• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Leftist ‘faith leaders’ twisting Bible to support wasteful gov't spending

Vambram

Born-again Christian; Constitutional conservative
Site Supporter
Dec 3, 2006
8,657
6,174
61
Saint James, Missouri
✟466,491.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Jesus certainly lived and taught in that manner.
And we also know that the Lord God instituted the New Covenant after the death and resurrection of the Lord Jesus Christ. The Lord doesn't want us to live according to the many multitude of laws given in Old Testament. I believe that you would agree with that.
 
Upvote 0

FireDragon76

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Apr 30, 2013
33,778
21,015
Orlando, Florida
✟1,560,394.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
United Ch. of Christ
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
Let's not label Jesus as a Leftist (nor a Conservative). This distorts His purpose.

What are his purposes?

In the earliest Gospels we have, Jesus proclaimed the Kingdom of God, which is not merely "going to heaven when you die", but also includes a just social order where the poor and marginalized are elevated, included, and loved. That isn't "apolitical".
 
Upvote 0

FireDragon76

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Apr 30, 2013
33,778
21,015
Orlando, Florida
✟1,560,394.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
United Ch. of Christ
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
And we also know that the Lord God instituted the New Covenant after the death and resurrection of the Lord Jesus Christ. The Lord doesn't want us to live according to the many multitude of laws given in Old Testament. I believe that you would agree with that.

No, I don't agree. That's not consistent with Lutheran or Reformed theology.

While the ceremonial laws are not binding on gentiles, the moral laws still reflect God's eternal character and will.
 
Upvote 0

Vambram

Born-again Christian; Constitutional conservative
Site Supporter
Dec 3, 2006
8,657
6,174
61
Saint James, Missouri
✟466,491.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
No, I don't agree. That's not consistent with Lutheran or Reformed theology.

While the ceremonial laws are not binding on gentiles, the moral laws still reflect God's eternal character and will. The Gospel is preached in both the Old and New Testaments and both are God's Word.
I am an independent fundamentalist Baptist, and I do agree that the moral laws in the Old Testament are also taught in the New Testament. Those moral laws still indeed reflect the eternal character and will of the Lord God.
 
Upvote 0

Ignatius the Kiwi

Dissident
Mar 2, 2013
9,065
4,768
✟360,169.00
Country
New Zealand
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
You're using the word force in multiple ways in an attempt to force your argument to carry more weight than it does.
Force being the physical application of strength. In the end law, taxation and order in society is ultimately reliant on this aspect of reality. I have been consistent with my use of the word.
 
Upvote 0

FireDragon76

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Apr 30, 2013
33,778
21,015
Orlando, Florida
✟1,560,394.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
United Ch. of Christ
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
As you've basically laid out, to come and save that which was lost.

And I didn't say His teachings were apolitical. Instead, I am saying that pushing modern labels onto Him is a reflection more of us than Him. We're trying utilize His authority to our own political benefits.

I don't see it that way. I was raised in a Christian family (albeit a Mainline Protestant family) and I see my politics as reflecting my values. I'm not twisting anything.
 
Upvote 0

Ignatius the Kiwi

Dissident
Mar 2, 2013
9,065
4,768
✟360,169.00
Country
New Zealand
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
Let's see how this played out.





























This exchange shows that you've shifted from "take from" to "lethality" when talking about force.
Lethality is an aspect of force one cannot exclude from the meaning if one wants to see taxation applied ultimately. Because in the ultimate expression you must be willing to use lethal force in order to enforce the law. Not that this is the first option but it is the final option.

It's not as if states cease to use force when the first attempt fails. Rather they go in harder and more serious.

This is why it's difficult for me to accept the idea that our Lord supported a progressive tax policy. Because this would justify the idea of forced confiscating and redistribution of wealth. I don't think out Lord was talking about governments when he was talking to the average person. He was talking to us and our collective responsibility as Christians and followers of him. We shouldn't see to outsource what Christ expects of us to a bureaucratic machine of government.
 
Upvote 0

Ignatius the Kiwi

Dissident
Mar 2, 2013
9,065
4,768
✟360,169.00
Country
New Zealand
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
This is a completely different question from what started the discussion.
But it's related. If yoy want to suggest Jesus supports a progressive tax structure then ultimately we have to believe Jesus supports the system of actually extracting the tax. This is backed by force, lethal or otherwise.
 
Upvote 0

FreeinChrist

CF Advisory team
Christian Forums Staff
Site Advisor
Site Supporter
Jul 2, 2003
153,485
20,134
USA
✟2,130,031.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
Are you telling me that states don't ultimately rely on lethal force to back up the law?
When is the last time you know a person was killed for not paying taxes in the US?
Remember, resisting arrest with violent means carries different charges for other broken laws.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Vambram
Upvote 0

Ignatius the Kiwi

Dissident
Mar 2, 2013
9,065
4,768
✟360,169.00
Country
New Zealand
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
So let's apply this idea to understanding Matthew 22:21.

Does Jesus believe that Caesar would be justified in applying lethal force to collect taxes?
The verse in question is silent on that issue. I take the view that Christ is being practical because otherwise it means that governments are fully justified in using force to back all their laws. Even unjust laws and that doesn't quite jell with the gospel.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Vambram
Upvote 0

Ignatius the Kiwi

Dissident
Mar 2, 2013
9,065
4,768
✟360,169.00
Country
New Zealand
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
When is the last time you know a person was killed for not paying taxes in the US?
Remember, resisting arrest with violent means carries different charges for other broken laws.
Irrelevant. What's relevant is what ultimately backs up a law. You cannot deny that it is power, force, which does this.
 
Upvote 0

FreeinChrist

CF Advisory team
Christian Forums Staff
Site Advisor
Site Supporter
Jul 2, 2003
153,485
20,134
USA
✟2,130,031.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
Irrelevant. What's relevant is what ultimately backs up a law. You cannot deny that it is power, force, which does this.
No, it is relevant. You are creating a false situation when you suggested a person could be killed in the US for not paying their taxes.

Now if we were in a dictatorship that ignores the rule of law, a person might be disappearred.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Vambram
Upvote 0

Richard T

Well-Known Member
Mar 25, 2018
3,640
2,316
traveling Asia
✟150,621.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
It's kind of weird to justify taxation based on democracy when any biblical verse you would appeal to in order to justify this view would be regarding non democratic governments. Yet the issue isn't so much the theory but the actual reality. Government and taxes ultimately rely on force regardless of their ideology and do we really want to say that Jesus is teaching us that it is moral for governments to redistribute wealth?

I don't see Christ ever doing that. Rather he talks about our responsibility as individuals. Not collective rights. Not what society ought to do to solve the problem.
The church is far better off it it were communal as the early church in Acts was. I am not saying full blown communism, unbelievers don't work under God. However, I do think though that what is good for Christians is also often good for the government. Thus, Christians should support pro-life, and support it within government. Christians should give to the poor, widows, disabled etc and also support that in government. The same ideas in regard to marriage etc. So it is not a question that income is going to be redistributed, but how much to me. Again lots of benefits exist in common: public education, parks, roads, etc. Some form of relief towards the poor is warranted. Another reason is that many rich people also receive subsidies. Tesla for instance was profiting only because of government monies for tax credits and environmental credits. https://edition.cnn.com/2024/11/20/business/elon-musk-wealth-government-help/index.html
Lots of subsides to corporations directly and indirectly. So who can even know the fair share of taxes that are taken and given? Here is an excerpt from an older report from Sen Coburn of Oklahoma

"On average, each year, this report (Subsidies of the Rich and Famous) found that millionaires enjoy benefits from tax giveaways and federal grant programs totaling $30 billion. As a result, almost 1,500 millionaires paid no federal
income tax in 2009."

Let's not forget that Warren Buffet's tax rate is lower than his secretaries. Investment income is taxed at best at middle income rates. Sometimes individuals like Trump pay zero taxes in certain years. In all fairness the USA needs to clean up the tax code first, then decide what rates and who pays to manage the government of the size that most people prefer. With so many specific tax breaks, subsidies and credits it it hard to sort through tax code to apply taxes fairly.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Merrill

Well-Known Member
Mar 25, 2023
1,456
1,065
45
Chicago
✟89,817.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Jesus certainly lived and taught in that manner.
Not that simple at all

Jesus did not simply follow the Hebrew law, He fulfilled and then supplanted the law, and ushered in the new and everlasting covenant

this is affirmed by Paul and others --it is one reason why Christians are not required to keep kosher, etc.

Now some Christians have different beliefs about all of this, and it can get into dispensationalism vs. covenants theology, etc.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Vambram

FireDragon76

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Apr 30, 2013
33,778
21,015
Orlando, Florida
✟1,560,394.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
United Ch. of Christ
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
Not that simple at all

Jesus did not simply follow the Hebrew law, He fulfilled and then supplanted the law, and ushered in the new and everlasting covenant

I don't think "supplant" is the correct way to understand Jesus' relationship to the Law. He correctly interpreted the Law, he did not supplant it. Jesus ethics point to the heart of the Law, which is to love God and love our neighbor, with everything else being dependent on that.

this is affirmed by Paul and others --it is one reason why Christians are not required to keep kosher, etc.

Kosher would be understood in the Lutheran or Reformed theology as pertaining to the ceremonial law, so it was never binding on gentiles in the first place.

Most Jews have the same understanding of the divisions in the law, at least going back to Maimonedes in medieval Spain. Moral laws are always more important than ceremonial laws.

Paul's theology is difficult to understand at times, but the traditional Protestant understanding isn't that the Law has no place in the Christian life, but that the Law condemns us in our sins, but grace is available to both Jews and Gentiles through Jesus Christ.

There is a famous quote by the late Lutheran theologian, Jaroslav Pelikan:

The Law says "Do this" and it is never done
The Gospel says "Believe this", and everything is done already"

 
Upvote 0

Merrill

Well-Known Member
Mar 25, 2023
1,456
1,065
45
Chicago
✟89,817.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I don't think "supplant" is the correct way to understand Jesus' relationship to the Law. He correctly interpreted the Law, he did not supplant it. Jesus ethics point to the heart of the Law, which is to love God and love our neighbor, with everything else being dependent on that.



Kosher would be understood in the Lutheran or Reformed theology as pertaining to the ceremonial law, so it was never binding on gentiles in the first place.

Most Jews have the same understanding of the divisions in the law, at least going back to Maimonedes in medieval Spain. Moral laws are always more important than ceremonial laws.

Paul's theology is difficult to understand at times, but the traditional Protestant understanding isn't that the Law has no place in the Christian life, but that the Law condemns us in our sins, but grace is available to both Jews and Gentiles through Jesus Christ.

There is a famous quote by the late Lutheran theologian, Jaroslav Pelikan:
I don't think Jesus merely interpreted the law --there were multiple instances in His earthly ministry where he defied the Pharisees, and those who rigidly followed the old law, or even "broke" the law (Luke 13:14, touching lepers, etc.)

yes, Jesus spoke to the "heart of the Law" which some call "Christ's Law"

as Christians were are not held to the Hebrew laws regarding funding temples, keeping kosher, etc.

Now someone can make the case that the state or people should fund the building of a grand church, but this would certainly look like Christian Nationalism or theonomy
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Vambram
Upvote 0

FireDragon76

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Apr 30, 2013
33,778
21,015
Orlando, Florida
✟1,560,394.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
United Ch. of Christ
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
I don't think Jesus merely interpreted the law --there were multiple instances in His earthly ministry where he defied the Pharisees, and those who rigidly followed the old law, or even "broke" the law (Luke 13:14, touching lepers, etc.)

Jesus wasn't breaking the Law in that instance. Helping people is always more important as a moral commandment than a commandment that concerns ritual purity, because it's fulfilling the commandment to love your neighbor. So Jesus was in the right according to the Law by healing the lepers.

Now, some rabbis speculated around the time of Jesus that it was a sin to heal on the Sabbath (I know this through studying the work of James Dunn regarding Second Temple Judaism), but Judaism as a religion is not like Christianity and isn't monolithic: Jews differ on the interpretation of the Torah, and that perspective isn't shared by most Jews today. A few years ago some Conservative Jews actually went on the Sabbath to Haiti to help with relief efforts there after the earthquake, and they believed they weren't breaking their religious laws, due to the imperative to help people in need superceding ritual purity.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
Reactions: Vambram
Upvote 0

Akita Suggagaki

Well-Known Member
Jul 20, 2018
10,658
7,600
70
Midwest
✟388,782.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
As you've basically laid out, to come and save that which was lost.

And I didn't say His teachings were apolitical. Instead, I am saying that pushing modern labels onto Him is a reflection more of us than Him. We're trying utilize His authority to our own political benefits.

Instead of saying "Jesus is an X" we should reason "Jesus taught Y which aligns with what X believe." This properly places the discussion on what Jesus taught and our understanding of it rather than abusing Jesus as being for us and against them.
I agree. His mission and teaching were not simplistic nor easily labelled. Our goal, where Jesus is concerned, should be to invite him into our hearts. Then, the Holy Spirit will lead us in every decision we need to make. And sometimes, if we are really listening and obeying, we will discover that voice calling us to actions, positions and thoughts that challenge us no matter what side of the political divide we choose.
 

Yarddog

Senior Contributor
Site Supporter
Jun 25, 2008
17,522
4,501
Louisville, Ky
✟1,067,192.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
We’re seeing a society become unhinged … again. Trump has quite a way with the radical Left. They absolutely hate him and DOGE, and they lose it by the hour. Now they’re burning Teslas (so much for climate care), raging in hotel lobbies and on college campuses to defend Hamas supporters, and cursing up a storm at rallies.

It's not just paid activists and politicians jumping into the resistance ring; it’s leftist “faith leaders” too. Recently, nearly 100 “progressive” religious folks signed a letter demanding an unbiblical “Return to Jesus.” The Lent letter demanded that hundreds of millions of dollars of wasted taxpayer dollars continue to flow to (leftist) NGOs.

Funny. I don’t recall the Bible ever advocating that government fund the Church. I don’t recall Jesus demanding the government take care of the poor and the needy and ensure justice for those being crushed. Oh, wait, that’s because that’s the Church’s job. But a social justice worldview sees forced taxpayer funding of (leftist) faith-based organizations (despite massive taxpayer fraud and little to no accountability) as good stewardship.

Continued below.
Sad that these guys embrace right wing lies.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: FreeinChrist
Upvote 0