“That’s Their Problem”: How Jared Kushner Let the Markets Decide America’s COVID-19 Fate

essentialsaltes

Stranger in a Strange Land
Oct 17, 2011
33,270
36,591
Los Angeles Area
✟829,962.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)
I've noted several times that the national strategy for a response to COVID-19 coming from the Trump Administration has largely been 'You're on your own.' 1 2 3

The author of the Vanity Fair piece in the first link above has provided more internal details from some of these meetings with Kushner.

First-person accounts of a tense meeting at the White House in late March suggest that President Trump’s son-in-law resisted taking federal action to alleviate shortages and help Democratic-led New York. Instead, he enlisted a former roommate to lead a Consultant State to take on the Deep State, with results ranging from the Eastman Kodak fiasco to a mysterious deal to send ventilators to Russia.

Kushner, seated at the head of the conference table, in a chair taller than all the others, was quick to strike a confrontational tone. “The federal government is not going to lead this response,” he announced. “It’s up to the states to figure out what they want to do.”

One attendee explained to Kushner that due to the finite supply of PPE, Americans were bidding against each other and driving prices up. To solve that, businesses eager to help were looking to the federal government for leadership and direction.

Free markets will solve this,” Kushner said dismissively. “That is not the role of government.”

In a bidding war without federal guidance, “everyone is going to overbuy and overpay. That is the definition of the tragedy of the commons. Everyone accidentally creates a worse outcome for everybody.”

“We had so much potential to commandeer against this,” said one person who attended the meeting. “We had a real system for contact tracing, the world’s best mobile engineers on standby. There was a real opportunity to have a coordinated response.”

That attendee said he remains “angry” over the federal government’s intransigence in stockpiling supplies and feels certain that people died because of it. “At the time I just thought of it as blind capitalism and extreme libertarian ideals gone wrong,” he said. “In hindsight it’s not crazy to think it was some purposeful belief that it was okay if Cuomo had a tough go of it because [New York] was a blue state.”

One public health expert in frequent contact with the White House’s official coronavirus task force said a national plan likely fell out of favor in part because of a disturbingly cynical calculation: “The political folks believed that because [the virus] was going to be relegated to Democratic states, that they could blame those governors, and that would be an effective political strategy.

The story struck a nerve, partly because it painted a picture of what might have been: The administration could have invested in a national testing system at a scale that could have greatly limited the number of cases and deaths. Instead the U.S. is on track to pass the grim milestone of 200,000 official COVID-19 deaths this month. With just 4% of the world’s population, we now account for 20% of global deaths from the virus.

“What you have going on here is smoke and mirrors,” said Larry Hall, who retired last year as director of the Defense Production Act program division at FEMA. “You do not have a national strategy.”
 

Ana the Ist

Aggressively serene!
Feb 21, 2012
37,579
11,396
✟437,402.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
I've noted several times that the national strategy for a response to COVID-19 coming from the Trump Administration has largely been 'You're on your own.' 1 2 3

The author of the Vanity Fair piece in the first link above has provided more internal details from some of these meetings with Kushner.

First-person accounts of a tense meeting at the White House in late March suggest that President Trump’s son-in-law resisted taking federal action to alleviate shortages and help Democratic-led New York. Instead, he enlisted a former roommate to lead a Consultant State to take on the Deep State, with results ranging from the Eastman Kodak fiasco to a mysterious deal to send ventilators to Russia.

Kushner, seated at the head of the conference table, in a chair taller than all the others, was quick to strike a confrontational tone. “The federal government is not going to lead this response,” he announced. “It’s up to the states to figure out what they want to do.”

One attendee explained to Kushner that due to the finite supply of PPE, Americans were bidding against each other and driving prices up. To solve that, businesses eager to help were looking to the federal government for leadership and direction.

Free markets will solve this,” Kushner said dismissively. “That is not the role of government.”

In a bidding war without federal guidance, “everyone is going to overbuy and overpay. That is the definition of the tragedy of the commons. Everyone accidentally creates a worse outcome for everybody.”

“We had so much potential to commandeer against this,” said one person who attended the meeting. “We had a real system for contact tracing, the world’s best mobile engineers on standby. There was a real opportunity to have a coordinated response.”

That attendee said he remains “angry” over the federal government’s intransigence in stockpiling supplies and feels certain that people died because of it. “At the time I just thought of it as blind capitalism and extreme libertarian ideals gone wrong,” he said. “In hindsight it’s not crazy to think it was some purposeful belief that it was okay if Cuomo had a tough go of it because [New York] was a blue state.”

One public health expert in frequent contact with the White House’s official coronavirus task force said a national plan likely fell out of favor in part because of a disturbingly cynical calculation: “The political folks believed that because [the virus] was going to be relegated to Democratic states, that they could blame those governors, and that would be an effective political strategy.

The story struck a nerve, partly because it painted a picture of what might have been: The administration could have invested in a national testing system at a scale that could have greatly limited the number of cases and deaths. Instead the U.S. is on track to pass the grim milestone of 200,000 official COVID-19 deaths this month. With just 4% of the world’s population, we now account for 20% of global deaths from the virus.

“What you have going on here is smoke and mirrors,” said Larry Hall, who retired last year as director of the Defense Production Act program division at FEMA. “You do not have a national strategy.”

Contact tracing was never going to work because wherever the virus peaked....wait times for results were anywhere from 1-2 weeks.

It's a pointless exercise to ask people to explain who they were in contact with 2 weeks ago. The CDC flubbed the testing at the start...but yeah, I agree that the PPE issue was poorly handled.
 
Upvote 0

SimplyMe

Senior Veteran
Jul 19, 2003
9,719
9,443
the Great Basin
✟330,073.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
It's worth noting that not only having the states bid against each other make the prices higher, then the Federal government would step in after a state had won, outbid them, and commandeered the shipment as part of their "federal priority." States literally had to make a deal and send planes to pick them up before the government could "commandeer" the shipment, much like Massachusetts ended up doing with the NE Patriot's jet.
 
Upvote 0

essentialsaltes

Stranger in a Strange Land
Oct 17, 2011
33,270
36,591
Los Angeles Area
✟829,962.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)
I've noted several times that the national strategy for a response to COVID-19 coming from the Trump Administration has largely been 'You're on your own.' 1 2 3

At last! Probably too late to save his presidency, but here's what we've been asking for the whole time.

www.trumpcovidplan.com
 
Upvote 0

CitizenD

Well-Known Member
Jul 19, 2017
915
1,431
44
San Francisco
✟100,555.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Contact tracing was never going to work because wherever the virus peaked....wait times for results were anywhere from 1-2 weeks.

It's a pointless exercise to ask people to explain who they were in contact with 2 weeks ago. The CDC flubbed the testing at the start...but yeah, I agree that the PPE issue was poorly handled.

What a surprise that by the time it has exploded, contact tracing is too late.

It's almost as if the whole concept of contact tracing is focus resources on the small number of initial cases that kick off an epidemic.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Triumvirate
Upvote 0

Ana the Ist

Aggressively serene!
Feb 21, 2012
37,579
11,396
✟437,402.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
What a surprise that by the time it has exploded, contact tracing is too late.

It's almost as if the whole concept of contact tracing is focus resources on the small number of initial cases that kick off an epidemic.

You don't need to be symptomatic to spread it....and many who are symptomatic aren't going to suspect they have covid.

How exactly do you imagine doctors would focus on that small group of initial cases? Magic? Psychic powers? There's no way to know who they are until after the first severe cases emerge....and by then it's too late for contact tracing.
 
Upvote 0

Tanj

Redefined comfortable middle class
Mar 31, 2017
7,682
8,316
59
Australia
✟277,286.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
How exactly do you imagine doctors would focus on that small group of initial cases? Magic? Psychic powers? There's no way to know who they are until after the first severe cases emerge....and by then it's too late for contact tracing.

South Korea, Singapore, Australia and Taiwan amongst others beg to differ.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

essentialsaltes

Stranger in a Strange Land
Oct 17, 2011
33,270
36,591
Los Angeles Area
✟829,962.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)
I've noted several times that the national strategy for a response to COVID-19 coming from the Trump Administration has largely been 'You're on your own.' 1 2 3

The author of the Vanity Fair piece in the first link above has provided more internal details from some of these meetings with Kushner.

The story struck a nerve, partly because it painted a picture of what might have been: The administration could have invested in a national testing system at a scale that could have greatly limited the number of cases and deaths. Instead the U.S. is on track to pass the grim milestone of 200,000 official COVID-19 deaths this month. With just 4% of the world’s population, we now account for 20% of global deaths from the virus.

“What you have going on here is smoke and mirrors,” said Larry Hall, who retired last year as director of the Defense Production Act program division at FEMA. “You do not have a national strategy.”

Dr. Birx says Trump White House prioritized election over COVID-19 response

Birx said the [Trump] administration's resistance to promoting basic public health mitigation resulted in more than 100,000 avoidable deaths. She said former President Trump did not do everything he could to try to stop the spread of the virus and save lives.

"I believe if we had fully implemented the mask mandates, the reduction in indoor dining, the getting friends and family to understand the risk of gathering in private homes, and we had increased testing, that we probably could have decreased fatalities into the 30 percent less to 40 percent less range," Birx said.

Administration officials were not present at the White House, and nobody was holding consistent COVID-19 meetings, Birx said. Instead, they were traveling across the country to campaign.
 
Upvote 0

probinson

Legend
Aug 16, 2005
22,326
2,955
46
PA
Visit site
✟135,418.00
Country
United States
Faith
Word of Faith
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
"I believe if we had fully implemented the mask mandates, the reduction in indoor dining, the getting friends and family to understand the risk of gathering in private homes, and we had increased testing, that we probably could have decreased fatalities into the 30 percent less to 40 percent less range," Birx said.

I'm sorry... is this the same Dr. Birx that "...travelled from Washington to one of her other properties, on Fenwick Island in Delaware, where she was joined by three generations of her family from two households...", right after she told everyone that they should restrict their Thanksgiving gatherings to their immediate households? Is she saying if she'd followed her own advice, she could have prevented some of these deaths?

Dr Deborah Birx: White House virus expert quits over holiday travel
 
Upvote 0

essentialsaltes

Stranger in a Strange Land
Oct 17, 2011
33,270
36,591
Los Angeles Area
✟829,962.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)
I'm sorry... is this the same Dr. Birx

I can't help who Trump put in charge of things. But those people have insight into how Trump ran things.
 
Upvote 0