• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

Is belief/non-belief a morally culpable state?

zippy2006

Dragonsworn
Nov 9, 2013
7,829
3,940
✟313,009.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
God may say that all these people are culpably ignorant, but except perhaps for the auditor, it's not likely to help guide their decision-making.
So do you then conclude that no act of decision-making can ever be helped, except for rare cases such as the auditor's?
 
Upvote 0

Meowzltov

Freylekher Yid
Aug 3, 2014
18,678
4,495
64
Southern California
✟70,672.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Judaism
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Others
What is the relation between belief and moral culpability? Is it wrong to believe/not-believe certain things?

Is it wrong to believe X if a more thorough investigation would show that X is false? In other words, do we have a moral obligation to do as thorough an investigation as possible before accepting the truth/falsity of X? If so, how would we know when our investigation is sufficiently thorough?

I assume the answer may differ depending on the belief in question. Beliefs that lead to right/wrong actions will clearly have a moral component. But what about beliefs regarding evolution or that the earth is flat/spherical?

Do we have a moral obligation to seek the truth? I'm not sure that we do. Is it wrong to believe what is false?

Please avoid theological subjects such as whether one is morally culpable for belief/non-belief in God since such subjects are not allowed in this forum. I know that's a big ask, but I believe we can do it! Maybe I'm wrong in so believing, i.e., such a belief is false, but is it morally wrong for me to so believe?
When I was a child, I assumed people chose what they believed. Then I grew up.

Here is the problem:

1. Our senses are not entirely accurate. Our eyes, ears, etc., don't always work the way they should and there are many things that exist for which we have no ability to sense.

2. Our perception is not completely reliable either. Perception is the ability to properly interpret sensory data. Even if our bodies are functioning as designed we make mistakes. Optical illusions are well known, as are hallucinations, and these things are far more common than people want to think. Do you realize just how common it is for people to not quite hear a word, and insert the wrong word into the blank spot?

3. Contrary to popular thinking, human beings are incredibly irrational creatures. We have inherited biologically ingrained cognition errors that literally block us from reaching accurate conclusions: confirmation bias, primacy effect, projection, need for closure, illusion of control.... I could probably list 30 different cognitive distortions that keep us from the truth.

IMHO, it's a miracle that human beings can function as well as we do.

Do I think we have a moral imperative to try to find the truth? Yes. But I would say we have just as strong a moral imperative to humbly realize just how fallible we are, and to extend grace to those who are "wrong," because after all, that wrong person could be us.

I am not Christian, and quite frankly I find the Christian notion that God will eternally reward or eternally torture someone due solely to their honest errors seems morally outrageous to me. It would be the worst sort of injustice to punish a person for something that is beyond their control. And folks, that's just not the God I love and serve.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: timothyu
Upvote 0

2PhiloVoid

I won't b6 chairing that committ66!
Site Supporter
Oct 28, 2006
25,495
12,057
Space Mountain!
✟1,459,154.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
When I was a child, I assumed people chose what they believed. Then I grew up.

Here is the problem:

1. Our senses are not entirely accurate. Our eyes, ears, etc., don't always work the way they should and there are many things that exist for which we have no ability to sense.

2. Our perception is not completely reliable either. Perception is the ability to properly interpret sensory data. Even if our bodies are functioning as designed we make mistakes. Optical illusions are well known, as are hallucinations, and these things are far more common than people want to think. Do you realize just how common it is for people to not quite hear a word, and insert the wrong word into the blank spot?

3. Contrary to popular thinking, human beings are incredibly irrational creatures. We have inherited biologically ingrained cognition errors that literally block us from reaching accurate conclusions: confirmation bias, primacy effect, projection, need for closure, illusion of control.... I could probably list 30 different cognitive distortions that keep us from the truth.

IMHO, it's a miracle that human beings can function as well as we do.

Do I think we have a moral imperative to try to find the truth? Yes. But I would say we have just as strong a moral imperative to humbly realize just how fallible we are, and to extend grace to those who are "wrong," because after all, that wrong person could be us.

I am not Christian, and quite frankly I find the Christian notion that God will eternally reward or eternally torture someone due solely to their honest errors seems morally outrageous to me. It would be the worst sort of injustice to punish a person for something that is beyond their control. And folks, that's just not the God I love and serve.

Your comments here are wonderful and all, but I wouldn't call that last point you made a 'Christian notion' if it's not something that Jesus Christ Himself, or His apostles and immediate disciples, mentioned.

Just something to think about where Hermeneutical acumen is an important part of reading and understanding either the Tanakh or the New Testament. I'm sure we have some concurrence in sentiments about this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fervent
Upvote 0

Fervent

Well-Known Member
Sep 22, 2020
7,652
3,576
45
San jacinto
✟231,485.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
When I was a child, I assumed people chose what they believed. Then I grew up.

Here is the problem:

1. Our senses are not entirely accurate. Our eyes, ears, etc., don't always work the way they should and there are many things that exist for which we have no ability to sense.

2. Our perception is not completely reliable either. Perception is the ability to properly interpret sensory data. Even if our bodies are functioning as designed we make mistakes. Optical illusions are well known, as are hallucinations, and these things are far more common than people want to think. Do you realize just how common it is for people to not quite hear a word, and insert the wrong word into the blank spot?

3. Contrary to popular thinking, human beings are incredibly irrational creatures. We have inherited biologically ingrained cognition errors that literally block us from reaching accurate conclusions: confirmation bias, primacy effect, projection, need for closure, illusion of control.... I could probably list 30 different cognitive distortions that keep us from the truth.
All of this is true, there are factors that play into what we believe or don't believe that are not within our control. But the issue isn't quite as black and white as entirely voluntary or beyond our control, and the choices we make often accumulate into the things that we believe to be true.
IMHO, it's a miracle that human beings can function as well as we do.

Do I think we have a moral imperative to try to find the truth? Yes. But I would say we have just as strong a moral imperative to humbly realize just how fallible we are, and to extend grace to those who are "wrong," because after all, that wrong person could be us.
Again, it's not an all-or-nothing issue. We can hold firm to convictions about what we think to be our best approximation of truth while recognizing that these convictions are not purely a product of our own intellect or ethical character or some other quality that sets us apart. Yet we remain culpable for the choices that aggregate into our beliefs.
I am not Christian, and quite frankly I find the Christian notion that God will eternally reward or eternally torture someone due solely to their honest errors seems morally outrageous to me. It would be the worst sort of injustice to punish a person for something that is beyond their control. And folks, that's just not the God I love and serve.
You seem to be hanging what to my understanding is a vocal minority position as the normative Christian position. There is a wide array of understanding that falls within orthodox Christian conversation on such matters, even arguably extending to a form of universalism where through Christ all of humanity(and in fact all of creation) is delivered from sin and death. While it is not a position I agree with or believe fits within orthodoxy, there is room for discussion on the matter such that your characterization of such a notion as "the Christian notion" is uncharitable and not reflective of the diversity of thought within Christianity.
 
Upvote 0

essentialsaltes

Fact-Based Lifeform
Oct 17, 2011
45,739
48,555
Los Angeles Area
✟1,081,353.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)
  • Haha
Reactions: askesis
Upvote 0

Meowzltov

Freylekher Yid
Aug 3, 2014
18,678
4,495
64
Southern California
✟70,672.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Judaism
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Others
What is the relation between belief and moral culpability? Is it wrong to believe/not-believe certain things?
If a person believes X when non-X is objectively more likely (meaning there is evidence to that effect), I believe this would make the individual a stupid person making an honest mistake. In other words, their mistake is not a moral failure, but a failure of intelligence.
 
Upvote 0

RDKirk

Alien, Pilgrim, and Sojourner
Site Supporter
Mar 3, 2013
43,087
23,831
US
✟1,821,179.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
If a person believes X when non-X is objectively more likely (meaning there is evidence to that effect), I believe this would make the individual a stupid person making an honest mistake. In other words, their mistake is not a moral failure, but a failure of intelligence.
Who determines whether the evidence is sufficient?

Romans 1:20 (KJV)
For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse.

Psalm 19 (KJV)
  1. The heavens declare the glory of God;
    and the firmament sheweth his handywork.
  2. Day unto day uttereth speech,
    and night unto night sheweth knowledge.
  3. There is no speech nor language,
    where their voice is not heard.
  4. Their line is gone out through all the earth,
    and their words to the end of the world.
It appears to be God's opinion that everyone has been given sufficient evidence to believe in His existence and essential virtue.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jacks
Upvote 0

Hans Blaster

Area Meathead
Mar 11, 2017
24,212
17,814
56
USA
✟459,294.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
Who determines whether the evidence is sufficient?
Hmm.
Romans 1:20 (KJV)
For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse.
Well, it sure ain't Paul. That dude is clueless about what other people know.
Psalm 19 (KJV)
  1. The heavens declare the glory of God;
    and the firmament sheweth his handywork.
  2. Day unto day uttereth speech,
    and night unto night sheweth knowledge.
  3. There is no speech nor language,
    where their voice is not heard.
  4. Their line is gone out through all the earth,
    and their words to the end of the world.
This p-salmist is also a bit confused. (though the archaic language makes it hard to see) For starters there is no "firmament" separating the heavens from the waters above. The space race killed that one hard.
It appears to be God's opinion that everyone has been given sufficient evidence to believe in His existence and essential virtue.
neither of these passages claim to be spoken by God.
 
Upvote 0

RDKirk

Alien, Pilgrim, and Sojourner
Site Supporter
Mar 3, 2013
43,087
23,831
US
✟1,821,179.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Hmm.

Well, it sure ain't Paul. That dude is clueless about what other people know.

This p-salmist is also a bit confused. (though the archaic language makes it hard to see) For starters there is no "firmament" separating the heavens from the waters above. The space race killed that one hard.

neither of these passages claim to be spoken by God.
Christians believe all scripture is "God-breathed."

Pretend you're discussing canon in the Star Wars universe with a Star Wars nerd.
 
Upvote 0

Hans Blaster

Area Meathead
Mar 11, 2017
24,212
17,814
56
USA
✟459,294.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
Christians believe all scripture is "God-breathed."
So are we now to just accept so post-biblical Christian dogma or what the text actually says?

Some sections clearly say "and God said to Moses:", etc.

Paul rather famously states in several places "hey this is just my opinion".

As for "Christians believe", no one ever bothered telling me to believe that.


Pretend you're discussing canon in the Star Wars universe with a Star Wars nerd.
Not a great example. Fan canon debates are notorious online for not agreeing about what is and is not canon, rather than universal agreement that whatever the [franchise] creator says is dogma.
 
Upvote 0

RDKirk

Alien, Pilgrim, and Sojourner
Site Supporter
Mar 3, 2013
43,087
23,831
US
✟1,821,179.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
So are we now to just accept so post-biblical Christian dogma or what the text actually says?

Some sections clearly say "and God said to Moses:", etc.
“All scripture is God-breathed, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness.” 2 Timothy 3:16
Paul rather famously states in several places "hey this is just my opinion".
Only one place. In that case, he's making a distinction between actually quoting Jesus (with regard to marriage between believers, on which Jesus explicitly spoke) and giving instruction through his own Holy Spirit inspiration (with regard to marriage between a believer and a nonbeliever, a subject never mentioned by Jesus). But Paul affirms as well that he's speaking by the inspiration of the Holy Spirit.
As for "Christians believe", no one ever bothered telling me to believe that.
I gave you the specific passage.
Not a great example. Fan canon debates are notorious online for not agreeing about what is and is not canon, rather than universal agreement that whatever the [franchise] creator says is dogma.
Well, there are great debates among Christians as well, which you should know, having been in these forums for a while.
 
Upvote 0

Hans Blaster

Area Meathead
Mar 11, 2017
24,212
17,814
56
USA
✟459,294.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
“All scripture is God-breathed, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness.” 2 Timothy 3:16
As Paul says to his friend Timothy. I don't think Paul considered his own correspondence to be "scripture".
Only one place. In that case, he's making a distinction between actually quoting Jesus (with regard to marriage between believers, on which Jesus explicitly spoke) and giving instruction through his own Holy Spirit inspiration (with regard to marriage between a believer and a nonbeliever, a subject never mentioned by Jesus). But Paul affirms as well that he's speaking by the inspiration of the Holy Spirit.
"Inspiration"? Lot's of people claim "inspiration" from things.
I gave you the specific passage.

Well, there are great debates among Christians as well, which you should know, having been in these forums for a while.
I try not to read canon fights. To quote Mr. Worf: "Those *are* Klingons and we don't talk about it."
 
Upvote 0

Meowzltov

Freylekher Yid
Aug 3, 2014
18,678
4,495
64
Southern California
✟70,672.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Judaism
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Others
Who determines whether the evidence is sufficient?

Romans 1:20 (KJV)
For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse.

Psalm 19 (KJV)
  1. The heavens declare the glory of God;
    and the firmament sheweth his handywork.
  2. Day unto day uttereth speech,
    and night unto night sheweth knowledge.
  3. There is no speech nor language,
    where their voice is not heard.
  4. Their line is gone out through all the earth,
    and their words to the end of the world.
It appears to be God's opinion that everyone has been given sufficient evidence to believe in His existence and essential virtue.
I'm sorry, but Paul is just mistaken about this. For me? For me, the whole universe screams "God!" But I know many atheists who simply don't hear this, simply don't see it, simply don't sense it. So NO, it is NOT clear. And that means there IS excuse.
 
Upvote 0

RDKirk

Alien, Pilgrim, and Sojourner
Site Supporter
Mar 3, 2013
43,087
23,831
US
✟1,821,179.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I'm sorry, but Paul is just mistaken about this. For me? For me, the whole universe screams "God!" But I know many atheists who simply don't hear this, simply don't see it, simply don't sense it. So NO, it is NOT clear. And that means there IS excuse.
Paul apparently came to that conclusion based on Greek philosophers like Epimenides.
 
Upvote 0

Hans Blaster

Area Meathead
Mar 11, 2017
24,212
17,814
56
USA
✟459,294.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
I'm sorry, but Paul is just mistaken about this. For me? For me, the whole universe screams "God!" But I know many atheists who simply don't hear this, simply don't see it, simply don't sense it. So NO, it is NOT clear.
Neither did this Catholic lad. I didn't hear a lot of that kind of talk (look at God's wonders) but I do sort of recall my mom commenting about the amazing power of God when we stared at the Grand Canyon of the Colorado, and my thought was about the Colorado Plateau being lifted up while the river cut the canyon.
And that means there IS excuse.
Or Paul is just another fanatic in error.
 
Upvote 0

The Barbarian

Crabby Old White Guy
Apr 3, 2003
30,681
13,805
78
✟461,651.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
I'm sorry, but Paul is just mistaken about this. For me? For me, the whole universe screams "God!" But I know many atheists who simply don't hear this, simply don't see it, simply don't sense it. So NO, it is NOT clear. And that means there IS excuse.
The Church recognizes the fact of invincible ignorance. Some people just can't see it, even thought it's obvious to most others. And they are blameless if, by no intention of their own, they are unable to recognize the truth.

I am told that Calvinists don't agree, or limit it to human laws as opposed to divine law.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Meowzltov
Upvote 0

Bradskii

Under the Southern Cross I stand...
Aug 19, 2018
24,658
17,053
72
Bondi
✟406,806.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
I'm sorry, but Paul is just mistaken about this. For me? For me, the whole universe screams "God!" But I know many atheists who simply don't hear this, simply don't see it, simply don't sense it. So NO, it is NOT clear. And that means there IS excuse.
Someone mentioned the Grand Canyon earlier. Went there a few years back with my wife. You stand on the edge and soak it all in and it's awe inspiring. Truly magnificent. One of my top 10 'Wow' moments. You stand there and think that that little river down there slowly carved out this magnificent canyon over millions of years. Hard to get your head around it.

Now what would it feel like if someone walked over and said 'Hey, you know that this was designed and built back in the 50's? The casinos chipped in and had it designed and carved out over 15 years as a tourist attraction. See the river as it turns the bend down there? It flows into a small lake and is pumped back up to the start to flow down again'.

Would it be so magnificent now you realise it was designed just for us? That someone thought about it and made it just so? To me it would be like seeing the back of film set where you see that the magnificent building is just a wood and plaster facade.

Been on a safari? You'd think it would be for animal lovers. Unless...you see a kill in close up. A few hyenas tearing lumps out of the back of a gazelle (where the flesh is a lot softer). It'll be a slow death for the prey. You could watch it go on all afternoon if you've got a strong stomach and a complete lack of empathy. And then you can talk about it over a whisky back in camp and discuss that the whole process was designed thus. And what you struggled to watch for an few minutes has been happening in millions of cases each hour, each day, for millions upon millions of years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hans Blaster
Upvote 0

Meowzltov

Freylekher Yid
Aug 3, 2014
18,678
4,495
64
Southern California
✟70,672.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Judaism
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Others
Paul apparently came to that conclusion based on Greek philosophers like Epimenides.
I think that when a particular perception is prevalent, it is VERY easy to slip into the "Everyone experiences it this way." That is almost always a mistake. Exceptions prove the rule, as they say.
 
Upvote 0

Meowzltov

Freylekher Yid
Aug 3, 2014
18,678
4,495
64
Southern California
✟70,672.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Judaism
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Others
Neither did this Catholic lad. I didn't hear a lot of that kind of talk (look at God's wonders) but I do sort of recall my mom commenting about the amazing power of God when we stared at the Grand Canyon of the Colorado, and my thought was about the Colorado Plateau being lifted up while the river cut the canyon.

Or Paul is just another fanatic in error.
I am no friend of Paul. But in this instance I think he is simply being human. When a particular perception is common, most people will jump to the conclusion that everyone experiences it this way.
 
Upvote 0