Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Would something like these campus groups count?Maybe if we had the Yale newspaper calling for a Cultural Revolution or something, you might have a point.
www.thecornellreview.org
I just remembered a memory. I came close to getting beat up by skinheads a couple of times in the '80's. I once stood up to some skins and prevented them from beating up this homosexual guy. I barely knew the guy, but he'd done nothing to deserve getting beat.They spent the 1990s trying to beat me up. I try to keep tabs on them.
Would something like these campus groups count?
![]()
Students Launch Communist Club at Columbia University
At Columbia University, a group of students recently launched the “Columbia Communists.”www.thecornellreview.org
![]()
"New communism" group disrupts Yale professor's class
A group that advocates for the “new communism” disrupted a Yale University professor’s class Thursday.www.insidehighered.com
No, because the phrases called out in the Harvard article have specific connotations. Comparing that to generalized Communist slogans is disingenuous.
So? Their presence either way meant USA was going to be a multicultural country. Same with our annexation of places with "other" type people in them. Thats the only point I was trying to make with all of this. We began on a multicultural course, and for the most part stayed on it.They were purchased property, not settlers.
Makes sense. The USA was premised on freedom of religion (among other things). So any religion based tax is out of bounds. And people intent on coming here would need to respect that sort of thing. But they dont need to have the same relgion as me, obviously. Thats the whole point of liberty: you can make those sort of choices for yourself.Briefly, I see two layers to what culture is. The superficial and the deep. The superficial is stuff like food, clothing, music, etc. The deeper involves different core values such as one has about religion, political philosophy, morals, etc. I'm fine if my neighbor eats hummus. I'm not so fine if he wants to impose a non-believer tax on me.
Why it was made legal.Why the immigration, or why they make it legal?
Its still pics of randos on the street. Theres no specific context and response to examine like we have in this Harvard situation.It's not all that vague if you know the history of Antifa.
It's the modern day incarnation (based on the symbolism and slogans) of the 1930's Communist party in Germany (the KPD) who waved the banner of "Antifaschistische Aktion"
View attachment 372680
(picture from 1932)
...they later folded into the Soviet-backed SED party in the days of East Germany.
East Germany's name for the Berlin Wall was the "Anti-Fascist Protection Wall" (drawing off of their KPD comrades' "lingo" to try to gain some public support among the young people -- ironically, the guards faced inward at that wall)
The SED was also pretty deep into the "Anti-Zionist" movement. As they viewed Israel as "fascists" along side the United States and West Germany... East Germany (along with several other soviet counterparts) were antagonizers in stirring up trouble between Israel and Arab states in the 60's making use of the Stasi to advise Arab states on how to conjure up misinformation PR campaigns.
Even the more modern day off-shoots list everything you want to know about them on their chapter websites (except their identities of course...they wouldn't want to get harassed at the coffee shop on "smash capitalism" poetry open-mic night)
You can draw a direct line from what they believe today, back to what their predecessors in East Germany believed, and the ideas, values, tactics, etc... aren't all that different.
Amongst our early political thinkers including Founding Fathers, this concern was much discussed, and in some cases much feared, especially after the slave takeover in Haiti.So? Their presence either way meant USA was going to be a multicultural country.
For now. But look at places like Dearborn which is basically ruled by Muslims. Imagine the interesting Constitutional Amendments that could hypothetically appear as we get much less insular.So any religion based tax is out of bounds.
And people intent on coming here would need to respect that sort of thing.

Are we talking about in America, the U.K., Europe? I believe there are somewhat different reasons, but the initial and continuing reason common to all is the one you know - Big Business. "You know, congressman, I could make a whole lot more money if I could hire a Juan rather than John. And of course you'll be taken care of."Why it was made legal.
Doesnt matter. They could fret all they want. Millions of Africans and African origin people were already here. USA was not destined to be a white Euro only country where other cultures are insignificant.Amongst our early political thinkers including Founding Fathers, this concern was much discussed, and in some cases much feared, especially after the slave takeover in Haiti.
The bar for constitutional amendments is insanely high. The character of Dearborn means nothing in that context.For now. But look at places like Dearborn which is basically ruled by Muslims. Imagine the interesting Constitutional Amendments that could hypothetically appear as we get much less insular.
![]()
We were talking about UK/ Euro post colonial immigration. Why did they let in so many immigrants from former colonies? I'd assumed it was some kind of moral obligation they felt. But you claim to know different. So....?Are we talking about in America, the U.K., Europe? I believe there are somewhat different reasons, but the initial and continuing reason common to all is the one you know - Big Business. "You know, congressman, I could make a whole lot more money if I could hire a Juan rather than John. And of course you'll be taken care of."
I was just reminded of something clever Rush once did:
But you're talking about during slavery. They didn't all anticipate they would necessarily ever be freed.Doesnt matter. They could fret all they want. Millions of Africans and African origin people were already here. USA was not destined to be a white Euro only country where other cultures are insignificant.
For now.The bar for constitutional amendments is insanely high.
A predominantly Christian city has become an Islamic city. Minneapolis will likely be next. Today Peoria, tomorrow the world. (Yes that's a reference from both Hitler and the Ramones.)The character of Dearborn means nothing in that context.
Because European cities, industry and infrastructure had been heavily damaged in WWII, They needed to rebuild, which required lots of workers, and if you can get them on the cheap, so much better. Kind of paradoxical - Europe needed it's modern stuff so it wouldn't be a 3rd world place, so they brought the 3rd in, and now...We were talking about UK/ Euro post colonial immigration. Why did they let in so many immigrants from former colonies?
Because European cities, industry and infrastructure had been heavily damaged in WWII, They needed to rebuild, which required lots of workers, and if you can get them on the cheap, so much better. Kind of paradoxical - Europe needed it's modern stuff so it wouldn't be a 3rd world place, so they brought the 3rd in, and now...
You are correct, but UK/Europe had to "catch up" with the two superpowers (yes I know Stalingrad was nearly a ruins). If you lose 50% of your money, you have to make 100% just to get back to where you were. Hence the urgency beginning in the 1960's.Post WW2 labour to rebuild Europe mostly came from within Europe.
Migration into Europe from other regions was minor in the immediate post WW2 decades. Migration grew only very slowly through the late 1940s and 1950s and hardly accelerated until the mid 1960s.
For instance, UK migrant growth in the 1940s and 1950s was slower than it was in the 1920s and 1930s. The 'guest worker' programmes of Germany and the Low Countries didn't start until the second half of the 1950s and weren't expanded to countries outside of Western Europe until the 1960s and 1970s.
France was a major exception to this, with large numbers of Vietnamese and Algerian refugees started arriving in the 1940s. This was followed by waves of migration from France's colonial holdings in West Africa in the 1950s and 1960s.
Migration into Western Europe accelerated mildly though the early 1970 to the end of the 1980s. The big change in migration rates really occurs in the early to mid 1990s.
This is primarily related to the end of the Cold War, the formation of the EU and the unwinding of regulatory, practical and economic impediments to migration (on both sides). Put another way, it became cheaper, easier and above all legal for people to move across borders to seek opportunities.
.....Britain for the British is a very nice thought.
France for the French, too.
Yet another terror attack today as a Muslim rimmed 10 people leaving some critically injured before yelling Allah Akbar upon arrest.
If you're talking about the knife attack on a train at Huntingdon station, that wasn't related to Islam or Islamist terrorism.Britain for the British is a very nice thought.
France for the French, too.
Yet another terror attack today as a Muslim rimmed 10 people leaving some critically injured before yelling Allah Akbar upon arrest.
Maybe he's reading the writing on the wall, consider Islam is a plague on Europe and Europeans are paying the price.
Yikes.....
"rimmed"?
uhh........
EDIT: AAHHH!!! Rammed (with a vehicle...I...assume.)
No, in France.If you're talking about the knife attack on a train at Huntingdon station, that wasn't related to Islam or Islamist terrorism.
The phrase "Blood and soil", "Blut und Boden" isn't vaguely Hitler-ish, it was at the core of the nazi ideology.In these types of situations though, even if an author is carefully choosing words... if a subset of the population is already determined to label an idea as "Hitler-ish", is the wording really going to matter?
Thanks for the clarification. It turns out that the suspect, Jean Guillot, 35, a local fisherman who grew up in the Dordogne, has addiction and mental issues, and despite yelling "Allahu Akbar," neither his religion nor terrorism appears to have been a motive.No, in France.
The suspect in this case was Anthony Williams, a British national born in the UK. Both terrorism and religion have been ruled out as a motive.Huntingdon is very close to me and I used to travel there for work, but no, we don't know the motive yet.
This appears to have been some sort of domestic dispute between the man and his landlord.However last week there was an Afghan asylum seeker that murdered someone walking there dog, stabbed a 14-year-old and injured someone else, which is one of many recent instances of people from those backgrounds proving they shouldn't be allowed here.