- Jul 25, 2005
- 10,760
- 7,229
- 63
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Charismatic
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Others
That last post did not make any sense to me...
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
No, she didn't.Eve had twins. Two different fathers. Able is prodigy of Adam. Cain is seed of satan.
If Cain's line did not make it onto the Ark throughThe kenites are offspring of Cain. These are satan's children.
The wisdom is in the bible. Please, forget about all those crazy conspiracies, find the one and only connection to this number:The 666 is the number of the beast's name. So while there will be a combination of numbers that total 666, it can be only one combination of numbers - specific to the beast's name.
So, if a person suspects someone to be the beast - one way to check the possibility is to add the letter-number equivalents of the person's name to see if it adds to 666. One place to do that is Gematria Calculator . This is assuming the letter-number approach. It may be something else, like the person's seat in a parliment (as some have speculated).
What will be displayed, however, when the law is enacted, on the forehead or hand will likey be the total , the singular displayed number of - 666. Time will tell the closer that day becomes.
We should pray that God gives us the wisdom to figure out the 666 number of the beast's name.
Welcome to the forum, Jonathan,The wisdom is in the bible. Please, forget about all those crazy conspiracies, find the one and only connection to this number:
1 Kings 10:14 The weight of the gold that Solomon received yearly was 666 talents,
2 Chronicles 9:13 The weight of the gold that Solomon received yearly was 666 talents
If you dismiss this as pure coincidence, think again. The number 666 combined with wisdom point to no one else but king Solomon, the heir of David. The author of several books in the bible, he built the temple for God, and he also went apostasy by multiplying horses and chariots, wives, and wealth, those were specifically prohibited for a king of Israel in Deuteronomy 17. His heart turned to all of these worldly pursuits and away from God. That's the model and the spirit for the Antichrist. 6 is the number of man, the number 666 itself symbolizes the highest achievement of man, all the power, wealth and pleasure you can have, and yet still fall short of perfection.
The wisdom is in the bible. Please, forget about all those crazy conspiracies, find the one and only connection to this number:
1 Kings 10:14 The weight of the gold that Solomon received yearly was 666 talents,
2 Chronicles 9:13 The weight of the gold that Solomon received yearly was 666 talents
If you dismiss this as pure coincidence, think again. The number 666 combined with wisdom point to no one else but king Solomon, the heir of David. The author of several books in the bible, he built the temple for God, and he also went apostasy by multiplying horses and chariots, wives, and wealth, those were specifically prohibited for a king of Israel in Deuteronomy 17. His heart turned to all of these worldly pursuits and away from God. That's the model and the spirit for the Antichrist. 6 is the number of man, the number 666 itself symbolizes the highest achievement of man, all the power, wealth and pleasure you can have, and yet still fall short of perfection.
Except his name and the "number of his name" are two distinct forms of the mark.So it seems more likely that the letters of his name, the numerical value of each, when added up equals "666".
I don't understand what you mean. Do you mean his first, middle, and last name are fully spelled out ? And that the 666 value may only apply to his first name or maybe his last name?That means that when his name is fully spelled out, it will not contain that numerical quality.
I don't understand what you mean ?Except his name and the "number of his name" are two distinct forms of the mark.
I don't understand what you mean. Do you mean his first, middle, and last name are fully spelled out ? And that the 666 value may only apply to his first name or maybe his last name?
As you have pointed out in your own posts, when the mark is finally issued, it will exist in two or three forms,*I don't understand what you mean ?
This question could be shown with both a hypothetical example (I.), and the reality (II.)As you have pointed out in your own posts, when the mark is finally issued, it will exist in two or three forms,*
While the meaning of #2 is unclear, #1 & 3 will be stupidly obvious.
- his name (spelled out),
- the number of his name** or
- possibly, a logo.
#2 will have a hidden numerical value. #1 will not.
*Depending on the correct punctuation of Rev. 13:17.
**That phrase is unclear, but my pet theory would be his initials.
I elaborate on my previous post at...This question could be shown with both a hypothetical example (I.), and the reality (II.)
Agreed. So, the mark could potentially be a barcode or a new technology that hasn't been developed. Maybe a digital tattoo to track movements, or something we have never thought of yet.I elaborate on my previous post at...
Even if we do not spot the 600 + 60 + 6 right away, requiring a physical mark on one's right hand or forehead in order to engage in business will be a no-brainer.Observations About The Mark Of The Beast...
Subtle details about the Mark of the Beast, as found in Rev.13:16-18www.christianforums.com
As a retired systems analyst/programmer, those are not likely. (Each person in such a system would require a unique ID that corresponds to a database.)Agreed. So, the mark could potentially be a barcode or a new technology that hasn't been developed. Maybe a digital tattoo to track movements, or something we have never thought of yet.
Potentially, but the database could be distributed over multiple computers, not just confined to one data center. I think the mark will be in a database, where you can't buy or sell without it. But potentially, it could be just a generic symbol on the hand that one must wave over a scanner before a purchase (that doesn't associate the user by name), and anyone without a symbol on the hand isn't allowed to buy, say food. But someone is bound to spoof the signal without a mark, or just plain walk away with the food without paying. So, what would the ethics be if we unmarked folks will no longer be allowed to purchase food or essential items as Christians, and only those with a mark had permission to buy food? Should we just let a marked person buy us unmarked folks our food, and trade him/her our valuables? Or should we just take food from the store shelves in this hypothetical future where we can't buy food without a mark?As a retired systems analyst/programmer, those are not likely. (Each person in such a system would require a unique ID that corresponds to a database.)
The mark in all three of its forms will be an unambiguous pledge of devotion to a particular individual.
Thanks for clarifying.As you have pointed out in your own posts, when the mark is finally issued, it will exist in two or three forms,*
While the meaning of #2 is unclear, #1 & 3 will be stupidly obvious.
- his name (spelled out),
- the number of his name** or
- possibly, a logo.
#2 will have a hidden numerical value. #1 will not.
It may be.**That phrase is unclear, but my pet theory would be his initials.
Well, I think the best and first option is to be looking for the rapture to avoid going through that time.Potentially, but the database could be distributed over multiple computers, not just confined to one data center. I think the mark will be in a database, where you can't buy or sell without it. But potentially, it could be just a generic symbol on the hand that one must wave over a scanner before a purchase (that doesn't associate the user by name), and anyone without a symbol on the hand isn't allowed to buy, say food. But someone is bound to spoof the signal without a mark, or just plain walk away with the food without paying. So, what would the ethics be if we unmarked folks will no longer be allowed to purchase food or essential items as Christians, and only those with a mark had permission to buy food? Should we just let a marked person buy us unmarked folks our food, and trade him/her our valuables? Or should we just take food from the store shelves in this hypothetical future where we can't buy food without a mark?
Well, it would be impossible to look for the rapture, as we Christians who have Jesus in our hearts would be teleported or something into heaven. But for the people who convert after the rapture, I hope they do well. However, I have not enough knowledge if the rapture is pre, mid, or post. So, for myself, I just trust in God, and don't worry about the end times. Just as long as I try my best to take care of other people, and the earth in a Christian manner, one such as myself could hope to make the world a just a slightly bit better place for the next generation until whatever happens, happens.Well, I think the best and first option is to be looking for the rapture to avoid going through that time.
I think it is hard for us as Christians to envision that the unsaved world will have a worship-like adoration of the person -which they say "who can make war against the beast (king)?" . So for them, taking the mark would be part of their devotion to the person.
Persons, who missed the rapture, but who become Christians in those days, will be painted as the bad guys. So the system will be operated at all levels by the deceived persons devoted to the beast-king.
It may be that Christians in those days try to survive by an underground economy for their own.
God could sustain His people miraculously like with manna or being fed by ravens.So, what would the ethics be if we unmarked folks will no longer be allowed to purchase food or essential items as Christians, and only those with a mark had permission to buy food?
Yeah, in theory, but what if the end of the world is a test which we must pass? We might not have the help of miracles and food from the sky, and we will have to find ethical means of sourcing our food (eg. growing our own) instead of taking from the store shelves or being lazy and choosing the really bad route by using the mark.God could sustain His people miraculously like with manna or being fed by ravens.
Or He may have His people develop a "white" market where we all grow our own food & barter.
"Shadrach, Meshach, and Abed-Nego answered and said to the king,
'O Nebuchadnezzar, we have no need to answer you in this matter.If that is the case, our God whom we serve is able to deliver us from the burning fiery furnace,
and He will deliver us from your hand, O king.But if not, let it be known to you, O king,
that we do not serve your gods,nor will we worship the gold image which you have set up.' ” Daniel 3:16-18 NKJV