Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Who was the alternative again, the sexual abuser?
They arguably were worse when they were in power.
Ain't rhat true. We have congresswoman stating they have more allegiance to order countries than they do this one.
The choice of potential nominees including an overt Commie and a "sexual abuser" kinda tells us where the Democrats stand, doesn't it?
Hey, I've stood next to Muslims protesting the sexualization of children in primary school curicula. I've found that a good many Southern Muslims are very, well, Southern. They're more likely to see Christians as "people of the book" rather than infidels. We're not likely to change each other's religious beliefs, but we share some common ground in the secular realm. One is that state schools should stick to teaching and leave off indoctrination. The cool thing is that Christians can be smeared as xenophobic louts who want to impede "progress", but if you claim that about Muslims then you're religious and cultural bigot, and probably a racist, since Islam is always associated with people of Middle Eastern descent. Gotta love it! So no, I din't give a rat's hind quarters whether Commie Boy is a Muslim or not (how many Muslim Communists do you know?), it's the fact that he's an open Communist that I despise. Given my family's experiences with sho-nuff Communism of the kind dispensed by the Kim Dynasty in Korea, my loathing for Commies as a species puts them lower than the Nazis on my scale of inhuman scum. After all, the Nazis only tried to kill my dad, while Communists actually did kill some of my kinfolk , badly injured others, and separated the family forever. Not that you'd care about any of that, of course.
Oh no, I lije it when the radicals are out in the open, so we can all see who they are. That way the American people are clear who the Democratic Party is, what they are all about and who is running it.
The Western Journal.
This again?
So radical for a child of immigrants having pride in her heritage! What would you have from her? To repudiate her roots?
Again that shows how messed up the Democratic Party is right now. Of course its not the only thing.
The key difference here is democrats are apparently rejecting their sex pest candidates instead of electing them to high office.
So? How many articles and videos would you like me to post? Even she didnt deny saying it.
Is that why they rejected him? Or was it the fact that he wasnt that great and killed thousands of old people during COVID? Or maybe it was because they WANT a communist. This is the direction of the Democratic party. Radicals taking over.
I have no idea. I don't live in New York.
Could be. He's carrying a ton of baggage and running on name recognition alone doesn't seem to be cutting it.
Kind of like the GOP of about a decade ago. They could have gone with a more centrist but the people wanted a radical outsider to shake things up. You can understand that sentiment, right?
Me too and I'm also hoping more candidates like him start to spring up around the country. Clearly the old Biden, Obama, Clinton, Pelosi, Schumer Cuomo establishment wing of the party isn't drawing in voters like it used to.
Well, thats probably because of the radicalism in the Democratic Party.
While I do think rjs330 was wrong to previously respond to you without really addressing this point you raise, appealing to an automated translation isn't the greatest defense because... well, even if they've gotten a lot better, automated translations makes errors all the time (not that humans are immune, but automated translation is worse). When companies try cutting corners by trying to translate things via automated translations, they tend to get blowback because the translations are noticeably worse.This again?
www.nationalreview.com
www.snopes.com
