- Nov 29, 2005
- 58,198
- 16,494
- Faith
- Eastern Orthodox
- Marital Status
- Private
We had an interesting and thought provoking question posed to us this afternoon on our Parish Chat Thread
<< I am still debating whether we eat fish or not next week >>
I did respond stating that I had always been taught [ and this BTW, was whilst I was still in the UGCC ] that fish was meat [ because it had a spine and bones]
There have been a couple of very lighthearted responses but the original poster has just added this to the thread https://orthochristian.com/68722.html and the comment that clearly Fr Epiphanius, who was a canonist knows best.
We can't refer this to our Priest at present as he is away in Thessaloniki [ a Monastic Tonsuring and Diaconate Ordination].
Any comments or is this a difference between Greek and Russian Practice ?
<< I am still debating whether we eat fish or not next week >>
I did respond stating that I had always been taught [ and this BTW, was whilst I was still in the UGCC ] that fish was meat [ because it had a spine and bones]
There have been a couple of very lighthearted responses but the original poster has just added this to the thread https://orthochristian.com/68722.html and the comment that clearly Fr Epiphanius, who was a canonist knows best.
We can't refer this to our Priest at present as he is away in Thessaloniki [ a Monastic Tonsuring and Diaconate Ordination].
Any comments or is this a difference between Greek and Russian Practice ?
Last edited:
