First, most of the truly wealthy are taxed lower on capital gains than they are on income. The rich too receive no tax on their more hefty benefit packages and the new child accounts certainly allow those who can fund these accounts to the max. The poor too often receive credits, EIC, Savers, etc. So there is a lot to clean up to get to a "proportional tax." As it is the middle class get squeezed. The government too gets revenue from fees. A rich person and poor person pay the same for their passport for instance, the same for speeding fines, the same for all kinds of government services from license fees, airport fees etc. A proportional tax would charge those fees on based on income, including fees for Medicare. (Medicare does charge the wealthy more) but this is not exactly proportional.
I believe it is Pastor Rick Warren that reverse tithes, giving 90% of his income away. Should we expect more similar to that from the rich? Not 90% but something more than average. "In America, the top 1% control 35% of all wealth, while the bottom 50% hold just $9,000 per person."
Ranked: How Wealthy the Top 1% Are in Each Major Economy
Are we certain that is fairness? Is patent protection fair? Who gets to decide how long until it expires? This is an example of the structural system of government in the USA that panders the rich with corporate welfare. Again, the poor get transfer payments in the form of various types of welfare while the middle class again often gets the least.
If you want proportional, how do you account for marriage and kids? Are there still special breaks for larger families?
"While the poor receive more
money in the form of survival-based assistance, evidence suggests the wealthy receive more
structural value that enables the accumulation and protection of vast wealth." google ai
Are we certain the phrase "to whom much is given, much is required" does not mean a graduated tax for those who have the most? The Acts church pooled their money, one has to assume the rich gave far more than the poor to accomplish this.
Lastly, does American capitalism promote the love of money? Society does not have to be organized that way. Yes, ambition is good and should be rewarded. But why has this scaled up so much recently?
- "Average Pay Ratio (281:1): In 2024, CEOs at the top 350 U.S. firms were paid an average of 281 times as much as a typical worker. This is a massive increase from 1978, when the ratio was roughly 31-to-1. [1, 2]
- Long-Term Growth (1,094% vs. 26%): Between 1978 and 2024, top CEO compensation rose by 1,094% after adjusting for inflation. In contrast, the compensation of a typical worker grew by only 26% during that same 46-year period. Source: google ai, from the Economic Policy Institute.