The challenge in keeping track of the statements made by President Trump and his supporters lies in their frequent changes in stance. For instance, when President Trump imposed a 25% tariff on European allies and a 140% tariff on China, his supporters claimed it was merely a negotiation tactic. Subsequently, President Trump reduced these tariffs to 30%, and both he and his supporters asserted that they were achieving more favorable deals. During this period, the US did receive some revenue from these tariffs, prompting his supporters to celebrate the influx of funds from foreign governments. Simultaneously, negotiations continued to lower tariffs with other countries, while projections were being made about the revenue generated over the next decade and its potential to reduce national debt. This continuous adjustment raises the question of their ultimate objective—is it to maintain high tariffs to generate revenue and pay off the debt, or to lower tariffs through negotiations with other countries?
Each objective contradicts the other. If the goal is to raise tariffs so the US government can generate some revenue, regardless of who pays the revenue, and pay off some of the debt, then it is illogical to negotiate with foreign governments to lower tariffs. Conversely, if lowering the tariffs is the objective, then the discussions about how much money the US is generating from tariffs represent only a temporary gain that will not last more than 90 days. Therefore, talking about paying off debt by 2 trillion dollars is not practical.
But, If you present these points to any ardent supporters of President Trump, they usually disregard the facts and accuse you of being a "Trump hater" who dislikes America.