• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Anyone have good arguments against Calvinism.

Hentenza

I will fear no evil for You are with me
Mar 27, 2007
35,288
4,189
On the bus to Heaven
✟84,625.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
The ways of God are far above our ways.
My brother I agree with your statement but it does not respond to my post. I’ll give you a hint: apostolic succession according to the RCC.
 
Upvote 0

Carl Emerson

Well-Known Member
Dec 18, 2017
15,538
10,399
79
Auckland
✟439,323.00
Country
New Zealand
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
no God wills all men everywhere to repent. The elect are those that will repent. God does not force them to repent.
John 6:44
No one can come to Me unless the Father who sent Me draws him; and I will raise him up on the last day.

Ephesians 2:8
For by grace you have been saved through faith; and this is not of yourselves, it is the gift of God;
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
Jun 26, 2003
8,848
1,502
Visit site
✟299,488.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
John 6:44
No one can come to Me unless the Father who sent Me draws him; and I will raise him up on the last day.

Ephesians 2:8
For by grace you have been saved through faith; and this is not of yourselves, it is the gift of God;
Yes God draws them, He does not handcuff, hoodwink, or kidnap them

I know it is not of myself as the natural man has no instinct to chose God. Our natural state wishes to make a god of ourselves. That is the temptation between which our will chooses.
Take pride and claim we know enough of God ourselves and brag we can never lose Him, or humble ourselves, take up our cross and say not my will but thine be done, let it be done to me according to your words.
If we claim mental ascent of Jesus is all that is needed, it goes against Jesus own instruction when He says you will seek me and find me when you search with all your heart. If we say we have already found Him, how does that spur us to keep searching? That kind of preaching leads to spiritual sloth and the attitude of the Laodiceans which God warned us about
 
Upvote 0
Jun 26, 2003
8,848
1,502
Visit site
✟299,488.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
Again, assuming facts not in evidence.

My brother, you go where the Lord takes you and I will go where the Lord takes me. Talking RCC speak is not going to change my mind.

No church is invisible in the eyes of the Lord. Where 3 are gathered in my name there I am. You need to trust the Holy Spirit in which, as Christians, we walk in.

BTW- you are still to respond to my post 220 and to the post with the cathechism quotes that you requested and then quickly ignored.
You need to give me time. So as not to miscommunicate, can you tell me your point in quoting that portion of the Catechism?
 
Upvote 0

Hentenza

I will fear no evil for You are with me
Mar 27, 2007
35,288
4,189
On the bus to Heaven
✟84,625.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
You need to give me time. So as not to miscommunicate, can you tell me your point in quoting that portion of the Catechism?
Because it adds works for salvation. 1129 adds sacraments as a requirement for salvation which is not biblical. 2010 states that we can gather merits by ourselves during sanctification for the attainment of salvation. Meaning that we work for salvation not from salvation. 2027 is similar to 2010 but only states that we can gather merits for our own salvation which takes salvation to a merit salvation. 2068 related to the canons of Trent which requires baptism and the Ten Commandments in order to attain salvation. This is faith plus works salvation.
 
Upvote 0
Jun 26, 2003
8,848
1,502
Visit site
✟299,488.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
Because it adds works for salvation. 1129 adds sacraments as a requirement for salvation which is not biblical. 2010 states that we can gather merits by ourselves during sanctification for the attainment of salvation. Meaning that we work for salvation not from salvation. 2027 is similar to 2010 but only states that we can gather merits for our own salvation which takes salvation to a merit salvation. 2068 related to the canons of Trent which requires baptism and the Ten Commandments in order to attain salvation. This is faith plus works salvation.
I can show you the scriptures, but the sacraments were commanded by Jesus, so to deny them would be to rebel against Jesus commands
Jesus says if you love me, keep my commandments. To rebel against them then would be to not love Jesus. Are you saying that those that are saved do not love Jesus?

I mean Jesus said unless you eat my flesh and drink my blood, you have no life in you. Also He commanded the Apostles to go into all the world and baptize them in the name of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit, teaching them to obey all that I have commanded you. How does the catechism contradict these scriptures?
 
Upvote 0

Hentenza

I will fear no evil for You are with me
Mar 27, 2007
35,288
4,189
On the bus to Heaven
✟84,625.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I can show you the scriptures, but the sacraments were commanded by Jesus, so to deny them would be to rebel against Jesus commands
You have great theological drama in your responses. I don’t see John 3:16 adding anything to salvation beyond faith so anything else is done FROM salvation. See no drama. No one is rebelling.
Jesus says if you love me, keep my commandments. To rebel against them then would be to not love Jesus. Are you saying that those that are saved do not love Jesus?
More drama. No one is rebelling against the Ten Commandments because again we keep them FROM salvation. We keep them because of our love of Jesus and this love can only come from justification and regeneration. We cannot love Jesus in our fallen state.
I mean Jesus said unless you eat my flesh and drink my blood, you have no life in you. Also He commanded the Apostles to go into all the world and baptize them in the name of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit, teaching them to obey all that I have commanded you. How does the catechism contradict these scriptures?
Because the catechism asserts that you need to do the above TO attain salvation. Once again we have the Lord’s supper and baptize new believers FROM salvation. In fact, we only baptize those that have professed their faith in Jesus Christ as it shows in scripture.
 
Upvote 0

Valletta

Well-Known Member
Oct 10, 2020
12,260
5,814
Minnesota
✟327,667.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Because the catechism asserts that you need to do the above TO attain salvation. Once again we have the Lord’s supper and baptize new believers FROM salvation. In fact, we only baptize those that have professed their faith in Jesus Christ as it shows in scripture.
John 6:53 So Jesus said to them, “Truly, truly, I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of man and drink his blood, you have no life in you; RSVCE
 
Upvote 0

Hentenza

I will fear no evil for You are with me
Mar 27, 2007
35,288
4,189
On the bus to Heaven
✟84,625.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
John 6:53 So Jesus said to them, “Truly, truly, I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of man and drink his blood, you have no life in you; RSVCE
And that’s what happens when you use verses out of context.

Audience: Jews
Reason for passage: comparing the manna that the descendants of the Jews ate in the desert to Jesus deity. Jesus begins his discourse announcing that He is the bread of life. Right before the verse that you cited Jesus states:

“So then the Jews were complaining about Him because He said, “I am the bread that came down out of heaven.” And they were saying, “Is this not Jesus, the son of Joseph, whose father and mother we know? How does He now say, ‘I have come down out of heaven’?” Jesus answered and said to them, “Stop complaining among yourselves. No one can come to Me unless the Father who sent Me draws him; and I will raise him up on the last day. It is written in the Prophets: ‘And they shall all be taught of God.’ Everyone who has heard and learned from the Father, comes to Me. Not that anyone has seen the Father, except the One who is from God; He has seen the Father. Truly, truly, I say to you, the one who believes has eternal life.”
‭‭John‬ ‭6‬:‭41‬-‭47‬ ‭NASB2020‬‬
Here He states what is actually needed for salvation.


“I am the bread of life. Your fathers ate the manna in the wilderness, and they died. This is the bread that comes down out of heaven, so that anyone may eat from it and not die. I am the living bread that came down out of heaven; if anyone eats from this bread, he will live forever; and the bread which I will give for the life of the world also is My flesh.” Then the Jews began to argue with one another, saying, “How can this Man give us His flesh to eat?” So Jesus said to them, “Truly, truly, I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink His blood, you have no life in yourselves. The one who eats My flesh and drinks My blood has eternal life, and I will raise him up on the last day. For My flesh is true food, and My blood is true drink. The one who eats My flesh and drinks My blood remains in Me, and I in him. Just as the living Father sent Me, and I live because of the Father, the one who eats Me, he also will live because of Me. This is the bread that came down out of heaven, not as the fathers ate and died; the one who eats this bread will live forever.””
‭‭John‬ ‭6‬:‭48‬-‭58‬ ‭NASB2020‬‬

Here Jesus is telling the unbelieving Jews that they must believe in Him to have salvation. The Christians were accused of performing cannibalistic rituals because if Jesus words and many of His audience did not believe His words.

But whether you read the passage right or not the fact still remains that I continue to state that we do the Lords Supper FROM salvation for FOR salvation as verse 47 do eloquently proclaims.

BTW, transubstantiation is an invention of the council of Trent. The elements do not turn into the flesh and blood of Christ.
 
Upvote 0
Jun 26, 2003
8,848
1,502
Visit site
✟299,488.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
You have great theological drama in your responses. I don’t see John 3:16 adding anything to salvation beyond faith so anything else is done FROM salvation. See no drama. No one is rebelling.

More drama. No one is rebelling against the Ten Commandments because again we keep them FROM salvation. We keep them because of our love of Jesus and this love can only come from justification and regeneration. We cannot love Jesus in our fallen state.

Because the catechism asserts that you need to do the above TO attain salvation. Once again we have the Lord’s supper and baptize new believers FROM salvation. In fact, we only baptize those that have professed their faith in Jesus Christ as it shows in scripture.
Again, how can one claim to love Jesus and not desire to keep His commandments? The Ten Commandments are Old Covenant. Jesus expanded on the Ten Commandments in Matthew 5-7, and He gave additional commandments which are demonstrated in the sacraments.
Are you saying that if we think we keep the Ten Commandments, we may ignore Jesus teaching?

It’s not drama, Just taking Jesus at His word. He says that there are those that claim to follow Him and have faith in Him, but do not. They will be cast into outer darkness where there is wailing and gnashing of teeth. His words, not only the Catechism or the Church.

According to you, we ignore everything taught in scripture and just profess faith in Jesus but don’t have to demonstrate it and we can be saved.

I don’t see that taught in scripture. Jesus says life is a struggle. Strive to enter the straight gate, take the narrow way. Few there be that find the way to life. The book of Acts says that it is through much suffering that we enter into life.

I see none of those warnings coming from you. Call it drama if you wish, but wailing and gnashing of teeth at the throne of grace is going to be dramatic, don’t you think?
 
Upvote 0

PloverWing

Episcopalian
May 5, 2012
5,143
6,118
New Jersey
✟404,382.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
I can show you the scriptures, but the sacraments were commanded by Jesus, so to deny them would be to rebel against Jesus commands

In my church's tradition, there's a separation of the sacraments into two groups: dominical sacraments, which were directly instituted by Jesus himself; and church sacraments (also called ecclesiastical sacraments or sacramental rites), which developed later in the life of the church. Baptism and the Eucharist are in the first category, and the other five are in the latter category.

I thought that Catholic theology made the same distinction. Am I mistaken?
 
Upvote 0

Hentenza

I will fear no evil for You are with me
Mar 27, 2007
35,288
4,189
On the bus to Heaven
✟84,625.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Again, how can one claim to love Jesus and not desire to keep His commandments?
Again, that is not what anyone here is claiming. The difference is than your church teaches that a person needs to keep the commandments FOR salvation while we keep the commandments FROM salvation as the Holt Scriptures teach. Your church teaches a faith plus works salvation.

You are starting from the wrong premise, hence theological drama.
 
Upvote 0

Valletta

Well-Known Member
Oct 10, 2020
12,260
5,814
Minnesota
✟327,667.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
And that’s what happens when you use verses out of context.

Audience: Jews
Reason for passage: comparing the manna that the descendants of the Jews ate in the desert to Jesus deity. Jesus begins his discourse announcing that He is the bread of life. Right before the verse that you cited Jesus states:

“So then the Jews were complaining about Him because He said, “I am the bread that came down out of heaven.” And they were saying, “Is this not Jesus, the son of Joseph, whose father and mother we know? How does He now say, ‘I have come down out of heaven’?” Jesus answered and said to them, “Stop complaining among yourselves. No one can come to Me unless the Father who sent Me draws him; and I will raise him up on the last day. It is written in the Prophets: ‘And they shall all be taught of God.’ Everyone who has heard and learned from the Father, comes to Me. Not that anyone has seen the Father, except the One who is from God; He has seen the Father. Truly, truly, I say to you, the one who believes has eternal life.”
‭‭John‬ ‭6‬:‭41‬-‭47‬ ‭NASB2020‬‬
Here He states what is actually needed for salvation.


“I am the bread of life. Your fathers ate the manna in the wilderness, and they died. This is the bread that comes down out of heaven, so that anyone may eat from it and not die. I am the living bread that came down out of heaven; if anyone eats from this bread, he will live forever; and the bread which I will give for the life of the world also is My flesh.” Then the Jews began to argue with one another, saying, “How can this Man give us His flesh to eat?” So Jesus said to them, “Truly, truly, I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink His blood, you have no life in yourselves. The one who eats My flesh and drinks My blood has eternal life, and I will raise him up on the last day. For My flesh is true food, and My blood is true drink. The one who eats My flesh and drinks My blood remains in Me, and I in him. Just as the living Father sent Me, and I live because of the Father, the one who eats Me, he also will live because of Me. This is the bread that came down out of heaven, not as the fathers ate and died; the one who eats this bread will live forever.””
‭‭John‬ ‭6‬:‭48‬-‭58‬ ‭NASB2020‬‬

Here Jesus is telling the unbelieving Jews that they must believe in Him to have salvation. The Christians were accused of performing cannibalistic rituals because if Jesus words and many of His audience did not believe His words.

But whether you read the passage right or not the fact still remains that I continue to state that we do the Lords Supper FROM salvation for FOR salvation as verse 47 do eloquently proclaims.

BTW, transubstantiation is an invention of the council of Trent. The elements do not turn into the flesh and blood of Christ.
"Transubstantiation" is a word for what Jesus tells us in John. When Jews doubted that they were to eat His true flesh, Jesus became more emphatic. The Greek changes to a word meaning to "masticate," to actually chew, physical eating. It was such a "hard saying" for the disciples of Jesus that many actually walked away. Jesus did not call them back and say "Wait, I was only speaking symbolically." Jesus linked this new sacrament to the Passover. In order to complete the Passover meal the Jews had to physically eat the lamb. Had they disobeyed God's orders to eat the lamb at the Passover they would not have been saved.
 
Upvote 0
Jun 26, 2003
8,848
1,502
Visit site
✟299,488.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
In my church's tradition, there's a separation of the sacraments into two groups: dominical sacraments, which were directly instituted by Jesus himself; and church sacraments (also called ecclesiastical sacraments or sacramental rites), which developed later in the life of the church. Baptism and the Eucharist are in the first category, and the other five are in the latter category.

I thought that Catholic theology made the same distinction. Am I mistaken?
Jesus breathed on the Apostles and gave them the power to forgive sin, so there is confession or Penance. He validated marriage as binding, so there is matrimony. He said John baptized with water, but He would baptize with the Holy Spirit and with fire, so there is baptism in rhe Holy Spirit which is confirmation.
He directly commissioned the twelve with Holy Orders and that charism has been passed down by the laying on of hands in apostolic succession
The anointing of the sick is mentioned in one of John’s epistles so that may be construed as coming later, but I would have to research that further, although Peter had exercised holy healing in his ministry and Jesus did directly commission him.
 
Upvote 0

Hentenza

I will fear no evil for You are with me
Mar 27, 2007
35,288
4,189
On the bus to Heaven
✟84,625.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
"Transubstantiation" is a word for what Jesus tells us in John. When Jews doubted that they were to eat His true flesh, Jesus became more emphatic. The Greek changes to a word meaning to "masticate," to actually chew, physical eating. It was such a "hard saying" for the disciples of Jesus that many actually walked away. Jesus did not call them back and say "Wait, I was only speaking symbolically." Jesus linked this new sacrament to the Passover. In order to complete the Passover meal the Jews had to physically eat the lamb. Had they disobeyed God's orders to eat the lamb at the Passover they would not have been saved.
Your church stands alone in this belief. Jesus defined a simile for the rest of us.
 
Upvote 0

Valletta

Well-Known Member
Oct 10, 2020
12,260
5,814
Minnesota
✟327,667.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Your church stands alone in this belief. Jesus defined a simile for the rest of us.
The Greek Orthodox also believe the literal words of Jesus. The three leaders of the reformation all came up with their own different ideas on the Eucharist and I don't know how may are ideas out there today. This was not new, first with the disciples described in John, who had been with Jesus up until that point. It was also so decades later:

Ignatius of Antioch:
“I have no taste for corruptible food nor for the pleasures of this life. I desire the bread of God, which is the flesh of Jesus Christ, who was of the seed of David; and for drink I desire his blood, which is love incorruptible” (Letter to the Romans 7:3 [A.D. 110]).
“Take note of those who hold heterodox opinions on the grace of Jesus Christ which has come to us, and see how contrary their opinions are to the mind of God. . . . They abstain from the Eucharist and from prayer because they do not confess that the Eucharist is the flesh of our Savior Jesus Christ, flesh which suffered for our sins and which that Father, in his goodness, raised up again. They who deny the gift of God are perishing in their disputes” (Letter to the Smyrnaeans 6:2–7:1 [A.D. 110]).
 
Upvote 0

Hentenza

I will fear no evil for You are with me
Mar 27, 2007
35,288
4,189
On the bus to Heaven
✟84,625.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
The Greek Orthodox also believe the words of Jesus.

All of us believe the words of Jesus but transubstantiation belief belongs only to the RCC.
The three leaders of the reformation all came up with their own different ideas on the Eucharist and I don't know how may are out there today. This was not new, first with the disciples described in John, who had been with Jesus up until that point. It was also so decades later:

Ignatius of Antioch:
“I have no taste for corruptible food nor for the pleasures of this life. I desire the bread of God, which is the flesh of Jesus Christ, who was of the seed of David; and for drink I desire his blood, which is love incorruptible” (Letter to the Romans 7:3 [A.D. 110]).
“Take note of those who hold heterodox opinions on the grace of Jesus Christ which has come to us, and see how contrary their opinions are to the mind of God. . . . They abstain from the Eucharist and from prayer because they do not confess that the Eucharist is the flesh of our Savior Jesus Christ, flesh which suffered for our sins and which that Father, in his goodness, raised up again. They who deny the gift of God are perishing in their disputes” (Letter to the Smyrnaeans 6:2–7:1 [A.D. 110]).
Ignatius is not pitching transubstantiation. Start with Thomas Aquinas but Trent finalized it. As a counterreformation council that only applied to the RCC the impetus was to separate the RCC from everyone else. Mistakes were made.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
Jun 26, 2003
8,848
1,502
Visit site
✟299,488.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
Again, that is not what anyone here is claiming. The difference is than your church teaches that a person needs to keep the commandments FOR salvation while we keep the commandments FROM salvation as the Holt Scriptures teach. Your church teaches a faith plus works salvation.

You are starting from the wrong premise, hence theological drama.
No you are misconstruing Church doctrine.
Please review the Canons on justification from the Council of Trent. Man is fully dependent on the grace of God for justification and does no work to bring it about.
The Church teaches works from justification as you say that you do. What the catechism teaches is that it is impossible to claim salvation and refuse to work. There is no such thing as a Christian who does not pray and does not deny himself, and does not repent of sin. Those that are justified and claim salvation yet continue to sin make a mockery of God.
The teaching on justification is simple. One who is justified will do the works lovingly and willingly.
If one refuses to work and rather enter in under presumption, he should have no hope of joining the marriage supper of the Lamb. As Jesus teaches that we cannot enter in without a wedding garment, though some will try, and Jesus said they will be bound hand a foot and cast into outer darkness.


This is from the council of Trent from a copy posted by the Holy See


CHAPTER XI.
On keeping the Commandments, and on the necessity and possibility thereof.



But no one, how much soever justified, ought to think himself exempt from the observance of the commandments; no one ought to make use of that rash saying, one prohibited by the Fathers under an anathema,-that the observance of the commandments of God is impossible for one that is justified. For God commands not impossibilities, but, by commanding, both admonishes thee to do what thou are able, and to pray for what thou art not able (to do), and aids thee that thou mayest be able; whose commandments are not heavy; whose yoke is sweet and whose burthen light. For, whoso are the sons of God, love Christ; but they who love him, keep his commandments, as Himself testifies; which, assuredly, with the divine help, they can do. For, although, during this mortal life, men, how holy and just soever, at times fall into at least light and daily sins, which are also called venial, not therefore do they cease to be just. For that cry of the just, Forgive us our trespasses, is both humble and true. And for this cause, the just themselves ought to feel themselves the more obligated to walk in the way of justice, in that, being already freed from sins, but made servants of God, they are able, living soberly, justly, and godly, to proceed onwards through Jesus Christ, by whom they have had access unto this grace. For God forsakes not those who have been once justified by His grace, unless he be first forsaken by them. Wherefore, no one ought to flatter himself up with faith alone, fancying that by faith alone he is made an heir, and will obtain the inheritance, even though he suffer not with Christ, that so he may be also glori-[Page 39]fied with him. For even Christ Himself, as the Apostle saith, Whereas he was the son of God, learned obedience by the things which he suffered, and being consummated, he became, to all who obey him, the cause of eternal salvation. For which cause the same Apostle admonishes the justified, saying; Know you not that they that run in the race, all run indeed, but one receiveth the prize? So run that you may obtain. I therefore so run, not as at an uncertainty: I so fight, not as one beating the air, but I chastise my body, and bring it into subjection; lest perhaps, when I have preached to others, I myself should become a cast-away. So also the prince of the apostles, Peter; Labour the more that by good works you may make sure your calling and election. For doing those things, you shall not sin at any time. From which it is plain, that those are opposed to the orthodox doctrine of religion, who assert that the just man sins, venially at least, in every good work; or, which is yet more insupportable, that he merits eternal punishments; as also those who state, that the just sin in all their works, if, in those works, they, together with this aim principally that God may be gloried, have in view also the eternal reward, in order to excite their sloth, and to encourage themselves to run in the course: whereas it is written, I have inclined my heart to do all thy justifications for the reward: and, concerning Moses, the Apostle saith, that he looked unto the reward
 
Upvote 0

Hentenza

I will fear no evil for You are with me
Mar 27, 2007
35,288
4,189
On the bus to Heaven
✟84,625.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
No you are misconstruing Church doctrine.
And yet I posted the evidence from the CCC that you still have not addressed.
Please review the Canons on justification from the Council of Trent. Man is fully dependent on the grace of God for justification and does no work to bring it about.
The Church teaches works from justification as you say that you do. What the catechism teaches is that it is impossible to claim salvation and refuse to work.
Then you work FOR salvation not FROM salvation. No one here is saying that the believers with saving faith refuse to do works or keep the Ten Commandments.

Secondly, as you have conceded before, justification is a progressive action in your church’s belief so you guys bunch up justification with sanctification making it a faith plus works salvation.
There is no such thing as a Christian who does not pray and does not deny himself, and does not repent of sin. Those that are justified and claim salvation yet continue to sin make a mockery of God.
The teaching on justification is simple. One who is justified will do the works lovingly and willingly.
If one refuses to work and rather enter in under presumption, he should have no hope of joining the marriage supper of the Lamb. As Jesus teaches that we cannot enter in without a wedding garment, though some will try, and Jesus said they will be bound hand a foot and cast into outer darkness.
Again, you are starting with the wrong premise. This is more theological drama. All Christians, including you, still sin otherwise no one would ever need to repent. Second, all Christians with saving faith pray and deny themselves. All Christians who have saving faith will do works but not for salvation but from salvation. We do the works that God prepared in advance for us to do because we are made a workmanship for Christ (Eph. 2). No one is made a workmanship for Christ unless they have been born again and justified. We will join the marriage supper of the Lamb.
 
Upvote 0

Carl Emerson

Well-Known Member
Dec 18, 2017
15,538
10,399
79
Auckland
✟439,323.00
Country
New Zealand
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Yes God draws them, He does not handcuff, hoodwink, or kidnap them

I know it is not of myself as the natural man has no instinct to chose God. Our natural state wishes to make a god of ourselves. That is the temptation between which our will chooses.
Take pride and claim we know enough of God ourselves and brag we can never lose Him, or humble ourselves, take up our cross and say not my will but thine be done, let it be done to me according to your words.
If we claim mental ascent of Jesus is all that is needed, it goes against Jesus own instruction when He says you will seek me and find me when you search with all your heart. If we say we have already found Him, how does that spur us to keep searching? That kind of preaching leads to spiritual sloth and the attitude of the Laodiceans which God warned us about

Was Paul bragging then when he made this claim?

Romans 8:38-39

For I am convinced that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor principalities, nor things present, nor things to come, nor powers, nor height, nor depth, nor any other created thing will be able to separate us from the love of God that is in Christ Jesus our Lord.

Contrary to your opinion I believe brothers and sisters are being robbed of Godly confidence by being convinced by nay-sayers that they must doubt their salvation and being daily afraid of losing it... To me this is the work of a wrong spirit that is intent on disempowering the Church.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hentenza
Upvote 0