Video: 'You would think we deported a candidate for father of the year'

Belk said:

This coming from the people who voted to elect a serial adulterer who hung out with Jeffry Epstein to the office of president.

Click to expand...

SimplyMe said:

What Russian collusion impeachment trial?

Click to expand...

probinson said:

I haven't followed this case closely, but I'm just posting an excerpt from the PDF posted a few posts up.

Regardless, the determination that the Respondent is a gang member appears to be trustworthy and is supported by other evidence in the record, namely, information contained in the Gang Field Interview Sheet. Although the Court is reluctant to give evidentiary weight to the Respondent's clothing as an indication of gang affiliation, the fact that a "past, proven, and reliable source of information" verified the Respondent's gang membership, rank, and gang name is sufficient to support that the Respondent is a gang member, and the Respondent has failed to present evidence to rebut that assertion.​

​

Is there new evidence that rebuts that assertion?

Click to expand...

DaisyDay said:

No, the evidence is in the court documents which are not new. This article contains most the links.

Click to expand...

Oompa Loompa said:

The article provides no evidence that the wife beater isn't a gang member. It does however, give much weight to the statements made by the beaten wife. I wonder why they did not include her statements about how she was in fear of her husband and suspected him of being a gang member."

Click to expand...

Oompa Loompa said:

Anyways, could you simply provide the source that rebuts the assertion as probinson requested?

Click to expand...

BPPLEE said:

We're talking about people who weren't deported, and having the government appeal the decision.
These people have had due process. Rambot seems to think the government is under some constitutional obligation to appeal these decisions

Click to expand...

RocksInMyHead said:

If the ruling is that they can't be deported and the government wants to change that, then they need to appeal the ruling rather than just ignoring it. To ignore the court's ruling and deport the person anyway would be a violation of due process. Do you agree with that?

Click to expand...

DaisyDay said:

As I posted above, the links to the court documents are in the article.

See above.

Click to expand...

Oompa Loompa said:

Links to the plaintiffs lawyer's statements. If you are suggesting that we blindly trust the statements from a plaintiff's counsel, why not blindly believe everything Rudy Guliani says about Trump's cases?

Click to expand...

DaisyDay said:

You are mistaken; the article contains multiple links to court documents. I am not going to pick out, cut and paste each one for you yet again.

Click to expand...

Oompa Loompa said:

And none of them provide any evidence other than "trust me bro."

Click to expand...

DaisyDay said:

You are mistaken.

Click to expand...

Oompa Loompa said:

Then provide me a source that is not written by the guy getting paid to protect the wife beater. Otherwise, it is all just "trust me bro."

Click to expand...

DaisyDay said:

Source provided above. Click on the link to the article. Find the links in said article. Click on each link. Read each link.

Click to expand...

Oompa Loompa said:

Have you actually read the sources he provides? You know, the ones related to the question discussed? Which one provides evidence that the wife beater is not a member of a gange and isn't also getting paid to protect the gangster.

Click to expand...

Oompa Loompa said:

Have you actually read the sources he provides?

Click to expand...

Oompa Loompa said:

You know, the ones related to the question discussed? Which one provides evidence that the wife beater is not a member of a gange and isn't also getting paid to protect the gangster.

Click to expand...

wing2000 said:

I always thought those making the accusation need to provide the evidence.

Can you prove that you are not a gang member?

Click to expand...

DaisyDay said:

Wait, the sources who provides? Just now, the demand was that I provide a source, which I did.

Click on the links. Read the links. The answer you seem to be seeking, if any of this is in good faith, are in the court documents linked in the article.

Click to expand...

Oompa Loompa said:

Look throughout the thread. I have literally provided the evidence at least 4 times.

Click to expand...

Oompa Loompa said:

Look throughout the thread. I have literally provided the evidence at least 4 times. It would be worth reading it before responding.

Click to expand...