Eight Foot Manchild
His Supreme Holy Correctfulness
- Sep 9, 2010
- 2,389
- 1,605
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- Married
God became temporal at t=1. God's temporalness aside, it's impossible to get around infinite regress if there was nothing known about point t=0 unless there is a timeless, spaceless, non-temporal cause of the universe. Notice I am talking about time and not the universe as an exclusive thing at this point.
None of this answers the question, did Yahweh create the universe ex nihilo, or ex materia? You don't appear to be a Mormon, so let's go with ex nihilo.
I don't know of any evidence that there is anything outside of the universe and God.
Nor do you have evidence that it represents the totality of existence. No one has any means of knowing, either way.
However, you have to make the positive assertion that it does represent the totality of existence, if you want to invoke Kalam as evidence for the Christian god. Otherwise, there would be aspects of existence that he is not responsible for creating.
So, rewording Kalam to accurately represent what you are actually arguing for, it looks like this,
-Everything which begins to exist ex nihilo has a cause.
-The totality of existence began to exist ex nihilo.
-Therefor, the totality of existence has a cause.
There is no scientific evidence that the universe represents the totality of existence. There is no scientific evidence that the totality of existence began ex nihilo.
So, that is the answer to your question about why it is unscientific.
Which is all to say nothing of the fact that the first premise is inductively vacuous.
Pick your poison: Either the universe was caused by God, or you have to believe something else that doesn't have any evidence for it.
No, that is a completely false dichotomy. I am not forced to "pick" between two different magical non-answers.
The other answer - the only honest, scientifically valid one - is "I don't know".
Upvote
0