• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Salvation Wars

caffeinated.hermit

Active Member
Jun 25, 2025
49
45
Mid-West
✟4,553.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Has anyone read Matthew W. Bates' "Beyond The Salvation Wars"?

It's getting some attention (negative and positive, but plenty positive), and I'm thinking about buying a copy. His basic thesis is that "faith" was never meant to mean "belief" but more like "active loyalty", (as to a King). The book also seems to examine and split apart the differences in how Catholics and Protestants think about and understand salvation, and what each might learn from the other.

This, to an extent, perhaps ties into the "New Perspective on Paul" and other recent works by Protestant scholars that question what Sola Fide means, or perhaps question it all together. Anyway... looks good, might buy it. :seedling:
 
Last edited:
  • Useful
Reactions: St_Worm2

d taylor

Well-Known Member
Oct 16, 2018
13,755
5,818
60
Mississippi
✟321,422.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Has anyone read Matthew W. Bates' "Beyond The Salvation Wars"?

It's getting some attention (negative and positive, but plenty positive), and I'm thinking about buying a copy. His basic thesis is that "faith" was never meant to mean "belief" but more like "active loyalty", (as to a King). The book also seems to examine and split apart the differences in how Catholics and Protestants think about and understand salvation, and what each might learn from the other.

This, to an extent, perhaps ties into the "New Perspective on Paul" and other recent works by Protestant scholars that question what Sola Fide means, or perhaps question it all together. Anyway... looks good, might buy it. :seedling:
-

Never read it and never will, but he is a little late to the game. People have been redefining belief to include works (commitment, obedience, etc..) for a very long time.
 
Upvote 0

St_Worm2

Simul Justus et Peccator
Site Supporter
Jan 28, 2002
28,144
45,798
68
✟3,111,251.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Hello @caffeinated.hermit, there is a pretty positive review of the book in Christianity Today from earlier this year. Are you a subscriber to CT by any chance?

It's online too (here: What Must We Do to Agree on Salvation? - Christianity Today), but you need to be a CT subscriber to read it online, I believe (I would be willing to copy it and PM it to you if you'd like me to? .. if you are unable to read it online).

The "positive" reviews of the book all seem to come from liberal Christian sources (like CT), and what Bates espouses as a way to bridge Catholic and Protestant salvation models is really nothing new, just FYI (one of his other books is called Salvation by Allegiance Alone, just FYI). To begin with, the basis for his teaching seems to require the belief that πίστις (pistis) means FAR more than its traditional meaning ("faith"/"belief"/"trust"), rather, that it should be rightly translated as "loyalty" or allegiance" to Christ instead.

BTW, he is a Protestant theologian who I believe both graduated from a Catholic seminary and is now a professor at a Catholic University (Notre Dame).
edit: Well, I certainly got most of that wrong :sigh: For a far better Bates' bio, go here: Matthew W. Bates | Northern Seminary

This book seems to start with what Protestants refer to as Lordship Salvation, but his idea of "salvation by allegiance" seems to go MUCH further than that (Lordship Salvation teaches that we are saved by grace alone, through faith alone, in Christ alone, APART from anything that "we" do, but allegiance salvation appears to include some of our works as a necessary part of our salvation, rather than as one of the many things that results from justification/salvation in the life of a true believer). IOW, Lordship Salvation teaches Ephesians 2:8-9 ~PLUS~ Ephesians 2:10 is true (that our salvation is by grace/faith alone, but that our salvation is always accompanied by/results in changes in what we desire/what we do/what and how we think/how we live our lives before God .. things that we will choose to do because we ARE believers, not things that we are ~required~ to do to BECOME or remain believers).

Ephesians 2
8 By grace you have been saved through faith; and that not of yourselves, it is the gift of God;
9 not as a result of works, so that no one may boast.
10 For we are His workmanship, created in Christ Jesus ~for/unto~ good works, which God prepared beforehand so that we would walk in them.

I'm looking for a negative review to hear from the other side (so to speak), which would be a conservative Protestant or Catholic article on the book, but I haven't found one yet (if I do, I'll pass it alone).

God bless you!!

--David
p.s. - though it looks to be an interesting read, at $17 for the Kindle edition/$18 for the paperback, I think that I going to wait and buy a used paperback when they become available (because again, I don't think that Bates is going to make any new or significant points about soteriology in this book, nor will he be able to bridge the divide that he is hoping to between Catholics and Protestants with his "allegiance salvation" model.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

caffeinated.hermit

Active Member
Jun 25, 2025
49
45
Mid-West
✟4,553.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Thanks for the feedback, @St_Worm2! I got through the CT article by using the "Read Only" setting on my browser, but thank you!

I think, next month, I may order it. I've been noticing a few books out lately by folks who are (technically) Protestant, kind of questioning Sola Fide, or, at least, questioning what it means. There was a book out by Paul A. Rainbow a while on the same topic. I might need to get that one, too.

I do see that Lordship Salvation models can be a bridge. Perhaps, in some ways, many of us are saying the same things in different ways. Perhaps this can be described as justification and sanctification being seen as part of a whole, instead of separate, or one springing from the other.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: St_Worm2
Upvote 0

St_Worm2

Simul Justus et Peccator
Site Supporter
Jan 28, 2002
28,144
45,798
68
✟3,111,251.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
If you have the time to read it, here's a short, sort of fun article about the 5 Solas of the Reformation (or at least a somewhat humorous way of looking at them) which I believe can actually be helpful in understanding what the Reformers really meant when they used them (it is to the Reformers that we should be looking to correctly define the terms that they coined, like sola fide, sola gratia, and solus Christus, rather than inventing our own definitions for them, which so many do today instead).
The Sole Soul of the Solas
It puzzles me deeply that so few are puzzled deeply by the paradox. We are so used to the befuddling language that we miss its befuddling nature. It ought to stop us in our tracks, arrest our attention, like those signs I see for Fifth Third Bank. Fifth Bank I could understand. Third Bank I could understand. I could understand them merging to become Fourth Bank. But Fifth Third Bank? What does that even mean?
In like manner, how is that our spiritual ancestors, our theological heroes, when they set about to tell us the one thing, ended up telling us five things? If I had lived in a cave for the last five hundred years and someone wanted to get me up to speed on the Reformation, and what it is I should believe and they said, “There are five things. The first one is sola–“ I would have to say, “Stop right there. If there are five, how can even one be called sola?”
It does, of course, in the end make perfect sense. The alones are not alone because they are talking, in a manner of speaking, on different axes. An infinite line is really infinite, but it doesn’t cover everything. An infinite plane is, in a manner of speaking, even more infinite that an infinite line, but it doesn’t cover everything. What sola Scriptura is seeking to keep out isn’t grace, or faith, or Christ or God’s glory. It’s trying to keep out tradition. Grace alone doesn’t exclude the Bible, or faith, or Christ or the glory of God.
In a very real sense, though they operate on different axes, these five are one. The Bible alone is God’s full revelation of His glory, in manifesting His grace in Christ, which becomes ours through the gift of faith. God’s grace is uniquely revealed in His Word, which manifests the work of Christ which becomes our by faith, all redounding to His glory. The solas are precise and potent affirmations of this truth, that it’s all about God. They remind us not just how we might have peace with God, but that peace with God is not the full and final end of all things. They remind us that the story of the Bible isn’t simply how we who are in dire straits can make it to safety, and how nice God is to play such an important role in making that happen. Instead they remind us that He is the end, and we are the means. The story is about Him and His glory more than us and our comfort.
Jesus makes much the same point in the Sermon on the Mount. He recognizes our weaknesses. We are self-centered, concerned with ourselves, and what we perceive our needs to be. So we worry about what we will eat and what we will wear. We fret about our provision and our status. What Jesus doesn’t tell us however, is, “Now, look, you have no need to worry about these things because you have someone on your side. Other people might need to worry but you don’t, because my Father in heaven is for you. You can pursue these things with confidence, knowing that you have the supreme advantage of having the supreme being on your side.”
What He told us instead was surprising. He told us to set aside our petty concerns and to set our minds on, well, depending on how you look at it, one, or two things. He said, “Seek first the kingdom of God and His righteousness.” Do we now have seven solas? Ought we to add the kingdom and His righteousness to the alones? By no means. These are all still together the one thing. There is an organic unity not only between the kingdom and the righteousness, but among these two and the five of the Reformation. We are not failing to pursue the kingdom of God when we are seeking after His righteousness. We are not failing to pursue His righteousness when we are seeking after His kingdom. We are pursuing one thing, one way, to honor and serve our Maker and Redeemer by affirming our dependence on Him and His preeminence in all things.
The God we serve is one. As such He calls us to follow one path. His commands are never and can never be pitted against each other. His wisdom is never and can never be pitted against itself. His grace is never and can never be pitted against His character. When we find ourselves torn, confused, pulled in different directions it isn’t because we are faithfully following Him, but because we are not. It isn’t because we are faithfully heeding His voice, but because we are not.
The two, His kingdom and His righteousness are one, as the five, the solas of the Reformation are one, as the Three, Father, Son and Holy Spirit are One. And these three groups are one as well. For in the end, they are all about the beginning. From the beginning they have always been about the end. For our lives are and always will be bound up together in the Alpha and the Omega. ~The Sole Soul of the Solas | RC Sproul Jr
--David
 
Upvote 0

St_Worm2

Simul Justus et Peccator
Site Supporter
Jan 28, 2002
28,144
45,798
68
✟3,111,251.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Hello again @caffeinated.hermit, I haven't found a contrasting review of Bates' book, but I did find one that seems to do so (take a look from a more conservative POV, or at least a more balanced one) about an earlier, but very similar book of his,

1753600019092.png

If you'd care to take a look, go here: Saved by ‘Allegiance’ Alone? On a New Attempt to Revise the Reformation

Thanks for the feedback, @St_Worm2! I got through the CT article by using the "Read Only" setting on my browser, but thank you!
Thank you for letting me know how to do that so I can let others know :oldthumbsup:

I think, next month, I may order it. I've been noticing a few books out lately by folks who are (technically) Protestant, kind of questioning Sola Fide, or, at least, questioning what it means. There was a book out by Paul A. Rainbow a while on the same topic. I might need to get that one, too.
If you find something interesting, perhaps you would consider coming back and telling us what you discover? (or perhaps you could start a thread about it so that we can discuss it?)

I do see that Lordship Salvation models can be a bridge. Perhaps, in some ways, many of us are saying the same things in different ways.
That's possible, of course, depending on how the two (or more) parties define the terminology that they are using (so each case would have to be considered individually).

Perhaps this can be described as justification and sanctification being seen as part of a whole, instead of separate, or one springing from the other.
That's what the Roman Catholics do. They refer to what Protestants call 1. "justification" and 2. "progressive sanctification" by simply calling all of it (the combination of the two, that is) "justification" (with 3. glorification thrown into the "justification" mix, as well). I believe that this is just one of the many reasons that our soteriological conversations leave us talking around, instead of to one another about this critical topic.

In the end however, I do not believe that there is a bridge that can be built between the two theologies, because our choosing to do good works and to live a holy life because we are ALREADY saved will always be at (unbridgeable) odds with our choosing to do good works and to live a holy life IN ORDER to be saved.

Gotta go. Talk to you later (Dv)

--David
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0