So far, at least nine (now ~40) (now >70) judges, including Trump appointees, have called a halt to Trump executive actions

Valletta said:

To you that may be true. To me I strongly believe the judges must comply with U.S. law.

Click to expand...

Remind us where you received your schooling in U.S. law.

Valletta said:

Thomas Jefferson's fears have come to fruition. We have district courts violating the laws in regard to deportation, law where the courts are specifically banned from interfering. There are roughly 700 district courts, and the most radical judges among those 700 un-elected are being sought out by the left so they can make pronouncements on national issues. These individuals are trying to take over from the powers of the elected representatives of the people and the elected president. This cannot be allowed to go on, and will not. The people will not allow our Republic to be seized.

Click to expand...

If I gave you a list of judges and asked you which ones that you would trust to give an opinion on any current matter before the courts then your answer would be 'Any one that rules in favour of the administration'. And we all know that that is your criteria.

Your opinion on any matter before the courts is then worthless.

Bradskii said:

If I gave you a list of judges and asked you which ones that you would trust to give an opinion on any current matter before the courts then your answer would be 'Any one that rules in favour of the administration'. And we all know that that is your criteria.

Your opinion on any matter before the courts is then worthless.

Click to expand...

It's actually just the opposite. Radical judicial activism took a leap in order to try and stop Trump from becoming president. There is real hatred for Trump and whoever associated with Trump, and sadly many district attorney and judges are willing to abandon the law

Valletta said:

It's actually just the opposite. Radical judicial activism took a leap in order to try and stop Trump from becoming president. There is real hatred for Trump and whoever associated with Trump, and sadly many district attorney and judges are willing to abandon the law

Click to expand...

Let's get real. If I gave you a complete list of all judges and asked you which ones you'd trust to give an honest verdict then you'd look each one up to check to see if he'd decided for or against Trump at any time.

The opinion on judicial matters of anyone who'd need to do that would be, as I said, worthless. It's the same as me asking you if you are prepared to accept any decision made by the courts, or even the SC. The answer would be 'Well, that depends on whether they make a decision with which I agree or not'.

It's a nonsensical position to hold.

Valletta said:

It's actually just the opposite. Radical judicial activism took a leap in order to try and stop Trump from becoming president. There is real hatred for Trump and whoever associated with Trump, and sadly many district attorney and judges are willing to abandon the law

Click to expand...

Who were these mythical judges that tried to stop Trump from becoming president? Are then in the room with us?

Valletta said:

It's actually just the opposite. Radical judicial activism took a leap in order to try and stop Trump from becoming president.

Click to expand...

How, exactly? Please give specific details about how the judiciary attempted this.

It's been quite clearly demonstrated that even if Trump were to be convicted of a felony, that would not prevent him from running for president, being elected as president, or even serving as president. So his indictments would not have accomplished that goal, even if that were the intent.

So, I have to ask, what SPECIFICALLY did anyone do to prevent Trump from becoming president?

Valletta said:

There is real hatred for Trump and whoever associated with Trump, and sadly many district attorney and judges are willing to abandon the law

Click to expand...

Again, please give specific details about how anyone, judge or DA in any jurisdiction, abandoned the law.

I understand you believe this happened, but as has been explained several times on this forum, that is simply not the case. The judges and DAs in each and every trial Trump has been involved with followed the law, and any challenges Trump's legal team have attempted to argue otherwise have not met with success. I'll grant that there are appeals in the works, and those outcomes remain to be seen, but even if there are some constitutional issues to be resolved, there have been no blatantly illegal methods used against Trump. And the fact that Trump's legal team haven't been able to demonstrate any bears this out.

Fact is, there is no evidence of judicial impropriety whatsoever, and no evidence that anyone, anywhere, has abandoned the law.

Trump's words, spoken in public and not under oath, are not evidence of anything.

-- A2SG, anyone who believes a word Trump says shouldn't be anywhere near a used car dealership, for their own good....

Interesting statistics.


The Trump administration lost 26 out of 27 cases brought by it or against it in district courts during May-2025. That's up from 51/67 in Apr-2026 and 26/35 in Mar-2026.

In total, of 142 cases brought against it, it has seen adverse rulings in 111 of those (a staggering 78.2% loss rate). Since February, the Trump administration has lost 72.2% of cases with Republican-appointed judges and 80.4% of cases with Democrat-appointed judges.


The Trump administration appears to be uniquely bad at following the law and winning cases in front of federal judges. That was true of Trump 45 and it appears to be even more true for Trump 47.