• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

My own theory on how life originated

Helg

Member
May 27, 2026
18
2
41
lena
✟1,038.00
Country
Norway
Gender
Male
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
I think maybe a bit like this: remnants of protein from plants in warm water in Africa, two strands of protein that combine and form a bond, the sun is always a "pressing" force, so from there you have the first "will". The will never gets stronger than this first bond unless the one who controls this will allows itself to grow stronger. Plants are life too, they feel their surroundings, so they have a soul too, animals and humans are just more intelligent, they don't necessarily sense more of their surroundings than plants do, but they think more.

Were there two protein bonds that made the first plant too, I don't really know, I would assume so, but maybe rather that there was something before protein. More advanced life requires protein to build a physical body, while plants may have something even simpler,


how does this view fit into the picture of a Creator and the first will?
 

2PhiloVoid

Perceiving the Bigger Picture
Site Supporter
Oct 28, 2006
26,677
12,403
Space Mountain!
✟1,517,057.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I think maybe a bit like this: remnants of protein from plants in warm water in Africa, two strands of protein that combine and form a bond, the sun is always a "pressing" force, so from there you have the first "will". The will never gets stronger than this first bond unless the one who controls this will allows itself to grow stronger. Plants are life too, they feel their surroundings, so they have a soul too, animals and humans are just more intelligent, they don't necessarily sense more of their surroundings than plants do, but they think more.

Were there two protein bonds that made the first plant too, I don't really know, I would assume so, but maybe rather that there was something before protein. More advanced life requires protein to build a physical body, while plants may have something even simpler,


how does this view fit into the picture of a Creator and the first will?

From the perspective of the biblical narrative in Genesis, it is God's Will that is sovereign over the material world and prompts life.
 
Upvote 0

Helg

Member
May 27, 2026
18
2
41
lena
✟1,038.00
Country
Norway
Gender
Male
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
From the perspective of the biblical narrative in Genesis, it is God's Will that is sovereign over the material world and prompts life.

Is this God sort of the same as the feeling you have inside of someone listening, or outside our body?
 
Upvote 0

2PhiloVoid

Perceiving the Bigger Picture
Site Supporter
Oct 28, 2006
26,677
12,403
Space Mountain!
✟1,517,057.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Is this God sort of the same as the feeling you have inside of someone listening, or outside our body?

From what my minuscule mind can cobble together, it's the sort of God who exists eternally but, as Blaise Pascal noted, is hidden and beyond our ability to comprehesively analyze. This ends up meaning that we unfortunately won't be able to answer every question about 'how' God performs in the universe or by exactly which processes He invisibly distributes His Will.

Does that make any sense?
 
  • Like
Reactions: David Lamb
Upvote 0

David Lamb

Well-Known Member
May 30, 2024
5,102
3,425
77
Paignton
✟149,502.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
I think maybe a bit like this: remnants of protein from plants in warm water in Africa, two strands of protein that combine and form a bond, the sun is always a "pressing" force, so from there you have the first "will". The will never gets stronger than this first bond unless the one who controls this will allows itself to grow stronger. Plants are life too, they feel their surroundings, so they have a soul too, animals and humans are just more intelligent, they don't necessarily sense more of their surroundings than plants do, but they think more.

Were there two protein bonds that made the first plant too, I don't really know, I would assume so, but maybe rather that there was something before protein. More advanced life requires protein to build a physical body, while plants may have something even simpler,


how does this view fit into the picture of a Creator and the first will?
I am no scientist, but the idea of two strands of protein possessing a "will" seems unlikely in the extreme. You say that plants feel their surroundings, so they must , in your view, have a soul. But a soul is not required to feel surroundings. I cannot think of anywhere in the Bible where we read that plants have souls.
 
Upvote 0

Helg

Member
May 27, 2026
18
2
41
lena
✟1,038.00
Country
Norway
Gender
Male
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
From what my minuscule mind can cobble together, it's the sort of God who exists eternally but, as Blaise Pascal noted, is hidden and beyond our ability to comprehesively analyze. This ends up meaning that we unfortunately won't be able to answer every question about 'how' God performs in the universe or by exactly which processes He invisibly distributes His Will.

Does that make any sense?

Well, I`m not gonna try to analyse God, I often pray to him
 
Upvote 0

2PhiloVoid

Perceiving the Bigger Picture
Site Supporter
Oct 28, 2006
26,677
12,403
Space Mountain!
✟1,517,057.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Well, I`m not gonna try to analyse God, I often pray to him

That's always a good place to start when any of us are on a journey to explore Christianity.
 
Upvote 0

Lost4words

Jesus I Trust In You
Site Supporter
May 19, 2018
11,979
12,732
South Wales, UK
✟1,326,629.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
I think maybe a bit like this: remnants of protein from plants in warm water in Africa, two strands of protein that combine and form a bond, the sun is always a "pressing" force, so from there you have the first "will". The will never gets stronger than this first bond unless the one who controls this will allows itself to grow stronger. Plants are life too, they feel their surroundings, so they have a soul too, animals and humans are just more intelligent, they don't necessarily sense more of their surroundings than plants do, but they think more.

Were there two protein bonds that made the first plant too, I don't really know, I would assume so, but maybe rather that there was something before protein. More advanced life requires protein to build a physical body, while plants may have something even simpler,


how does this view fit into the picture of a Creator and the first will?
God created everything...
 
  • Like
Reactions: David Lamb
Upvote 0

stevevw

inquisitive
Nov 4, 2013
18,195
2,134
Brisbane Qld Australia
✟366,654.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
I remember an evolutionary biologist mentioning that there are 20 amino acids that are crucial for the structure and function of proteins in all living organisms. Among these, nine amino acids are considered essential for humans. Basically, life was based on laws of form like codes rather than random mutations and NS.

Which makes sense as all creatures have the same basic body plans. Development and change is restricted to these forms.

You could say this was inherent in all life including bacteria.

But as far as how life originated. This is a different issue to how life evolves. Because first you have to have a way of creating life from non-life. Similar to something from nothing when it comes to the universe.

I am not too fussed with the mechanisms of how life came about and evolves. I believe God is the creator of everything. He is timeless and beyond space. I have no idea and I don't think anyone else does. Humans in their limited knowledge will deduce certain aspects and make assumptions. But we cannot fully know.

So therefore, there will always be a big chunk missing that will change how we see things. We see in part now but later we will see more fully. Which is also true in this world. If we look back 100 years ago our worldview was completely different. The same with the future. We are always revising and still will not know in full.

All the rationalizing about how life happened and evolved as to where God its and steps in is basically trying to fit Him in somewhere. We know God created everything, so He was involved. But how we do not know,

Certainly, I think the universe and life has Gods signature all over it. We don't need a degree for that. In fact, that may blur things. The bible says we all intuitive know of God's creation in the things that we see in nature. That's enough.

I think just proclaiming this as a testimony is all we need like with the psalms and prophets. Let people see the joy and belief that comes from the creator of all things. Which is in Christ.

I like the pictures from the JWT showing the cosmos in detail. Or a fetus glowing and growing in the womb. Even the workings of a cell and with Gods signature in the corner.

1780761083281.png
1780761157311.png
1780761240541.png
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Reasonable Christian

Active Member
Dec 15, 2020
186
34
Maryland
✟34,637.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I think maybe a bit like this: remnants of protein from plants in warm water in Africa, two strands of protein that combine and form a bond, the sun is always a "pressing" force, so from there you have the first "will". The will never gets stronger than this first bond unless the one who controls this will allows itself to grow stronger. Plants are life too, they feel their surroundings, so they have a soul too, animals and humans are just more intelligent, they don't necessarily sense more of their surroundings than plants do, but they think more.

Were there two protein bonds that made the first plant too, I don't really know, I would assume so, but maybe rather that there was something before protein. More advanced life requires protein to build a physical body, while plants may have something even simpler,


how does this view fit into the picture of a Creator and the first will?
If this is how it happened, an intelligent mind (a Creator) had to create those “remnants of protein from plants.” Or create whatever produced those proteins, or create whatever produced that, etc. You can push things back as far as you want, but there eventually has to be an uncaused Cause, because otherwise you have an infinite regress of causes, which is logically impossible and also doesn’t explain anything. That is how your scenario fits into the picture of a Creator.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: John Bauer
Upvote 0

John Bauer

Reformed
Jul 21, 2022
607
405
Vancouver
✟95,251.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Others
My own theory on how life originated

I think maybe a bit like this: remnants of protein from plants …

Oops. Plants are life. So it must have originated earlier than that.

Were there two protein bonds that made the first plant, too? I don't really know. I would assume so.

If you are talking about the first self-organizing molecular structure—two organic molecules joining, stabilizing each other, and thereby becoming the primitive basis of life—then, yes, this is a decent picture of how life originated.

How does this view fit into the picture of a Creator and the first will?

It works—except the Creator simply is the first will.
 
Upvote 0