Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
No I don't, because it wasn't. Randi had a challenge prize for the demonstration of supernatural claims. Applicants were required to work with Randi's staff to develop a test for a public challenge.
I already mentioned their call-in shows and streams, but this isn't about theological debates. This was about professors on the watch list and the claim that Kirk debated them.
Randi had more than that on his web site. I know because I saw it. What's sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander: If the memory of Kirk is besmirched because he had a web site promoting his views, then we must also besmirched Randi's for doing the same. And IIRC, Randi once made a post where he insinuated a couple had possibly killed their disabled child.
That is obviously not the claim being made. Charlie Kirk put a list of people's names and affiliations on a Watchlist.
Was it defamatory? If so they could have sued. But I don't see the relevance to Charlie Kirk's list of 'politically incorrect' professors.
I never mentioned Randi's web site, only his supernatural challenge.
I haven't.
This thread is about Kirk. I mentioned his professor harassment site. It is one of many marks against Kirk.
