• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Illinois Gov. Pritzker Says Chicago Is Safe As 35 Shot, 5 Dead Labor Day Weekend

Oompa Loompa

Well-Known Member
Jun 4, 2020
9,445
4,983
Louisiana
✟296,938.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
yes, cities like Portland and Minneapolis but that is not the case with these cities who have a shortage of police officers and a problem with recruitment. These are predominately black urban cities, and quite different from the more white liberal ones who think they do not need much police. I am not sure if more funding will help. But you can't deploy the national guard forever. So Trump should step up and offer long term funding for officers. This has been done in the past. with Clinton. I wonder who killed the grants?

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Just a dozen days after money became
available, President Clinton today announced the first round of
police hiring grants under the new crime bill, an important step
toward his goal of putting 100,000 police on America's streets.
More than $200 million in grants were awarded to communities in
all 50 states and Puerto Rico, including 332 police departments,
46 sheriffs' departments, six Indian tribal groups, and several
other law enforcement agencies. The crime bill authorizes money
to increase the number of police in America by twenty percent.
At a White House ceremony today, President Clinton and
Attorney General Janet Reno welcomed mayors and chiefs of police
from many of the jurisdictions receiving grants."


From google AI in asking does _____ want more police?
"Yes, the Memphis Police Department (MPD) is actively seeking more police officers to fill hundreds of open positions and reach their staffing goal of 2,200 to 2,300 officers, as they currently have 1,942 officers on staff as of late 2024."

Yes, the St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department (SLMPD) has sought more officers due to a documented shortage, with the police union and an internal memo indicating a deficit, even as the mayor has claimed a sufficient number per capita. While the police department is actively working on recruitment, challenges like officer departures and better pay in surrounding departments have contributed to the shortage.


Yes, the New Orleans Police Department (NOPD) is actively seeking more police officers to address a significant shortage, having lost many officers recently and facing ongoing recruitment challenges despite efforts like pay raises and remote testing. The department needs to increase staffing to adequately respond to public safety concerns and reduce the workload on existing officers, who are struggling with low morale and feelings of being unsupported.



Why NOPD is seeking more police:
  • Historical Low Staffing:
    The NOPD is at an all-time low in officer numbers, with many officers leaving the department.

  • High Crime Rates:
    The city has experienced a surge in violent crimes like shootings and carjackings, leading residents to feel unsafe and demand more action from the city.


  • Officer Morale:
    Current officers are experiencing low morale due to negative public perception, a lack of support from the city, and concerns about policies that they feel hinder their work.
Yes! Please send more troops to other Democrat run cities to fix their crime problems!
 
Upvote 0

Richard T

Well-Known Member
Mar 25, 2018
3,215
2,039
traveling Asia
✟136,744.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Yes! Please send more troops to other Democrat run cities to fix their crime problems!
Troops are OK, but more police funding would be better. Let's send them to the red states too. Memphis, New Orleans, St Louis, Kansas City all have more violent crime than Chicago. But I think Trump is doing this out of spite rather than address the problem of crime in USA cities in a fair way. I think too that cities should be allowed to decline Federal troops or aid. Some Red states declined expanded medicare. I imagine more died from that than will ever die from declining troops. To me conservatism is more constant. You allow states rights when possible.
 
Upvote 0

Richard T

Well-Known Member
Mar 25, 2018
3,215
2,039
traveling Asia
✟136,744.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single

Meanwhile, 35 people are shot dead in Chicago, and Denocrats dont care because they hate Trump and dont want him to send the national guard to fix the problem. Democrat mayor proves yet again than they hate Trump more than they care about the citizens they represent.
I will help Trump with his math. New Orleans population is 363,000 / 4 deaths = 1 death per 91,000 people
Chicago population is 2,721, 000 / 7 deaths = 1 death per 385,000 people
Wichita population is 400,000 / 4 deaths = 1 death per 100,000 people

Murder rate this week was 4X higher in New Orleans. and Wichita. I am sure I could find more but does evidence even matter?
Do MAGA folks or Trump care about red states too? Or is it the political win that is the most important thing? What about policies that violate state's rights? This is a centerpiece of conservatism to me. The consent of the governed is an entrenched idea from John Locke. Better to send the troops where they are needed most, if Kansas and Louisiana consent.

Look at Sen. Rand Paul's position on troops doing police or immigration work. Around 3:30 in the video.

I am glad that Trump is cleaning up the DC area, if he desires to make the changes long lasting. DC is not a state and is more of a Federal responsibility. The biggest problem I found with cities with the highest crime is that they can't find enough officers to hire. We should pray that Trump can help with that problem.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: DaisyDay
Upvote 0

Oompa Loompa

Well-Known Member
Jun 4, 2020
9,445
4,983
Louisiana
✟296,938.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Troops are OK, but more police funding would be better. Let's send them to the red states too. Memphis, New Orleans, St Louis, Kansas City all have more violent crime than Chicago. But I think Trump is doing this out of spite rather than address the problem of crime in USA cities in a fair way. I think too that cities should be allowed to decline Federal troops or aid. Some Red states declined expanded medicare. I imagine more died from that than will ever die from declining troops. To me conservatism is more constant. You allow states rights when possible.
Again, I agree. Send them to BLUE cities.
 
Upvote 0

DaisyDay

I Did Nothing Wrong!! ~~Team Deep State
Jan 7, 2003
42,209
20,106
Finger Lakes
✟315,376.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Unitarian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Upvote 0

Tropical Wilds

Little Lebowski Urban Achiever
Oct 2, 2009
6,961
5,073
New England
✟272,436.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
What laws do you propose and why the states accused of being the source/cause of these gun crimes not experiencing similar gun crime issues? The short answer is that the problem is not the gun laws, but a culture that promotes gun violence.
By not wanting to refine gun laws, you’re not super concerned about lowering gun violence, which means it must not be that big a problem, which means the federal government doesn’t need to invade Chicago.

Problem solved.
 
Upvote 0

Tropical Wilds

Little Lebowski Urban Achiever
Oct 2, 2009
6,961
5,073
New England
✟272,436.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Criminals don't care about gun control. That's why, they are CRIMINALS.

If anything, we have a mental health problem.

Our nation needs to address that.

Saying that as a person who doesn't own guns, nor will ever use one.

(for personal reasons)

My opinion only.
They don’t care about gun control, no, but it certainly makes the criminals easier to identify and arrest.
 
Upvote 0

Tropical Wilds

Little Lebowski Urban Achiever
Oct 2, 2009
6,961
5,073
New England
✟272,436.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Again, I agree. Send them to BLUE cities.
Girl, you just told on yourself.

By wanting them sent to blue cities, you reveal that:

1. You don’t want this action taken in areas with citizens you agree with

2. The overall deployment of government against its own people on its own land is undesirable and thus you don’t want it for you

3. There is an intimidation factor in deployment and you want it used on the people you don’t agree with

4. If suppression is a byproduct of what’s occurring, you’re fine with it occurring against the people you don’t agree with but don’t want it in cities with people who support your agenda

I’m not shocked that the person who doesn’t think women should be allowed to vote thinks all this, mind you. I’m just amused that you really have zero ethical or moral issue with admitting the vision you want in America is not that of a democracy and that you’re willing to deploy Herod-like tactics to ensure it.
 
Upvote 0

RileyG

Veteran
Christian Forums Staff
Moderator Trainee
Hands-on Trainee
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Feb 10, 2013
36,659
21,100
29
Nebraska
✟784,779.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Republican
They don’t care about gun control, no, but it certainly makes the criminals easier to identify and arrest.
What? They can obtain guns illegally, that’s the issue.
 
Upvote 0

Tropical Wilds

Little Lebowski Urban Achiever
Oct 2, 2009
6,961
5,073
New England
✟272,436.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
What? They can obtain guns illegally, that’s the issue.
Ok. If I have cocaine, it’s pretty obvious I’m breaking the law. If somebody has a gun that is illegal to own or with modifications that are illegal to have or are absent the control they need to have or in an area they’re clearly not allowed, when they are spotted, it’s obvious they’re breaking the law.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RileyG
Upvote 0

DaisyDay

I Did Nothing Wrong!! ~~Team Deep State
Jan 7, 2003
42,209
20,106
Finger Lakes
✟315,376.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Unitarian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
WRONG! Try again. Are they red cities, or are they blue cities located in red states?
Crime ridden Oklahoma City looks pretty darn rosy to me.
 
Upvote 0

Oompa Loompa

Well-Known Member
Jun 4, 2020
9,445
4,983
Louisiana
✟296,938.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Ok. If I have cocaine, it’s pretty obvious I’m breaking the law. If somebody has a gun that is illegal to own or with modifications that are illegal to have or are absent the control they need to have or in an area they’re clearly not allowed, when they are spotted, it’s obvious they’re breaking the law.
I have a splendid idea. Why not have areas that legally prohibit gun possession all together? We can call these areas "gun free zones." We can implement these "gun free zones" in any and all areas that we deem that guns have no purpose. Like public and private schools. Surly the very same criminals who disregard every gun law will obey this one and never take advantage of the fact that all the law abiding citizens will be completely unarmed in these "gun free zones."

I anyone things anything said was stupid, it is because it is stupid.
 
Upvote 0

RileyG

Veteran
Christian Forums Staff
Moderator Trainee
Hands-on Trainee
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Feb 10, 2013
36,659
21,100
29
Nebraska
✟784,779.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Republican
Ok. If I have cocaine, it’s pretty obvious I’m breaking the law. If somebody has a gun that is illegal to own or with modifications that are illegal to have or are absent the control they need to have or in an area they’re clearly not allowed, when they are spotted, it’s obvious they’re breaking the law.
Ok!
 
Upvote 0

Aldebaran

NCC-1701-A
Christian Forums Staff
Purple Team - Moderator
Site Supporter
Oct 17, 2009
43,102
13,643
Wisconsin, United States of America
✟881,547.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Ok. If I have cocaine, it’s pretty obvious I’m breaking the law. If somebody has a gun that is illegal to own or with modifications that are illegal to have or are absent the control they need to have or in an area they’re clearly not allowed, when they are spotted, it’s obvious they’re breaking the law.
And the more gun types and features on them that are made illegal, the more "criminals" we make out of what were once law-abiding citizens. If you want to eliminate illegal guns and criminals who have them, we should legalize all types of guns. That would also take a heavy burden off the back of law enforcement, and would result in having to maintain so many people in jails/prisons.
 
Upvote 0