Is Muhammad the AntiChrist?

researchguy said:

I've heard this claim thrown around. But who would be the false prophet, and would satan be the author of the quran, the head of the unholy trinity who tries to be like God, while Muhammad tries to be like Jesus?

Click to expand...

Researchguy seems as research goes deeper into the origins of Islam it seems that Islam embraced the Aryan creed of one God with no 3 persons . There may have never been any Muhammad. Since you like to research very much. I do recommend Pfander films search for on Utube . Islams origins part 1 part 2 speaker Jay Smith . Wishing you a blessed day. Kathleen

researchguy said:

I've heard this claim thrown around. But who would be the false prophet, and would satan be the author of the quran, the head of the unholy trinity who tries to be like God, while Muhammad tries to be like Jesus?

Click to expand...

The bible says that evil makes itself look like an angel of light also the bible doesn't just say there will be one antichrist but antichrist(s) so anyone not in the will of our father is doing the will of there spiritual father. It's is likey that it's a religion designed for the end times to fight against Christians and the Israelites

researchguy said:

I've heard this claim thrown around. But who would be the false prophet, and would satan be the author of the quran, the head of the unholy trinity who tries to be like God, while Muhammad tries to be like Jesus?

Click to expand...

You are closer to the end than you think. Most everyone (if they aren't ready to meet the Lord Jesus today) is going to be in shock when it happens.

The person you are looking for is a political leader. While people shun the idea of obvious figures you might want to just get prepared for the big event. The false prophet isn't a religious figure, but more a scientific ("god of forces"). Israel was looking for this "political figure" in the Lord Jesus' day, who would take control politically through force. (sounding familiar?) Israel is still looking for a political figure today.

The deceiver comes with light and goodness and brings peace everywhere through strength. (Rev 6 - White horse, isn't Christ)

Where is the best place to hide something? In plain sight.

Pack your bags first and say your prayers, then continue your research. Things are further along than the popular consensus is aware of.

Lastly, don't go bonkers if you see it. Just be aware, share the Gospel, and stay prepared for the Bridegroom.

If you don't see it, you are looking too hard.

researchguy said:

I've heard this claim thrown around. But who would be the false prophet, and would satan be the author of the quran, the head of the unholy trinity who tries to be like God, while Muhammad tries to be like Jesus?

Click to expand...

A false prophet of necessity would be someone "professing" to be a genuine Christian. The bible describes both the antichrist and a false prophet who will rise to power just prior to Jesus return. The false prophet will appear as a lamb but speak as a dragon. (Rev. 13:11) We see this taking place today. Many "religious" leaders profess to be born again children of God yet preach many things that directly contradict the word of God.

The formation of the one world religion has been ongoing for quite some time. It began as ecumenism, and slowly progressed to Interfaithism. Interfaithism is all religions coming together regardless of their doctine. Adhering to the doctrine as established by God no longer matters to many. Many religious leaders, such as previous, as well as the newly elected pope state everyone that believe's in the God of Abraham, and that includes muslims are going to Heaven. (consider Muslims think Jesus was just a prophet and don't believe He resurrected) It is interesting to note as well that the Roman Catholic Church who sees itself as the Mother and all denominations that adhere to their water baptism practices as their daughters.

Sadly, the long held belief that it is unacceptable to refuse to abide by God's precepts is none existent in many churches today. The false prophet, who many believe to be the pope (due to his unwillingness to stand firm in God's truth) will encourage many to follow the dictates of the antichrist who is expected to be a government official. In the end both the Antichrist and the False Prophet will be thrown in the lake of fire. (Rev. 20:10)

Endtime.com is a great source for information:
"Understanding the End Time is the #1 prophecy study in the world that's
helped millions of people gain peace and hope about the future." Endime.com

ByGraceandLoveDivine said:

The bible says that evil makes itself look like an angel of light also the bible doesn't just say there will be one antichrist but antichrist(s) so anyone not in the will of our father is doing the will of there spiritual father. It's is likey that it's a religion designed for the end times to fight against Christians and the Israelites

Click to expand...

I think as you say Muhammad was an anti-Christ not THE AntiChrist.

researchguy said:

I've heard this claim thrown around. But who would be the false prophet, and would satan be the author of the quran, the head of the unholy trinity who tries to be like God, while Muhammad tries to be like Jesus?

Click to expand...

There have been many antichrists.

In the most generic and broadest sense anything that is against Christ is, quite literally, anti-Christ.

In the Epistles of St. John "antichrist" tends to mean heretical teachers.

How narrow or how broad we want to apply the term "antichrist" is going to matter a lot with questions like this. Was Muhammad "THE Antichrist", an eschatological figure who precedes the end of the world? Well, I suspect we can probably say no--it's been over 1300 years since Muhammad died. If, in the broadest sense, Muhammad claimed divine revelation directly contradicting the Gospel, and preached against the Christian religion and whose political and spiritual ambitions led to the suffering of Christians and, indeed, many people--well the term "antichrist" probably could work there. But then, many Christians have also, by the same token, been antichrists.

Again, there is a question of how loose, how broad, or how strict/narrow we want to use the term. And what, exactly, we mean by it.

-CryptoLutheran

Kathleen30 said:

Researchguy seems as research goes deeper into the origins of Islam it seems that Islam embraced the Aryan creed of one God with no 3 persons . There may have never been any Muhammad. Since you like to research very much. I do recommend Pfander films search for on Utube . Islams origins part 1 part 2 speaker Jay Smith . Wishing you a blessed day. Kathleen

Click to expand...

Arian, not Aryan. VERY different meanings. Also, Islam definitely isn't Arian; Arianism taught that Jesus was Divine, but a lesser Divinity than God the Father. Islam teaches that Jesus was human, but not in anyway divine; and that He didn't exist until His Virgin conception in Mary's womb. According to Islam, Jesus is the Virgin-born Son of Mary, but not Divine whatsoever. Arius, on the other hand, taught that Jesus was Divine, but less Divine than God; Arius believed in one Uncreated God (the Father) and a lesser Creature-God (the Son). What the Nicene Creed emphatically insists, against Arius, is that the Son is homousious with the Father, the Son is Uncreated, of the Same-Being as the Father.

-CryptoLutheran

ViaCrucis said:

Arian, not Aryan. VERY different meanings. Also, Islam definitely isn't Arian; Arianism taught that Jesus was Divine, but a lesser Divinity than God the Father. Islam teaches that Jesus was human, but not in anyway divine; and that He didn't exist until His Virgin conception in Mary's womb. According to Islam, Jesus is the Virgin-born Son of Mary, but not Divine whatsoever. Arius, on the other hand, taught that Jesus was Divine, but less Divine than God; Arius believed in one Uncreated God (the Father) and a lesser Creature-God (the Son). What the Nicene Creed emphatically insists, against Arius, is that the Son is homousious with the Father, the Son is Uncreated, of the Same-Being as the Father.

-CryptoLutheran

Click to expand...

A mere misspelling. But thank you. It seems to be what the latest findings be that Islam embraced Arianism

Kathleen30 said:

A mere misspelling. But thank you. It seems to be what the latest findings be that Islam embraced Arianism

Click to expand...

I'm aware of theories that certain heterodox forms of Christianity present in pre-Islamic Arabia may have been an influence on Muhammad's religious beliefs. But Islam isn't Arian. Arians believed in a Divine Son of God, but they didn't believe the Divine Son of God was homoousios with the Father. Islam teaches that Jesus is only human, a view held not by Arianism, but was held by some groups like Ebionites and Nasoreans, these Judeo-Christian sects which held to a solely human, or a group similar or related to them, may have influenced Islam.

-CryptoLutheran

According to Jewish interpretation, the Messiah can have the concept of a collective soul. The Antichrist can be a collective soul, and a long list can be made. Mohammed is just one of them. Just as Hitler and Stalin were contradictory, the Antichrist is also contradictory. Muhammad could be a tool used by God, like King Nebuchadnezzar of Babylon, to strike the fallen Israel and the Christian Church.

researchguy said:

I've heard this claim thrown around. But who would be the false prophet, and would satan be the author of the quran, the head of the unholy trinity who tries to be like God, while Muhammad tries to be like Jesus?

Click to expand...

Muhammad is dead, plus the antichrist will be Jewish.

The antichrist is also the false prophet in Revelation and the beast from the land.

The state of Israel is declaring "their" messiah as we speak. If you need more than that I suggest a lot more prayer and some introspection. God made this all much easier than I ever thought it would be and people are still lost.

Wake up, smell the roses, and share the Gospel more often, before you are Raptured without realizing it was even coming.

He isn't hiding in some discreet corner of the world and if you are lost get your nose off the tree and step back to see the forest. I'm nearly to the point at assuming if you don't see it you aren't actually asking God and likely aren't in a position of needing to know anyway. The "spoon feeding" is for toddlers and toddlers aren't fighting God's war. They are usually busy playing with their toys.

Satan has decoys everywhere. Stop taking the bait, pray, study, take note of the obvious, and focus more on the Gospel if you aren't. We all know what we are are and are not doing for God and everything is literally so in-our-face Satan is trying to mock God's Elect.

Some of these statements are obviously are not for everyone, but if the shoes fits kick it off, be encouraged you are going home soon, and don't pass up an opportunity to share Jesus. You might not get another chance with prophecy unfolding faster than literally anyone but God can track.

researchguy said:

I've heard this claim thrown around. But who would be the false prophet, and would satan be the author of the quran, the head of the unholy trinity who tries to be like God, while Muhammad tries to be like Jesus?

Click to expand...

I think it is the same God for the Hebrews, Islam and Chistianity. Its just different takes on what God represents.

I think Islam takes certain aspects of the old testament and still aplies this today. Almost like they are bound by the old Jewish laws in some way. Such as the extreme sactions of the old law. Almost as though lost in that time and yet to move on.

Whereas the Jews are still waiting for their Messiah. They cannot live out the old laws as these need to be progressed somehow. So it has become all about teachings and practices and authority of the Torah itself. Which is still sort of binding to the old system.

Whereas in Christianity it actually fullfilled the old testament God in Christ as the Messiah.

I think we can trace back Islam to the heretic beliefs such as the Nestorians who deminished Christs divinity. Nestorianism was execommunicated to the middle east pre Islam and this influenced the beliefs about Christ. Such as the monoistic idea that there is only Allah and He has no Son of God.

An interesting discovery I read was that the Dome of the Rock was specifically aligned to look down on the church of the Holy Sepulchre as though signifying the superiority of Islam. The only text in the Dome itself pre Koran all allude to deminishing Christs status as the Son of God.

So it seems this was not just about denying the Jews their own sacred ground and an authority before Mohummad, But all about denying and denouncing Christ. So in that sense this is being an antiChrist.

But I think this is only one manifestation of being an antiChrist rather than the antiChrist whoever or whatever that may be. It all feeds into creating the climate for the antiChrist.

Thats why I think we can see two completely different forms or anti Christ uniting in Woke and support for radical ideologies that hate the Jews and western Christianity. Two different manifestations of anti Christian and Christ uniting for a common cause. It will be the conglomerate of this for which the anti Christ will be allowed to manifest.

Kathleen30 said:

Researchguy seems as research goes deeper into the origins of Islam it seems that Islam embraced the Aryan creed of one God with no 3 persons

Click to expand...

Note this heresy is called Arianism, after the fourth century heretic Arius, who taught it, and is not related to the Indo-Aryan (also known as Indo-European or Indo-Iranian) languages such as English, Hindu, German, Greek, French, Russian and so on, which is one of the principle language families of the greater Mediterranean region along with the Semitic, Turkic, Afro-Asiatic, Uralic (a group including Hungarian, Finnish and Estonian among other languages), and a few others.

Also some racists identify as “Aryans” including notably the historic Third Reich, but while the Nazis did promote a heretical form of Christianity, it was more akin to the ancient heresy of Marcionism (which claimed that the Old Testament was unrelated to the New) and was driven by racist views of Judaism, whereas the Arian heresy is a rejection of the Incarnation and Deity of our Lord, God and Savior Jesus Christ (and the Nicene Creed was developed in response to it).

Various forms of Arianism seem predominant among heretical sects such as the J/Ws, Unitarians and so on. One they reject the divinity of Christ everything else falls apart.

ViaCrucis said:

I'm aware of theories that certain heterodox forms of Christianity present in pre-Islamic Arabia may have been an influence on Muhammad's religious beliefs. But Islam isn't Arian. Arians believed in a Divine Son of God, but they didn't believe the Divine Son of God was homoousios with the Father. Islam teaches that Jesus is only human, a view held not by Arianism, but was held by some groups like Ebionites and Nasoreans, these Judeo-Christian sects which held to a solely human, or a group similar or related to them, may have influenced Islam.

-CryptoLutheran

Click to expand...

St. John of Damascus classified Islam as a discrete heresy, but it is widely believed Muhammad was influenced by members of a heretical sect.

At any rate, it is the case that large numbers of Arian Visigoths converted to Islam, apparently impressed by its denial of the Incarnation.

ViaCrucis said:

Arianism taught that Jesus was Divine, but a lesser Divinity than God the Father.

Click to expand...

That said, it is widely believed Arius was influenced by the proto-Unitarian views of Paul of Samosata and Lucian of Antioch.