• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

South Dakota Democrat says wanting kids to have a mom and dad is ‘dangerous and un-American’

Michie

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 5, 2002
182,700
66,204
Woods
✟5,930,207.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Rep. Erin Healy's tweet was bombarded with social science literature.

PIERRE, South Dakota (LifeSiteNews) — A Democrat lawmaker in South Dakota is under fire for declaring it “dangerous” and “un-American” to believe that children should have both a mother and a father.

On Monday, State Rep. Erin Healy tweeted, “Extremist group Family Heritage Alliance said this morning that the safest place for kids are in families that have a married mom and dad. What a dangerous and un-American belief,” apparently in reaction to comments against an unsuccessful bill to remove sex-specific language from South Dakota’s legal definition of marriage.

Continued below.
 

chevyontheriver

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Sep 29, 2015
22,797
19,808
Flyoverland
✟1,367,214.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-American-Solidarity
Rep. Erin Healy's tweet was bombarded with social science literature.

PIERRE, South Dakota (LifeSiteNews) — A Democrat lawmaker in South Dakota is under fire for declaring it “dangerous” and “un-American” to believe that children should have both a mother and a father.

On Monday, State Rep. Erin Healy tweeted, “Extremist group Family Heritage Alliance said this morning that the safest place for kids are in families that have a married mom and dad. What a dangerous and un-American belief,” apparently in reaction to comments against an unsuccessful bill to remove sex-specific language from South Dakota’s legal definition of marriage.

Continued below.
Every state needs at least one of these for comic relief.
 
Upvote 0

chevyontheriver

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Sep 29, 2015
22,797
19,808
Flyoverland
✟1,367,214.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-American-Solidarity
The woman is obviously a mental defective and has no business whatsoever being in a position of legislative influence.
Agreed. But you want one of these folks in a university or in a legislative body just so everyone else can see how crazy their thinking actually is.

I was SHOCKED when I hears that such folks can get elected in South Dakota. But then again my current state senator defeated a good incumbent and is spouting the same sort of silliness. It is painful to know he 'represents' me because he is about as 180 as can be from actually representing me.
 
Upvote 0

LizaMarie

Newbie
Jan 17, 2015
1,446
1,185
✟204,139.00
Country
United States
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
It's the truth, whether she or others in our society like it or not.
I'm old enough to remember the Dan Quayle controversy.
He has been proven right ,of course, but we live in a time where good is evil and evil good.
 
Upvote 0