Timtofly
Well-Known Member
- Jun 29, 2020
- 9,318
- 568
- 56
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
Not blatant. You are blatantly mashing creation together into one moment in time, when clearly we are to be patient like God is patient and longsuffering.That is not at all what Peter was saying in 2 Peter 3:13. You are blatantly twisting that verse to fit your view. What Peter was clearly saying there is that the new heavens and new earth would come in accordance with "his promise". Which promise? The promise of Christ's second coming that Peter referenced earlier in 2 Peter 3:4. It does not at all say that we would still be waiting for the new heavens and new earth even after the promise of His second coming occurs.
I did point out a new heaven and earth with righteousness. But you all reject John in Revelation 20, you all reject Paul in 1 Corinthians 15:24-28, and now you reject Peter in 2 Peter 3:8. The NHNE is a totally different creation altogether, and you reject that as well. You have previously claimed the same earth, just different. Where is there a literal city like in Revelation 21 with current capability?
The moon if square would be 2159 miles in length, hight, and depth. The New Jerusalem is about 1200 miles square, so not as big, but certainly bigger than any city known to man. 900 miles difference is less than the actual city size. Putting a square city that size next to a round earth would look funny. Would the city balance or at the center be dozens of miles below the surface of the earth? Since there will be no sun or moon, that is already totally different than the modern concept of heavens and earth and present reality.
I guess if one chooses to symbolize Revelation, one can make it mean anything they so desire.
Upvote
0