• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

So far, at least nine (now ~40) (now >70) judges, including Trump appointees, have called a halt to Trump executive actions

Bradskii

Old age should burn and rave at close of day;
Aug 19, 2018
22,812
15,471
72
Bondi
✟363,194.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Thomas Jefferson's fears have come to fruition. We have district courts violating the laws in regard to deportation, law where the courts are specifically banned from interfering. There are roughly 700 district courts, and the most radical judges among those 700 un-elected are being sought out by the left so they can make pronouncements on national issues. These individuals are trying to take over from the powers of the elected representatives of the people and the elected president. This cannot be allowed to go on, and will not. The people will not allow our Republic to be seized.
If I gave you a list of judges and asked you which ones that you would trust to give an opinion on any current matter before the courts then your answer would be 'Any one that rules in favour of the administration'. And we all know that that is your criteria.

Your opinion on any matter before the courts is then worthless.
 
Upvote 0

Valletta

Well-Known Member
Oct 10, 2020
11,808
5,574
Minnesota
✟309,593.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
If I gave you a list of judges and asked you which ones that you would trust to give an opinion on any current matter before the courts then your answer would be 'Any one that rules in favour of the administration'. And we all know that that is your criteria.

Your opinion on any matter before the courts is then worthless.
It's actually just the opposite. Radical judicial activism took a leap in order to try and stop Trump from becoming president. There is real hatred for Trump and whoever associated with Trump, and sadly many district attorney and judges are willing to abandon the law
 
Upvote 0

Bradskii

Old age should burn and rave at close of day;
Aug 19, 2018
22,812
15,471
72
Bondi
✟363,194.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
It's actually just the opposite. Radical judicial activism took a leap in order to try and stop Trump from becoming president. There is real hatred for Trump and whoever associated with Trump, and sadly many district attorney and judges are willing to abandon the law
Let's get real. If I gave you a complete list of all judges and asked you which ones you'd trust to give an honest verdict then you'd look each one up to check to see if he'd decided for or against Trump at any time.

The opinion on judicial matters of anyone who'd need to do that would be, as I said, worthless. It's the same as me asking you if you are prepared to accept any decision made by the courts, or even the SC. The answer would be 'Well, that depends on whether they make a decision with which I agree or not'.

It's a nonsensical position to hold.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gene2memE
Upvote 0

Hans Blaster

Hood was a loser.
Mar 11, 2017
21,058
15,911
55
USA
✟400,977.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
It's actually just the opposite. Radical judicial activism took a leap in order to try and stop Trump from becoming president. There is real hatred for Trump and whoever associated with Trump, and sadly many district attorney and judges are willing to abandon the law
Who were these mythical judges that tried to stop Trump from becoming president? Are then in the room with us?
 
Upvote 0

A2SG

Gumby
Jun 17, 2008
9,525
3,669
Massachusetts
✟162,292.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
It's actually just the opposite. Radical judicial activism took a leap in order to try and stop Trump from becoming president.
How, exactly? Please give specific details about how the judiciary attempted this.

It's been quite clearly demonstrated that even if Trump were to be convicted of a felony, that would not prevent him from running for president, being elected as president, or even serving as president. So his indictments would not have accomplished that goal, even if that were the intent.

So, I have to ask, what SPECIFICALLY did anyone do to prevent Trump from becoming president?

There is real hatred for Trump and whoever associated with Trump, and sadly many district attorney and judges are willing to abandon the law
Again, please give specific details about how anyone, judge or DA in any jurisdiction, abandoned the law.

I understand you believe this happened, but as has been explained several times on this forum, that is simply not the case. The judges and DAs in each and every trial Trump has been involved with followed the law, and any challenges Trump's legal team have attempted to argue otherwise have not met with success. I'll grant that there are appeals in the works, and those outcomes remain to be seen, but even if there are some constitutional issues to be resolved, there have been no blatantly illegal methods used against Trump. And the fact that Trump's legal team haven't been able to demonstrate any bears this out.

Fact is, there is no evidence of judicial impropriety whatsoever, and no evidence that anyone, anywhere, has abandoned the law.

Trump's words, spoken in public and not under oath, are not evidence of anything.

-- A2SG, anyone who believes a word Trump says shouldn't be anywhere near a used car dealership, for their own good....
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bradskii
Upvote 0

Gene2memE

Newbie
Oct 22, 2013
4,583
7,093
✟327,582.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Interesting statistics.


The Trump administration lost 26 out of 27 cases brought by it or against it in district courts during May-2025. That's up from 51/67 in Apr-2026 and 26/35 in Mar-2026.

In total, of 142 cases brought against it, it has seen adverse rulings in 111 of those (a staggering 78.2% loss rate). Since February, the Trump administration has lost 72.2% of cases with Republican-appointed judges and 80.4% of cases with Democrat-appointed judges.


The Trump administration appears to be uniquely bad at following the law and winning cases in front of federal judges. That was true of Trump 45 and it appears to be even more true for Trump 47.
 
Upvote 0

essentialsaltes

Fact-Based Lifeform
Oct 17, 2011
41,255
44,335
Los Angeles Area
✟989,539.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)
Judge Boasberg starts with quoting Kafka, and moves on from there.

As I understand it, CECOT inmates will be able to sue for habeas corpus as a class. And the government must facilitate this as they have so ably done in the case of Abrego Garcia.

1749074132737.png


1749074189679.png
 
Upvote 0

essentialsaltes

Fact-Based Lifeform
Oct 17, 2011
41,255
44,335
Los Angeles Area
✟989,539.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)
Upvote 0