?

[AV1611VET]

If evolution is true, what would we look like if we hadn't have evolved?

 

[Frumious Bandersnatch]

If evolution is true, what would we look like if we hadn't have evolved?

 

[Singermom]

If we evolved from ape-like creatures...why are there still apes?

 

[Frumious Bandersnatch]

If evolution is true, what would we look like if we hadn't have evolved?

What would you look like if your parents had never met?

 

[Son of the King]

If evolution is true, what would we look like if we hadn't have evolved?

IF this is true, then we have come a long way. As for the intermidiate forms from then until now? Your guess is as good as anyone else's.

 

[Freodin]

Who is the "we" you are talking about?

Consider this: what would a human look like that had not been born, but been created?
(Ex-nihilo or whatever you´d like... I think that this creation-alternative has been in your mind when you made this thread, even if you didn´t mention an alternative to "had not evolved.)

Answer: it would look like a human, of course.

But why would it look that way? Because there is already a template "human" - which are born - to copy.

Such a template would not exist if you didn´t start with born - or evolved - humans. So basically the answer to your question would be: whatever our origin made "us" look like.

But in what way would that be "us"?

 

[plindboe]

If evolution is true, what would we look like if we hadn't have evolved?

Your question makes no sense.

Peter

 

[Cabal]

I would figure that we'd look no different, inasmuch that most other claims on the matter are religious and we look they way we do because we're "supposed" to - frailties, fragilities and flaws aside.

 

[plindboe]

I would figure that we'd look no different, inasmuch that most other claims on the matter are religious and we look they way we do because we're "supposed" to - frailties, fragilities and flaws aside.

I'm not sure how you can answer such a nonsensical question. He basically asked "if we had evolved, how would we look if we hadn't evolved?".

Peter

 

[rockaction]

If evolution is true, what would we look like if we hadn't have evolved?

This makes no sense at all.

 

[Golden Yak]

His question is asked from the perspective of someone who doesn't believe in evolution.

"I don't believe evolution happens, but if it did happen, what would humans look like if it never happened to us?"

I don't know what that pic is that Son of the King posted, but that's probably close, if humans never evolved at any point in their lineage.

 

[Agonaces of Susa]

If evolution is true, what would we look like if we hadn't have evolved?

Behold: Homo ignoramous.

 

[Mike Elphick]

If evolution is true, what would we look like if we hadn't have evolved?

This makes no sense at all.

Maybe he means that if evolution is true for all non-human life, what would we look like if we had not evolved, but had been created. In other words, what affect would life evolving around us have upon our appearance?

An example would be the curse, assuming this suddenly permitted created organisms to evolve (except humans). We might then expect nasty things to happen like parasitism, virus-induced cancers and man-eating tigers. There's evidence for this in the Bible:-

Genesis 3:18 (KJV)
Thorns also and thistles shall it bring forth to thee; and thou shalt eat the herb of the field

I'd say we'd all look like God intended but appear very tired coping with horrible things like bees and wasps, mosquitoes, antibiotic resistant bugs, weeds in our gardens and devastating agricultural diseases. We'd have pock-marks, warts, bite marks, premature balding, white hair and rotting teeth.

And don't forget, evolution enables plants and microorganisms to produce mind-altering drugs which results in wars and terrorism, not to mention early death through smoking and drinking. Perhaps the Bible is right after all...

 

[Agonaces of Susa]

Your question makes no sense.

Peter

Reading comprehension fail?

The question is what would we look like if we hadn't evolved.

 

[Agonaces of Susa]

This makes no sense at all.

Reading comprehension fail?

The question is what would we look like if we hadn't evolved.

 

[plindboe]

Reading comprehension fail?

No. The problem is that AV is not a good communicator.

The question is what would we look like if we hadn't evolved.

The question was "If evolution is true, what would we look like if we hadn't have evolved?". In other words "If A, what would we look like if not A?". The question contradicts its own premise, hence nonsensical.

Peter

 

[Mike Elphick]

Reading comprehension fail?

The question is what would we look like if we hadn't evolved.

Who's failing reading comprehension? Are you saying that Richard Dawkins (Homo ignoramous) is NOT the product of evolution?

Please explain why AV prefixed his question with "If evolution is true"? He obviously made a mistake.

The original question did not make sense, AoS

.

 

[Targ]

What a nonsensical question.

 

[3sigma]

If evolution is true, what would we look like if we hadn't have evolved?

If creationists had brains, what sort of questions would they ask if they didn’t use those brains?

 

[Agonaces of Susa]

LOL @ the chorus of Darwinists afraid to answer a simple question.