- Aug 3, 2012
- 31,856
- 31,420
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Democrat
Upvote
0
-
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
-
CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
Hey! Let's take a look at Twitter these days
- Thread starter rambot
- Start date
Hans Blaster
Returning from Wilusa
- Mar 11, 2017
- 26,535
- 19,008
- 56
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- Private
- Politics
- US-Democrat
Tesla doesn't seem to have much growth room. (It was already overvalued before their sales dropped.) Twitter is worth a couple billion. Don't know about "xAI".
Upvote
0
essentialsaltes
Fact-Based Lifeform
- Oct 17, 2011
- 49,311
- 51,609
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- Legal Union (Other)
Elon Musk’s company sues Minnesota over new law to bar manipulated images to fake nudity
Attorneys for the company say, if enacted, the law would significantly abridge Grok and Grok Imagine users’ First Amendment rights.“Although Minnesota likely has a compelling interest in preventing individuals from creating nudes of other people without consent and distributing that content, the statute punishes AI platforms for assisting in the creation of a substantial amount of protected speech in relation to that limited goal,” the company wrote.
Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison, who is named as a defendant in the lawsuit, posted on X that he was prepared to defend the law.
“Using AI to generate nude images of people against their will is appalling. There are plenty of worthy debates to have about AI. This is not one of them. AI nudification robs the target of their dignity and could cause them immense harm on many levels,” Ellison wrote. “I'll see X in court.”
The House sponsor of the law, DFL Rep. Jess Hanson of Burnsville, said the pushback didn’t come as a surprise but she hoped that the companies would abide by the law.
“They're kind of being like, ‘Well, it's not our fault what people choose to do,’ but at the same time, you're providing the tool, right?” she said. “And there's no constitutional protection for providing a tool like that.” <-- this could be an interesting/arguable point.
Hanson said that AI tools are some of the most prevalent ways in which child pornography is being made and said companies should be working in conjunction with laws trying to stop it.
Upvote
0
- Jun 13, 2015
- 10,560
- 10,141
- 49
- Country
- United Kingdom
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- Single
Upvote
0
Similar threads
