Oh, so now water baptism is not absolutely necessary for salvation. I see your wishy washy.
All along I have been saying that water baptism is not absolutely necessary for salvation, which is not being wishy washy. Are you completely reading my posts or just skimming over them?
Here is the point that matters that everyone must get or they will die in their sins. Baptism is a direct command from Jesus making it a must. It is essential to ones salvation. Baptism is commanded TO THE LOST NEVER TO THE SAVED IN THE NEW TESTAMENT. Why is that?
In John 8:24, Jesus said - "Therefore I said to you that
you will die in your sins; for if you do not believe that I am He, you will die in your sins." Now show me in scripture where Jesus said, "unless you are water baptized, you will die in your sins" or "whoever is not baptized will be condemned." I'll be waiting.
John 3:18 - He who
believes in Him is not condemned; but he who (is not water baptized? - NO)
does not believe is condemned already, because he has not (been water baptized? - NO)
because he has not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.
Baptism is a command for the saved, not the lost. Acts 10:43 - Of Him all the prophets bear witness that through His name
everyone who believes in Him receives forgiveness of sins. 44 While Peter was still speaking these words, the Holy Spirit fell upon all those who were listening to the message. 45 All the circumcised believers who came with Peter were amazed, because
the gift of the Holy Spirit had been poured out on the Gentiles also. 46 For they were hearing them
speaking with tongues and exalting God. Then Peter answered, 47
"Surely no one can refuse the water for these to be baptized who have received the Holy Spirit just as we did, can he?" 48 And he commanded them to be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ. Then they asked him to stay on for a few days.
*So did the command for these Gentiles to be baptized "precede" or "follow" these Gentiles
believing in Him, receiving remission of sins and the gift of the Holy Spirit and the spiritual gift of tongues? To say other than "follow" is to be completely dishonest.
Why not one account of any new testament Christian being told by one of the apostles to be baptized?
The Bible makes clear that men are saved through belief/faith prior to receiving water baptism. These Gentiles in Acts 10 received the gift of the Holy Spirit and were manifesting the spiritual gift of tongues (which is only for the body of Christ - 1 Corinthians 12)
after believing the gospel but before being baptized. (Acts 10:44-47) This observation needs to be properly balanced by the fact that baptism was not considered an "optional extra" for these Gentiles. It was a command (Acts 10:48) that they were expected to obey, yet it was not obedience to this command that saved them, but their
believing in Christ to receive remission of sins. (Acts 10:43)
Baptism is the expected initial outward response to the gospel, but it is not a part of the gospel itself (1 Corinthians 1:17; 15:1-4). There are a handful of alleged proof texts which are often cited to prove that the Bible makes baptism mandatory for salvation. Yet a careful examination of each of these texts in context will show that none of them prove that baptism is absolutely necessary for salvation, although they do prove that baptism was an assumed initiatory response to the gospel of salvation. In other words, these texts only prove that
baptism is regularly associated with conversion and salvation, (signified)
rather than absolutely required for salvation.
Why is it that as soon as someone was taught the gospel, THEY WERE BAPTIZED IMMEDIATELY. Why is that?
Why not? Immediately if water if available, within the same day if possible. For me I believed the gospel and was saved on Saturday late at night at my home, but was unable to receive water baptism until Sunday morning. I didn't wait a week or a month or a year.
Baptist will get baptized whenever they "feel" like it. Maybe today, tomorrow.
I can't speak for everyone, but in most conversions that I have witnessed, the converts received water baptism by the following Sunday at church. You seem to enjoy picking on Baptists, yet I attend a non-denominational church that is not officially Baptist.
True story: a man was raised by Baptist parents. When the boy turned 10 a pastor asked him if he was saved. The boy said "I don't know" The pastor replied: "Son all you have to do is believe in Jesus and He will save you" the boy thought about what he said. And realized that he was a believer. So he went up to the pastor and said. "I believe I'm saved" When the boy turned into a teenager his mother asked if he wanted to be water baptized. The boy asked his mother a good question: "Mom, do I have to be baptized?" His mother said, well, NO but Jesus wants you to be baptized. So the boy asked his mother: " can I get to heaven without being baptized?" His mother said sure but why would you not want too? The boy told his mother that HE DID NOT WANT TO DO ANYTHING THAT WAS NOT NECESSARY TO GET TO HEAVEN. That is a true story.
Do I need to join a Baptist church to be saved?
Joining a particular church, whether Baptist, Catholic, church of Christ etc.. is not what saves you. Believing the gospel saves you. (1 Corinthians 15:1-4; Romans 1:16)
I have a true story for you. Several years ago, my friend and his Aunt invited me to attend the church of Christ with them. His Aunt was a very devout and thoroughly indoctrinated member of the church of Christ. I did attend for a short while and I'll never forget several years later running into my friend's Aunt at my friend's daughter's birthday party. Since then, I had received Christ through faith and was now a born again Christian. I shared this good news with his Aunt and the only response she had for me was, "where do you attend church?" When my answer was not "the church of Christ," she bowed her head in sadness as if to imply that I was still lost because I did not say, "the church of Christ."
A little later, her husband approached me and I shared the good news with him as well, but the only response that he had for me was the same, "where do you attend church," and when I told him and the answer was not the church of Christ, his eyes glazed over followed by a cheesy legalistic grin on his face and he simply walked away from me and neither of them would speak with me for the rest of the night. I knew that something was terribly wrong! I could hear them both over in the corner going on and on about "salvation by water baptism" and that "ONLY" the church of Christ is the "true church." I quickly came to realize they were deceived!
Did the baptism of John the baptist save the apostles when they were baptized by him? Mark 1:4 John came baptizing in the wilderness and preaching a baptism of repentance FOR THE REMISSION OF SINS
No. This baptism of repentance was for "in regards to/on the basis of" the remission of sins received upon repentance. The apostles were saved when they
believed in Him. (John 3:15,16,18) In John 20:31, we read - but these are written that you may
believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and that
believing you may have life in His name. Hmm.. *What happened to baptism?
Matthew 26:28 For this is My blood of the new covenant, which is shed for many FOR THE REMISSION OF SINS
Again, in Acts 2:38, "for the remission of sins" does not refer back to both clauses, "you all repent" and "each one of you be baptized," but refers only to the first. Peter is saying "repent unto the remission of your sins," the same as in Acts 3:19. The clause "each one of you be baptized" is parenthetical. This is exactly what Acts 3:19 teaches except that Peter omits the parenthesis, so your argument here in regards to Matthew 26:18 is moot.
In Matthew 26:26-28, Jesus said, "This IS my body when He took the bread." When He took the cup, He said, "This IS my blood." Of course, His body was still His body and His blood was still in His body. He was using attributing the reality to the emblem, yet the emblem is not the reality. When a believer is water baptized, sins are not washed away literally, but ceremonially, pointing to the death of Christ by which sins are actually washed away.
Since it's not possible for an external ordinance to do an internal work on the heart, baptism can not do these things in a literal sense, yet it signifies the remission of sins by the death of Christ, which was the real remission (Matthew 26:28; Hebrews 9:22-28). Christ put away sins by the sacrifice of Himself.
In EXPERIENCE, the remission of sins comes to us through FAITH in Christ (Acts 26:18; Romans 3:24-26). The "remission of sins" has three applications. Literally, by the sacrificial death of Christ - Matthew 26:28. Experientially, by faith in Christ - Acts 10:43; 26:18. Ceremonially, by water baptism - Acts 2:38; 22:16
Now what does this verse mean? Does it mean Jesus shed His blood for forgiveness of our sins? You and I both know the correct answer.
Jesus shed His blood for literal remission of sins and it's the blood of Christ that washes away sins (and not plain ordinary H20). Ephesians 1:7 - In whom we have
redemption through his blood, the forgiveness of sins, according to the riches of his grace.
Acts 2:38 Then Peter said to them, Repent and let everyone of you be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ FOR THE REMISSION OF SINS and you shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.
Now let's see if a Baptist can answer this question honestly for a change. Do we repent and get baptized, FOR THE FORGIVENESS OF OUR SINS?
Baptism does not obtain the forgiveness of sins. In Matthew 3:11, did John the Baptist baptize with water for "in order to obtain" repentance or "in regards to/on the basis of" repentance? Obviously the latter. Repentance precedes baptism. Now let's go over this again. In Acts 2:38, "for the remission of sins" does not refer back to both clauses, "you all repent" and "each one of you be baptized," but refers only to the first. Peter is saying "repent unto the remission of your sins," the same as in Acts 3:19. The clause "each one of you be baptized" is parenthetical. This is exactly what Acts 3:19 teaches except that Peter omits the parenthesis.
*Also compare the fact that these Gentiles in Acts 10:45 received
the gift of the Holy Spirit (compare with Acts 2:38 -
the gift of the Holy Spirit) and this was
BEFORE water baptism (Acts 10:47).
In Acts 10:43 we read
..whoever believes in Him receives remission of sins. Again, these Gentiles received
the gift of the Holy Spirit - Acts 10:45 -
when they believed on the Lord Jesus Christ - Acts 11:17 - (compare with Acts 16:31 -
Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ and you will be saved) BEFORE water baptism - Acts 10:47. This is referred to as
repentance unto life - Acts 11:18.
*So the only logical conclusion
when properly harmonizing scripture with scripture is that faith in Jesus Christ "implied in genuine repentance" (rather than water baptism) brings the remission of sins and the gift of the Holy Spirit (Luke 24:47; Acts 2:38; 3:19; 5:31; 10:43-47; 11:17,18; 15:8,9; 16:31; 26:18). *Perfect Harmony*