- Jan 7, 2024
- 9,948
- 1,392
- Country
- United Kingdom
- Gender
- Female
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
Why would the trees be cut down ?
I don't know you tell me.
Petrified Tree at the Yellowstone National Park
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Why would the trees be cut down ?
Now just making up your own false fairy tales ??
What is scriptural is that when God created trees, they were sufficiently mature to be bearing fruit/seed:Even if God made Adam as a fully grown man as you believe, that doesn't mean therefore God made trees with annual rings already in them, plus all the other manipulations that would have to occur.
And it's not scriptural.
Those are erosion surfaces. We know this because they run parallel to bedding plains of depositional layers.I don't know you tell me.
View attachment 359806
Petrified Tree at the Yellowstone National Park
View attachment 359807
Those are erosion surfaces. We know this because they run parallel to bedding plains of depositional layers.
"Let the earth bring forth" does not mean that they were instantaneously mature in a seed bearing state. Only that the earth brought them forth.What is scriptural is that when God created trees, they were sufficiently mature to be bearing fruit/seed:
“Then God said, "Let the earth bring forth grass, the herb [that] yields seed, [and] the fruit tree that yields fruit according to its kind, whose seed is in itself, on the earth"; and it was so.” (Ge 1:11 NKJV)
Whether those first created trees had growth rings, we are not told.
I never said that it wasn't a tree. Would you like to frame your response in a question (assuming that you don't understand what I said).Look like trees to me.
I never said that it wasn't a tree. Would you like to frame your response in a question (assuming that you don't understand what I said).
I'm saying that the flat surface overtop of the tree stump depicted, is not a result of being "chopped down", rather it's a result of erosion. And we know this because these flat surfaces run parallel to bedding planes of sedimentary layers surrounding the tree.Yes, I don't understand what you were implying.
I'm saying that the flat surface overtop of the tree stump depicted, is not a result of being "chopped down", rather it's a result of erosion. And we know this because these flat surfaces run parallel to bedding planes of sedimentary layers surrounding the tree.
Let me know if that helps clarify.
Did you read my post, if not here is what I wrote:What artifacts?
Do you think that archaeologists are not able to examine artifacts carefully? If you do please provide sources.We need to critically examine them.
Thanks for sharing.I reckon that most of the trees were cut down before the deluge & have since become petrified.
I don't see that as describing the state of the trees. It reads to me more like a description of the types of trees that the earth brought forth.What is scriptural is that when God created trees, they were sufficiently mature to be bearing fruit/seed:
“Then God said, "Let the earth bring forth grass, the herb [that] yields seed, [and] the fruit tree that yields fruit according to its kind, whose seed is in itself, on the earth"; and it was so.” (Ge 1:11 NKJV)
Whether those first created trees had growth rings, we are not told.
How else could you have a 50 foot tree? It would have to have all the normal appearance of age...leaves would be on it - the age would appear both externally and internally - just as if you drew me a picture of a tall tree - you'd hit every detail of what a 50 foot tree would look like. (both interally and externally). I don't know of any other way. Adam would have fingernails and other features of what a 20 year old man would have (I'm making an assumption of his age). That's the way I see it.Even if God made Adam as a fully grown man as you believe, that doesn't mean therefore God made trees with annual rings already in them, plus all the other manipulations that would have to occur.
And it's not scriptural.
Let review one of those chipped stone tools together - I'm not just gonna take what some archaeologists says...I want to see the data.Did you read my post, if not here is what I wrote:
"artifacts used to date sites like Göbekli Tepe include chipped stone tools, grinding stones, and animal bones. This can be done using radiocarbon dating, potassium-argon dating, tephrochronology, or magnetostratigraphy."
Do you think that archaeologists are not able to examine artifacts carefully? If you do please provide sources.
BTW you still have not provided a source regarding your previous claims putting them where they belong.
View attachment 359823
Lets look at one of those chipped stone tools together and see who they extracted an age from it. I"m not going to take their word for it - I want to see what they and how they based it.Did you read my post, if not here is what I wrote:
"artifacts used to date sites like Göbekli Tepe include chipped stone tools, grinding stones, and animal bones. This can be done using radiocarbon dating, potassium-argon dating, tephrochronology, or magnetostratigraphy."
Do you think that archaeologists are not able to examine artifacts carefully? If you do please provide sources.
BTW you still have not provided a source regarding your previous claims putting them where they belong.
View attachment 359823
What tree are you talking about?How else could you have a 50 foot tree?
There's nothing about any 50 foot tree in there.The trees God created in Genesis 1:11-12. God created the Earth with trees and vegetation. Animals had to eat.
You're right could have been 75 or 100 ft - I was just using 50 ft since that is basically the average height of a tree as a hypothetical - same way I was using Adam being 20 years old.There's nothing about any 50 foot tree in there.
But there's nothing in there about the earth bringing forth trees with annual rings already in them.You're right could have been 75 or 100 ft - I was just using 50 ft since that is basically the average height of a tree as a hypothetical - same way I was using Adam being 20 years old.