This has been falsified and some people include it in the hall of shame. If your going to try to present evidence then you should avoided evidence that has been shown to be wrong. Haeckel's Embryos simple could not stand up to scrutiny.
They used Haeckel's "embellished" drawing as evidence. Did you click on the link?Haeckel embellished his drawings
They used Haeckel's "embellished" drawing as evidence. Did you click on the link?
The only way someone in American can be scientifically illiterate is if they do not have a high school degree. Because you are required to be tested in science in order to get your degree. These tests are a big deal for the school system and they try to get as high of scores as they can in comparison to the scores other schools get in other communities.
This has been falsified and some people include it in the hall of shame. If your going to try to present evidence then you should avoided evidence that has been shown to be wrong. Haeckel's Embryos simple could not stand up to scrutiny.
That is the statement from that web site. The Bible uses the word Living Water.
But what the web site means is that you should not use stagnate water. Do you really need me to explain why we should not wash out clothing in stagnate water?
Water needs fresh water in and a place where water drains off. The Dead Sea is dead because there is no supply of fresh water. The water then becomes stagnate.
The word here is "living" water. Lev 15:13b "wash his clothes, and bathe his flesh in running water, and shall be clean." Jesus talks about: " the water I give them will become in them a spring of water welling up to eternal life." Esp we are in the book of Leviticus. This is a book of instruction for those who want to enter into the priesthood. So there is a lot of spiritual meaning in this in addition to what Science can confirm about the water we need to use to wash our clothing (and spiritual water to cleanse or flesh).But this does not answer my original question. What evidence is there that for centuries people naively washed their clothes in standing water? By the way, the Bible doesn't explain why one should use running water to wash.
I seldom use creationists sites but this link does offer Scientific Evidence to show the Bible is accurate and true. So the atheists can try to go through and falsify all 101 points or they can come up with evidence to falsify the Bible. For now the score is 101 to 0 and the ball is in the court of the atheists to offer evidence that the Bible is not 100% accurate and true. We know that God watches over His Word to Perform and to do what He says He is going to do. Jeremiah 1:12 We know that God's Word does not fail and that God always accomplishes His plan and purpose.
"God is not human, that he should lie, not a human being, that he should change his mind. Does he speak and then not act? Does he promise and not fulfill?" Num23:19
"So shall my word be that goeth forth out of my mouth: it shall not return unto me void, but it shall accomplish that which I please, and it shall prosper in the thing whereto I sent it." Isa 55:11
55:11 So shall my word be that goeth forth out of my mouth: it shall not return unto me void, but it shall accomplish that which I please, and it shall prosper in the thing whereto I sent it.
The BLUE words are the Hebrew words that we find in our Bible. So there are only 9 words in this verse in the Hebrew Bible. Nine is the last of the digits, and thus marks the end; and is significant of the conclusion of a matter.
http://www.eternal-productions.org/101science.html
1. 'The earth free-floats in space (Job 26:7), affected only by gravity. While other sources declared the earth sat on the back of an elephant or turtle, or was held up by Atlas, the Bible alone states what we now know to be true - "He hangs the earth on nothing".
7. There are mountains on the bottom of the ocean floor (Jonah 2:5-6). Only in the last century have we discovered that there are towering mountains and deep trenches in the depths of the sea.
The word here is "living" water. Lev 15:13b "wash his clothes, and bathe his flesh in running water, and shall be clean." Jesus talks about: " the water I give them will become in them a spring of water welling up to eternal life." Esp we are in the book of Leviticus. This is a book of instruction for those who want to enter into the priesthood. So there is a lot of spiritual meaning in this in addition to what Science can confirm about the water we need to use to wash our clothing (and spiritual water to cleanse or flesh).
02416 // yx // chay // khah'-ee //
from 02421 ; TWOT - 644a
AV - live 197, life 144, beast 76, alive 31, creature 15, running 7,
living thing 6, raw 6, misc 19; 501
adj
1) living, alive
1a) green (of vegetation)
1b) flowing, fresh (of water)
1c) lively, active (of man)
1d) reviving (of the springtime)
n m
2) relatives
3) life (abstract emphatic)
3a) life
3b) sustenance, maintenance
n f
4) living thing, animal
4a) animal
4b) life
4c) appetite
4d) revival, renewal
5) community
What is the use if people are going to be ignorant of the point and purpose? If you do not want to believe then don't beleive. But at least make an attempt to understand just what it is that you do not accept, endorse or believe in. I get a little tired of dealing with strawmen arguments.You are getting off the point. Your link is enumerating 'scientific facts in the Bible', and describing the importance of washing in running rather than stagnant water, not explaining the spiritual meaning of the book of Leviticus.
Moses and Abraham were highly educated and trained. The city of Ur at the time Abraham lived there had an extremely advanced school system. I never though about how well educated Job was because we do not know that much about him. So what your saying is interesting. He had a lot of kids so it is good that he was able to provide them with a top rated education in his time and day.It is more interesting that at the same time that the book of Job was written (6th century BC), Pythagorean and Babylonian speculations about the shape and location of the earth were developing that were very similar to the interpretation that your website puts on Job 26:7. According to Christine Garwood, in Flat Earth: The History of an Infamous Idea (pages 18-20), Pythagoras (582-500 BC) and his followers 'believed that the earth was a globe freely floating in space because the sphere was the perfect shape.' Perhaps the author of Job picked up the same ideas as Pythagoras at about the same time.
What is the use if people are going to be ignorant of the point and purpose? If you do not want to believe then don't beleive. But at least make an attempt to understand just what it is that you do not accept, endorse or believe in. I get a little tired of dealing with strawmen arguments.
This is not my first rodeo. I did not just get off the boat.I don't think you understand what is meant by a straw-man.
"The median annual Speech Writer salary is $121,533, as of June 24, 2016, with a range usually between $99,569-$155,512" Favreau, now President Obama's head speechwriter, takes home an annual salary of $172,200, equal to that of the president's Chief of Staff. wikiWords are cheap.
"The median annual Speech Writer salary is $121,533, as of June 24, 2016, with a range usually between $99,569-$155,512" Favreau, now President Obama's head speechwriter, takes home an annual salary of $172,200, equal to that of the president's Chief of Staff. wiki
How do you reconcile your understanding that: "words are cheap" when J.K. Rowling has made over a Billion dollars from her use of words. The entire franchise was estimated to be worth more than $24 billion in 2014, according to IMDB and Scholastic Children's Books. Sounds like more then chump change to me.
Can you predict the outcome of the presidential election based on this hypothesis?Words typed that don't match with behavior, are meaningless and people tend to catch on to this pretty quick.
That is today's lesson.
I seldom use creationists sites but this link does offer Scientific Evidence to show the Bible is accurate and true. So the atheists can try to go through and falsify all 101 points or they can come up with evidence to falsify the Bible. For now the score is 101 to 0 and the ball is in the court of the atheists to offer evidence that the Bible is not 100% accurate and true. We know that God watches over His Word to Perform and to do what He says He is going to do. Jeremiah 1:12 We know that God's Word does not fail and that God always accomplishes His plan and purpose.
"God is not human, that he should lie, not a human being, that he should change his mind. Does he speak and then not act? Does he promise and not fulfill?" Num23:19
"So shall my word be that goeth forth out of my mouth: it shall not return unto me void, but it shall accomplish that which I please, and it shall prosper in the thing whereto I sent it." Isa 55:11
55:11 So shall my word be that goeth forth out of my mouth: it shall not return unto me void, but it shall accomplish that which I please, and it shall prosper in the thing whereto I sent it.
The BLUE words are the Hebrew words that we find in our Bible. So there are only 9 words in this verse in the Hebrew Bible. Nine is the last of the digits, and thus marks the end; and is significant of the conclusion of a matter.
http://www.eternal-productions.org/101science.html
There are only nine words in the Hebrew Bible. Here is the link you can look up that verse and check it out for yourself. http://www.apostolic-churches.net/bible/strongs/isaiah_55.shtmlTwo problems. First, the verse has 19 words in Hebrew, not 9 words.
Second, 9 is not the last number in Hebrew represented by a single digit. 400 is.
There are only nine words in the Hebrew Bible. Here is the link you can look up that verse and check it out for yourself. http://www.apostolic-churches.net/bible/strongs/isaiah_55.shtml
All the numbers have a meaning and nine is no different.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?