• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

All humans are 50th cousins?

Tuur

Well-Known Member
Oct 12, 2022
2,517
1,322
Southeast
✟88,173.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I'm curious what Long/Heinlein said. I'm getting the feeling I'm likely to agree with it.
Let's if I can find it. Ah, here it is:
This sad little lizard told me that he was a Brontosaurus on his mother’s side. I did not laugh; people who boast of ancestry often have little else to sustain them. Humoring them costs nothing and adds to happiness in a world in which happiness is in short supply.
- Robert Heinlein, Time Enough for Love, 1973.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hans Blaster
Upvote 0

Tuur

Well-Known Member
Oct 12, 2022
2,517
1,322
Southeast
✟88,173.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I don't think anyone's pointed it out, but my back-of-the-envelope estimate has a major flaw: It presumes a population where none are isolated. Did mention that, but didn't bother to think about what that meant.

Let's say a family in Asia parted company about, oh, let's say 30,000 years ago to pull a number out of the hat, with one brother heading north while another stays behind. They really lose contact with each other's relations about 24,000 years ago when one strikes out across the land bridge. From that point their descendants have no contact until the 20th Century. That's roughly 960 generations, so they would be 959th cousins, far more than 50th. According to one theory, there was a split between European and Asian populations about 45,000 years ago, and had no real contact until Atilla rode into town about 43,000 years later. That's about 1,720 generations, so they'd be about 1,719th cousins. Populations that split over long periods of time would be way over 50th cousins in kinship, something I should have realized but didn't.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,995
52,622
Guam
✟5,143,321.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Charles Darwin: "Why is everyone looking at me?"

Well ... let's see ...

1755647212722.png


1755647469472.jpeg


1755647513693.jpeg


1755647558504.jpeg


Is it any wonder?
 
Upvote 0

Hans Blaster

Raised by bees
Mar 11, 2017
22,006
16,563
55
USA
✟417,187.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
I don't think anyone's pointed it out, but my back-of-the-envelope estimate has a major flaw: It presumes a population where none are isolated. Did mention that, but didn't bother to think about what that meant.

Let's say a family in Asia parted company about, oh, let's say 30,000 years ago to pull a number out of the hat, with one brother heading north while another stays behind. They really lose contact with each other's relations about 24,000 years ago when one strikes out across the land bridge. From that point their descendants have no contact until the 20th Century. That's roughly 960 generations, so they would be 959th cousins, far more than 50th. According to one theory, there was a split between European and Asian populations about 45,000 years ago, and had no real contact until Atilla rode into town about 43,000 years later. That's about 1,720 generations, so they'd be about 1,719th cousins. Populations that split over long periods of time would be way over 50th cousins in kinship, something I should have realized but didn't.

Even if we take the 50 generations within Europe or East Asia as a fixed thing, I don't think we need to get to 1700 generations between them. Even in ancient times there were long distance trade routes and other low-levels of population exchange. Not enough to change the overall character of regions, but enough to get that *one* person whose descendants include both groups. Think of the brothers in your example as traders from India, one trading with Mesopotamia, the other China, things happen...
 
Upvote 0

RileyG

Veteran
Christian Forums Staff
Moderator Trainee
Hands-on Trainee
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Feb 10, 2013
35,891
20,660
29
Nebraska
✟759,897.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Republican
I've been thinking about taking one of those dna tests to see where your heritage originates. Parts of England are a bit of a mish mash with Romans, Vikings, Saxons etc being regular visitors. But parts of Wales might have escaped the interbreeding.
I've done about 5 different DNA tests, and many of them contradict each other.

It also occurs my deceased uncle (died 2010) apparently had an affair in the early 1960s....and someone who is 99.9% chance of being my first cousin messaged me. He found out via ancestry.com his father, whom he is named after, is not really his biological father.

Yikes!
 
Upvote 0

Ophiolite

Recalcitrant Procrastinating Ape
Nov 12, 2008
9,276
10,162
✟286,234.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Private
It also occurs my deceased uncle (died 2010) apparently had an affair in the early 1960s....and someone who is 99.9% chance of being my first cousin messaged me. He found out via ancestry.com his father, whom he is named after, is not really his biological father.
It puts meat on the bones of the old comic line, "I can trace my ancestry as far back as my mother".
 
  • Like
Reactions: RileyG
Upvote 0

Tuur

Well-Known Member
Oct 12, 2022
2,517
1,322
Southeast
✟88,173.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I've done about 5 different DNA tests, and many of them contradict each other.

It also occurs my deceased uncle (died 2010) apparently had an affair in the early 1960s....and someone who is 99.9% chance of being my first cousin messaged me. He found out via ancestry.com his father, whom he is named after, is not really his biological father.

Yikes!
I'm dubious about these kinds of tests matching regions. I'm especially dubious about how they manage your information. What finally shook out with 23andMe data?

Ultimately, except for health reasons, it doesn't matter, anyway. Who our ancestors were has no real bearing on us. And if we play the game of halving their genetic contribution with each generation, very quickly it runs to practically nothing, unless there's some kind of trait that manifests with the right gene combinations.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RileyG
Upvote 0

RileyG

Veteran
Christian Forums Staff
Moderator Trainee
Hands-on Trainee
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Feb 10, 2013
35,891
20,660
29
Nebraska
✟759,897.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Republican
I'm dubious about these kinds of tests matching regions. I'm especially dubious about how they manage your information. What finally shook out with 23andMe data?

Ultimately, except for health reasons, it doesn't matter, anyway. Who our ancestors were has no real bearing on us. And if we play the game of halving their genetic contribution with each generation, very quickly it runs to practically nothing, unless there's some kind of trait that manifests with the right gene combinations.
I dunno, I was just curious is all.
 
Upvote 0

RileyG

Veteran
Christian Forums Staff
Moderator Trainee
Hands-on Trainee
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Feb 10, 2013
35,891
20,660
29
Nebraska
✟759,897.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Republican
Upvote 0