• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

God did not create from nothing

Status
Not open for further replies.

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,858,029
52,920
Guam
✟5,247,073.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
There is no solid evidence he even existed.

Does science require solid evidence?

From Wikipedia:

... virtually all modern scholars of antiquity agree that Jesus existed historically.

SOURCE

But Wikipedia can take a hike, can't it? ;)
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,858,029
52,920
Guam
✟5,247,073.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Nope... didn't miss it... just didn't get the gist of it. (I didn't bother watching the video)

You told me I was a YEC.

Then, when I showed you otherwise, you told me I was Last Thursday.

Then, when I showed you you were wrong by a factor of 314,000, you told me I was Apparent Age.

Then, when I explained how actual age can be misconstrued for apparent age, you went back to YEC.

Just like playing Simon.
 
Upvote 0

Platte

Well-Known Member
Jul 14, 2020
2,032
321
57
Virginia
✟90,999.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Perhaps not. It was probably just preaching. No one needs preaching.
Yeah it was kind of preachy...lol
Who does?

Good thing you weren't looking for a job.
I tell my 5 daughters I haven't worked a day of my life (I'm a manager/programmer/it guy)
No need to apologize to "Low Bar Bill".

There is no solid evidence he even existed. The Roman world took little to no notice of him (other than to execute him for insurrection like so many others). "Light of the world" is just sloganeering.
No it was much more than sloganeering - Jesus' whole existence, even before his birth, was related to letting the world know about God.
As you know, there is little to no debate among historians that Jesus was a real person. Though I will say - I don't think the evidence that he existed is overwhelming like some claim.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

partinobodycular

Well-Known Member
Jun 8, 2021
3,180
1,285
partinowherecular
✟175,487.00
Country
United States
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
YEC ... then Last Thursday ... then Apparent Age ... then Simulation ... now back to YEC.

Just to clarify... you are:

A YECer, a Last Thursdayist, and a simulationist, all wrapped up in one.

Or as you like to describe yourself... you're an embedded ager... but any of the above shoes will fit.

I fail to see where you demonstrated that any of these are wrong... to anyone but yourself. As of now, you're still all of the above, and sadly oblivious to the fact. But that's okay, NPCs don't need to be rational.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ophiolite
Upvote 0

dlamberth

Senior Contributor
Site Supporter
Oct 12, 2003
20,472
3,305
Oregon
✟1,071,069.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Other Religion
Politics
US-Others
All I can tell you is, it was Created as it is today (basically). What we are seeing is basically exactly the way the earth was created. Not much has changed in 6000 year.
How do you fit the Ice age and the glacial extent into your 6000 year old earth?
 
Upvote 0

Hans Blaster

Your turn, Atlanta!
Mar 11, 2017
26,483
18,991
56
USA
✟495,631.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
Yeah it was kind of preachy...lol

I tell my 5 daughters I haven't worked a day of my life (I'm a manager/programmer/it guy)
well that explains it.
No it was much more than sloganeering - Jesus' whole existence, even before his birth, was related to letting the world know about God.
we know now about your god, but many of us just don't care. why do you not stick to the topic?
As you know, there is little to no debate among historians that Jesus was a real person.
It is the most parsimonious explanation for the religion that they ended up worshiping a real man, but that doesn't mean there is anything like direct evidence of his life.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,858,029
52,920
Guam
✟5,247,073.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I fail to see where you demonstrated that any of these are wrong... to anyone but yourself. As of now, you're still all of the above, and sadly oblivious to the fact. But that's okay, NPCs don't need to be rational.

And Simon just keeps on playing.
 
Upvote 0

Platte

Well-Known Member
Jul 14, 2020
2,032
321
57
Virginia
✟90,999.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
well that explains it.

we know now about your god, but many of us just don't care. why do you not stick to the topic?

It is the most parsimonious explanation for the religion that they ended up worshiping a real man, but that doesn't mean there is anything like direct evidence of his life.
So tell me - you at a Christian forum - tell me why? To disprove the Bible?

This was an interesting statement from AI:

Their are Two Types of Age: To resolve this, philosophers split the concept of "age" into two distinct categories:
Chronological Age: The actual amount of time that has passed since an entity came into existence (which would be zero).
Biological Age: The physical condition, maturity, and developmental state of the organism (which would look like an adult).

Many try to use science to disprove the earth was created 6000 years ago...however what I see is science trying to use a Biological Age to dispove a Chronological Age, and that is not possible. I generally don't have an issue with scienctific theories - aside from C14 that is so bad that I call it science fiction...but I don't have an issue with science saying the Biological Age of the Universe is 13 billion - but I'll also say the Chronological Age is 6000. The only way to Create a functioning universe is to create it with age - God using a modelistic approach is how I see it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AV1611VET
Upvote 0

2PhiloVoid

What goes around comes around!
Site Supporter
Oct 28, 2006
27,273
12,590
Space Mountain!
✟1,541,189.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I enjoy the conversations - but I got people here posting comments about the Bible - like its simply some ancient text. This book is real - and it was shaped and crafted by the Creator. I say - just take the message that the Bible says, as it was written that way for a purpose. Then make your arguments from there. For example - I dont argue that the world is or isnt billions of years old....just like I don't argue if you say Adam was 21 years old when created. All I can tell you is, it was Created as it is today (basically). What we are seeing is basically exactly the way the earth was created. Not much has changed in 6000 year.

"Just taking" the message of the Bible in a presuppositional, axiomatic way is exactly what doesn't work for me. I've always been an Evidentialist, so you'll just have to make room for those of us who do need evidence and rational explanations to get us out of our existential ruts.

This is why I'm not a YEC or '6,000 year believer,' and I never have been. But I know, epistemologically, where faith in Christ and belief in the contents of the Bible are center stage, it's different strokes for different folks, and it is what it is.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,858,029
52,920
Guam
✟5,247,073.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I've always been an Evidentialist,

* cough *

1. the Bible
2. time divided into BC & AD
3. organizations such as the Red Cross and Salvation Army
4. hospitals built by Christian organizations
5. Christian artwork, edifices, statuary, and literature
6. IN GOD WE TRUST on our coins
7. UNDER GOD in our pledge of allegiance
8. the Ten Commandments and other literature displayed in public
9. Christmas & Easter
10. symbols on bumper stickers and flags
11. public debates in the name of Christianity
12. crosses and billboards erected to testify of Jesus Christ
13. two major nations founded on His existence
14. martyrs
15. Christians & Jews
 
Upvote 0

2PhiloVoid

What goes around comes around!
Site Supporter
Oct 28, 2006
27,273
12,590
Space Mountain!
✟1,541,189.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
* cough *

1. the Bible
2. time divided into BC & AD
3. organizations such as the Red Cross and Salvation Army
4. hospitals built by Christian organizations
5. Christian artwork, edifices, statuary, and literature
6. IN GOD WE TRUST on our coins
7. UNDER GOD in our pledge of allegiance
8. the Ten Commandments and other literature displayed in public
9. Christmas & Easter
10. symbols on bumper stickers and flags
11. public debates in the name of Christianity
12. crosses and billboards erected to testify of Jesus Christ
13. two major nations founded on His existence
14. martyrs
15. Christians & Jews

And why are you're giving me this list as if I need it? **cough** :ahah:
 
Upvote 0

2PhiloVoid

What goes around comes around!
Site Supporter
Oct 28, 2006
27,273
12,590
Space Mountain!
✟1,541,189.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
* cough *

1. the Bible
2. time divided into BC & AD
3. organizations such as the Red Cross and Salvation Army
4. hospitals built by Christian organizations
5. Christian artwork, edifices, statuary, and literature
6. IN GOD WE TRUST on our coins
7. UNDER GOD in our pledge of allegiance
8. the Ten Commandments and other literature displayed in public
9. Christmas & Easter
10. symbols on bumper stickers and flags
11. public debates in the name of Christianity
12. crosses and billboards erected to testify of Jesus Christ
13. two major nations founded on His existence
14. martyrs
15. Christians & Jews

When I said that I'm an Evidentialist and have the sort of psychology that "needs evidence," that doesn't mean I don't already have evidence or that I was placing an order for a Big Mac and some fries. :rolleyes:
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,858,029
52,920
Guam
✟5,247,073.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
When I said that I'm an Evidentialist and have the sort of psychology that "needs evidence," that doesn't mean I don't already have evidence or that I was placing an order for a Big Mac and some fries. :rolleyes:

Thanks for the clarification.
 
Upvote 0

dlamberth

Senior Contributor
Site Supporter
Oct 12, 2003
20,472
3,305
Oregon
✟1,071,069.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Other Religion
Politics
US-Others
Many try to use science to disprove the earth was created 6000 years ago...however what I see is science trying to use a Biological Age to dispove a Chronological Age, and that is not possible.
I use Historical age, the Yellowstone Hotspot for instance as the North America Plate moved across it. Or the Hawaii Hotspot and the 3,900 mile long volcanic Hawaiian-Emperor seamount chain.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,858,029
52,920
Guam
✟5,247,073.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Upvote 0

-57

Well-Known Member
Sep 5, 2015
8,740
1,963
✟89,562.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
You are going around in circles and back to isochron testing.
As I pointed out isochron testing serves two purposes, to date samples according to the slope of the isochron line and any points that deviate from the line cannot be trusted for the reasons highlighted by your AI response.
This includes being able to differentiate a 'mixing line' from an isochron line.
As I just showed you....your AI...pointed out the many flaws. Go argue with your AI.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.