• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Why to believe in god

Lost4words

Jesus I Trust In You
Site Supporter
May 19, 2018
12,022
12,763
South Wales, UK
✟1,366,916.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
You're right that the Councils of Rome (382), Hippo (393), and Carthage (397) listed the Deuterocanonical books, and that Trent reaffirmed that canon in 1546. I don't dispute those historical facts.

Where I think we differ is in what those councils actually did.

From the Protestant perspective, the Church did not create the canon; it recognized the books that God had inspired. The authority of Scripture comes from God, not from a church council.
Also, it's not quite accurate to say Martin Luther "removed" the books. Luther's German Bible still contained the Apocrypha in a separate section, and so did the original 1611 King James Bible. He regarded them as useful to read but not as equal to Scripture.

It's also worth noting that there wasn't universal agreement in the early Church about the Deuterocanonical books. Jerome, the translator of the Latin Vulgate, argued that the Old Testament should follow the Hebrew canon, even though he translated the additional books. So, the debate existed long before the Reformation.

Once again, the real question isn't whether a church council listed certain books. The question is: Which books did God inspire? That's the issue Protestants and Catholics answer differently.
A non argumentative reply. I like that.

God bless you my friend.....
 
Upvote 0

Valletta

Well-Known Member
Oct 10, 2020
14,710
6,325
Minnesota
✟399,933.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
A non argumentative reply. I like that.

God bless you my friend.....

I understand. In fact Protestants don't believe that authority, as per the Bible, was granted to the Catholic Church. Thus it is no surprise to hear Protestant scholars claim that "that council didn't have authority" or "it wasn't decided upon until Trent." Realize that those 73 books decided upon in the late 300s were used at masses for readings over the next one thousand years or so before Protestants came up with their own canon. Before that, in the earliest centuries, there were differences at what was used at mass from region to region. The books of the Bible are the liturgical books of the Catholic Church. The last NT book accepted for the Catholic canon was Revelation. Luther tried to get that and other books removed from the Protestant canon. Also know that that every Bible in Europe during those thousand years was a 73 book Bible. When Protestants produced their own version it was decided that a strong formal statement should be made at Trent. In fact councils are often called because there are challenges to Church teaching that have gained momentum.

God Bless.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

fhansen

Oldbie
Sep 3, 2011
17,252
4,309
✟434,061.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
I do not believe in a creator because of the bible, I could argue the inconsitencies in the bible and every other religion but that is just a waist of time. I believe because the Universe and the earth are far to complex to have come about by chance.

the universe holds mysteries that go beyond human reason and scientific understanding

So I believe in God or a creator because to not believe is just ignorant
That's one very good reason for believing, or at least a good motivation or support for belief. The Christian faith fills in the gaps giving us both the reason and the grace to believe in a particularly good and loving God, one truly worth believing in, hoping in, and loving-one that not only brought the universe into existence, but makes it worth our existing in...eternally.
 
Upvote 0

fhansen

Oldbie
Sep 3, 2011
17,252
4,309
✟434,061.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
The books of the New Testament were already being widely recognized and read as Scripture long before AD 325. Later church councils listed the books that Christians had already accepted; they didn't invent the canon.
And yet those who accepted them were also the church. The very early churches relied heavily on oral teachings while writings, some inspired and others not, circulated among them, with no church having the complete new testament as later assembled into canon. The councils were simply that same church speaking in unified manner-and that also involved excluding certain previously accepted writings in some cases.

Either way, the new testament certainly didn't float fully formed down from heaven. God used people-to write it-and others to determine the canonicity of those writings
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

fhansen

Oldbie
Sep 3, 2011
17,252
4,309
✟434,061.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Nonsense. Protestants did not remove any books from scripture but merely relegated the deuterocanonical books to their own section just as Jerome did in the first editions of the vulgate. If you look at the first printings of the KJV you will find the deuterocanonical books included.
How come they're not included in present Protestant bibles, then?
 
Upvote 0

Hentenza

I will fear no evil for You are with me
Site Supporter
Mar 27, 2007
40,638
7,497
On the bus to Heaven
✟349,497.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
How come they're not included in present Protestant bibles, then?
You can get them with or without to this day. In 1826 the British and Foreign Bible Society made the definitive decision to stop printing and circulating Bibles that included the deuterocanonical books. This resulted in Protestant publishers in both Europe and the United States to remove the books entirely from standard printings.
 
Upvote 0

linux.poet

Love does not insist on its own way
Christian Forums Staff
Purple Team - Moderator
Angels Team
CF Senior Ambassador
Site Supporter
Apr 25, 2022
7,830
2,977
Poway
✟541,080.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Republican

MOD HAT ON

This thread has had a cleanup to remove some Disruptive Behavior.​


If you feel the need to discuss your friend’s ban from the CF, the place to do is a support ticket with the admins, not on the open forum.​

MOD HAT OFF

 
Upvote 0