- Jul 20, 2018
- 10,983
- 7,786
- 71
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Catholic
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Others
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Also “You should apologize to Donald Trump!” When asked to apologize to Epstein victims.Did enjoy the full mask off moment of her yelling about how can anyone be concerned with raping kids when the stock market is up.
It was a performance, for an audience of one sitting in the oval office.Also “You should apologize to Donald Trump!” When asked to apologize to Epstein victims.
Her and Noem are like Trump groupies. Willingly radicalized by personality.
It's shameful that all this nonsense is blasting out of her mouth just so she can waste time, rather than answer important questions honestly.
...even labeling a Republican with TDS....
Rep. Thomas Massie, a Kentucky lawmaker who broke with his party to advance the legislation that forced the released of the Epstein files, also took Bondi to task for the release of victims’ personal information, telling her: “Literally the worst thing you could do to survivors, you did.”
Bondi told Massie that he was only focused on the files because Trump is mentioned in them, calling him a “hypocrite” with “Trump-derangement syndrome.”
Meteorite to the head it is.
Haven't you heard, the Dow is over 50,000!
Around 5:20 Bondi show photos and start to read cases of foreign criminals from New York. The video cuts off there (sadly). But what can only wonder, why has she these documents with here when none of these people are related to the Epstein case. Just to smear whoever questions her?
Is that transparency?
These are the tactics of someone who is (defending the) guilty and wants to muddy the waters as much as possible.
So it seems that it's her womanish qualities that bug you, not the lying and lawlessness?She came across as shrill, overly-defensive, whiney, combative, and unprofessional in those hearings. ...and unable to internalize and process criticism in a constructive way.
She reminded me a lot of my ex....
Definitely not a good fit for the position.
In such a position where grilling, criticism, and being able to not hold grudges and dig up petty insults and not fly off the handle over trivial comments is important, she should be replace by someone who's not so emotional.