• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
Status
Not open for further replies.

GeneSplicer

Regular Member
Jan 2, 2004
239
6
Right Coast
Visit site
✟15,500.00
Faith
Atheist
I got no warning of the site you keep mentioning. Funny that.

So you keep claiming but you have also claimed that you have never been banned from any site. That is a lie. Again, accounts like “Simple” or your Arkathon derivative account.

I saw an antichrist surge and unfairness, and took action. End of story.

So after calling people anti-Chirsts and telling them they were worthy of death, you just left quietly? Still doesn’t jive with your documented actions to date.

And again, if that were true then why you did have to create another account for that very same site?

Your claims simply do not make sense in comparison to your action and track record.

Your obsessive compulsive fascination with God taking over, and ending the rule, and rules of man is noted.

And as you have been told before David, it is not compulsive to take a stand against a person such as you who claims and justifies the hopeful murder of millions.

This doesn’t even begin to address your posted hope to take part in such mass murder.

Tough. Get over it.


Get over what? Your desire to harm others or your desire to murder non-Christians? Again David, nothing to get over.

Now, about the dating basis for the movie in the OP...any comment?

I have plenty of comments David, but as usual you are incapable of addressing them and prefer to try to change the topic when you cannot reply rationally or with substance.

Sorry to interupt your stalking here, but time is a tickin.

And gain David, my account predates yours on this forum. Your ever-present stalking claim is still just as amusing as when you stated I was stalking you in a thread of my own creation, but it doesn’t change the fact that you are unable to address your own rather violent claims of what will happen to non-Christians at your hands.

And again David, you made your non-Christian snuff fantasy part of this topic thread by posting your magical and fantasy-filled split/merge rhetoric.

And as it has been posted here and on so many other forums, your claims require proof or your claims are simply hollow.

Be they the “special” magically murdering ones of the split/merge with a flying golden pyramid measuring 1500 miles tall and wide with, using your words, the “space army” crusaders riding flaming steeds and wielding flaming swords or not, you still need proof.

And as on so many other forums you still appears to be painfully lacking in any.

So where is your proof of your magical murder fantasy David?

I can cite your own posts David to back up what I have stated about your claims:
PhysForum Science, Physics and Technology Discussion Forums -> What To Teach In School About Creation?


When provided with a detailed reply regarding facts that illustrate just how laughable your magical murder fantasy is, this is the typical response you post in the face of facts you cannot rationally debate:

PhysForum Science, Physics and Technology Discussion Forums -> What To Teach In School About Creation?


More personal insults and yet another appeal to the lurkers.

There are so many examples of some of the same tactics you have resorted to here, but I don’t think you have resorted to name calling, juvenile name alteration and the threats here that you have resorted to there.

But one thing that should comfort you I hope. Your split/merge document sill be available even after your website shuts down.
 
Reactions: Baggins
Upvote 0

BananaSlug

Life is an experiment, experience it!
Aug 26, 2005
2,454
106
41
In a House
✟25,782.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
You seem to assume that physical science covers spirits. That is spooky. How do you propose that the phsycal spot the spritual, precisely?? It would be easier for a blind man to spot a spotted owl.

ICT Results - Helping the blind to see

I guess the physical could spot the spiritual the same way the people of the Bible did... with their senses. That is the basis of the scientific method, using your senses and reasoning to understand the world. All of the spirtual experiences of the Bible took place in the physical world. If it happens in the physical world it can be studied by "physical science".



Not I, but the records man actually has, rather than dreams up, based on pretending the present has to be the be all end all.

So I guess the Rig Veda has as much authority as the Bible? It is a record of man as well...

It is this. The proper unbiased interpretation of all evidence screams out ;different state past'!

You also have a biased interpretation based in your religious conviction. Bias is a part of science but scientists have to be intellectually honest. If a conclusion contradicts what you want you can't change the result.

The spirits among men in the past, the fast evolving, and plant growth rate, and different light, and life spans etc etc/

So are there not spirits among us now? Many people think the spiritual world is still here with us. What makes our state different from the past (you have yet to answer it by the way)? What different light is there? God created the Sun and stars in Genesis. It doesn't mention any "different state" light.

That is why looking at the millimeters a year crawl of the continents, and trying to use that as a measure of deep past rates, for example, is truly laughable.

Well perhaps you could provide an alternative hypothesis? We don't just look at current continental movement either. We also use fossils and other geologic phenomena to piece together the past shifting of our continents. Until you can name a better hypothesis that can explain all of the current data you're just blowing smoke.


I would say yes! But first one must take off the shackles and limitations of same state religious thinking.

I'll go along.


What is The Milankovitch Theory? The Milankovitch or astronomical theory of climate change is an explanation for changes in the seasons which result from changes in the earth's orbit around the sun. The theory is named for Serbian astronomer Milutin Milankovitch, who calculated the slow changes in the earth's orbit by careful measurements of the position of the stars, and through equations using the gravitational pull of other planets and stars. He determined that the earth "wobbles" in its orbit. The earth's "tilt" is what causes seasons, and changes in the tilt of the earth change the strength of the seasons. The seasons can also be accentuated or modified by the eccentricity (degree of roundness) of the orbital path around the sun, and the precession effect, the position of the solstices in the annual orbit.
What does The Milankovitch Theory say about future climate change?
Orbital changes occur over thousands of years, and the climate system may also take thousands of years to respond to orbital forcing. Theory suggests that the primary driver of ice ages is the total summer radiation received in northern latitude zones where major ice sheets have formed in the past, near 65 degrees north. Past ice ages correlate well to 65N summer insolation (Imbrie 1982). Astronomical calculations show that 65N summer insolation should increase gradually over the next 25,000 years, and that no 65N summer insolation declines sufficient to cause an ice age are expected in the next 50,000 - 100,000 years
NOAA Paleoclimatology Program - Orbital Variations and Milankovitch Theory


So????! Point? Is there some ash somewhere you want to offer us as pre flood ash? Let's see it! What country? What layer? Etc. Get down, man.

The point is that any volcanic ash we find on earth will have the same structure and composition. It doesn't matter if it is 3 hours old or 200 million years old, it will still be identifiable as volcanic ash.

Say what??? What ash, where? Let's see the specs. The microscopic details. Don't just blow smoke.

Ash particle from Mount Saint Helens- 1980


Volcanic ash from the Rockland Ash Bed, California- 600,000 years ago.​
http://www.minsocam.org/ammin/AM15/AM15_253.pdf
That seems off topic? This is about 4004 BC, and the sillly unsupported claim it was a day as usual, blah blah. No evidence for the dates was given, just a story rattled off.

The evidence was in the archaeological research conducted over decades. The irony of the last sentence is overwhelming.

The state of the past is another thread. But, rather than spend a lot of time, let me give you the low down on that. There is no proof of a sams state past. That kills your case dead.

You have yet to explain how the past was different. There is no proof of a different state past. All the evidence can easily be explained using our "same state" science. Until you can provide evidence to the contrary, your case is deader.
 
Upvote 0

dad

Undefeated!
Site Supporter
Jan 17, 2005
44,905
1,259
✟25,524.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
False! The application of the spiritual on the physical, or spiritual added, if you will is what went down. In fact, if the universe was different pre flood, with a spiritual added component, that changes all laws, forces, light, and etc. The garden of Eden was not in this physical world. Not unless this universe was physical only back then!




So I guess the Rig Veda has as much authority as the Bible? It is a record of man as well...
Not all records are equal. But if the records are directly after the flood, or split, they would have significance. The one you speak of, is dated how??



You also have a biased interpretation based in your religious conviction. Bias is a part of science but scientists have to be intellectually honest. If a conclusion contradicts what you want you can't change the result.
Also being the key word there. I also do not claim my views are science based. Learn the difference they do!



Yes, Genesis does so! It states that the light was for signs for man. That means we had to see them! That means creation week. There are also many other differences there that cannot be reconciled to this state. Spirits that come here now are visitors. They are not marrying gals here at the moment.



For what? It is not ehat you use, it is how you use it.



What is The Milankovitch Theory?
So, what? Tell us the details, HOW the so called slow changes were calculated, what the so called slow changes were etc!!! The position of the solstices!??? Show us! What is the data? You will find it is a lark, by the way. But feel free to put it on the table. I need a laugh.


[quyote]What does The Milankovitch Theory say about future climate change?[/quote]

Who cares? What does the tooth fairy say?

Orbital changes occur over thousands of years,
Nope. I doubt it. I think the big change was right where the dodwell curve put it!


and the climate system may also take thousands of years to respond to orbital forcing.
Paleeeese. How much of this happened since Jesus?? Precisely? Show us. Don't just rattle on as if it were true.

The tooth fairy may also suggest that. So??? Same state theory suggests what it can, and is based on an unproven same state past. The suggestion is gibberish, and myth, unless backed by some fact.


The point is that any volcanic ash we find on earth will have the same structure and composition. It doesn't matter if it is 3 hours old or 200 million years old, it will still be identifiable as volcanic ash.

Great. Show us one 200 million years old!



Ash particle from Mount Saint Helens- 1980


Volcanic ash from the Rockland Ash Bed, California- 600,000 years ago.[/quote]​

Tell us, now, how do you think you know that this ash is 600,000 years old? <staff edit>​



The evidence was in the archaeological research conducted over decades. The irony of the last sentence is overwhelming.
And what is this evidence? What is the basis? Really.


You have yet to explain how the past was different. There is no proof of a different state past. All the evidence can easily be explained using our "same state" science. Until you can provide evidence to the contrary, your case is deader.
<staff edit> The spiritual. That is the difference.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Upvote 0

Hespera

Junior Member
Dec 16, 2008
7,237
201
usa
✟8,860.00
Faith
Buddhist
Marital Status
Private


Speaking as a "lurker" who has someone on ig, this particular dead horse doesnt need any more beating.
 
Upvote 0

dad

Undefeated!
Site Supporter
Jan 17, 2005
44,905
1,259
✟25,524.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Rockland ash....apparently near the San Andreas fault. If this area got hot around the time of the rapid continental move, it would appear to make sense. Not 400,000 imaginary years ago, bit more like a hundredth of that. The dating that I see on googled sites is same state decay dating. That means all we have is your story of the unknown past universe state to rely on. That means you got nothin. Work on that.
 
Upvote 0

gipsy

Newbie
Jan 23, 2009
271
6
✟59,773.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
I find it funny how everyone is trying to tell dad that he's wrong with his different state "theory".
Imho he's not really wrong, like I couldn't be proven wrong if I told you that all the universe together with everything in it was created by the allmighty FSM exactly 2.563 seconds ago.
I think the main point is that his "theory" is absolutely and completely irrelevant to actual science, because science is all about the observable facts and predictions based on these facts. If the facts of the current state "predict" a same state past and future than it's simple the (scientific) thruth.
Other states are not falsifiable, because the current state is of course not presenting any facts or even hints to these, otherwise the current state would have errors.
So I would say, perhaps dad is right, but it's not relevant for any kind of real "at the moment actual state" science ...
 
Upvote 0

dad

Undefeated!
Site Supporter
Jan 17, 2005
44,905
1,259
✟25,524.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
That does not include a far future or past, however, as all observations are in the here and now! Not unless you prove the state of the universe was or will be as you believe!


If the facts of the current state "predict" a same state past and future than it's simple the (scientific) thruth.

Nothing predicts a same state past or future, however. Not in science. If you claim it does prove it.

Other states are not falsifiable, because the current state is of course not presenting any facts or even hints to these, otherwise the current state would have errors.
Say what? The current state have errors? No. It is what it is. The errors are in assuming it was and will be what it is. Try to get a handle on what is when.


So I would say, perhaps dad is right, but it's not relevant for any kind of real "at the moment actual state" science ...
You have a major problem you haven't realized yet, however that negates all in your post. That is that a same state past is not falsifiable either!

You can line up with the tooth fairy now. Stand in awe, as the big boys of faith strut their observations, predictions, and evidences. So called science is a 5th rate player at the fable table.
 
Upvote 0

mpok1519

Veteran
Jul 8, 2007
11,508
347
✟36,350.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
but whats the point of believing such an insane theory?

other than to get beter meds?

believing such things will only leading you to believe other insane things, thus, afer a while, if you believe enough false, insane things, then by clinical definition yes, you are insane, and thus, are a danger to society, yourself, and others, and should be treated as such.
 
Upvote 0

GeneSplicer

Regular Member
Jan 2, 2004
239
6
Right Coast
Visit site
✟15,500.00
Faith
Atheist
Speaking as a "lurker" who has someone on ig, this particular dead horse doesnt need any more beating.

Which dead horse do you mean? That Dad's theory is pseudoscience or that he has made some rather disturbing and violent threats against others?

I&#8217;m sure everyone here who has read his posts and have debated Dad know the first, but I would be shocked to see that he posted his full split/merge snuff fantasy here.

If he has or has made other similar threats of killing non-Christians, then you are right, it is beating a dead horse.

If not, then at least you now know his full violent fantasy.
 
Upvote 0

dad

Undefeated!
Site Supporter
Jan 17, 2005
44,905
1,259
✟25,524.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
So now you label those that don't believe in a same state future you could never prove insane, and a danger to society. OK. I suppose if I had a nutball case I couldn't support I might call others names too. So called science, based on a dream state future and past is as nutball as anything could get. The zenith of idiocy.

Those that live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones at those living in houses built upon a rock. If there are any uncracked glass mirrors left in your house, next time you try to hit someone with the crazy stick, take a look in one.
 
Upvote 0

dad

Undefeated!
Site Supporter
Jan 17, 2005
44,905
1,259
✟25,524.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Yes God will take over one day. If you don't believe in God why obsess so over it??
 
Upvote 0

mpok1519

Veteran
Jul 8, 2007
11,508
347
✟36,350.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single

I'm not trying to be mean, but what I say is true! If you teach people and spread ideas as truth which are not, then its bad for impressionable ears to take what is false and believe to be true.

Oh wait....it can be the other way around....if people hear such insane theories for so long, they begin to look the other direction toward knowledge, truth and enlightenment, sure and positive of what can be observed, and thus be true. So, no, perhaps what you do is a good thing for society.


Those that live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones at those living in houses built upon a rock. If there are any uncracked glass mirrors left in your house, next time you try to hit someone with the crazy stick, take a look in one.

I don't need allegories to explain what I just explained.=)
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

dad

Undefeated!
Site Supporter
Jan 17, 2005
44,905
1,259
✟25,524.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
I'm not trying to be mean, but what I say is true! If you teach people and spread ideas as truth which are not, then its bad for impressionable ears to take what is false and believe to be true.
Right, that is what so called science does. By force of law. Mandatory worship.

Don't worry about it. What matters is what evidence is there for a same state past, that opposes the bible account, or a same state future? The answer is zero. Nada. None. You are not in a position to decide what is true. I think God is.


I don't need allegories to explain what I just explained.=)
No. Maybe a few to get anyone to understand, and a few more to get them to care?
 
Upvote 0

Hespera

Junior Member
Dec 16, 2008
7,237
201
usa
✟8,860.00
Faith
Buddhist
Marital Status
Private


I am aware that there are people who pray to god every day for a message that it is time to hunt down and kill people like me. They write books like The Turner Diaries. They post of the internet.

I dont think anyone here reading this thread believes his theories, or his denials of the things you brought up about his activities in other places.


Flogging his pseudoscience is i think, a bad idea to the extent that it gives an opportunity for him to post it again.
 
Reactions: GeneSplicer
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,210
52,660
Guam
✟5,153,482.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Correct me if I'm wrong, but if we interpret the Bible like you guys interpret It, we would be out looking for witches to burn, people to enslave, and genociding the rest?
 
Upvote 0

Hespera

Junior Member
Dec 16, 2008
7,237
201
usa
✟8,860.00
Faith
Buddhist
Marital Status
Private
Correct me if I'm wrong, but if we interpret the Bible like you guys interpret It, we would be out looking for witches to burn, people to enslave, and genociding the rest?

Glad to correct you.

There is no "you guys".

Everyone, Christian or otherwise, seems to interpret it differently. Do you agree with say, the 7th day adventists, mormons, jehovahs witnesses, menonites, catholics and methodists?

Im glad that Christianity has matured past the point when they did go out looking for witches to burn.

There are people who interpret the bible in a way that leads them to do things like pray for a sign to go out and kill me. You do know that is so.

As for how I personally interpret the bible, that depends on what part of it.
Some is fairly good history, some is poetry, some is wisdom, some is, well, stuff I totally dont believe.

So I guess Id say that if you interpret the Bible the way I do, you wont be spending much time trying to act on what it says. Especially things like the economic advice that Jesus gave, I dont think much of anyone tries to stick to that.
 
Upvote 0

Gracchus

Senior Veteran
Dec 21, 2002
7,199
821
California
Visit site
✟38,182.00
Faith
Pantheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
So I guess Id say that if you interpret the Bible the way I do, you wont be spending much time trying to act on what it says. Especially things like the economic advice that Jesus gave, I dont think much of anyone tries to stick to that.
Well, Gotama Buddha gave away kingdom and family.

Clinging to possessions gives rise to anxiety.

"Therefore I say unto you, Take no thought for your life, what ye shall eat, or what ye shall drink; nor yet for your body, what ye shall put on. Is not the life more than meat, and the body than raiment?" --- KJV Matthew 6:25

That is a very Buddhist attitude.

 
Upvote 0

Hespera

Junior Member
Dec 16, 2008
7,237
201
usa
✟8,860.00
Faith
Buddhist
Marital Status
Private

Oddly, it is hard to find any Chinese who take that economic advice either.

Believe me if my bf gave away the rent money he would find it gave rise to anxiety or worse, when i found out.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.