3 Undeniable Evidence that Noah's Flood was Real!

[hiwaystar]

''Noah's Flood is mythology!!'' ''Fossils disprove the Flood!'' ''A loving God wouldn't drown everyone!''

We true Christians know that the Flood was real, since we read the Bible. However, we've definitely heard evolutionists and atheists uttering those statements at some point in our lives.

We can't change their minds using the Bible, since they don't even accept the Bible in the first place. However, we can still prove Noah's Flood using science and knowledge, and stop those evolutionists from spreading wishy-washy ''theories'' once and for all!

Here are three undeniable, unarguable, undisprovable scientific evidence that Noah's Flood was a real event!

1. The layers of the fossil record.

Any geologist would tell you that the fossil record is divided into layers--primitive fossils (trilobites, sponges, etc) at the bottom, complex fossils (dinosaurs, humans, etc) at the top.

Isn't this exactly what we should expect if there were a global flood? Complex animals had a greater chance of fleeing to higher lands, while primitive life got stuck in their habitats. That explains the layers perfectly!

At this point, evolutionists would cry, ''but that's evidence for primitive life evolving into complex life over time!'' I feel sorry for them. Always making up ad hoc fairy tales to atone for their lack of understanding of the Bible.

2. Worldwide flood myths.

Every single culture that ever existed has a flood myth--be it the Sumerians, Mayans, Chinese, the godly ones, the ungodly ones--no exception!

''But it's just coincidence!'' Yells the evolutionists. Guess what, if you ever studied geology, you'll know that continental floods rarely happen. To say that it was pure chance that every continent experienced massive floods at the same time is straight out LYING.

3. Remains of the Ark.

Last but not least, we've even discovered the actual remains of Noah's Ark! Countless pictures have shown a ship-like object resting in the Ararat mountains--now that's some solid evidence!

''Those are hoaxes!'' Cries the evolutionists. Ironically, they always claim that they ''believe in evidence'' and accuse us of blind faith. Guess what, they don't even know what they're talking about. All they want to do is just deny, deny and deny; so that they can continue to reject the Truth of God.

Let this be a warning to all of you evolutionists and atheists: when that day arrives and you meet God face-to-face, you WILL have to explain all the decisions you made, and God WILL punish you for them! Just like how He punished the people of Noah's time!

That's all for today. Amen and God bless America.

 

[RaymondG]

Your evidence is very shaky, and would not hold to one who practices to debate and has an abundance of mans wisdom.

Why not, instead, show them the power of God? Go and heal the sick among them, and let them know the one whom gives you this power. I think this will go much further than pointing them to the myths of other religions.

 

[DW1980]

''Noah's Flood is mythology!!'' ''Fossils disprove the Flood!'' ''A loving God wouldn't drown everyone!''

We true Christians know that the Flood was real, since we read the Bible. However, we've definitely heard evolutionists and atheists uttering those statements at some point in our lives.

We can't change their minds using the Bible, since they don't even accept the Bible in the first place. However, we can still prove Noah's Flood using science and knowledge, and stop those evolutionists from spreading wishy-washy ''theories'' once and for all!

Here are three undeniable, unarguable, undisprovable scientific evidence that Noah's Flood was a real event!

1. The layers of the fossil record.

Any geologist would tell you that the fossil record is divided into layers--primitive fossils (trilobites, sponges, etc) at the bottom, complex fossils (dinosaurs, humans, etc) at the top.

Isn't this exactly what we should expect if there were a global flood? Complex animals had a greater chance of fleeing to higher lands, while primitive life got stuck in their habitats. That explains the layers perfectly!

At this point, evolutionists would cry, ''but that's evidence for primitive life evolving into complex life over time!'' I feel sorry for them. Always making up ad hoc fairy tales to atone for their lack of understanding of the Bible.

2. Worldwide flood myths.

Every single culture that ever existed has a flood myth--be it the Sumerians, Mayans, Chinese, the godly ones, the ungodly ones--no exception!

''But it's just coincidence!'' Yells the evolutionists. Guess what, if you ever studied geology, you'll know that continental floods rarely happen. To say that it was pure chance that every continent experienced massive floods at the same time is straight out LYING.

3. Remains of the Ark.

Last but not least, we've even discovered the actual remains of Noah's Ark! Countless pictures have shown a ship-like object resting in the Ararat mountains--now that's some solid evidence!

''Those are hoaxes!'' Cries the evolutionists. Ironically, they always claim that they ''believe in evidence'' and accuse us of blind faith. Guess what, they don't even know what they're talking about. All they want to do is just deny, deny and deny; so that they can continue to reject the Truth of God.

Let this be a warning to all of you evolutionists and atheists: when that day arrives and you meet God face-to-face, you WILL have to explain all the decisions you made, and God WILL punish you for them! Just like how He punished the people of Noah's time!

That's all for today. Amen and God bless America.

Erm... Noah's Ark has not been found - and even major creationist organisations rubbish that claim, such as Creation Ministries International who publish Creation Magazine.
Has the Ark of the Covenant been found? - creation.com
Special report: Amazing 'Ark' exposé - creation.com

 

[archer75]

Indeed. No remnant of the Ark has ever been found. Such claims are always unsourced or outright fabrications.

In my opinion, it is...not any kind of bolster to faith to claim that this or that trivial (and often counter-factual) observable thing "proves" the Bible or the faith or...anything. YMMV.

 

[Petros2015]

Last but not least, we've even discovered the actual remains of Noah's Ark! Countless pictures have shown a ship-like object resting in the Ararat mountains--now that's some solid evidence!

Is it? I don't think you've discovered the actual remains of Noah's Ark. Sounds like solid poo-poo.

 

[com7fy8]

Last but not least, we've even discovered the actual remains of Noah's Ark! Countless pictures have shown a ship-like object resting in the Ararat mountains--now that's some solid evidence!

''Those are hoaxes!'' Cries the evolutionists.

(1) Noah's Ark landed on the mountain. And Noah made sacrifice to the LORD. I would say he used wood for the fire. He either brought wood or used wood from the structure of the Ark. This would use up wood. Also, he could have used structural wood of the ark for later sacrifices and for building things which needed wood for building them. Possibly, after some time, the Ark's wood got used up . . . if that would . . . I mean, wood . . . was used by Noah and others.

So, I can't guarantee you that the Ark is still on the mountain in Turkey. And we do not need to make things up, in order to try to protect God. I suspect there are people who are wishfully believing there is an Ark there, though it has not been openly and publicly proven.

(2) By now, I would think, someone wood . . . I mean, would, sorry . . . have parachuted in or climbed up on the sly to see what is really there. But . . . who could be sure about the person's report?? There are motives for finding the Ark or proving it is not there. And I am not God to know what God knows. He could tell me, of course.

(3) But faith works "through love" (Galatians 5:6), not through outward proof, including trying to protect God.

(4) About "Arks" being "hoaxes" > the claims might be hoaxes, but the objects sighted might just be there for no reason, but the hoax can be how people try to fool us into interpreting them. So, in some way, they might not be hoaxes, at all; but ones might want to think so, so they can accuse Christians of hoaxing. So, ones might be wishful that the objects are the Ark, while others are wishing they are hoaxes so they can cast doubt on people claiming to be Christians.

Where might our attention belong??? May we trust God to personally guide our attention, all the time with Him

 

[Job 33:6]

''Noah's Flood is mythology!!'' ''Fossils disprove the Flood!'' ''A loving God wouldn't drown everyone!''

We true Christians know that the Flood was real, since we read the Bible. However, we've definitely heard evolutionists and atheists uttering those statements at some point in our lives.

We can't change their minds using the Bible, since they don't even accept the Bible in the first place. However, we can still prove Noah's Flood using science and knowledge, and stop those evolutionists from spreading wishy-washy ''theories'' once and for all!

Here are three undeniable, unarguable, undisprovable scientific evidence that Noah's Flood was a real event!

1. The layers of the fossil record.

Any geologist would tell you that the fossil record is divided into layers--primitive fossils (trilobites, sponges, etc) at the bottom, complex fossils (dinosaurs, humans, etc) at the top.

Isn't this exactly what we should expect if there were a global flood? Complex animals had a greater chance of fleeing to higher lands, while primitive life got stuck in their habitats. That explains the layers perfectly!

At this point, evolutionists would cry, ''but that's evidence for primitive life evolving into complex life over time!'' I feel sorry for them. Always making up ad hoc fairy tales to atone for their lack of understanding of the Bible.


That's all for today. Amen and God bless America.

Older layers also have more primitive plants, while younger layers have more highly derived plants.

For example, vascular plants appear after non vascular. Flowers and seeds do not appear until later in time.

Did vascular plants out run non vascular plants?

The cenozoic also has giant sloths. Did giant sloths outrun pterodactyls and raptors?

This post must be just sarcasm.