Interplanner
Newbie
Yet he is to be preached as the ascended Lord now who is entitled to everything on earth. That's why Acts 24:25 was as subversive as it was.
The NT specifically chose vocab that would conflict with Roman state theology, as well as Judaism. It does not recur to the future to resolve things. This never shows up in any of the live, real time exchanges in Acts; obviously I Cor 15 is making a point that the form of the kingdom now is less than will be then. But it is not absent now, and it is to be proclaimed a certain way.
The phrase gospel of the kingdom is not genetive but possessive (these are standard grammatical categories in the lexicons). Meaning the content of the Gospel is not that the kingdom is here, but that the Gospel belongs to and energizes the kingdom. In the same sense, the kingdom is not one where you say 'here it is' or 'there it is' like the temple operations of Judaism, but 'it is at work among you.'
The NT specifically chose vocab that would conflict with Roman state theology, as well as Judaism. It does not recur to the future to resolve things. This never shows up in any of the live, real time exchanges in Acts; obviously I Cor 15 is making a point that the form of the kingdom now is less than will be then. But it is not absent now, and it is to be proclaimed a certain way.
The phrase gospel of the kingdom is not genetive but possessive (these are standard grammatical categories in the lexicons). Meaning the content of the Gospel is not that the kingdom is here, but that the Gospel belongs to and energizes the kingdom. In the same sense, the kingdom is not one where you say 'here it is' or 'there it is' like the temple operations of Judaism, but 'it is at work among you.'
Upvote
0