An honest look at Christians and Atheists and what they don't see, maybe.

Moral Orel

Proud Citizen of Moralton
Site Supporter
May 22, 2015
7,379
2,641
✟476,748.00
Country
United States
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Married
Going back, I think this is where your misunderstanding is coming from. I said:
Tom believes there is no god, so he must also not believe there is a god.
And you replied:
Bob who says there is no God is also an atheist.
Bob is Tom. I already included him. Bob lacks belief too. If you believe there is no god, then you also don't believe there is a god.
 
Upvote 0

GDL

Well-Known Member
Jul 25, 2020
4,247
1,255
SE
✟105,387.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Going back, I think this is where your misunderstanding is coming from. I said:

There is no God is not the same as I don't believe there is a God / I believe there is no God. One leaves the door open. The other is an absolute statement - door closed. Both are types of atheism.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Agnos
Upvote 0

Moral Orel

Proud Citizen of Moralton
Site Supporter
May 22, 2015
7,379
2,641
✟476,748.00
Country
United States
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Married
There is no God is not the same as I don't believe there is a God / I believe there is no God. One leaves the door open. The other is an absolute statement - door closed. Both are types of atheism.
I didn't say they are the same. I said that if you believe there is no god, then you also don't believe there is a god.
 
Upvote 0

Moral Orel

Proud Citizen of Moralton
Site Supporter
May 22, 2015
7,379
2,641
✟476,748.00
Country
United States
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Married
Again with authoritative absolute statements. Are you presenting fact or belief? Such wording does not convey belief that leaves the door open.
I'm presenting a fact I happen to know that you may not be aware of. If you don't want to believe a random stranger on the internet, okay, that's fair.
 
Upvote 0

Moral Orel

Proud Citizen of Moralton
Site Supporter
May 22, 2015
7,379
2,641
✟476,748.00
Country
United States
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Married
There is no God is not the same as I don't believe there is a God / I believe there is no God. One leaves the door open. The other is an absolute statement - door closed. Both are types of atheism.
Oh.... I get it. You just want to insist that folks say "I believe" before they make a claim. Sorry, I was rushing too much. Anyways, the person who says "I know there is no God" also doesn't believe there is a god, so he's included too.
 
Upvote 0

GDL

Well-Known Member
Jul 25, 2020
4,247
1,255
SE
✟105,387.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Oh.... I get it. You just want to insist that folks say "I believe" before they make a claim. Sorry, I was rushing too much. Anyways, the person who says "I know there is no God" also doesn't believe there is a god, so he's included too.

Atheism is a lack of belief, not a belief that something is false.

You're not rushing, but trying to assert superiority by apologizing for rushing. You're also back-tracking. You're also making assumptions. You were also limiting atheism to disbelief. Now you're tying a statement of knowledge to an underlying disbelief/belief, which is fine, but there is also a disbelief that states itself as disbelief, and there are also statements that do not represent actual beliefs.

Atheism may be a lack of belief. A lack of belief is a partial unbelief or a total unbelief.

Atheism is also a belief that something is false or that something is not true (since you think this distinction is meaningful). This belief can be expressed as unbelief - leaving a door open - or as knowledge of what is true and not true - closing the door.

You say you are agnostic. You speak in absolutes. Your absolute statement as fact about words/language having been developed by humans, speaks to your rejection of God, not to your negation of knowledge - God being unknowable - and not to your disbelief in God that leaves a door open.

What is your true position - belief/disbelief stated as such - authoritative knowledge and assertion of fact - something else you'd like to present for discussion until it is understood so it can be discussed substantively?
 
Upvote 0

Moral Orel

Proud Citizen of Moralton
Site Supporter
May 22, 2015
7,379
2,641
✟476,748.00
Country
United States
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Married
You're not rushing, but trying to assert superiority by apologizing for rushing.
This is incorrect.

Atheism is also a belief that something is false or that something is not true (since you think this distinction is meaningful).
No. Atheism is a lack of belief. That's it. A person who merely lacks belief, a person who believes there is no god, and a person who claims to know there is no god all lack belief. That is the underlying, unifying fact behind all of those varying people. I don't find the distinction meaningful that's why I'm lumping all of these people under one definition that fits all of them. You're drawing a distinction and making one word mean two very different things for no reason.

What is your true position - belief/disbelief stated as such - authoritative knowledge and assertion of fact - something else you'd like to present for discussion until it is understood so it can be discussed substantively?
I am a hard agnostic, so I believe it's impossible to know whether there is or isn't a god. I'm also an atheist because I don't believe there is a god. I chose "agnostic" as my "faith status" because it's the more interesting of the two.

This thread is about what you can generally say about atheist beliefs accurately. The only thing you can say accurately about all atheists is that they lack belief in a god. Do you disagree?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Ophiolite
Upvote 0

Clizby WampusCat

Well-Known Member
Jul 8, 2019
3,657
892
54
Texas
✟109,913.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
I want to state the basics of what Christians and Atheists believe.

Christians believe God came down from heaven and was incarnated in a human birth on earth to bring abundant life to all those who are committed to this belief. Atheists do not believe this is True.

Christians believe the Bible is the inspired Word of God and as such is True. Atheists believe the Bible is just like any other book, or worse.

Christians think Christianity is True while Atheists posit that Christianity is False.

Christians need to defend all of their belief claims about Christianity because if one of their beliefs claims about Christianity is not True, then it shows Christianity is False. Atheists don't need to defend any of their belief claims about Christianity because none of their belief claims about Christianity shows anything about the Truthfulness or Falseness of Christianity.

Now, I am generalizing in order to contrast the two, but can you more or less agree to this?

My simple question then, is why do you believe what you do as either a Christian or an Atheist?

Tagging @cvanwey here since this seems in line with the kind of logic they like to use. let me know if i am being accurate in tagging you here.
I never understand the Christians need to define atheism for others. Every person Christian or atheist needs to be clear what they believe. A person calling themselves a Christian does not tell me what that person believes. Same with atheist. You need to ask that person what they believe and go from there. Some atheists believe a god does not exist and therefore have a burden of proof for their claim, some like myself have a lack of belief gods exist and have no burden of proof because no claim is being made. Any Christian that believes a god exists has a burden of proof for that claim.
 
  • Agree
  • Informative
Reactions: Agnos and GDL
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Ophiolite

Recalcitrant Procrastinating Ape
Nov 12, 2008
8,649
9,620
✟240,926.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Private
@True Counterphobia there are several points in several of your posts I wished to respond to, but perhaps the best way of doing it is simply to make the following observations:

  • You comment as if atheists were some kind of unified group, with broadly similar views on things. They aren't. The only thing they have in common is that they doubt the existence of a God, or God, or gods. In all other matters they can be quite diverse.
  • For example, contrary to what you seem to think, many atheists value the Bible as a cultural artifact, a literary work (KJV), a historical treasure trove, a useful guide to moral choices (at least in the NT).
  • Many atheists have zero interest in the Bible, but are actively disinterested in, for example, the Koran. That is, the thrust of some atheists disbelief is directed towards the predominant religious deity in their culture.
  • You ask why an atheist wouldn't wish to explore the possibilty that the Bible is truth, thereby ignoring the fact that many atheists have already been there, done that, got the T-shirt.
No need to respond to any of that. I simply wish you to reflect on the possibility that some of your perceptions are wrong, or that you are doing a poor job of conveying what you actually mean.
 
Upvote 0

GDL

Well-Known Member
Jul 25, 2020
4,247
1,255
SE
✟105,387.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
No. Atheism is a lack of belief. That's it. A person who merely lacks belief, a person who believes there is no god, and a person who claims to know there is no god all lack belief.

And all are atheists.

Lack of belief manifests itself differently - in different types of atheism - so lack of belief (whether partial or complete unbelief) although a common factor, is not "That's it."

"An atheist - "a person who believes there is no god"...is thus also a person who believes the statement, god or God exists, is false. Thus your following statement is false:
Atheism is a lack of belief, not a belief that something is false

I am a hard agnostic, so I believe it's impossible to know whether there is or isn't a god. I'm also an atheist because I don't believe there is a god. I chose "agnostic" as my "faith status" because it's the more interesting of the two.

So:
- Your original statement: Atheism is a lack of belief, not a belief that something is false, because:
- "a person who believes there is no god" is by necessity a person who does not believe there is a god and thus who believes the statement "God exists" to be false
- a person who lacks belief in God and/or believes there is no god we'll assume to also be the person who claims to know there is no god, and who thus believes and claims to know the statement "God exists" to be false
- You are "a hard agnostic" and "believe it's impossible to know whether there is or isn't a god"
> and, since it's impossible to know, then this cannot mean God does not exist
- You are "also an atheist" and "don't believe there is a god"
> and this means you also believe that the statement "God exists" to be false​
- So:
- You do not know whether or not God exists
- You do not believe God exists
- You believe the statement "God exists" to be false
- You are a certain type of atheist and know there are other types
- You believe a certain type of atheist such as yourself is the more common type
- You believe all atheists have in common a lack of belief [in god, gods, God]
- You do not agree with those atheists who claim to know there is no god, gods, God
- You find for yourself "agnostic" to be more interesting than "atheist"
- You know that "atheist" at root essentially means no theos, no god
- You know that "agnostic" at root means no knowledge, unknown​
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

GDL

Well-Known Member
Jul 25, 2020
4,247
1,255
SE
✟105,387.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I never understand the Christians need to define atheism for others. Every person Christian or atheist needs to be clear what they believe. A person calling themselves a Christian does not tell me what that person believes. Same with atheist. You need to ask that person what they believe and go from there. Some atheists believe a god does not exist and therefore have a burden of proof for their claim, some like myself have a lack of belief gods exist and have no burden of proof because no claim is being made. Any Christian that believes a god exists has a burden of proof for that claim.

Some Christians.

I agree with most of what you say.

I find atheism to be fairly well defined, and like "Christian," I find, in both definition and experience, variations on the theme and in understanding. I agree with you on being clear what they (we) believe - as clear as we are able.

I respectfully disagree with your last sentence and have alluded to this in part in post #30. In fairness, I thus place no burden of proof on a professing atheist or agnostic. I recognize yours are the more common assertions.
 
Upvote 0

Par5

Well-Known Member
Nov 5, 2017
1,013
653
78
LONDONDERRY
✟69,175.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
You know, Christians could put this discussion to bed, and all the godless atheists in their place by simply providing proof that the god they so fervently worship actually exists.
I've lost count of the times this has been asked of Christians and lost count of the times the evidence they supply is purely anecdotal.
So when I say I don't believe in a god or gods it is because I have been shown nothing that makes me see that they actually exist. It is a lack of evidence that makes me say I don't believe in god. That is not the same as me saying god does not exist.
 
Upvote 0

cvanwey

Well-Known Member
May 10, 2018
5,165
733
64
California
✟144,344.00
Country
United States
Faith
Skeptic
Marital Status
Private
1 Peter 3:15

You looked to have dedicated, at least in part, the OP to me. Are you planning on addressing anything substantial, via post #39? Or, do you concur with all that I have said in my response?
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

cvanwey

Well-Known Member
May 10, 2018
5,165
733
64
California
✟144,344.00
Country
United States
Faith
Skeptic
Marital Status
Private
Confidence based upon what - in-depth studies of the Text, input from others,...???

Well, let's take the 'grand-daddy' of all claims, from the NT. The claim of the resurrection. I assess it's probability, by the following categories of evaluation:

- Any/all historical reports have to be acknowledged as fallible.
- Reported sources, which stem from a particular bias - (politically or socially), tend to lend less plausible 'objective' credibility.
- Reported events, which defy the laws of physics, tend to lend less plausible credibility.
- Hearsay is usually less reliable than first hand reports.
- Such events supported by relevant concrete relics add to the possible veracity...
- Claimed events are independently corroborated, via eyewitness attestation.
- Eyewitness attestations are reported contemporarily.
- Original source documents are preserved, where applicable.
- All accounts of the same claimed event, are consistent, and later accounts of the same claimed event do not look to demonstrate additional embellishment(s) or alterations.


Although seemingly respectful and possibly based in some level of thoughtful considerations, are your stated %'s not substantially negative claims in themselves?

Extraordinary claims seem to require extraordinary evidence. Please take note as to what I stated in another part of my prior response:

I'm just a plain 'ol skeptic about many claims (i.e.) people rising from the dead, haunted houses, psychics, mediums, ghosts, alien abductions, etc....


What type of "data" are you "holding out for"?

Well, I'm not sure really? I would venture to state "I've heard all the relevant arguments." If you are a believer, maybe we can start by you giving me your best one? If I've already heard it, I'll let you know my current take. If it happens to be a new one, I will be happy to address anew.

Any thoughts on the "data" that Romans 1 says God has given to every human being (see post #30).

Can you give me the basic final gist (your conclusion)? I feel I could answer this in more than one way. I want to make sure I address what you actually think.

Looks like you were invited here in the OP, so, please, either of you inform me you'd like to discuss between yourselves.

I'm open to logic, reason, and 'truth'. I welcome all comers, regardless of their current stance or position :)
 
Upvote 0

GDL

Well-Known Member
Jul 25, 2020
4,247
1,255
SE
✟105,387.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
You know, Christians could put this discussion to bed, and all the godless atheists in their place by simply providing proof that the god they so fervently worship actually exists.
I've lost count of the times this has been asked of Christians and lost count of the times the evidence they supply is purely anecdotal.
So when I say I don't believe in a god or gods it is because I have been shown nothing that makes me see that they actually exist. It is a lack of evidence that makes me say I don't believe in god. That is not the same as me saying god does not exist.

I'll bring this out here, since you've bottom-lined it so succinctly. Maybe this will put it "to bed" although not in the way you are suggesting.

I'll say up front that I mean no personal disrespect to you. I'm simply going to speak from the Christian Bible to show you my current point of view and to explain it to some degree.

You're asking for proof from Christians. Others, like True Counterphobia, may be tasked to deal with this quite differently than I and I'm happy to sit back and watch the discussion, until I don't. For me, as a Christian, I'm going to answer like this: You've already been given proof that you have rejected. Unless and until you may desire to reconsider this proof, IMO we may as well discuss something else.


NKJ Romans 18-25 18 For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who suppress the truth in unrighteousness, 19 because what may be known of God is manifest in them, for God has shown it to them. 20 For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even His eternal power and Godhead, so that they are without excuse, 21 because, although they knew God, they did not glorify Him as God, nor were thankful, but became futile in their thoughts, and their foolish hearts were darkened. 22 Professing to be wise, they became fools, 23 and changed the glory of the incorruptible God into an image made like corruptible man-- and birds and four-footed animals and creeping things. 24 Therefore God also gave them up to uncleanness, in the lusts of their hearts, to dishonor their bodies among themselves, 25 who exchanged the truth of God for the lie, and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever. Amen.

NKJ Romans 1:28 And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a debased mind, to do those things which are not fitting;

I do not see atheism or agnosticism to be legitimate, at least from a beginning. I'm going to use "you" in the general, plural sense, to refer to professing atheists and agnostics (which at one point we all were):

- 18: All people (other than a very few Biblical exceptions) begin in this category of "ungodliness and "unrighteousness" "who suppress the truth in unrighteousness."​

- 19: God has revealed / made known to all people the visible thing He wants known about Himself

- 20: Explaining 19, from the time of creation of the world, the invisible things about Him - both His eternal power and divine nature - are understood & clearly perceived, so you have no excuse for being the types in v.18

- 21: You knew God, but you did not glorify Him or thank Him, rather, you were made / rendered futile/worthless in your reasoning and your senseless/void of understanding hearts were darkened

- 22-23: While confidently asserting to be wise, you became foolish and changed the glory of the immortal/incorruptible God in image of likeness of perishable creatures

- 24: And therefore God handed you over to uncleanness

- 25: You exchanged the truth about God for the lie. You both reverence and serve the creation instead of the blessed forever Creator.

- 28: Just as you did not see value in having God in practical/usable knowledge, God handed you over to your worthless mind, to do what is not appropriate.
This similar observation was made by King David in times much prior:

NET Psalm 53:1 For the music director; according to the machalath style; a well-written song by David. Fools say to themselves, "There is no God." They sin and commit evil deeds; none of them does what is right.

So, from my point of view, it is the one who says we cannot know whether there is a God who should explain why they believe God is unknown. God tells me you have no excuse for rejecting the practical knowledge about Himself He has given to every human being from the beginning of time. He further tells me you see no value in having Him in this universal, practical knowledge.

Similarly, whether you say: you lack or have no belief, do not believe, or simply say God does not exist, it is you who should explain why you see no value in having God in the practical knowledge about Himself, He has given to all.

How do we Christians prove what you have already rejected that is directly from Him? Do we tell you to try to go back to your very young years, go look out at the creation and innocently wonder where it all came from?

All we Christians really did is to retain that wonder at some level and find interest in, learn, and ultimately believe more that He reveals to us. Somehow, we saw value in this information about Him & did not reject it in finality.

So, you can use agnostic or atheist to identify your state of mind, but as soon as you do, Romans 1 categorizes the condition of your mind for me and it's not a pretty picture. You can be smart to genius, successful in a worldly sense, moral & ethical to some degree, whatever anyone thinks is special, but in the most vital sense, from a Christian perspective, it's all eternally worthless and you are suppressing Truth
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

GDL

Well-Known Member
Jul 25, 2020
4,247
1,255
SE
✟105,387.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Can you give me the basic final gist (your conclusion)? I feel I could answer this in more than one way. I want to make sure I address what you actually think.

Good question/request. See post #77. I see it as a starting point.

Try to go beyond what I say & see what you think the Text says. I'm trained in Greek exegesis and proficient to whatever degree one can argue knowledgeably. I'm happy to try to answer serious questions beginning there.
 
Upvote 0

cvanwey

Well-Known Member
May 10, 2018
5,165
733
64
California
✟144,344.00
Country
United States
Faith
Skeptic
Marital Status
Private
Good question/request. See post #77. I see it as a starting point.

Try to go beyond what I say & see what you think the Text says. I'm trained in Greek exegesis and proficient to whatever degree one can argue knowledgeably. I'm happy to try to answer serious questions beginning there.

I'll do you one better. Assume, because of the assertions above alone, I now become a deist. We have now eliminated many back-and-forths :)

I still seem to have miles to go, between thinking everything was created by some intentional agency or agencies, to also concluding it was all done from the specifically asserted deity YHWH, right?

I now ask you... What argument would you begin with, in leading a deist to YHWH?
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Moral Orel

Proud Citizen of Moralton
Site Supporter
May 22, 2015
7,379
2,641
✟476,748.00
Country
United States
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Married
And all are atheists.
Because they lack belief and for no other reason. But they are free to hold any other belief that doesn't contradict their lack of belief.
Lack of belief manifests itself differently - in different types of atheism - so lack of belief (whether partial or complete unbelief) although a common factor, is not "That's it."
What is a "partial" and "complete" lack of faith? Like, how sure you are? Because I see those as separate propositions. I either believe there is a god, or I do not believe there is a god. I can also hold a separate belief about how likely I am to be right to hold or not hold the belief.
"An atheist - "a person who believes there is no god"...is thus also a person who believes the statement, god or God exists, is false. Thus your following statement is false:
My statement is not false. That person is an atheist because he lacks belief in a god. He can hold whatever other beliefs he chooses.
So:
- Your original statement: Atheism is a lack of belief, not a belief that something is false, because:
- "a person who believes there is no god" is by necessity a person who does not believe there is a god and thus who believes the statement "God exists" to be false
Yes, he does happen to believe that, but that isn't the defining factor of an atheist.

A person who believes there is no god believes the statement "God exists" to be false.

A person who merely does not believe there is a god does not believe the statement "God exists" to be false.
- a person who lacks belief in God and/or believes there is no god we'll assume to also be the person who claims to know there is no god, and who thus believes and claims to know the statement "God exists" to be false
Again, he can believe there is no god, he can believe he knows that there is no god, but those aren't the defining factors of atheism.
- You are "a hard agnostic" and "believe it's impossible to know whether there is or isn't a god"
> and, since it's impossible to know, then this cannot mean God does not exist
It means I don't claim God does not exist, yes.
- You are "also an atheist" and "don't believe there is a god"
> and this means you also believe that the statement "God exists" to be false
Nope. See, this is the problem with you having a bunch of separate definitions for atheism. Atheism is a lack of belief, that's it. I might hold other beliefs, but I don't have to, and I personally don't.
- So:
- You do not know whether or not God exists
- You do not believe God exists
Good so far.
- You believe the statement "God exists" to be false
Nope.
- You are a certain type of atheist and know there are other types
- You believe a certain type of atheist such as yourself is the more common type
- You believe all atheists have in common a lack of belief [in god, gods, God]
Again, all good. But let's explore that last one. How does one be an atheist and believe there is a god?
- You do not agree with those atheists who claim to know there is no god, gods, God
- You find for yourself "agnostic" to be more interesting than "atheist"
Yep, that's right. But only because I'm a hard agnostic. We're like unicorns (very rare).
- You know that "atheist" at root essentially means no theos, no god
- You know that "agnostic" at root means no knowledge, unknown
You're trying to set up some bit where words have objective meaning aren't you?
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0