside the books they are written in. Added to which the stories, although entertaining, are plain silly. Nothing in them is even close to the evidence of the world we live in. Well, unless you're on drugs.

Tell me why it cant be history?

Because there is no evidence, that's why. Tell me why Harry Potter and his fight against Lord Voldemort can't be history.

Is it history that Jesus died and rose again? or was Jospehus on pot?

Given that the lifestory of Jesus had such enormous repercussions for Western history there is a frightening lack of evidence for him having existed outside the gospels. Even the gospels themselves are a mixed bag especially when you add in the apocrypha, which usually upsets religious fundamentalists. Josephus is a rare exception, and his mention of Jesus is very controversial, historians believing it to have been added later. At best we can say we have to treat Josephus with suspicion.

This leaves little other than the gospels. I happen to believe it likely that the gospels are based on the life of a man who actually existed. The emphasis being on the word 'based'. The details of this man's life are wide open to dispute. But I believe, based on the historical evidence of an emerging Christian religion in the first century and the stories written up in the gospels that it is likely that we're closer to historical truth. How close is for each person to decide.

You, on the other hand, don't seem to apply any critical faculty at all. If it's in the Bible then it must be true, however much it means you have to dismiss libraries full of proven science and corrobarated history. You ask me to tell you why it can't be history? You have it the wrong way round. You are the one making eyebrow raising claims. It's up to you to prove that they are true. Good luck with that.
 
Reactions: troodon
Upvote 0

Tiberius

Well-Known Member
Jun 28, 2005
6,032
116
46
✟6,911.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship

Yeah I read them. I still don't get it. Those posts were people saying that they had no knowledge of right and wrong, good or evil, and they had no way to know those things until AFTERwards.

You posting the bit where God says that they'll die in that very same day if they eat the tree doesn't make any difference, because Adam and Eve lacked the ability to actually understand what god was saying.

It's like me going to Japan and asking where the train station is. I can ask someone all I want, but if they don't understand English, I'm never gonna make myself understood, no matter how many times I say it. Likewise, God could say it is wrong to eat from the tree all he wants, but Adam and Eve, lacking the knowledge of right and wrong, will NEVER understand what he means.

And because of God's great love, He did not abandon us.

No, he sent himself as a sacrifice to himself. Now, why did God even need a sacrifce? Couldn't he just snap his fingers? We're talking OMNIPOTENT. What is there that could only come about by a murder, bloodshed when God can snap his fingers and do anything????

But anyway, that's off topic. If you want to discuss it, let's start a new thread for it, okay?


You still have God using deception and lies to get what he wants.


You wanna explain why you are quoting from Jer 14 when the passage in question is from six chapters later or ten chapters earlier?


Seems to be saying the same thing, that God has no problem taking actions that lead to people being deceived. So God wants them to be deceived.

Once again you seem to be drawing your conclusions with just a portion of the message given, read the whole context of the story.

You aren't providing context. So far you;ve either posted a separate part of the Bible and not explained how it fits in, or posted the same single verse I did, just from another bible version.

Originally Posted by
2 Thessalonians 2:11 For this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie.



A prophecy about the future? And we STILL have God sending a delusion. God sends a delusion! That is the bit I have a problem with.


Who can know the mind of God, you ask? Well, apparently, you can, because you claim there is a very good reason for God to do all this!


Onvce again, unbelievers are hit over the head with passages that say, "You can't help the unbelievers, they'll just have to miss out."

Do you see that every religion just about has the same thing? It's just a continuation of the "Them and us" mentality.

You do realise this didn't literally, actually happen, don't you? You do realise that this isn't ACTUAL history being reported, don't you?

So in other words....

God sent himself to be sacrificed to himself to convince himself to allow humanity to be forgiven because a man who didn't exist and a woman who didn't exist were convinced by a snake that didn't exist to eat the fruit of a tree that didn't exist?

Is that it? Really?
 
Upvote 0

Cabal

Well-Known Member
Jul 22, 2007
11,592
476
39
London
✟37,512.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Engaged
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
Even the gospels themselves are a mixed bag especially when you add in the apocrypha, which usually upsets religious fundamentalists.

It seems to me that fundamentalists are actually quite happy to cite the apocrypha - as long as it proves a point of theirs, of course.
 
Upvote 0

Nathan Poe

Well-Known Member
Sep 21, 2002
32,198
1,693
51
United States
✟41,319.00
Faith
Agnostic
Politics
US-Democrat
Why not? Because you dont like it? because you dont think its possible? Because you cant stand the story of God creating the world?

Tell me why it cant be history?

Because history requires someone to record it -- who recorded this?

Is it history that Jesus died and rose again? or was Jospehus on pot?

Are there other options?
 
Upvote 0

Nostromo

Brian Blessed can take a hike
Nov 19, 2009
2,343
56
Yorkshire
✟25,338.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Or possibly, "is God lying to me?"
I'd be more inclined to wonder how the serpent could know what he claims to know. Adam knew that the tree was in the Garden before he got there and then saw all the animals made and then named them. The serpent is a newcomer to the garden from Adam's point of view.
 
Upvote 0

Friendly.Atheist

Regular Member
Feb 20, 2010
108
7
✟22,785.00
Faith
Pantheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat

I'd be wondering what I had smoked to make me think a snake is talking to me.
 
Upvote 0

Spacewyrm

cognitive dissident
Oct 21, 2009
248
10
California
✟22,932.00
Faith
Deist
I thought that the snake, being an animal, was made at the same time as all the othjer animals. According to the Bible, anyway...

Yeah, but depending on whether you're reading Genesis 1 or Genesis 2, Adam either came after or before the non-human animals.
 
Upvote 0

Nostromo

Brian Blessed can take a hike
Nov 19, 2009
2,343
56
Yorkshire
✟25,338.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Yeah, but depending on whether you're reading Genesis 1 or Genesis 2, Adam either came after or before the non-human animals.
On reading it through again I think I saw more conflict in the two passages than there really is. I was wrong, the animals come first, Gen 2 implies past tense when talking about the animals forming.

Doesn't really make a great difference to who you'd trust more, between the animals and God.
 
Upvote 0

Tiberius

Well-Known Member
Jun 28, 2005
6,032
116
46
✟6,911.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
I don't think there's any implication at all.

Genesis 2 describes God creating man, THEN says God made all the animals. THEN God made woman because Adam hadn't found a suitable companion (which leads me to wonder, if God thought that Adam might find compansionship with an animal, did he thiink Adam was going to do with an animal what he did with Eve?)

Genesis 1 on the other hand, describes God creating the animals BEFORE he made people, with some animals on the fifth day and the rest on the sixth day. And then he made man and woman at the same time, on the sixth day AFTER he made the last of the animals.

There is no implication - the Bible is quite clear.
 
Upvote 0

Nostromo

Brian Blessed can take a hike
Nov 19, 2009
2,343
56
Yorkshire
✟25,338.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
It's an odd one.

NIV Gen 2:19 "Now the LORD God had formed out of the ground all the beasts of the field"

KJV Gen 2:18-19 "And the LORD God said, It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him an help meet for him. And out of the ground the LORD God formed every beast of the field"
 
Upvote 0