Finnish Christian On Trial For Quoting The Bible On Twitter: ‘God Is Working’

Ignatius the Kiwi

Dissident
Mar 2, 2013
7,083
3,768
✟290,975.00
Country
New Zealand
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
No, I'm not saying that all nation leaders need be compared to Hitler

Then why bring up the worst person imaginable as if he were the greatest example of leadership? Hitler is entirely irrelevent to this conversation and if anything speaks more about the dangers of unfettered secularism and scientism, more than it does in the influence of Christianity over government.


I said that yes, He can. But no, I don't believe that based on these various nation leaders that I mentioned, that we can just take that as an across the board fact that God uses the nations of men for His purposes. And so to bring this back around to the point that was being made:

There have not been any nations of the world, that are particularly beholden to God. God created Israel and God stood as their king, until the wickedness of the people caused them to ask for a king like all the other nations had. My point was that even Israel was not able to remain faithful and beholden to God. Therefore, for one to expect that some nation created by men could do it, would seem, to me, quite an impossible task.

Is therefore your solution to surrender all political initiative to those who don't have our interests at heart? Leaving on secularists and anyone willing to take power? You've avoided this pretty obvious conclusion but it follows from what you said.

Now, there are nations that give a nod to God. The U.S., Great Britain, Canada, New Zealand and Australia and many others include God in their preambles or founding documents, but the people, the folks who are living in those nations, are all just about as wicked as any other, overall. There are some born again believers in every one of them, I'm sure, but the majority of the populations are lost people doing lost things.

I'm not arguing for nations to become like my own or God help us, the USA. That's part of the problem. These nations do not foster anything that is helpful to Christianity or the Church and actively foster other attitudes and laws which hinder Christianity. It doesn't matter if they mention God, none of those countries are Christian countries in any meaningful sense. They are secular democratic countries which regard all religions as equal. As a result secularism increases because one religion is refused favour.

Please, please. Stop putting words in my mouth, so to speak. You keep telling me that you believe that I'm just all hunky dory OK with the wickedness of the world. No I'm not. But I've read the book and so I know that it's happening and will get much, much worse.

God bless,
Ted

It will get worse if Christians act like Christians how? How does us being in a position of authority or seeking to influence the culture around us make it worse than it already is?
 
Upvote 0

miamited

Ted
Site Supporter
Oct 4, 2010
13,243
6,313
Seneca SC
✟705,807.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Hi @Ignatius the Kiwi

For instance, Constantine was he illegitimate when he dispensed justice to a Pagan because it wasn't his place as a Christian?

Wasn't Constantine a Roman ruler? Sure, nation rulers get to do whatever they want, depending on the form of government. Anyone in authority over someone, just as you correctly quote from Paul's writings, gets to judge those over whom they have authority. You'll have to remind me of what Constantine did, in ruling over pagans, that had application to christianity.

I have thought about this at great length and I cannot come to any other conclusion than you are wrong in your interpretation if it leads you to thinking Christians must abstain from all power and self interest and subject themselves entirely to the whims of others.

Well, when you put it like that, I rather agree with you. But again, you're putting words into my mouth. I never said that christians 'must abstain from all power and self interest and subject themselves entirely to the whims of others. I've merely been saying that christians shouldn't push others, who are not of us, to live like us. Where you got your claim from, must be from some other line of inquiry that you may have been involved with.

I would like your honest opinion, do you think it was a mistake for the Spanish to resist Muslim rule? Should they, by your standards, if they wanted to be true faithful Christians, have given up their kingdoms without a struggle?

I'm curious what 'the Spanish' have to do with this conversation. I thought we were talking about christians here. And you're taking a backwards approach. I'm talking about christians forcing unbelievers to live as we do. I would certainly approve of any group of people resisting making changes that they're not willing to make. Just as a christian should not be forced to make changes that someone would ask them to make, if it was something they didn't want to do. I'm certainly not advocating that anyone give up 'their kingdoms'.

God bless,
Ted
 
Upvote 0

miamited

Ted
Site Supporter
Oct 4, 2010
13,243
6,313
Seneca SC
✟705,807.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Hi @Ignatius the Kiwi

Then why bring up the worst person imaginable as if he were the greatest example of leadership?

You really don't get it do you? Oh well, I'll repeat it one more time. I brought up the worst of nation leaders to counter your claim: "Does God not use the nations of men to his own ends?" You even copied my answer to that in your next quote of mine. And honestly, where you get the idea that I was bringing them up 'as if (they) were the greatest examples of leadership' actually leaves me standing with my mouth agape. I was making the absolute 90° opposite point of what you seem to have gleaned from my statement.

Is therefore your solution to surrender all political initiative to those who don't have our interests at heart? Leaving on secularists and anyone willing to take power? You've avoided this pretty obvious conclusion but it follows from what you said.

Uhhh, only in your mind. No, christians, here in the U.S. anyway, are free to cast their vote in any way they feel is best. As I've repeatedly claimed, my position is and always has been that christians shouldn't use militant tactics to try and force unbelievers to live as we do. I'm referring to people like the Proud Boys or the Westboro Baptist group. Those who take it upon themselves to stand at abortion clinics telling mothers that they are murderers and going to H E double hockey sticks. When dealing with the idea of changing the mind of an unbeliever, Jesus has given us the prescription for doing that. Share with them the gospel of love and salvation through Jesus, God's Son. If they accept, then let the Holy Spirit begin his work of conviction of sin.

Do you believe that there are women who have had abortions who will be found worthy of God's promise of eternal life?

It will get worse if Christians act like Christians how? How does us being in a position of authority or seeking to influence the culture around us make it worse than it already is?

Sheesh!! Read the Book for crying out loud. You'll find that it will get worse because both God and Jesus have told us that it will. It won't have anything to do with christians acting like christians, it will all have to do with the world hating God in rebellion and defiance. Nothing you, or any 'supposed christian government' is going to change that ultimate outcome of this realm in which God created for us to live.

God bless,
Ted
 
Upvote 0

Tiberius Lee

Well-Known Member
Sep 6, 2017
2,092
2,560
Wisconsin
✟145,612.00
Country
United States
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
We're likely going to have to agree to disagree on this. In a Christian country, children growing up might go to private Christian schools and receive a solid foundation for their lives and beliefs. Children growing up in a Christian country are far more likely to hear the Word of God, and more often. It's just common sense that there is more opportunity for seed to sprout as it is more readily available.

The fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom. Given a choice, why would you not prefer people grow up learning that instead of learning that there are 57 genders?

I don’t think I am advocating we can’t have Christian society , Christian government or Christian nation.

Of course it is better if we have Christian society or Public school which teach Christian value, and gospel to it’s citizen.

Problem is that many Christians today thinks building a Christian society, or Christian government is as important as preaching the gospel.
 
Upvote 0

Ignatius the Kiwi

Dissident
Mar 2, 2013
7,083
3,768
✟290,975.00
Country
New Zealand
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
Hi @Ignatius the Kiwi



Wasn't Constantine a Roman ruler? Sure, nation rulers get to do whatever they want, depending on the form of government. Anyone in authority over someone, just as you correctly quote from Paul's writings, gets to judge those over whom they have authority. You'll have to remind me of what Constantine did, in ruling over pagans, that had application to christianity.

Constantine did what Roman rulers did. He started wars, administered the empire, implemented laws and was the final court of appeal in the matter of judging. What Constantine did that was different is that he influenced laws in a certain direction towards Christianity. By favouring Christianity and the Church and limiting the influence of Paganism. He legalized the former and outlawed parts of the latter by criminalizing animal sacrifice. At least I think it was him that outlawed that practice, it could have been Theodosius.


Well, when you put it like that, I rather agree with you. But again, you're putting words into my mouth. I never said that christians 'must abstain from all power and self interest and subject themselves entirely to the whims of others. I've merely been saying that christians shouldn't push others, who are not of us, to live like us. Where you got your claim from, must be from some other line of inquiry that you may have been involved with.

Well that's the thing isn't it. If Christians cannot implement their standards on others, they cannot rightfully take power in any context. If they do so, according to this standard, they must always act not on Christian principles and what they believe, but the standards of others in dealing with the general population. So a modern politician, if he is a Christian, like Joe Biden, cannot enforce his pro-life Catholic view on everyone but must enforce a pro-abortion view into law because that is what is fair to the non-Christian populations who desire abortion.

This in effect makes Christianity impossible to implement on a wider scale and I see it not based on anything biblical but more a secular attitude.


I'm curious what 'the Spanish' have to do with this conversation. I thought we were talking about christians here. And you're taking a backwards approach. I'm talking about christians forcing unbelievers to live as we do. I would certainly approve of any group of people resisting making changes that they're not willing to make. Just as a christian should not be forced to make changes that someone would ask them to make, if it was something they didn't want to do. I'm certainly not advocating that anyone give up 'their kingdoms'.

God bless,
Ted

I use the case of the Spanish here as an example of what one is willing to accept. The Muslims were an aggressive force who sought to expand the Ummah of Islam through military conflict. They were not shy in treating their Christian subjects as second class citizens. They got as far as Southern France before being turned back and then gradually it took the Christian Kingdoms of Spain centuries to retake Spain. This involved subjecting any Muslim population of the territories that Christians conquered to be subject ultimately to Christian standards. The Muslims became second class citizens who could not live as freely according to their faith as they once had. Even if they were allowed some autonomy that autonomy could never supersede the Christian authority over them. Christian standards and not Islamic standards became the final authority over them.

To transfer that to the current day, we see the final standard in our political lives is not Christianity but secular liberal standards. LGBT and other protected groups have special protections which prevent them from receiving any criticism they deem improper. To the point where in Finland they are willing to crush a politician for her words. This to me demonstrates part of the failure of this idea that multiple different groups with vastly different ideologies can live in the same society. We simply don't tolerate dissent in others as people as mankind. This has been the standard historic pattern and does not seem possible to escape it.

If you limit yourself, by saying you can have no influence in the lives of non-Christians. That we cannot apply our standards to them if we have the power to do so, they will inevitably apply their standards on you. Since you are unwilling to use power others fill the void and they are not shy about applying their morals to others. It is simply bad strategy and will inevitably result in the sort of failure of Christianity to assert itself in modernity.
 
Upvote 0

Ignatius the Kiwi

Dissident
Mar 2, 2013
7,083
3,768
✟290,975.00
Country
New Zealand
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
Hi @Ignatius the Kiwi



You really don't get it do you? Oh well, I'll repeat it one more time. I brought up the worst of nation leaders to counter your claim: "Does God not use the nations of men to his own ends?" You even copied my answer to that in your next quote of mine. And honestly, where you get the idea that I was bringing them up 'as if (they) were the greatest examples of leadership' actually leaves me standing with my mouth agape. I was making the absolute 90° opposite point of what you seem to have gleaned from my statement.

In the context I made that remark I was asking was there a point in God using these Christian kingdoms and other polities in history? Or were they merely accidental offshoots off Christianity that God had no grander vision for? Has the entire history of Christianity been a sort of cosmic accident devoid of God's influence? That's the real question here.

To bring up Hitler then and other totalitarian regimes, as if they compare to those past regimes is to miss the point entirely. Those regimes have a place in the story of God's people but not as a protagonist but rather as antagonist to be overcome.

Uhhh, only in your mind. No, christians, here in the U.S. anyway, are free to cast their vote in any way they feel is best. As I've repeatedly claimed, my position is and always has been that christians shouldn't use militant tactics to try and force unbelievers to live as we do. I'm referring to people like the Proud Boys or the Westboro Baptist group. Those who take it upon themselves to stand at abortion clinics telling mothers that they are murderers and going to H E double hockey sticks. When dealing with the idea of changing the mind of an unbeliever, Jesus has given us the prescription for doing that. Share with them the gospel of love and salvation through Jesus, God's Son. If they accept, then let the Holy Spirit begin his work of conviction of sin.

Do you believe that there are women who have had abortions who will be found worthy of God's promise of eternal life?

I don't really see much a choice offered to you Americans in the grand scheme of things. Liberalism and progressivism are the only real political option offered in the US. The only choice is between how fast you want to adopt it. If you want to slow the process of progress down, vote Republican and see it delayed, if you want to see it speed up, vote Democrat. If there was a genuine opposition party in the US I might be inclined to agree but I simply don't see a difference between Democrat and Republicans in the long term.

As for military tactics, I wouldn't recommend those either. What I would recommend is divesting oneself completely from the political system and entanglements of the USA as much as possible. Pay your taxes but don't give the USA any special recognition or do anything you don't have to for it. Don't treat it as if it were a Nation God established himself. Live a totally radically different life from the average American. This would mean putting some level of shame on those who have abortions within the Christian community. Give them an option to repent of course, but never accept it. Make the woman who obtains an abortion as a Christian go through public confession before she can be reconciled to the community.

Christians need to implement their own standards in their own communities.


Sheesh!! Read the Book for crying out loud. You'll find that it will get worse because both God and Jesus have told us that it will. It won't have anything to do with christians acting like christians, it will all have to do with the world hating God in rebellion and defiance. Nothing you, or any 'supposed christian government' is going to change that ultimate outcome of this realm in which God created for us to live.

God bless,
Ted

You honestly think a Christian government is equally bad as a secular one? Then I don't think you've been listening to me taking what I've said seriously. A Christian government might be bad, full of flaws, but it is still orientated in the right direction. A non-Christian government is bad because it's orientated in the wrong direction. How can the two ever be equal? They can't, at least from my perspective. It's like saying the Germany of the Kaiser is equally as bad as the Germany of the Furher. It's not true, the former was clearly better.

What then prevents us from seeking out political interests?
 
Upvote 0

miamited

Ted
Site Supporter
Oct 4, 2010
13,243
6,313
Seneca SC
✟705,807.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Hi again @Ignatius the Kiwi

Constantine did what Roman rulers did. He started wars, administered the empire, implemented laws and was the final court of appeal in the matter of judging. What Constantine did that was different is that he influenced laws in a certain direction towards Christianity. By favouring Christianity and the Church and limiting the influence of Paganism. He legalized the former and outlawed parts of the latter by criminalizing animal sacrifice. At least I think it was him that outlawed that practice, it could have been Theodosius.

Thanks for the history lesson.

Well that's the thing isn't it. If Christians cannot implement their standards on others, they cannot rightfully take power in any context.

Not according to Peter: Live such good lives among the pagans that, though they accuse you of doing wrong, they may see your good deeds and glorify God on the day he visits us.

Notice that he says 'among' not 'over'.

This in effect makes Christianity impossible to implement on a wider scale and I see it not based on anything biblical but more a secular attitude.

Oh, I think it's been doing pretty well now for about 2,000 years. It has been implemented over and over and over and over again in all that time. But, I would pause to say that this claim pushes me to believe that you and I see 'faith', the faith of christianity, differently. You seem to see it as something to be pushed on to others, while I see it as something to be accepted and practiced as an individual. You seem to be saying that you see God's will as being to save nations. While I see God's will as being the salvation of an individual. From what I have seen so far in all of history, and what I read in the Scriptures, I don't expect there to ever be a 'christian' nation, until Jesus returns and sets up his 1,000 year reign. There are no nations upon the earth that have yet been christian nations, as I previously stated. But there have been nations that have given a nod to God in some of their practices and establishment clauses. The actual people, overall, who live in those nations have never been particularly christian in the living of their lives.

Just as with Israel, there was always a remnant that was faithful to God and His desires for them. Similarly in any nation since Jesus' day, there have been remnants of believers that were faithful to God, but on a national level, no.

God bless,
Ted
 
Upvote 0

Ignatius the Kiwi

Dissident
Mar 2, 2013
7,083
3,768
✟290,975.00
Country
New Zealand
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
Thanks for the history lesson.


Not according to Peter: Live such good lives among the pagans that, though they accuse you of doing wrong, they may see your good deeds and glorify God on the day he visits us.

Notice that he says 'among' not 'over'.



Well the history lesson is relevent to this point you make. If Peter's advice is to all Christians irrespective of position in society, rank and the like, does this not make someone like Constantine totally illegitimate in the context of Christianity? He ruled over more non-Christians than he ruled over Christians, yet that didn't stop him from exercising his authority for the ultimate benefit of the Church.

This is a serious question that I would like an answer to. Because I only see two answers to it. Yes, Constantine was illegitimate and his assumption of power and using it to further the aims of Christianity was a serious sin. Or. No, Constantine was legitimate and what the Apostle said doesn't apply to Constantine or those who are in charge. This is the case because we know Saint Paul accepted the legitimacy of secular power when he said they dispense justice.

Oh, I think it's been doing pretty well now for about 2,000 years. It has been implemented over and over and over and over again in all that time. But, I would pause to say that this claim pushes me to believe that you and I see 'faith', the faith of christianity, differently. You seem to see it as something to be pushed on to others, while I see it as something to be accepted and practiced as an individual. You seem to be saying that you see God's will as being to save nations. While I see God's will as being the salvation of an individual. From what I have seen so far in all of history, and what I read in the Scriptures, I don't expect there to ever be a 'christian' nation, until Jesus returns and sets up his 1,000 year reign. There are no nations upon the earth that have yet been christian nations, as I previously stated. But there have been nations that have given a nod to God in some of their practices and establishment clauses. The actual people, overall, who live in those nations have never been particularly christian in the living of their lives.

Just as with Israel, there was always a remnant that was faithful to God and His desires for them. Similarly in any nation since Jesus' day, there have been remnants of believers that were faithful to God, but on a national level, no.

God bless,
Ted

It's not that I view the faith as something beyond individual acceptance, but it is not that alone and yes there is a legitimate case to be made that one can be pushed along or encouraged to become Christian. We accept this in the case of parents who raise their children as Christians irrespective of what the child might want. We accept this in the case of Churches which have standards for who and who cannot join and be part of any given congregation. We accept this in the case of special Christian communities which regulate themselves further in specific localities (the Amish and Monks for instance). A person's individuality does not override the authority of the whole and we don't insist on individualism in all aspects of life.

It is then not such a big leap to reject the secular impulse and argue that Christians can impose themselves on others by influencing the law and society around them.

As for the claim there have been no Christian nations. I simply beg to differ. Medieval Europe was primarily Christian in it's ethos and guiding principles. The faith was taken seriously in that context, more so than it is in our current secular age.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Hazelelponi
Upvote 0

miamited

Ted
Site Supporter
Oct 4, 2010
13,243
6,313
Seneca SC
✟705,807.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Hi @Ignatius the Kiwi

This is a serious question that I would like an answer to. Because I only see two answers to it. Yes, Constantine was illegitimate and his assumption of power and using it to further the aims of Christianity was a serious sin. Or. No, Constantine was legitimate and what the Apostle said doesn't apply to Constantine or those who are in charge. This is the case because we know Saint Paul accepted the legitimacy of secular power when he said they dispense justice.

Ok, here's my answer as to whether or not Constantine was somehow 'legitimate' or 'illegitimate'...whatever that's supposed to mean.

Constantine was a man. He was born of a woman. He apparently, in his life, asserted himself to a position of power as a ruler. There have been several thousand men, and women, who have asserted themselves in their lives to such a place. Was he legitimate or illegitimate in being put in that position. I wouldn't think he was illegitimate, I mean I'm guessing that he was somehow rightfully assigned that position, by either his own force and might or by the approval of others. It's how every nation leader gets to be where they wind up being. They either take the position by force, as in conquering a previous leader, or by some sort of vote of agreement they are installed into their position of leadership.

As far as what he did to further the growth or allowance of christianity, while that may seem a good thing to man, it's what God thinks that we really want to know. He made christianity the main religion of Rome. If that's what got us the RCC, or strengthened it, I'd have to say that what he did wasn't particularly good for believers. The RCC then grew to usurp power throughout all of Europe and was likely the most murderous force against the saints of God.

So yes, I'd say he was a legitimate leader, but no, I'd say that his work for christianity likely didn't work out well for believers.

I quote a piece from Christianity Today:

Historians now debate whether "the first Christian emperor" was a Christian at all. Some think him an unprincipled power seeker. What religion he had, many argue, was at best a blend of paganism and Christianity for purely political purposes.

This would be in keeping with the religion practiced by the RCC. It was founded as a blended religion of christianity and many of the pagan worship practices of that day.

Certainly, Constantine held to ideals we no longer share. He knew nothing of religion without politics or politics without religion.

In 325 he is recorded to have said, at a meeting of bishops:

"You are bishops whose jurisdiction is within the church," he told them. "But I also am a bishop, ordained by God to oversee those outside the church."

Is it true that he was ordained by God to oversee those outside the church? Maybe, maybe not. Certainly as a nation leader he did oversee those outside the church and inside the church, but that his position was given to him as an ordination of God, is debatable. I happen to believe what the Scriptures say about God and His Sovereignty over the nations of the earth. He does establish them. However, I'm not completely sold on the idea that once established, He then handpicks all of those who follow as leaders over them.

God bless,Ted
 
Upvote 0

miamited

Ted
Site Supporter
Oct 4, 2010
13,243
6,313
Seneca SC
✟705,807.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Hi @Ignatius the Kiwi

For the record, here's another thread that declares just the opposite of what you are saying. While you might not use the term 'thrive', the evidence presented here is that christianity is growing quite substantially:

The 2019 Status of Global Christianity report shows there were 2.5 billion Christians in the world as of mid-2019 – a major increase from the 1.98 billion Christians in 2000 and more than double the number of Christians (1.2 billion) in 1970. Christianity is growing worldwide at a rate of 1.27 percent each year and outpacing population growth (1.20 percent) – and is booming in Africa (2.37 percent), Asia (2.79 percent) and Latin America (2.29 percent).

By comparison, there were 138 million atheists around the world in mid-2019 – slightly more than the 137 million in 2000 but less than the 165 million in 1970. Atheism’s annual growth (.04 percent) is less than that of the population, and the number of atheists worldwide is projected to decline to 132 million in 2025.


https://www.christianheadlines.com/...TZSUbKow5UQ6-h-87RHDcKJ5ew7QfL2MMhZYkYal0bBYc

All without there having to be any governmental takeover by christians.

God bless,
Ted
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Till Schilling

Active Member
Feb 3, 2021
184
121
Bern, Switzerland
✟17,430.00
Country
Switzerland
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
I'm a card-carrying Christian Democrat and Päivi Räsänen is the former chair of my party. I have supported Räsänen in the past 100%. I don't support her anymore. She's lost the trust and respect of many in my party, which is why she was ousted as the leader. Many have left the party because of Räsänen and votes and seats have been lost because of Räsänen. So let's make this clear: Räsänen is not on trial "for quoting the Bible." Shame on those who spread such lies. Shame on those who spread such lies intentionally to deceive fellow people.

So WHAT is she on trial for then?
 
Upvote 0

Kalevalatar

Supisuomalainen sisupussi
Jul 5, 2005
5,469
908
Pohjola
✟20,327.00
Country
Finland
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
So WHAT is she on trial for then?

For ethnic agitation.

Posting on Twitter that "Russians are immoral people" or "Russians will not get to Heaven" is not a crime, however, posting that "Let's rid this world of Russians" or "Let's help Russians to meet their Final Judgment" can be, if it calls to aggressive action against the Russians.

Our bishops, pastors, and ordinary Christians and members of the church like myself quote the Bible on Twitter all the time and we are not being hauled to the court, despite what Putin's disinformation agents are busy sowing on social media to enforce the narrative that the western liberal democracies are morally bankrupt and must be saved by the righteous Russian Russkii Mir nuclear weapons gospel.
 
Upvote 0

Till Schilling

Active Member
Feb 3, 2021
184
121
Bern, Switzerland
✟17,430.00
Country
Switzerland
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
For ethnic agitation.

Posting on Twitter that "Russians are immoral people" or "Russians will not get to Heaven" is not a crime, however, posting that "Let's rid this world of Russians" or "Let's help Russians to meet their Final Judgment" can be, if it calls to aggressive action against the Russians.

Our bishops, pastors, and ordinary Christians and members of the church like myself quote the Bible on Twitter all the time and we are not being hauled to the court, despite what Putin's disinformation agents are busy sowing on social media to enforce the narrative that the western liberal democracies are morally bankrupt and must be saved by the righteous Russian Russkii Mir nuclear weapons gospel.

Are you sure we are talking about the same trial here? See

Closing statements heard in trial against Finnish Bishop and MP - International Lutheran Council

“Dr. Räsänen is charged for authoring a 2004 booklet entitled “Male and Female He Created Them: Homosexual Relationships Challenge the Christian Concept of Humanity,” and Bishop Pohjola is charged for publishing the work. Dr. Räsänen also faces two other charges, including for criticizing Finland’s national Lutheran church—of which she is a member—for its support of Helsinki Pride in a tweet that included an image of a Bible verse from Romans 1:24-27.”


I do not see what that has got to do with the ethnic agitation you mentioned. Neither is the website of the ILC a Russian propaganda tool.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Hazelelponi
Upvote 0

Hazelelponi

:sighing:
Site Supporter
Jun 25, 2018
9,375
8,788
55
USA
✟691,408.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
@miamited - forgive me if I'm misunderstanding your position in this thread, but I've now read about half the book this woman is being charged with a crime for writing - and the Bishop charged with a crime for publishing.

Clearly, this is the type of book published for Christians, usually sold or offered free on Christian sites that sell Christian books and booklets and/or teach Christian doctrine like Ligonier ministries, Reformed Heritage, etc.

Her position is laid out like any position, and makes arguments against Christians supporting these political positions due to some of the things we see in our society today, like young children being taught things like gender and sexuality should be explored and are only choices like any other choice make.

So, she is arguing from the perspective of how these policies affect society as a whole and how we as Christians should see them in light of those most affected and our faith, and not changing our faith to suit others, as she pointed out some were doing.

I have to say even if you disagree with her stance, to say this book somehow rises to the level of a hate crime is ridiculous... If we, as Christians, can't freely discuss our faith amongst ourselves and how that faith does or should (or even should not) affect our political stances on relevant topics of the day and why we can't change the teachings of that faith without running afoul of hate crime laws then teaching traditional Christianity has been effectively outlawed.

Are you for that? Really? While I don't live there I find this shocking for any western nation which claims religious freedom.


Edit to add:

An article to consider, since I guess that type of thing will be coming here soon if we don't stop it:

How do we know that this is a tree from which the hangman’s rope will swing? By its fruits. The Washington Free Beacon reports on an incident at Yale University Law School. Keep in mind as you read the following that these are America’s intellectual elite, the cream of our very best primary and secondary schools and our top colleges. That these people are training to be the federal judges, prosecutors, and white shoe attorneys tasked with enforcing our rights and the rule of law. Some of them might well end up on the U.S. Supreme Court. According to the Free Beacon:

More than 100 students at Yale Law School attempted to shout down a bipartisan panel on civil liberties, intimidating attendees and causing so much chaos that police were eventually called to escort panelists out of the building.

The March 10 panel, which was hosted by the Yale Federalist Society, featured Monica Miller of the progressive American Humanist Association and Kristen Waggoner of the Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF), a conservative nonprofit that promotes religious liberty. Both groups had taken the same side in a 2021 Supreme Court case involving legal remedies for First Amendment violations. The purpose of the panel, a member of the Federalist Society said, was to illustrate that a liberal atheist and a conservative Christian could find common ground on free speech issues.

“Free Speech” Now Fighting Word's

Meet the Yalies Who’ll Be Kommandants of Your Children’s Concentration Camps - The Stream
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

miamited

Ted
Site Supporter
Oct 4, 2010
13,243
6,313
Seneca SC
✟705,807.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Hi @Hazelelponi

forgive me if I'm misunderstanding your position in this thread,...

Ok, you're forgiven if that's the case. Honestly, you'll have to refresh my memory as to what I said in any previous post that supports what you're asking about my position. I know I've discussed that there seems to be some evidence that christianity is growing. I know that I've also discussed the issue of whether or not Constantine should really be getting as much credit as some want to give him as being some great christian leader. I know that I have also put forth the position that I don't believe God asks us to go and beat people over the head to live as christians should live, if they are not a part of us.

I haven't read the book and have no idea what it's about beyond what has been reported in this thread. I do agree, if what you're saying is true about her book, that 'christians' are far too involved in the 'politics' of government. I abhor the idea that so many of the so called 'evangelical' branch (for lack of a better word) came out with such loud and vociferous support of Donald Trump and his brand of politics. I'm more inclined to agree with the late Billy Graham, that we shouldn't support the politics of this world with christian activism.

There was a time, in Paul's ministry, that he felt blessed to be able to speak the gospel to kings because of his arrest. According to the words of Mrs. Pahjola, that's exactly the same way she feels about being called out before the courts and media: “I was happy to have the possibility to also tell the gospel—the solution to the problem of sin—in front of the court and in front of the media,”
So, just maybe, this trial she is going through is the work of God. I won't say that with any definitive force, but just offer up the possibility as her words are pretty much exactly what Paul said in the same situation.

The lawyer with her also said this: “This is a very serious issue, because for Christians the Bible is the word of God, and there is no Christianity if you are not allowed to agree with the Bible,” Rasanen said.
Notice please!! The bible is the word of God...FOR CHRISTIANS. Neither all of Finland nor all of America are believers in the one true and living God and, therefore, hold to that belief.

One of the three charges against Rasanen is for tweeting a picture of a Bible verse at Finland’s state church to criticize its cosponsorship of a homosexual parade.

Listen, I don't know how you feel about social media, but it's like making everyone their own king and kingdom of the world. Yes, if someone is going to express godly beliefs to the world, then they had better expect some push back.

I don't disagree with her stance, but I understand that her stance is only going to apply to christians. The world doesn't know God and therefore doesn't know that there is a law that He asks HIS CHILDREN to live by. I certainly don't support the idea that her book rises to the level of a hate crime. But I know that what the Scriptures teach is that there is coming a time when the world will see those who follow the Lord as haters deserving of hate in return. Remember Jesus' words?

Nation will rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom. There will be famines and earthquakes in various places. All these are the beginning of birth pains. “Then you will be handed over to be persecuted and put to death, and you will be hated by all nations because of me."

So, let's do keep in mind that this is practically fulfillment of the prophetic words of Jesus.

If we, as Christians, can't freely discuss our faith amongst ourselves and how that faith does or should (or even should not) affect our political stances on relevant topics of the day without running afoul of hate crime laws then teaching traditional Christianity has been effectively outlawed.

Well, I still say we should try it the way that Jesus told us to:

First, go out and preach the gospel. Not christianity, but the gospel. That is that we are all sinners in the eyes of a Holy God. We don't need to point fingers at someone's particular sin. I don't think anyone in the Scriptures ever made it personal as to one's sin. It was just said that we are all sinners and likely list off a few that apply to pretty much everyone. That God loves us and wants us to know Him and love Him. That He sent His one and only Son to die as the sacrifice to Him for our sin and that we can now have peace with our Creator and God and enjoy eternal life with him.

Second, if through the power of the Holy Spirit that person agrees with this position, then we should encourage them to confess Jesus as Lord and be baptized. Baptized in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit.

Third, we should THEN begin to teach them all that Jesus commanded us.

This idea that God has ever asked of His children to just go out and stand against the world and wag our fingers at them and tell them all how much they are sinning, just doesn't seem to be the way that Jesus or the first apostles built the fellowship of believers.

Sure, I have no problem, and often participate myself among the fellowship, in saying how much sin I see in the world. Even calling out those sins and referencing the words of the Scriptures that tell us that such things are sin. But all that is accomplished in doing that among the world, is that they come to hate this idea that there is a God who is going to hold them accountable and are more likely to turn away from God even more than they were before. Let's try it Jesus' way.

For those who feel so led to attack the sin of the world by merely pointing fingers and calling out all the many, many sins, then they should fully expect "and you will be hated by all nations because of me."

And yes, I believe that any believer who is familiar with the Scriptures should fully understand that a time is coming, and has yet come, that teaching the word of God will be seen as hate. We're going to have to deal with that through prayer. Praying for those who are more bold and are in positions where they can tell the gospel to more and more people. But this idea that we're going to make people godly by making them obey the law of God without first having the born again spirit of the Spirit of God living within them, is, I believe, a fool's errand.

So, she's welcome to write a book and I would not condemn that. But when you start spouting off to the world through social media, something that has gotten more people than just her in trouble, then one would be foolish not to expect some pretty harsh pushback. You want to do something constructive for the kingdom of God? Gather all of your social media friends and have them send out tweets or facebook messages or whatever social media one uses, to declare the gospel to all the nations.

FOR GOD SO LOVED THE WORLD THAT HE GAVE HIS ONLY BEGOTTEN SON THAT WE MIGHT HAVE ETERNAL LIFE. GOD DID NOT SEND HIS SON INTO THE WORLD TO CONDEMN THE WORLD BUT TO SAVE THE WORLD THROUGH HIM. WE ARE ALL SINNERS. MYSELF CHIEF AMONG THEM. BUT GOD DESIRES TO FORGIVE OUR SINS AND TO GIVE US ETERNAL LIFE OF PEACE AND SATISFACTION THAT IS DIFFERENT FROM WHAT THIS WORLD OFFERS. IF YOU BELIEVE THAT OR WOULD LIKE TO FIND OUT MORE...PLEASE REPLY.

Now, not everyone is going to reply. Some are perfectly satisfied to live in their sins. Not even aware of the expectation of an eternal life of struggle and torment. All of the pounding over the head that you think is going to save them will be for naught. There is only one name and one way for anyone to receive God's promise of eternal life with Him, and that is through His Son. That begins with believing in the Son and then the Holy Spirit will do the job that all of those 'sin pounders' are doing. But he'll surely be more successful at it than they will be.

God bless,
Ted
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

miamited

Ted
Site Supporter
Oct 4, 2010
13,243
6,313
Seneca SC
✟705,807.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Hi again @Hazelelponi

You know, I'm struck as to how believers today are in the same boat (pun intended) as Noah. Noah spent quite a lot of time preaching about the righteousness of God to the people of his generation. Yet only his own family were ultimately saved. But Noah didn't have the gospel to preach in his day. Today we do, and I contend that's exactly why we have it. Because God saw, through the efforts of Noah, the futility of trying to make people live by a law that they neither knew nor understood.

Of course, God did already know that Noah's efforts would be futile. But did you ever consider, that's why God put in His Scriptures the account of Noah's preaching, and then the total devastation of death and misery that followed all of his surely good intentions? Beating people over the head with the truth of God didn't work for Noah, and quite frankly, if we believe the prophets of Israel, didn't work particularly well for God's people in Israel. Why in the world would we think that it would work today?

So, follow Jesus' example: Preach the gospel. Baptize those who will believe. Then teach those who have heard the gospel, believed, and been baptized, to keep the commands of Jesus.

God bless,
Ted
 
Upvote 0

Hazelelponi

:sighing:
Site Supporter
Jun 25, 2018
9,375
8,788
55
USA
✟691,408.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Listen, I don't know how you feel about social media, but it's like making everyone their own king and kingdom of the world. Yes, if someone is going to express godly beliefs to the world, then they had better expect some push back.

I'm not on Twitter, but I am on Facebook. The people who get my posts in their feed are my friends and family, and what I say there are things that they may find interesting or helpful in some way, and that does extend to Christian topics, even though not everyone on my friends list is Christian. If they don't feel something is beneficial to them they don't have to read it but I do have many Christians in my friends list.

It's a small corner of the world that unless "the world" had some reason for going would never see at all .. those on my friends list know me, even those who aren't Christian, and can talk to me or even happily disagree with anything I say. Even in freinds lists as close (in friendship) as we all are, we don't always agree about everything.

Most people have similar pages to mine... It's not being king of anything, just a quaint means to communicate with those we value, in our spare time. Sometimes sparking interesting conversation.

But when you start spouting off to the world through social media,

Apparently all she did was to post a picture of Scripture from a page in Romans, and that's charge 1, and what led to the investigation that found the book which is charge 2 and 3.

So it's apparent that someone who happened by her page or was on her friends list took real offense at a Bible passage devoid of commentary.

but I understand that her stance is only going to apply to christians.

And from what I'm seeing of the book that was her intended audience..

However like anything else, it wasn't hidden, just not widely seen perse, as it took a police investigation to uncover it.

Why in the world would we think that it would work today?
I personally don't think it works today, I didn't become Christian because anyone beat me over the head with the falsehood of my faith, though it surely was.

But at the same time, we have to live here. We want a positive nation for our children and grandchildren to grow up in and since we have the right to vote, (unlike previous times in history) our sense of values will come into play when we do. And honestly - they should or the downfall of our society is on our own heads.

I believed in the legitimacy of gay marriage because marriage in general carried legal benefits, and I believe that everyone should be equal under the law.

But with everything that's ensued because of that legal benefit? I now look at my own thinking on the topic a little differently... And wonder if God sees me as being in the wrong for that. I don't know anymore, but it's been anything but positive for our society.

In the end, without Biblical or other examples of how to vote and live in societies that gives us a voice in our own governance, we are all just doing the best we can.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Hazelelponi

:sighing:
Site Supporter
Jun 25, 2018
9,375
8,788
55
USA
✟691,408.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
So, follow Jesus' example: Preach the gospel. Baptize those who will believe. Then teach those who have heard the gospel, believed, and been baptized, to keep the commands of Jesus

This we do. :)
 
Upvote 0

miamited

Ted
Site Supporter
Oct 4, 2010
13,243
6,313
Seneca SC
✟705,807.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Hi @Hazelelponi

This we do. :)

Yes, and as far as dealing with the lost, that's all we should do.

I think it worth considering that all of Paul's letters of instruction. All of Peter's letters of instruction. All that James wrote and John wrote. Those writings were addressed to the various church fellowships of the various cities in which they existed. There is not a single letter in all of the Scriptures where one of the writers wrote a letter addressed: To all the people in Rome. To all the citizens of Corinth. No! Not at all. Each one of them starts off with the message that the letter and the instructions and teachings contained therein were to the 'church'. The believers. Those who had already heard, understood and believed the gospel!!

In Acts 2 beginning in vs. 14 we are given the details of the first appeal of the apostles to an entire city. Peter speaks to them about Jesus and all that he did and Peter never once touches on any individual or specific sins of anyone, other than to mention that they killed Jesus. But he didn't seem to say that all aghast and horrified at what they had done. He finally ends by explaining to them, when asked mind you, how to be saved. And even then he never mentions their sin. He merely tells them
“Repent and be baptized, every one of you, in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins. And you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit. The promise is for you and your children and for all who are far off—for all whom the Lord our God will call.”

I believe that's God's example to us of how He asks us to deal with a lost and dying world. Notice that even after Peter makes his plea and offers the gift of God through Jesus to them, the account states: Those who accepted his message were baptized, and about three thousand were added to their number that day. Notice please, 'those who accepted his message were baptized. Now on that day in Jerusalem I'm confident that there were a lot more people than 3,000 listening to his message. Peter didn't then go out to those who didn't respond to the offer with threats of damnation and hellfire for them. We speak the gospel in love. For those whom God draws by His Spirit we baptize them and make them one of us and then begin to teach them how to follow the way of Christ.

Peter didn't berate Cornelius with all of his past sins. He merely spoke to him of Jesus and all that he had done that Cornelius and his entire family might be saved, and they listened and accepted it.


God bless,
Ted
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

miamited

Ted
Site Supporter
Oct 4, 2010
13,243
6,313
Seneca SC
✟705,807.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Hi @Hazelelponi

We want a positive nation for our children and grandchildren to grow up in and since we have the right to vote, (unlike previous times in history) our sense of values will come into play when we do. And honestly - they should or the downfall of our society is on our own heads.

Well if you're idea of 'positive nation' is that everyone loves God and obeys His laws, I'd say you're not likely to ever get what you desire this side of eternity. I would encourage you to do what I did with my son. I taught him how he should live and explained to him that this is not how the world was going to live and that God asks him, if he desires to be one of His children to live separate and apart from the desires and the work of the world. I also explained to him that God does ask him to go out and tell others about Jesus. That's it! As far as I know, my son is living a good life. But he knows that the world is always going to wax more and more wicked.

Christians can live with a positive attitude no matter what's going on in the world. Psssst! Jesus wins!!! You want your children to grow up in a positive world? Teach them to love Jesus. You want your grandchildren to grow up in a positive world? Both you and your children need to teach them to love Jesus. Beyond that, that's about as positive as this world's ever going to be. I find that the Scriptures are quite clear on the matter. It doesn't get better...it gets worse!

God bless,
Ted
 
Upvote 0