In Ezekiel 39 there are two major end times events.
1. Gog/Magog, which takes place when Israel is at peace. This is noted in Ezekiel 38, in the latter days, latter years. Ezekiel 39:1-6 is the destruction of Gog's army. Then the cleanup of the land ending in verse 16.
2. Armageddon, which takes place when Israel is in great tribulation. Ezekiel 39:17-20, which is the same as Revelation 19:17-18 at Jesus's return.
The 7 years following Gog/Magog are the 7 years of Daniel 9:27 and Revelation.
(Is the size of my chart about the right size for viewing? The new site progarm has a great feature making it easy to resize inserted images. )
View attachment 324849
The one battle, not 2 different battles instead.
For example. Doing an exact phrase search for--mountains of Israel---the following are the results.
Ezekiel 38:8 After many days thou shalt be visited:
in the latter years thou shalt come into the land that is brought back from the sword, and is gathered out of many people,
against the mountains of Israel , which have been always waste: but it is brought forth out of the nations, and they shall dwell safely all of them.
Ezekiel 39:2 And I will turn thee back, and leave but the sixth part of thee, and will cause thee to come up from the north parts, and
will bring thee upon the mountains of Israel :
Ezekiel 39:4
Thou shalt fall upon the mountains of Israel , thou, and all thy bands, and the people that is with thee: I will give thee unto the ravenous birds of every sort, and to the beasts of the field to be devoured.
Ezekiel 39:17 And, thou son of man, thus saith the Lord GOD; Speak unto every feathered fowl, and to every beast of the field, Assemble yourselves, and come; gather yourselves on every side to my sacrifice that I do sacrifice for you,
even a great sacrifice upon the mountains of Israel, that ye may eat flesh, and drink blood
Just from this alone it is already plainly obvious that only one battle is in view here, thus all of the above are involving the same events.
Why would anyone argue, as pertaining to this, for example?---(even a great sacrifice upon the mountains of Israel, that ye may eat flesh, and drink blood)---that that is meant for someone not even mentioned in Ezekiel 38-39, rather than someone mentioned in these two chapters, such as is mentioned here---(will bring thee upon the mountains of Israel---Thou shalt fall upon the mountains of Israel---I will give thee unto the ravenous birds of every sort, and to the beasts of the field to be devoured)
How can---(even a great sacrifice upon the mountains of Israel, that ye may eat flesh, and drink blood)---not be pertaining to this---(will bring thee upon the mountains of Israel---Thou shalt fall upon the mountains of Israel---I will give thee unto the ravenous birds of every sort, and to the beasts of the field to be devoured)----but instead is pertaining to events not even mentioned in these two chapters. How can anyone find that to be reasonable that Ezekiel 39:17-20 is involving a battle and people not even mentioned in these two chapters, rather than a battle and people who are mentioned in these two chapters?
I don't know why some interpreters apparently must think everything in the OT pertaining to prophecies is always in chronological order or something, which appears to be one reason you are seeing more than one battle here? Just because Ezekiel 39 records verses 11-16 first, then verses 17-20, that hardly means that verses 17-20 are the aftermath of another battle rather than the battle that led to the aftermath involving verses 11-16.