• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Wisconsin Democrat leadership continues drop box push

Valletta

Well-Known Member
Oct 10, 2020
12,773
6,144
Minnesota
✟342,134.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Kaul wrote that, by spring 2021, 570 drop boxes were placed across 66 of Wisconsin’s 72 counties and the share of Wisconsin voters casting an absentee ballot increased from 6% to 30% from 2002 to 2022.
Drop boxes that are not physically monitored make it easier for election cheating.
 

comana

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Jan 19, 2005
7,951
4,513
Colorado
✟1,133,334.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Kaul wrote that, by spring 2021, 570 drop boxes were placed across 66 of Wisconsin’s 72 counties and the share of Wisconsin voters casting an absentee ballot increased from 6% to 30% from 2002 to 2022.
Drop boxes that are not physically monitored make it easier for election cheating.
Has this proven to be a problem anywhere? CO has over 400 drop boxes. I can’t think of any issues here.
 
Upvote 0

essentialsaltes

Fact-Based Lifeform
Oct 17, 2011
43,726
46,792
Los Angeles Area
✟1,044,969.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)
  • Informative
Reactions: DaisyDay
Upvote 0

Pommer

CoPacEtiC SkEpTic
Sep 13, 2008
23,095
14,252
Earth
✟254,879.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Democrat
Drop boxes that are not physically monitored make it easier for election cheating.
Please for to explain how unmonitored drop boxes make for easier cheating.
 
Upvote 0

Valletta

Well-Known Member
Oct 10, 2020
12,773
6,144
Minnesota
✟342,134.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Since no fraud occurred in the past two elections, the Court shouldn't take this case at all.

We should be encouraging everyone to vote.
A number of election laws around the country were violated, including in Wisconsin. Give the amount of wrongdoing Republicans are gathering 100,000 people just for election integrity.
 
Upvote 0

Fantine

Dona Quixote
Site Supporter
Jun 11, 2005
41,775
16,862
Fort Smith
✟1,444,894.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
The 100,000 want voter suppression.

61 out of 62 audits showed the complaints of fraud to be completely unfounded.

Instead honest people living in blue zip codes will have to jump through hoops to exercise voting rights.
 
Upvote 0

Hans Blaster

I march with Sherman
Mar 11, 2017
22,717
16,987
55
USA
✟429,283.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
Since no fraud occurred in the past two elections, the Court shouldn't take this case at all.
This case is being made by the Democratic AG (the "democrat leadership" of the thread title) to *remove* newly added restrictions on drop boxes. Not taking this case will leave the restrictions in place.
We should be encouraging everyone to vote.
That's the way it used to be.
 
Upvote 0

Valletta

Well-Known Member
Oct 10, 2020
12,773
6,144
Minnesota
✟342,134.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Has this proven to be a problem anywhere? CO has over 400 drop boxes. I can’t think of any issues here.
Yes, the Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled it was illegal. The court pointed out that the extensive Wisconsin law on absentee voting says absolutely nothing about using drop boxes, and therefore if they want to use drop boxes the Wisconsin state legislature must act and pass legislation. You can't just do it because Democrat leaders are for it.
 
Upvote 0

comana

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Jan 19, 2005
7,951
4,513
Colorado
✟1,133,334.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Yes, the Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled it was illegal. The court pointed out that the extensive Wisconsin law on absentee voting says absolutely nothing about using drop boxes, and therefore if they want to use drop boxes the Wisconsin state legislature must act and pass legislation. You can't just do it because Democrat leaders are for it.
The law stating nothing does not make it illegal unless explicitly stated as illegal. Anyway, how does it increase fraud? You never answered. And show your work. Many sites use them with no issues.

it does make voting easier which is not what republicans want.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DaisyDay
Upvote 0

Valletta

Well-Known Member
Oct 10, 2020
12,773
6,144
Minnesota
✟342,134.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
The law stating nothing does not make it illegal unless explicitly stated as illegal. Anyway, how does it increase fraud? You never answered. And show your work. Many sites use them with no issues.

it does make voting easier which is not what republicans want.
Fraud is a very specific crime. The Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled it was illegal, they did not claim it was fraudulent. The chain of custody is very important, and with an unmanned dropbox, for just one example, there is nothing to stop one individual from putting in multiple ballots. An individual could put in blank sheets of paper and fill up the drop box, preventing those who expected to use it from being able to vote. I urge everyone in Wisconsin to obey the law, lobby your state legislator to pass drop box legislation if you wish, but don't go ahead and put out ballot boxes in defiance of the Supreme Court.
 
Upvote 0

Hans Blaster

I march with Sherman
Mar 11, 2017
22,717
16,987
55
USA
✟429,283.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
Fraud is a very specific crime. The Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled it was illegal, they did not claim it was fraudulent. The chain of custody is very important, and with an unmanned dropbox, for just one example, there is nothing to stop one individual from putting in multiple ballots. An individual could put in blank sheets of paper and fill up the drop box, preventing those who expected to use it from being able to vote. I urge everyone in Wisconsin to obey the law, lobby your state legislator to pass drop box legislation if you wish, but don't go ahead and put out ballot boxes in defiance of the Supreme Court.
The Wisconsin State Legislature is the ones that wrote all of the anti-voter laws in the first place, including the ones that keep them in power. Don't bother writing to them, just vote them out.
 
Upvote 0

essentialsaltes

Fact-Based Lifeform
Oct 17, 2011
43,726
46,792
Los Angeles Area
✟1,044,969.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)
but don't go ahead and put out ballot boxes in defiance of the Supreme Court.
Nobody is doing that. The Supreme Court is being petitioned to reconsider its decision.
 
Upvote 0

Valletta

Well-Known Member
Oct 10, 2020
12,773
6,144
Minnesota
✟342,134.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Nobody is doing that. The Supreme Court is being petitioned to reconsider its decision.
I'm talking election time. They broke the law last time and I urge them not to do it again.
 
Upvote 0

essentialsaltes

Fact-Based Lifeform
Oct 17, 2011
43,726
46,792
Los Angeles Area
✟1,044,969.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)
I'm talking election time. They broke the law last time
The decision is the latest in a legal battle that began in January, after a Waukesha County judge sided with a conservative legal group in a lawsuit, declaring state law doesn't allow for unstaffed ballot drop boxes and requires that voters physically return their own absentee ballots.

Although an appeals court temporarily blocked the order for contests in February, the ban was in effect for local elections in April.


Since the matter was still being appealed, it was legal in February when a judge allowed them to be used, but banned in April when they weren't.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: DaisyDay
Upvote 0

essentialsaltes

Fact-Based Lifeform
Oct 17, 2011
43,726
46,792
Los Angeles Area
✟1,044,969.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)
Their decision that drop boxes in Wisconsin are illegal.
Correct. it's similar to this situation:

North Carolina GOP: You've had first state supreme court ruling, yes, but what about second state supreme court ruling?

In win for GOP, NC Supreme Court positioned to reverse major voting rights cases

The North Carolina Supreme Court's decision Friday to rehear a high-profile redistricting case and a controversial voter ID case indicates that the court's new GOP majority plans to undo voting rights rulings that had been seen as victories for Democrats.

Republican lawmakers lost the nationally watched redistricting case — Harper v. Hall — last year, when the court ruled that extreme partisan gerrymandering is unconstitutional.

Writing for the majority Friday, however, Republican Justice Trey Allen said that the court is allowed to rehear cases when it’s possible “that the opinion may be erroneous.”

That’s what GOP leaders argued in a Jan. 20 court filing, less than three weeks after Allen and fellow new Republican Justice Richard Dietz were sworn in, flipping the court from a 4-3 Democratic majority to 5-2 in favor of Republicans.

“Respect for the institution and the integrity of its processes kept opportunities for rehearing narrow in scope and exceedingly rare,” [Justice Earls] wrote. “Today, that tradition is abandoned. Nothing has changed since we rendered our opinion in this case on 16 December 2022: The legal issues are the same; the evidence is the same; and the controlling law is the same. The only thing that has changed is the political composition of the Court.”
 
Upvote 0

Arcangl86

Newbie
Dec 29, 2013
12,115
8,363
✟417,914.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Green
I'm talking election time. They broke the law last time and I urge them not to do it again.
No, they made a decision that the law did not speak clearly one way or another about. It was only after the election that the courts found the use of drop boxes to be illegal.
 
Upvote 0