• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Do you believe in Creationism or Evolutionism?

Are you a Creationist as per the OP definition.. a literal 7 day week of creation. Gen 1?

  • yes

    Votes: 28 35.4%
  • yes but I think that the entire galaxy as well as Earth, Sun and moon were created in those 7 days

    Votes: 2 2.5%
  • Yes but I think the entire universe was created in in those 7 literal days

    Votes: 13 16.5%
  • yes - but the Bible is wrong

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • yes - but I mix evolution with it in some way

    Votes: 2 2.5%
  • No - but since I believe the Bible I think of this as a kind of creationism

    Votes: 9 11.4%
  • No - creationism is wrong, the Bible is wrong, I believe evolution is the real truth

    Votes: 3 3.8%
  • other

    Votes: 22 27.8%

  • Total voters
    79

Job 33:6

Well-Known Member
Jun 15, 2017
10,000
3,420
Hartford, Connecticut
✟400,794.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
So you agree the Bible tells us Creation was 6000 years ago and took 6 days. But it’s just symbolism?
I hold to a temple inauguration view of Genesis. In that the 6 days (a 7-day week) reflects the inauguration of what is essentially God's temple, creation.

Isaiah 66:1 ESV
[1] Thus says the Lord: “Heaven is my throne, and the earth is my footstool; what is the house [Temple] that you would build for me, and what is the place of my rest?

God's resting place, of the 7th day.

Psalm 132:7-8, 13-14 NIV
[7] “Let us go to his dwelling place; let us worship at his footstool!” [8] Arise, O Lord, and go to your resting place, you and the ark of your might.
[13] For the Lord has chosen Zion; he has desired it for his dwelling place: [14] “This is my resting place forever; here I will sit enthroned, for I have desired it.

The Lord is in His holy temple; the Lord’s throne is in heaven; His eyes see, His eyelids test the sons of mankind.
Psalms 11:4

“Now then arise, Lord God, to Your resting place, You and the ark of Your might; let Your priests, Lord God, be clothed with salvation, and let Your godly ones rejoice in what is good.
2 Chronicles 6:41

By wisdom a temple is built,
and by understanding it is established;
by knowledge the rooms are filled
with all precious and pleasant riches. (Prov. 24:3-4)
The LORD by wisdom founded the earth;
by understanding he established the heavens;
by his knowledge the deeps broke open,
and the clouds drop down the dew. (P
rov. 3:19-20)

Much like temples in old testament times were inaugurated in 7-days. For example, Solomon's temple:

So Solomon held the feast at that time, and all Israel with him, a great assembly, from Lebo-hamath to the Brook of Egypt, before the Lord our God, seven days.
1 Kings 8:65

Or here is another example in Ezekiel:
As the glory of the Lord entered the temple by the gate facing east, the Spirit lifted me up and brought me into the inner court; and behold, the glory of the Lord filled the temple. While the man was standing beside me, I heard one speaking to me out of the temple, and he said to me, “Son of man, this is the place of my throne and the place of the soles of my feet, where I will dwell in the midst of the people of Israel forever.
Ezekiel 43:4‭-‬7

Heaven and Earth, or creation, are God's throne and footstool, where God dwells and rests, in completed temples.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 2PhiloVoid
Upvote 0

PrincetonGuy

Veteran
Feb 19, 2005
4,943
2,303
U.S.A.
✟202,517.00
Faith
Baptist
What makes you think it’s myth?
Having a good understanding of Genesis is foundational to having a good understanding of the rest of the Bible. The first eleven chapters of Genesis are written in a genre of literature that is not found anywhere else in the Bible and hence it is studied today as a distinct body of biblical literature giving rise to some lengthy and very detailed commentaries exclusively on Genesis 1-11. The 648-page commentary on Genesis 1-11 by Clause Westermann published as a volume in the Continental Commentary series consists of a wealth of technical, objective data along with an academically solid analysis of the data. This commentary was first published in 1974 and therefore it does not consider any of the massive amounts of biblical research performed after that. The recently retired university professor Kenneth A. Matthews has given to us a more up to date but much less technical 644-page commentary on Genesis 1-11 in the Christian Standard Commentary series published by B&H Publishing in 2022. Matthews is an ordained minister in the Southern Baptist Convention. Either of these two commentaries will introduce young earth creationists for the first time to a world that is very new to them.

Unlike Genesis 12-50 that is written in a genre of literature known as the Historical Narrative, Genesis 1-11 is written in a genre of literature that is very similar to that of epic tales, sagas, myths, and legends. Moreover, epic tales, sagas, myths, and legends are written using very literal language that does not include symbolism, metaphors, and similes or other kinds of figurative language or literary devices. Therefore, Genesis 1-11 should be read with the assumption that every word is intended to be understood laterally—including the “fountains of the great deep” and the “windows of the heavens” in Genesis 7:11”even though such structures are fictional.
 
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
54,525
12,297
Georgia
✟1,208,113.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Having a good understanding of Genesis is foundational to having a good understanding of the rest of the Bible. The first eleven chapters of Genesis are written in a genre of literature that is not found anywhere else in the Bible

It SAYS it is written as historic account.

"4 This is the account of the heavens and the earth when they were created, in the day that the Lord God made earth and heaven." Gen 2:4

Ex 20:11 is part of the TEN Commandments (definitely NOT myth or legend) and it ALSO appeals to Gen 2:2-3 as a literal account used as the foundation for one of the TEN. Legal code in the Bible is never based on "Myth or legend"

Luke 1 also claims to be "an account" a historic account of real events.

Luke 1: 1 Inasmuch as many have undertaken to compile an account of the things accomplished among us, 2 just as they were handed down to us by those who from the beginning ..., 3 it seemed fitting for me as well, having investigated everything carefully from the beginning, to write it out for you in consecutive order
Matthews is an ordained minister in the Southern Baptist Convention. Either of these two commentaries will introduce young earth creationists for the first time to a world that is very new to them.
Many "tales" have been written in recent times that re-imagine biblical texts in very new and different ways to those use to taking the Bible seriously and as fact.
Genesis 1-11 is written in a genre of literature that is very similar to that of epic tales, sagas, myths, and legends.
The very claim Bible writers often disdain, making a mockery of the fall of mankind, and the gospel solution to it.

Genesis 1-11 should be read with the assumption that every word is intended to be understood laterally—including the “fountains of the great deep” and the “windows of the heavens” in Genesis 7:11”even though such structures are fictional.
Today "science' knows that there is more water below ground on planet Earth than there is above ground. Literally.
 
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
54,525
12,297
Georgia
✟1,208,113.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
The literary style, and the fact that we know that the earth is billions of years old, and that we got where we are by evvolution.
Atheists have been saying that same thing for centuries.

But we have to actually look at the Bible and read it, to understand God's view of the subject.
 
Upvote 0

Job 33:6

Well-Known Member
Jun 15, 2017
10,000
3,420
Hartford, Connecticut
✟400,794.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
It SAYS it is written as historic account.
Historic doesn't mean scientifically concordant.

Braveheart for example, is a popular film starring Mel Gibson. It is historical, and is about Scotland's fight for independence. William Wallace was in-fact a real leader in history who fought against English rule.

But that doesn't mean that the story is therefore scientifically accurate. Aspects of the story are dramatized for example. It is a movie.

When we read scripture, it is important to understand the difference between scientifically concordant historical account, and historical accounts that contain theology, mythology, symbology, rhetorical language, hyperbole etc.

Genesis falls into the latter category.
 
  • Like
Reactions: John Bauer
Upvote 0

Job 33:6

Well-Known Member
Jun 15, 2017
10,000
3,420
Hartford, Connecticut
✟400,794.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Today "science' knows that there is more water below ground on planet Earth than there is above ground. Literally.
And sorry to break this news to you, but science doesn't say nor know anything about windows opening and closing in the sky to release rain.
 
Upvote 0

PrincetonGuy

Veteran
Feb 19, 2005
4,943
2,303
U.S.A.
✟202,517.00
Faith
Baptist
It SAYS it is written as historic account.
Epic tales, sagas, myths, and legends say many things that are not true. Whether any statements are true or not is not determined by the statements themselves, but by the relevant objective information. Young earth creationism ignores a massive amount of relevant objective information that incontrovertibly proves that much of the information in Genesis 1-11 is based upon ancient, non-Judeo-Christian cosmology rather than upon a cosmology that is consistent with reality.

What does the Bible really say about God’s creation of the earth?

Genesis 1:6. And God said, “Let there be a dome in the midst of the waters, and let it separate the waters from the waters.”
7. So God made the dome and separated the waters that were under the dome from the waters that were above the dome. And it was so.
8. God called the dome Sky. And there was evening and there was morning, the second day. (NRSV)

Gen 1:6 ויאמר אלהים יהי רקיע בתוך המים ויהי מבדיל בין מים למים׃

Gen 1:7 ויעשׂ אלהים את־הרקיע ויבדל בין המים אשׁר מתחת לרקיע ובין המים אשׁר מעל לרקיע ויהי־כן׃

Gen 1:8 ויקרא אלהים לרקיע שׁמים ויהי־ערב ויהי־בקר יום שׁני׃​

The Greek word στερέωμα is used in the Septuagint to translate the Hebrew word רָקִיעַ, and expresses the concept of “the sky as a supporting structure, the firmament.” (BDAG, the italics are theirs). This Greek word is also found in Paul’s writings to express the concept of a “state or condition of firm commitment, firmness, steadfastness” (BDAG, the italics are theirs),

Col. 2.5. εἰ γὰρ καὶ τῇ σαρκὶ ἄπειμι, ἀλλὰ τῷ πνεύματι σὺν ὑμῖν εἰμι, χαίρων καὶ βλέπων ὑμῶν τὴν τάξιν καὶ τὸ στερέωμα τῆς εἰς Χριστὸν πίστεως ὑμῶν. (NA28)

Col. 2:5. For though I am absent in body, yet I am with you in spirit, and I rejoice to see your morale and the firmness of your faith in Christ. (NRSV)

On page 21 of his commentary on Genesis, the late John Skinner, Principal and Professor of Old Testament Language and Literature, Westminster College, Cambridge, writes,

6-8 Second Work: The Firmament.—The second fiat calls into existence a firmament, whose function is to divide the primeval waters into an upper and lower ocean, leaving a space between as the theater of further creative developments. The “firmament” is the dome of heaven, which to the ancients was no optical illusion, but a material structure, sometimes compared to an “upper chamber” (Ps. 104:12, Am 9:6) supported by “pillars” (Jb 26:11), and resembling in its surface a “molten mirror” (Jb 37:18). Above this are the heavenly waters, from which the rain descends through “windows” or “doors” (Gn 7:11, 8:2, 2 Ki 7:2, 19) opened and shut by God at His pleasure (Ps 78:23).​


The KJV correctly translates the Hebrew word רָקִיעַ (râqı̂ya‛) as “firmament”, but most modern readers of the KJV are unaware of the meaning of the word “firmament,” and do not realize that it came down to us from the Latin present active infinitive (firmāre) of the Latin verb firmō, meaning “I make firm, strengthen, harden, or fortify” and that it expresses the concept of the strong, solid dome that supported the water above the dome.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Job 33:6
Upvote 0

PrincetonGuy

Veteran
Feb 19, 2005
4,943
2,303
U.S.A.
✟202,517.00
Faith
Baptist
Luke 1 also claims to be "an account" a historic account of real events.

Luke 1: 1 Inasmuch as many have undertaken to compile an account of the things accomplished among us, 2 just as they were handed down to us by those who from the beginning ..., 3 it seemed fitting for me as well, having investigated everything carefully from the beginning, to write it out for you in consecutive order
Luke:1. Since many have undertaken to set down an orderly account of the events that have been fulfilled among us,
2. just as they were handed on to us by those who from the beginning were eyewitnesses and servants of the word,
3. I too decided, after investigating everything carefully from the very first, {Or [for a long time]} to write an orderly account for you, most excellent Theophilus,
4. so that you may know the truth concerning the things about which you have been instructed.
5. In the days of King Herod of Judea, there was a priest named Zechariah, who belonged to the priestly order of Abijah. His wife was a descendant of Aaron, and her name was Elizabeth.

Luke says nothing at all about the creation of the earth. Indeed, he begins his chronology with the days of King Herod of Judea. However, unlike Matthew who was very Jewish, Luke had an excellent Greek education and therefore knew that the earth is spherical rather than flat and covered with a dome as was taught by the Jewish Rabbis up until the 7th century based upon a literal reading of Genesis and the other Scriptures that are dependent upon a literal reading of Genesis. It is revealing to compare Matthew’s account in Matthew 4:8-11 with Luke’s account in Luke 4:5-8.

Matthew 4:8. Again, the devil took him to a very high mountain and showed him all the kingdoms of the world and their splendor;
9. and he said to him, “All these I will give you, if you will fall down and worship me.”
10. Jesus said to him, “Away with you, Satan! for it is written,
‘Worship the Lord your God,
and serve only him.’”
11. Then the devil left him, and suddenly angels came and waited on him.

Luke 4:5. Then the devil led him up and showed him in an instant all the kingdoms of the world.
6. And the devil said to him,
“To you I will give their glory and all this authority; for it has been given over to me, and I give it to anyone I please.
7. If you, then, will worship me, it will all be yours.”
8. Jesus answered him, “It is written,
‘Worship the Lord your God,
and serve only him.'"

Luke knew that Matthew’s account was not accurate because the earth is spherical rather than flat and he leaves out the “very high mountain.”

(All Scriptures are from the NRSV)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Job 33:6
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
54,525
12,297
Georgia
✟1,208,113.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Epic tales, sagas, myths, and legends say many things that are not true.
We get the "Bible is not true" argument from atheists all the time. I understand that this is their POV. But simply having that as a POV does not make it true.
Whether any statements are true or not is not determined by the statements themselves
You need to think that one through
Young earth creationism ignores a massive amount of relevant objective information
belief in evolutionism ignores a massive amount of young earth geochronometers

helium diffusion, ocean salinity, or magnetic field decay, micrometeor dust accumulation, river delta formation, ... data to suggests rapid geological change and a young age.

Even in belief systems such as evolutionism, there are multiple mass extinction events and a reliance on punctuated equilibrium rather than slow uniform change over time.
that incontrovertibly proves that much of the information in Genesis 1-11 is based upon ancient, non-Judeo-Christian cosmology
If one decides to ditch the Bible, then bend and wrench the text to fit whatever the latest speculation is for the age of the Earth... then please don't respond as if we all made that "same commitment" as our starting point.
What does the Bible really say about God’s creation of the earth?

Genesis 1:6. And God said, “Let there be a dome in the midst of the waters, and let it separate the waters from the waters.”
Gen 1:6
6 Then God said, “Let there be an expanse in the midst of the waters, and let it separate the waters from the waters."

Gen 1 says birds fly in the midst of that expanse.

20 Then God said, “Let the waters teem with swarms of living creatures, and let birds fly above the earth in the open expanse of the heavens

Bible details matter.
The Greek word στερέωμα is used in the Septuagint to translate the Hebrew word רָקִיעַ, and expresses the concept of “the sky as a supporting structure, the firmament.” (BDAG, the italics are theirs). This Greek word is also found in Paul’s writings
Genesis was written in Hebrew not Greek and the Hebrew word used is not limited to "iron dome"

Rather it includes the idea of an open expanse where birds can fly
 
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
54,525
12,297
Georgia
✟1,208,113.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Matthew 4:8. Again, the devil took him to a very high mountain and showed him all the kingdoms of the world and their splendor;
9. and he said to him, “All these I will give you, if you will fall down and worship me.”
10. Jesus said to him, “Away with you, Satan! for it is written,
‘Worship the Lord your God,
and serve only him.’”
11. Then the devil left him, and suddenly angels came and waited on him.

Luke 4:5. Then the devil led him up and showed him in an instant all the kingdoms of the world.
6. And the devil said to him,
“To you I will give their glory and all this authority; for it has been given over to me, and I give it to anyone I please.
7. If you, then, will worship me, it will all be yours.”
8. Jesus answered him, “It is written,
‘Worship the Lord your God,
and serve only him.'"
Neither Matthew nor Luke provide a technical document exlaining exactly how the devil did what he did.

We know today that the sky
Even with our current limited technology advancements in technology allow Earth's atmosphere to be used to display 3D pictures and hollow, free-floating graphics, effectively turning air into a, display screen.

Having a "big screen sky" provided by an observer elevated position provides the best view.

Your restrictions are overly simplistic
 
Upvote 0

PrincetonGuy

Veteran
Feb 19, 2005
4,943
2,303
U.S.A.
✟202,517.00
Faith
Baptist
We get the "Bible is not true" argument from atheists all the time. I understand that this is their POV. But simply having that as a POV does not make it true.

You need to think that one through

belief in evolutionism ignores a massive amount of young earth geochronometers

helium diffusion, ocean salinity, or magnetic field decay, micrometeor dust accumulation, river delta formation, ... data to suggests rapid geological change and a young age.

Even in belief systems such as evolutionism, there are multiple mass extinction events and a reliance on punctuated equilibrium rather than slow uniform change over time.

If one decides to ditch the Bible, then bend and wrench the text to fit whatever the latest speculation is for the age of the Earth... then please don't respond as if we all made that "same commitment" as our starting point.

Gen 1:6
6 Then God said, “Let there be an expanse in the midst of the waters, and let it separate the waters from the waters."

Gen 1 says birds fly in the midst of that expanse.

20 Then God said, “Let the waters teem with swarms of living creatures, and let birds fly above the earth in the open expanse of the heavens

Bible details matter.

Genesis was written in Hebrew not Greek and the Hebrew word used is not limited to "iron dome"

Rather it includes the idea of an open expanse where birds can fly
We get the "Bible is not true" argument from atheists all the time. . . .

If one decides to ditch the Bible, then bend and wrench the text to fit whatever the latest speculation is for the age of the Earth... then please don't respond as if we all made that "same commitment" as our starting point.

From the earliest days of the young earth creationism movement, the hallmark of the movement has been flagrant dishonesty and the deceitful manipulation of facts. No one is saying or implying that the Bible is not true and no one is ditching the Bible. Indeed, the very opposite is true. Our position has always been that the Bible is of such immense importance that is deserves to be very carefully and prayerfully studied taking good advantage of the most recent and helpful tools available today to aid in our understanding and appreciation of it. Moreover, the age of the earth is not a matter of speculation but a matter of a very well established fact.

In the academic world where accuracy is of prime importance, the Second Edition of the Revised Standard Version (1971) was until recently the most often quoted translation of the Bible (in any language) in academic literature. With the publication of the New Revised Standard Version in 1989, that began to change rapidly making the New Revised Standard Version the academic standard. With the publication of the New Revised Standard Version Updated Edition in 2022, this new edition may replace the earlier edition as the academic standard. The Revised Standard Version and the revisions of it became the academic standards because the translators had available to them the invaluable resources of Oxford University. However, hundreds of years earlier, the first five books of the Tanakh were translated into Greek giving us the first part of the Septuagint. In the Septuagint, Genesis 1:6-8 reads,

Gen. 1:6. Καὶ εἶπεν ὁ θεός γενηθήτω στερέωμα ἐν μέσῳ τοῦ ὕδατος καὶ ἔστω διαχωρίζον ἀνὰ μέσον ὕδατος καὶ ὕδατος. καὶ ἐγένετο οὕτως.
7. καὶ ἐποίησεν ὁ θεὸς τὸ στερέωμα, καὶ διεχώρισεν ὁ θεὸς ἀνὰ μέσον τοῦ ὕδατος, ὃ ἦν ὑποκάτω τοῦ στερεώματος, καὶ ἀνὰ μέσον τοῦ ὕδατος τοῦ ἐπάνω τοῦ στερεώματος.
8. καὶ ἐκάλεσεν ὁ θεὸς τὸ στερέωμα οὐρανόν. καὶ εἶδεν ὁ θεὸς ὅτι καλόν. καὶ ἐγένετο ἑσπέρα καὶ ἐγένετο πρωί, ἡμέρα δευτέρα.

The Greek word στερέωμα is used in the Septuagint to translate the Hebrew word רָקִיעַ, and expresses the concept of “the sky as a supporting structure, the firmament.” (BDAG, the italics are theirs). This Greek word is also found in Paul’s writings to express the concept of a “state or condition of firm commitment, firmness, steadfastness” (BDAG, the italics are theirs),

Col. 2.5. εἰ γὰρ καὶ τῇ σαρκὶ ἄπειμι, ἀλλὰ τῷ πνεύματι σὺν ὑμῖν εἰμι, χαίρων καὶ βλέπων ὑμῶν τὴν τάξιν καὶ τὸ στερέωμα τῆς εἰς Χριστὸν πίστεως ὑμῶν. (NA28)

Col. 2.5. For though I am absent in body, yet I am with you in spirit, and I rejoice to see your morale and the firmness of your faith in Christ. (NRSV)

The Greek word στερέωμα is also found in a number of other ancient Greek writings where it always expresses the concepts of something solid, strength, firmness or steadfastness. Indeed, all hands (even the folks at Answers in Genesis!) freely admit that this Greek word expresses in Genesis the concept of a ‘solid, supporting structure.’

The Septuagint was the Bible of the Early Church until it was superseded by the Latin Vulgate, which also expressly describes the creation of a flat earth covered with a dome that “separated the waters that were under the dome from the waters that were above the dome.” The Wycliffe Bible reads,

6 And God seide, The firmament be maad in the myddis of watris, and departe watrisfro watris.
7And God made the firmament, and departide the watristhat weren vndurthe firmament fro these watris that weren on the firmament; and it was don so.
8 And God clepide the firmament, heuene. And the euentid and morwetid was maad, the secounde dai.

The NRSV correctly translates the Hebrew word רָקִיעַ as “dome.” The evidence for the correctness of this translation is found in the use of this word in ancient Hebrew literature. Based upon this usage, the Hebrew and English Lexicon of the Old Testament by Brown, Driver, and Briggs published by Oxford University gives us the following meaning of it in Gen. 1:6, 7, and 8, “the vault of heaven, or ‘firmament,’ regarded by Hebrews as solid, and supporting ‘waters’ above it.” (p. 956)

In the Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological, and Ecclesiastical Literature, we find an excellent article (Vol. III, pp. 568-569 [two lengthy columns of fine print per page] on the word רָקִיעַ. Of special importance is the following from the article,

The verb רָקַע, raká, means to expand by beating, whether by the hand, the foot, or any instrument. It is especially used, however, of beating out metals into thin plates (Exod. xxxix, 3, Numb. xvi, 39), and hence the substantive רַקֻּעַים “broad plates” of metal (Numb. 16:38). (The italics are theirs).​

This takes us to the absurd mistranslation, “expanse.” The verb רָקַע, raká, means to expand by beating, and that which is expanded becomes an "expanse." But, of course, the translators do not want you to know that that which is expanded is always a solid substance.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
Reactions: Job 33:6
Upvote 0

Job 33:6

Well-Known Member
Jun 15, 2017
10,000
3,420
Hartford, Connecticut
✟400,794.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
This takes us to the absurd mistranslation, “expanse.” The verb רָקַע, raká, means to expand by beating, and that which is expanded becomes an "expanse." But, of course, the translators do not want you to know that that which is expanded is always a solid substance.​
Job 37:18 ESV
[18] Can you, like him, spread out the skies, hard as a cast metal mirror?

And so it is.
 
Upvote 0

Platte

Well-Known Member
Jul 14, 2020
1,844
303
57
Virginia
✟87,486.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Having a good understanding of Genesis is foundational to having a good understanding of the rest of the Bible. The first eleven chapters of Genesis are written in a genre of literature that is not found anywhere else in the Bible and hence it is studied today as a distinct body of biblical literature giving rise to some lengthy and very detailed commentaries exclusively on Genesis 1-11. The 648-page commentary on Genesis 1-11 by Clause Westermann published as a volume in the Continental Commentary series consists of a wealth of technical, objective data along with an academically solid analysis of the data. This commentary was first published in 1974 and therefore it does not consider any of the massive amounts of biblical research performed after that. The recently retired university professor Kenneth A. Matthews has given to us a more up to date but much less technical 644-page commentary on Genesis 1-11 in the Christian Standard Commentary series published by B&H Publishing in 2022. Matthews is an ordained minister in the Southern Baptist Convention. Either of these two commentaries will introduce young earth creationists for the first time to a world that is very new to them.

Unlike Genesis 12-50 that is written in a genre of literature known as the Historical Narrative, Genesis 1-11 is written in a genre of literature that is very similar to that of epic tales, sagas, myths, and legends. Moreover, epic tales, sagas, myths, and legends are written using very literal language that does not include symbolism, metaphors, and similes or other kinds of figurative language or literary devices. Therefore, Genesis 1-11 should be read with the assumption that every word is intended to be understood laterally—including the “fountains of the great deep” and the “windows of the heavens” in Genesis 7:11”even though such structures are fictional.
Does Jesus quote Genesis as myth or actual?
 
Upvote 0

Platte

Well-Known Member
Jul 14, 2020
1,844
303
57
Virginia
✟87,486.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
The literary style, and the fact that we know that the earth is billions of years old, and that we got where we are by evvolution.

The literary style, and the fact that we know that the earth is billions of years old, and that we got where we are by evvolution.
We don’t know either of those. It’s our best guess based on the conventions we accept.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Guardianista

Newbie
Jun 14, 2009
42
23
75
Hemel Hempstead
✟33,349.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Private
Politics
UK-Greens
We don’t know either of those. It’s our best guess based on the conventions we accept.
We know them for all practical purposes. No-one seriously doubts them except for religious reasons. The science is unanimous.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PrincetonGuy
Upvote 0

Guardianista

Newbie
Jun 14, 2009
42
23
75
Hemel Hempstead
✟33,349.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Private
Politics
UK-Greens
Does Jesus quote Genesis as myth or actual?
Irrelevant. Jesus was a man of hiis time and culture - he had to be, to be fully incarnate - and therefore accepted the current cosmology. Anyway, science trumps religion.
 
Upvote 0

PrincetonGuy

Veteran
Feb 19, 2005
4,943
2,303
U.S.A.
✟202,517.00
Faith
Baptist
Does Jesus quote Genesis as myth or actual?
In Mark 6:3 we read, “Is not this the carpenter, the son of Mary, and brother of James and Joses and Judas and Simon? Are not His sisters here with us?” And they took offense at Him. (NRSV)

I am a conservative, evangelical Christian, and therefore I believe that Jesus was actually a carpenter, having been raised in a first century Jewish family with four brothers and an unspecified number of sisters. I do not believe that He attended a university to study world history, cosmology, chemistry, physics, or the arts—and therefore I do not believe that He knew anything more about these subjects than the typical young layman in his community. I do believe, however, that He believed the Jewish traditions that were part of the culture in which He was raised by Mary and Joseph. Therefore, He would have believed that the Genesis flood actually occurred and that Moses wrote the Pentateuch—unless His heavenly Father had told Him otherwise.

Therefore, I ask—is it likely that His heavenly Father told had Him otherwise? Surely if He had, and Jesus had shared with the people around these things, He would have been severely ostracized by his community, and by every other community in which He had shared these things, for being a subversive heretic!

The inspired four gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John) accurately tell us what Jesus taught, but they do not tell us whether Jesus believed correctly about the Genesis flood and the Mosaic authorship of the Pentateuch. We simply believe that Jesus believed and taught correctly because God is omniscient—and Jesus is God—sometimes forgetting that He was also a human being with a very finite human brain!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Guardianista
Upvote 0

Platte

Well-Known Member
Jul 14, 2020
1,844
303
57
Virginia
✟87,486.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Irrelevant. Jesus was a man of hiis time and culture - he had to be, to be fully incarnate - and therefore accepted the current cosmology. Anyway, science trumps religion.
Is whas a rhetorical question....I knew you knew the answer.

Science is usually wrong so I don't put any faith in its opinions...only scientific facts are relevant.

Yes - we agree - Jesus quoted Genesis as actual events.
 
Upvote 0

Platte

Well-Known Member
Jul 14, 2020
1,844
303
57
Virginia
✟87,486.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
We know them for all practical purposes. No-one seriously doubts them except for religious reasons. The science is unanimous.
The science is only unanimous because they fully accept its conventions (which are just theoretical summaries). Its your acceptance of these scientific conventions that removes your doubts about its conclusions. Has nothing to do with religion
 
Upvote 0