We have the following verse from the bible.
1 Peter 2
13 Submit yourselves for the Lord's sake to every human institution, whether to a king as the one in authority.
Firstly, as a Christian, can we object to what a government is doing? If I were to live in a nation with a rabid anti-Christian mandate, would it be immoral to participate in activites meant to bring in a new, perhaps better government?
Secondly, this verse seems tailor-made to ensure that peasants and serfs did not question the horrible conditions in which they lived their lives, and to allow the "nobility" to live in luxury at the expense of the people. How likely is it that such a thing was added by those in power to ensure that they stayed in power?
Thanks.
1 Peter 2
13 Submit yourselves for the Lord's sake to every human institution, whether to a king as the one in authority.
Firstly, as a Christian, can we object to what a government is doing? If I were to live in a nation with a rabid anti-Christian mandate, would it be immoral to participate in activites meant to bring in a new, perhaps better government?
Secondly, this verse seems tailor-made to ensure that peasants and serfs did not question the horrible conditions in which they lived their lives, and to allow the "nobility" to live in luxury at the expense of the people. How likely is it that such a thing was added by those in power to ensure that they stayed in power?
Thanks.