STOP
Before this gets out of hand: can we please focus purely on the physics and forget who might have done what and why? I'm only concerned with the physics of whether or not the demolition model is plausible. Anything else is going to turn into a shouting match. Please provide sources for anything you paste and keep the subject on the scientific analysis.
[original post below]
Barking liberal moonbat?
http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html
...or respected physicist?
I'm still trying to figure this one out. Help would be appreciated.
In short, I'm finding myself convinced that it is significantly plausible that whatever the government told us is not likely to be true and was deliberately designed to hide the truth. I intend to do further research into the counter arguments.
For the moment, I was wondering who, if anyone, here has already gone down this road with skepticism and where has it taken you.
Off hand this guy doesn't seem like a nutter to me.
Before this gets out of hand: can we please focus purely on the physics and forget who might have done what and why? I'm only concerned with the physics of whether or not the demolition model is plausible. Anything else is going to turn into a shouting match. Please provide sources for anything you paste and keep the subject on the scientific analysis.
[original post below]
Barking liberal moonbat?
http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html
...or respected physicist?
I'm still trying to figure this one out. Help would be appreciated.
In short, I'm finding myself convinced that it is significantly plausible that whatever the government told us is not likely to be true and was deliberately designed to hide the truth. I intend to do further research into the counter arguments.
For the moment, I was wondering who, if anyone, here has already gone down this road with skepticism and where has it taken you.
Off hand this guy doesn't seem like a nutter to me.