Stopped_lurking
Well-Known Member
- Jan 12, 2004
- 1,659
- 651
- Country
- Sweden
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Agnostic
- Marital Status
- Private
You're just making me repeat myself. It's what I already said. I've heard all you're saying by several people in many threads over the last 10 years or more. And after all that repeated info, my conclusion is what I've already stated. I don't buy into most of it.
Yes, and people wonder about how you came to have that opinion. How was your reasoning? What data have you included?
Only about 3% of the Earth's surface is covered by cities and industry. I don't believe that 3% is affecting the rest of the 97% all that significantly. I think it's mostly the cycles of climate change the earth itself has generated over the last 4000 years.
Who, but you, propose that it is the amount of surface area covered by cities and industries that is the driver of global warming? Who and what is this argument directed at?
Upvote
0
@essentialsaltes