The News CNN Kept to Itself

MichaelFJF

Well-Known Member
Nov 13, 2002
8,264
811
Utah
✟12,597.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Republican
<H2>The News We Kept to Ourselves</H2></NYT_HEADLINE><NYT_BYLINE version="1.0" type=" ">By EASON JORDAN

</NYT_BYLINE><!--plsfield:TEXT--><NYT_TEXT><IMG alt=A src="http://graphics7.nytimes.com/images/dropcap/a.gif" align=left border=0>TLANTA — Over the last dozen years I made 13 trips to Baghdad to lobby the government to keep CNN's Baghdad bureau open and to arrange interviews with Iraqi leaders. Each time I visited, I became more distressed by what I saw and heard — awful things that could not be reported because doing so would have jeopardized the lives of Iraqis, particularly those on our Baghdad staff.

For example, in the mid-1990's one of our Iraqi cameramen was abducted. For weeks he was beaten and subjected to electroshock torture in the basement of a secret police headquarters because he refused to confirm the government's ludicrous suspicion that I was the Central Intelligence Agency's Iraq station chief. CNN had been in Baghdad long enough to know that telling the world about the torture of one of its employees would almost certainly have gotten him killed and put his family and co-workers at grave risk.

Working for a foreign news organization provided Iraqi citizens no protection. The secret police terrorized Iraqis working for international press services who were courageous enough to try to provide accurate reporting. Some vanished, never to be heard from again. Others disappeared and then surfaced later with whispered tales of being hauled off and tortured in unimaginable ways. Obviously, other news organizations were in the same bind we were when it came to reporting on their own workers.

We also had to worry that our reporting might endanger Iraqis not on our payroll. I knew that CNN could not report that Saddam Hussein's eldest son, Uday, told me in 1995 that he intended to assassinate two of his brothers-in-law who had defected and also the man giving them asylum, King Hussein of Jordan. If we had gone with the story, I was sure he would have responded by killing the Iraqi translator who was the only other participant in the meeting. After all, secret police thugs brutalized even senior officials of the Information Ministry, just to keep them in line (one such official has long been missing all his fingernails).

Still, I felt I had a moral obligation to warn Jordan's monarch, and I did so the next day. King Hussein dismissed the threat as a madman's rant. A few months later Uday lured the brothers-in-law back to Baghdad; they were soon killed.

I came to know several Iraqi officials well enough that they confided in me that Saddam Hussein was a maniac who had to be removed. One Foreign Ministry officer told me of a colleague who, finding out his brother had been executed by the regime, was forced, as a test of loyalty, to write a letter of congratulations on the act to Saddam Hussein. An aide to Uday once told me why he had no front teeth: henchmen had ripped them out with pliers and told him never to wear dentures, so he would always remember the price to be paid for upsetting his boss. Again, we could not broadcast anything these men said to us.

Last December, when I told Information Minister Muhammad Said al-Sahhaf that we intended to send reporters to Kurdish-controlled northern Iraq, he warned me they would "suffer the severest possible consequences." CNN went ahead, and in March, Kurdish officials presented us with evidence that they had thwarted an armed attack on our quarters in Erbil. This included videotaped confessions of two men identifying themselves as Iraqi intelligence agents who said their bosses in Baghdad told them the hotel actually housed C.I.A. and Israeli agents. The Kurds offered to let us interview the suspects on camera, but we refused, for fear of endangering our staff in Baghdad.

Then there were the events that were not unreported but that nonetheless still haunt me. A 31-year-old Kuwaiti woman, Asrar Qabandi, was captured by Iraqi secret police occupying her country in 1990 for "crimes," one of which included speaking with CNN on the phone. They beat her daily for two months, forcing her father to watch. In January 1991, on the eve of the American-led offensive, they smashed her skull and tore her body apart limb by limb. A plastic bag containing her body parts was left on the doorstep of her family's home.

I felt awful having these stories bottled up inside me. Now that Saddam Hussein's regime is gone, I suspect we will hear many, many more gut-wrenching tales from Iraqis about the decades of torment. At last, these stories can be told freely.

Eason Jordan is chief news executive at CNN.</NYT_TEXT><BR clear=all>http://www.nytimes.com/2003/04/11/opinion/11JORD.html
 

Lanakila

Not responsible for the changes here.
Jun 12, 2002
8,454
222
59
Nestled in the Gorgeous Montana Mountains
Visit site
✟25,473.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
Lynn I had the same thougt. I don't think the former pres would have done anything about it though. Hindsight is 20/20 they always say. When Saddam kicked out the Inspectors however many years ago that was, why didn't the UN do something about it, or even the US? We obviously should have, and would have saved countless lives, and however many people from terrible torture.
 
Upvote 0

MichaelFJF

Well-Known Member
Nov 13, 2002
8,264
811
Utah
✟12,597.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Republican
<SPAN class=name>BOB GARFIELD:</SPAN> I'm sure you have seen Franklin Foer's article in The New Republic which charges that the Western press is appeasing the Iraqi regime in order to maintain its visas -- to be there reporting should a war ultimately break out. What's your take on that?

<SPAN class=name>EASON JORDAN:</SPAN> The writer clearly doesn't have a clear understanding of the realities on the ground because CNN has demonstrated again and again that it has a spine; that it's prepared to be forthright; is forthright in its reporting. We wouldn't have a team in northern Iraq right now if we didn't want to upset the Saddam Hussein regime. We wouldn't report on the demonstration if we didn't want to upset the Saddam Hussein regime. We wouldn't have been thrown out of Iraq already 5 times over the last several years if we were there to please the Saddam Hussein regime. So the story was lopsided, unfair and chose to ignore facts that would refute the premise of the article.
tanding of the realities on the ground because CNN has demonstrated again and again that it has a spine; that it's prepared to be forthright; is forthright in its reporting. We wouldn't have a team in northern Iraq right now if we didn't want to upset the Saddam Hussein regime. We wouldn't report on the demonstration if we didn't want to upset the Saddam Hussein regime. We wouldn't have been thrown out of Iraq already 5 times over the last several years if we were there to please the Saddam Hussein regime. So the story was lopsided, unfair and chose to ignore facts that would refute the premise of the article.


http://www.wnyc.org/onthemedia/transcripts_102502_jordan.html

&nbsp;

Consistency is the key to success. M
 
Upvote 0

Gerry

Jesus Paid It All
May 1, 2002
8,301
17
Visit site
✟14,307.00
Lets not forget also that CNN is not only liberal and biased, but it's reporting at best is reckless and irresponsible.

One of the most shocking examples is a story they did on terrorism just prior to the start of the Iraqi war. Knowing full well that ALL the terrorist depend on CNN for their information, CNN had the incredible insensitivity and reckless abandon to report that "If the terrorists REALLY wanted to hurt us they would hit our Schools"! They then went on to explain how little security there was at our schools and how easy it would be to strike them. They even went so far as to name names of schools and show videos of them and give the location of Schools they deemed would be easiest to hit, and named one school that had the most security and explained what kind it had and how it could be overcome. I am still seething over that one.

But letters and emails from a handful of people like myself have absolutely no effect at all. Only when Christians get insensed enough and in unison write and boycott their sponsors will they be forced into responsibility. Unfortunately, Christians are the most apathetic group of people on the face of the earth.

CNN has put many spies out of business and onto the welfare roles. What country needs them? All they need do is watch CNN and they will tell them everything they want to know and MORE! All saddam insane had to do was watch CNN and he knew exactly where all of our troops were every moment and what they were doing and where they were going and when they would arrive. So IF he is dead it is certainly his own fault. He knew what time to leave and where to go, simply by watching CNN, which HE said he watched back during the Gulf War!
 
Upvote 0

Lynn

Veteran
Feb 14, 2002
1,509
102
69
Ogden, UT
Visit site
✟10,696.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Today at 05:30 AM Susan said this in Post #8

I don't see why Christians need to boycott CNN, except maybe for egging on this war for the last 6 months with all the "Showdown Iraq" blather.


Did you read the article?:(
 
Upvote 0
"CNN had the incredible insensitivity and reckless abandon to report that "If the terrorists REALLY wanted to hurt us they would hit our Schools"! "

Terrorists have been gathering information silently for some years now. Do you really think that it hadn't occured to them before now that schools would be an easy target?
CNN's motive was, rather, to encourage school policies to change so that they ARE protected. Reporting it is the only way you can really embarress the school systems into changing.

Now, let's look at the reality of the story. CNN, Foxnews, MSNBC, all of them are sensationalist. You don't get the whole picture. It's like watching a boxing match through a camera in one boxer's shirt. The reality is: terrorists haven't much motive for striking schools. Sure, they hate Americans and all, but look at their previous attacks: WTC, USS Cole, US embassies.
The WTC was a symbol of american imperialism, and the architecture was an insult to radical muslims (to them). USS Cole was a US warship refueling in the middle east. Embassies, I don't have to explain this one.
Schools are not a priority for terrorists, they have bigger fish to fry, the news networks know that.. that's why you won't see them airing all the easy ways to slip past an airline security check. (They might tell you you can, but not how).

"All saddam insane had to do was watch CNN and he knew exactly where all of our troops were every moment and what they were doing and where they were going and when they would arrive."

Blame all the news networks if you're going to mention that... No, wait, blame your own military for embedding journalists.
And no, this topic was brought up in a press conference, the military spokesman related the fact that looking and seeing live images of a convoy heading through the desert torwards a city is not enough info to find out where they are. The military is smarter than to allow that, virtually everything broadcast out of Iraq was at least partially censored by the military for safety purposes.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Gerry

Jesus Paid It All
May 1, 2002
8,301
17
Visit site
✟14,307.00
Today at 12:09 PM OPEC said this in Post #10

"CNN had the incredible insensitivity and reckless abandon to report that "If the terrorists REALLY wanted to hurt us they would hit our Schools"! "

Terrorists have been gathering information silently for some years now. Do you really think that it hadn't occured to them before now that schools would be an easy target?
CNN's motive was, rather, to encourage school policies to change so that they ARE protected. Reporting it is the only way you can really embarress the school systems into changing.

Now, let's look at the reality of the story. CNN, Foxnews, MSNBC, all of them are sensationalist. You don't get the whole picture. It's like watching a boxing match through a camera in one boxer's shirt. The reality is: terrorists haven't much motive for striking schools. Sure, they hate Americans and all, but look at their previous attacks: WTC, USS Cole, US embassies.
The WTC was a symbol of american imperialism, and the architecture was an insult to radical muslims (to them). USS Cole was a US warship refueling in the middle east. Embassies, I don't have to explain this one.
Schools are not a priority for terrorists, they have bigger fish to fry, the news networks know that.. that's why you won't see them airing all the easy ways to slip past an airline security check. (They might tell you you can, but not how).

"All saddam insane had to do was watch CNN and he knew exactly where all of our troops were every moment and what they were doing and where they were going and when they would arrive."

Blame all the news networks if you're going to mention that... No, wait, blame your own military for embedding journalists.
And no, this topic was brought up in a press conference, the military spokesman related the fact that looking and seeing live images of a convoy heading through the desert torwards a city is not enough info to find out where they are. The military is smarter than to allow that, virtually everything broadcast out of Iraq was at least partially censored by the military for safety purposes.

Well then, I stand corrected. CNN was obviously very responsible in their reporting. I was a fool to think some warped sick might get an idea from such a story.

I apologize. All news networks are very responsible and only me and "my" military are completely and totally wrong. I am such a dunce!
 
Upvote 0